CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01822600Updated Aug 29, 2019

The Therapeutic Role of Intravenous Albumin Administration for Peptic Ulcer Bleeding Patients With Hypoalbuminemia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Human albumin and Omeprazole in Peptic Ulcer Bleeding and Hypoalbuminemia, sponsored by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 39 Years to 83 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-29.

Sponsored by National Cheng-Kung University Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
39 Years to 83 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To test whether intravenous albumin can decrease the rebleeding rate or shorten the duration of hospitalization in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding and hypoalbuminemia.

Read the detailed description

Peptic ulcer bleeding is a common but potentially lethal disease. Recurrent bleeding is an independent risk factor for mortality. Inhibition of gastric acid secretion by intravenous proton pump inhibitor infusion can have a positive impact on the prevention of ulcer rebleeding after successful endoscopic therapy. However, the rebleeding rate can still be high in patients with comorbid illnesses even after proton pump inhibitor usage. Hypoalbuminemia has been reported to be a significant predictor of poor prognosis in patients with comorbid illnesses. Low serum albumin levels are associated with poor prognosis of wound healing and peptic ulcer bleeding; therefore, it is worthy to conduct a head-to-head comparison to validate whether administration of albumin can be helpful in improving the control of bleeding peptic ulcers, especially in patients with comorbid illnesses.

The albumin level may reflect upstream pathologic processes, such as stress or co-morbidities. Albumin administration may interrupt the downstream chain of poor outcome and thus maintain a favorable homeostasis in critically ill patients, and reduce morbidity. However, the clinical benefit of controlling peptic ulcer bleeding with exogenous albumin remains uncertain, and thus administration of albumin is not widely applied. Accordingly, the investigators conducted this pilot intervention to test whether short-term exogenous albumin administration can improve the control of peptic ulcer bleeding in hypoalbuminemic patients, who are at high risk of recurrent bleeding.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peptic Ulcer Bleeding
  • Hypoalbuminemia

Keywords

  • hypoalbuminemia
  • peptic ulcer
  • rebleeding
  • hospitalization
03

In context

Peptic Ulcer

193 studies on the registry are indexed under Peptic Ulcer; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 91 is below the median of 150 across 142 interventional studies indexed under Peptic Ulcer.

Browse Peptic Ulcer studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cheng-Kung University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 268 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
39 Years to 83 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical presentations of melena, hematochezia, or hematemesis
  • Gastroscopy confirmed peptic ulcers and major stigmata of recent hemorrhage
  • A Rockal score ≥ 6

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gastric or esophageal, or duodenal tumor bleeding
  • Ulcer due to mechanical factors
  • Warfarin use
  • Failure to establish hemostasis under gastroscopy
  • Hypersensitivity to omeprazole, esomeprazole, albumin or any component of the formulation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Normal albumin group

    Based on the serum albumin level at enrollment, the patients were assigned into the normal albumin group if their serum albumin ≥ 30 g/L. Patients in this group receive intravenous omeprazole treatment.

    Drug: Omeprazole

  • Experimental
    Intervention group

    Based on the serum albumin level at enrollment, the patients were assigned into an intervention group if their serum albumin \< 30 g/L. Patients in this group receive both Human albumin and intravenous omeprazole.

    Drug: Human albumin · Drug: Omeprazole

  • Experimental
    Cohort control group

    The study also included 29 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding and with hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin level \< 30 g/L), but without receiving albumin supply from our previous study to serve as the cohort control group. Patients in this group receive intravenous omeprazole treatment.

    Drug: Omeprazole

Interventions

  • DrugHuman albumin

    Each patient in the intervention group received Human Albumin 20%® (ZLB Behring, Marburg, Germany), immediately. The dosage of albumin infusion was 10 g q8h for 1 day in patients with albumin levels ranging from 25 g/L to 29 g/L or 2 days in those with albumin levels \< 25 g/L.

    Also known as: Human Albumin 20%®, ZLB Behring, Marburg, Germany

  • DrugOmeprazole

    After endoscopic hemostasis, each enrolled patient received an 80 mg loading dose of intravenous omeprazole (Losec®, AstraZeneca, Sweden) immediately. Patients then received a 3-day continuous omeprazole infusion in dosage of 80 mg per day. After omeprazole infusion, oral esomeprazole (Nexium®, AstraZeneca, Sweden) 40 mg per day was given in the normal albumin group and the intervention group until the end of follow-up. After omeprazole infusion, oral omeprazole (Losec®) 20 mg per day was given in the cohort control group until the end of follow-up.

    Also known as: Losec®, AstraZeneca, Sweden

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. peptic ulcer rebleeding

    rebleeding was defined as: (i) continuous melena, hematochezia, or the presence of recurrent bloody aspirates through the naso-gastric tube; and (ii) relapse of hemodynamic instability, including systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg, heart rate \>120 beats per min, or a hemoglobin drop by more than 20 g/L. For each patient with either suspected or active rebleeding of peptic ulcer, gastroscopy was conducted to confirm that the bleeding source was either a peptic ulcer or other non-ulcer conditions.

    Time frame: within 28 days after the first bleeding event

Secondary outcomes

  1. the length of hospitalization

    the length of hospitalization after the first bleeding episode and the length of hospitalization after peptic ulcer rebleeding

    Time frame: within 28 days after the first bleeding event

  2. the number of units of blood transfused

    Time frame: during the 28-day period after admission to the emergency room or after the presence of gastrointestinal bleeding signs in patients with nosocomial bleeding

  3. the number of participants with massive rebleeding events in need of transarterial embolization or emergency surgery

    Time frame: within 28 days after the first bleeding event

07

Study locations

1 site
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital
    Tainan, 704, Taiwan
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01822600
Lead sponsor
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Collaborators
National Science Council, Taiwan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 2, 2013
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Aug 2011
Completion
Aug 2011
Last update
Aug 29, 2019

Study contacts

Hsiu-Chi Cheng, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion