ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT01822470SIBOUpdated Jun 16, 2026

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth: A Prospective Registry

An observational study in Functional Dyspepsia and Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth, sponsored by Indiana University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-16.

Sponsored by Indiana University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in patients who will be undergoing an enteroscopy as an outpatient procedure with symptoms of functional dyspepsia. In addition, the investigators would like to identify the types of bacteria that are present in the small intestines in patients with SIBO and compare two different diagnostic tools: microbiologic culture and DNA sequencing of bacteria.

The aim is to compare the microbiota between patients with and without the clinical complications of SIBO

Read the detailed description

Same as above

02

Conditions studied

  • Functional Dyspepsia
  • Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth

Keywords

  • functional dyspepsia
  • post prandial distress syndrome
  • small bowel bacteria overgrowth
  • epigastric pain syndrome
  • diarrhea
  • bloating
  • post prandial fullness
  • weight loss
03

In context

Diarrhea

877 studies on the registry are indexed under Diarrhea; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is below the median of 248 across 103 observational studies indexed under Diarrhea.

Browse Diarrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

Indiana University is the lead sponsor of 986 studies on the registry; 198 are open to participants now.

Of its 148 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

a. All adult patients who are undergoing small bowel aspiration for suspected SIBO regardless etiology

Eligibility criteria

1.Study Subjects Inclusion Criteria i. All patients who are undergoing small bowel aspiration for suspected SIBO regardless etiology.

Exclusion Criteria i. Use of colon cleansing prep in the past 1 month ii. Treatment with antibiotics in the past 30 days (antibiotics are allowable for patients undergoing clinical indicated repeat aspiration to determine bacteria clearance) iii. Use of probiotics in the past 30 days iv. for upper endoscopy for any reason v. Prisoners vi. Pregnant vii. Unable to give own

2 Control Subjects Inclusion Criteria i. Patients who are undergoing double balloon enteroscopy or upper enteroscopy for another medical reason.

Exclusion Criteria i. Diagnosis of SIBO ii. Diagnosis of functional dyspepsia iii. Established risk factors for SIBO (ANY of the following)

  1. Connective tissue disorder (scleroderma, polymyositis, mixed connective tissue disease, or systemic lupus
  2. Resection of ileocecal valve for any reason
  3. Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction
  4. Small bowel blind limb, diverticulum or fistula
  5. Surgery with decreased gastric acid exposure for small bowel a. Gastric surgery with vagotomy (Bilroth I, Bilroth II, vagotomy/pyloroplasty) or gastric bypass iv. Use of colon cleansing prep in the past 1 month v. Use of antibiotics in the past 30 days vi. Use of probiotics in the past 30 days vii. Contraindication for upper endoscopy for any reason viii. Prisoners ix. Pregnant x. Unable to give own informed
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Study group

    a. Study Subjects will be recruited from patients who are already undergoing upper enteroscopy and aspiration for diagnosis of SIBO.

  • Control group

    b. Control Subjects will be recruited from patients who are already undergoing a double balloon enteroscopy or upper enteroscopy for another medical reason

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine the predictors for SIBO in patients with functional dyspepsia, who do not have the established risk factors for SIBO

    In this population, prevalence of potential predictors of SIBO will be compared between subjects with and without a diagnosis of Gram Negative Bacteria SIBO

    Time frame: two years

Secondary outcomes

  1. A registry of patients undergoing proximal jejunal aspiration for suspected small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

    A prospective registry will be created for all subjects who are undergoing jejunal aspirate for clinical indications. Private health information will be excluded from the data registry. Data collected for the registry will include: 1. Demographics 2. Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index total and subscale scores 3. Presence of functional gastrointestinal disorders 4. Established risk factors of gram negative small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. 5. Established risk factors of upper respiratory tract small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

    Time frame: Two years

  2. The demographics, clinical history, and symptoms in patients with and without SIBO

    Demographics 2. Patient Assessment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Symptom Severity Index total and subscale scores 3. Presence of functional gastrointestinal disorders 4. Established risk factors of gram negative small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. 5\. Established risk factors of upper respiratory tract small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

    Time frame: One day

  3. Characterize the clinical differences between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth by upper respiratory tract bacteria and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth by gram-negative bacilli bacteria

    clinical differences between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth by upper respiratory tract bacteria

    Time frame: One day

  4. Compare the composition between luminal and mucosal bacteria in the proximal small bowel

    Compare the results of bacteria species isolated from molecular polymerase chain reaction identification between luminal aspiration samples and mucosa biopsy samples.

    Time frame: One day

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2013 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 167 months after the start.

Of 34 non-industry observational studies under Diarrhea, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 167 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 42 studies reached it within 28 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 25, 2013
First posted
Apr 2, 2013
StartActual
Jan 7, 2013
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Jun 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 16, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01822470
Lead sponsor
Indiana University
Collaborators
Progenity, Inc.
Responsible party
John M. Wo (Professor of Medicine, Indiana University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 2, 2013
Start date
Jan 7, 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 16, 2026

Study contacts

John Wo, MD
principal investigator · Indiana University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion