ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06188585TREETUpdated Jun 22, 2026

Randomized Trial of UI-EWD vs. Conventional Endoscopic Therapy for Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

An interventional study of UI-EWD and Conventional therapy in Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding, sponsored by Medtronic - MITG. Recruiting at 14 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-22.

Sponsored by Medtronic - MITG (part of Medtronic) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
278
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A prospective, multi-center, noninferiority randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy of UI-EWD (Nexpowder™) hemostatic powder versus conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients presenting with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding which is found at endoscopy to be due to one of the following sources: a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel; an esophageal, gastric or duodenal tumor with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; a gastric or duodenal Dieulafoy lesion with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; or an actively bleeding Mallory-Weiss tear.

Read the detailed description

Endoscopic hemostatic therapy is recommended as the first line therapy for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) due to ulcers with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel identified at endoscopy. A variety of endoscopic modalities are used in the treatment of UGIB, including thermal therapies (e.g., bipolar electrocoagulation), injection therapy (e.g., epinephrine), clips, and hemostatic powder spray. Topical therapies, such as hemostatic powder spray, have been the most recent addition to the armamentarium of endoscopic therapies for UGIB.

UI-EWD hemostatic powder (Nexpowder™), which is manufactured by NextBiomedical and distributed by Medtronic, is approved for treatment of nonvariceal GI bleeding in the U.S., Canada, European Union and other countries.

A retrospective study of UI-EWD hemostatic powder in 56 patients with active bleeding found immediate hemostasis in 54 (96.4%), with rebleeding within 7 days in only 2 patients (3.7%)[1]. A large multi-center randomized trial in 340 patients with nonvariceal UGIB and either active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel compared conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy alone to conventional therapy plus UI-EWD. Rebleeding was significantly lower in the UI-EWD group at 3 days (3 vs. 11%) and at 30 days (19% vs. 7%) [2].

The primary aim of this trial is to demonstrate that UI-EWD when used as initial hemostatic therapy is non-inferior to older conventional endoscopic hemostatic therapy for the treatment of patients with high-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Keywords

  • Gastrointestinal hemorrhage
  • Peptic Ulcer
  • Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
03

In context

Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

338 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 278 is above the median of 98 across 210 interventional studies indexed under Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.

Browse Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic - MITG is the lead sponsor of 179 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults age 22 years or older
  2. Presentation with acute overt gastrointestinal bleeding (hematemesis, melena, and/or hematochezia)
  3. Subject voluntarily agrees to participate in the clinical investigation, provides written , and will be able to comply with the protocol in the opinion of the site investigator
  4. Cause of bleeding as determined at upper endoscopy is one of the following sources: a gastric or duodenal ulcer with active bleeding (spurting or oozing) or a non-bleeding visible vessel; an esophageal, gastric or duodenal tumor with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; a gastric or duodenal Dieulafoy lesion with active bleeding or a non-bleeding visible vessel; or an actively bleeding Mallory-Weiss tear. The definition of "active oozing" will require bleeding to persist for ≥ 3 minutes of endoscopic observation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Incarceration
  2. Subjects that are not able to provide written
  3. Pregnancy or nursing mothers
  4. Endoscopic hemostatic treatment in the past 30 days
  5. Use of triple antithrombotic therapy at the time of presentation
  6. Subjects who underwent gastric or duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedures within the past 2 months
  7. Post-polypectomy bleeding
  8. Subjects with erosive esophagitis, erosive gastritis, esophageal ulcer, or vascular ectasia including gastric antral vascular ectasia
  9. count \< 50 x 10\^9/L
  10. > 3.5 (or prothrombin time >35 seconds in patient not on warfarin and only prothrombin time is provided by local lab), at time of procedure or closest to procedure time
  11. Subjects who have documented galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption
  12. Subjects with documented to Brilliant Blue FCF
  13. Subjects with suspected bowel obstruction or gastrointestinal fistulas, and those suspected or are at high risk of having gastrointestinal perforation.
  14. Endoscopy not performed within 36 hours of presentation to hospital/emergency department
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
278 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Test Group

    UI-EWD

    Device: UI-EWD

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Conventional endoscopic therapy

    Device: Conventional therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceUI-EWD

    Hemostatic powder administered at index endoscopy

    Also known as: Nexpowder™

  • DeviceConventional therapy

    Conventional endoscopic therapy (bipolar electrocoagulation or clips or argon plasma coagulation, with or without epinephrine injection) administered at index endoscopy

    Also known as: Bipolar electrocoagulation or Bipolar electrocoagulation endoscopic hemostasis, Epinephrine (1:10,000 dilution) injection or Endoscopic hemostatic injection of epinephrine (1:10,000 dilution), Endoscopic hemostatic clip, Argon plasma coagulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. No further bleeding during the 7-day period after hemostatic treatment

    Further bleeding includes patients with persistent bleeding despite study-assigned endoscopic therapy or patients with recurrent bleeding

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite 30-day outcome of further bleeding

    Further bleeding leading to red blood cell transfusion or urgent intervention (need for alternative therapy at index endoscopy, repeat endoscopy, interventional radiology, or surgery)

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Initial hemostasis for patients with active bleeding at randomization

    Initial hemostasis with study-assigned endoscopic therapy for patients with active bleeding

    Time frame: During index endoscopy procedure

  3. Number of participants with recurrent bleeding over the 7-day period after randomization

    Recurrent bleeding among all patients with hemostasis within 7 days after study-assigned endoscopic therapy

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Mortality

    30-day mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

14 of 14 sites recruiting
  • Yale
    New Haven, Connecticut 06520, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kenneth Hung, M.D. · Contact
    • Kenneth Hung, M.D. · Principal investigator
  • RUSH University
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
    Recruiting
    • Neal Mehta, M.D. · Contact
    • Neal Mehta, M.D. · Principal investigator
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
    Recruiting
    • Linda Lee, MD · Contact
    • Linda Lee, MD · Principal investigator
  • Rutgers University
    Piscataway, New Jersey 08901, United States
    Recruiting
    • Arvind Trindade, M.D. · Contact
    • Arvind Trindade, M.D. · Principal investigator
  • Northwell Health
    Manhasset, New York 11030, United States
    Recruiting
    • Juan Bucobo, M.D. · Contact
    • Juan Bucobo, M.D. · Principal investigator
  • NYU Langone
    New York, New York 10016, United States
    Recruiting
    • Melissa Debordeaux, M.D. · Contact
    • Melissa Debordeaux, M.D. · Principal investigator
  • McGill University
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Yen-I Chen, M.D. · Contact
    • Yen-I Chen, M.D. · Principal investigator
  • St. Michael's Hospital
    Toronto, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Jeffrey Mosko, MD, MSc, FRCPC · Principal investigator
  • Vancouver General Hospital
    Vancouver, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Roberto Trasolini, MD · Principal investigator
  • Copenhagen University Hospital
    Hvidovre, Denmark
    Recruiting
    • John G Karstensen · Contact
    • John G Karstensen · Principal investigator
  • Odense University Hospital
    Odense, Denmark
    Recruiting
    • Stig Laursen, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • St. Antoine
    Paris, France
    Recruiting
    • Marine Camus, M.D. · Contact
    • Marine Camus, M.D. · Principal investigator
  • Emek Medical Center
    Afula, Israel
    Recruiting
    • Halim Awadie · Contact
    • Halim Awadie · Principal investigator
  • Cleveland Clinic London
    London, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Rehan Haidry, M.D. · Contact
    • Rehan Haidry, M.D. · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Park JS, Kim HK, Shin YW, Kwon KS, Lee DH. Novel hemostatic adhesive powder for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Endosc Int Open. 2019 Dec;7(12):E1763-E1767. doi: 10.1055/a-0982-3194. Epub 2019 Dec 10. PubMed 31828214 ↗
  • Cha B. A Randomized Control Study Evaluating the Efficacy of a Hemostatic Powder (UI-EWD) in Decreasing the Rate of Upper Gastrointestinal Re-Bleeding in Patients Treated with Endoscopic Therapy for High-Risk Lesions. Oral presentation presented at: Digestive Disease Week 2023; May 9, 2023; Chicago, IL.
  • Al Alawi S, Bessissow T, Fallone CA, Jacques J, Barkun A. Hemostatic powder's battle against a spurting bleeding ulcer: can it win? Endoscopy. 2025 Dec;57(S 01):E676-E677. doi: 10.1055/a-2610-3096. Epub 2025 Jun 26. No abstract available. PubMed 40570926 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06188585
Lead sponsor
Medtronic - MITG
Collaborators
North American Science Associates Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 3, 2024
Start date
Jun 21, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 22, 2026

Study contacts

Geraldine Kelly
Contact
geraldine.kelly@medtronic.com
+353014393000
Kara Saddoris
Contact
kara.l.saddoris@medtronic.com
303-476-7598
Loren Laine, MD
study chair · Yale University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion