An interventional study of Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in Renal Parenchymal Loss After the Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, sponsored by TC Erciyes University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-03-28.
Sponsored by TC Erciyes University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
In this study 37 patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy were included. Preoperative DMSA scans were performed a day before the surgery, whereas postoperative scans were randomized by evaluating them before (n=25) and after (n=12) the 6th postoperative month. A DMSA scan was read by using a technique that divides both kidneys into three paired poles. In this way functional changes were investigated in the renal units. Twenty six of 37 cases underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy with a single access site and 11 with multiple access sites. When each of the poles of a kidney was admitted as a surgical unit separately, there were 51 units.
Total 37 patients who had undergone PCNL were included between June 2007-June 2009. All patients were evaluated routinely with physical examination, complete blood count (CBC), blood urine nitrogen (BUN), creatinine levels, and urinalysis. None of the patients had experienced pyelonephritis, and none had a solitary kidney, renal ectopy or history of any other urinary abnormality. At least one of the following techniques; namely computed tomography (CT), intravenous urography or ultrasonography, was preferred routinely before surgery in order to visualize the urinary system. Unilateral PCNL was performed in all patients. Postoperative CBC and BUN creatine levels were repeated.
Preoperative DMSA scans were performed a day before the surgery, whereas postoperative scans were randomized to indicate early and late term. The aim of randomization was to determine an optimal time for assessing patients. A DMSA scan was read by using a technique that divides both kidneys into three paired poles. In addition the uptake of all opposite poles was measured together and calculated as a percentage value separately (Figure-1), e.g., the two upper poles' uptake was measured together as if they were renal units and each poles' own portion in this total uptake was declared separately as a percentage. How the differential functions were changed between the sides undergoing PCNL and the opposite sides, as well the changes before and 6 months after surgery are manifested by using these parameters.
Twenty six of 37 cases underwent PCNL with a single access site (70.3%) and 11 separately with multiple accesses (29.7%). When each of the poles of a kidney was considered as a surgical unit, there were 51 units. In this manner the functional change of a unit would show the surgical trauma inflicted on the poles by PCNL access.
TC Erciyes University is the lead sponsor of 341 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
It was performed only single access standard PCNL in this group.
Procedure: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
It was performed multiple access standard PCNL in this group
Procedure: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
The procedure is done under general anesthesia in the supine position. A Retrograde pyelogram is done to locate the stone in the kidney. With a small incision in the flank, the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCN) needle is passed into the pelvis of the kidney. The position of the needle is confirmed by fluoroscopy. A guide wire is passed through the needle into the pelvis. The needle is then withdrawn with the guide wire still inside the pelvis. Over the guide wire the dilators are passed and a working sheath is introduced. A nephroscope is then passed inside and stones are taken out.
Renal parenchymal function on DMSA before and after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Preoperative DMSA scans were performed a day before percutaneous nephrolithotomy.How the differential functions with DMSA scans were changed between the sides undergoing PCNL and the opposite sides, as well the changes before and 6 months after surgery are manifested by using these parameters.
Time frame: six months
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
TC Erciyes University