ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01808573NALAUpdated Jun 11, 2021Results posted

A Study of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in Patients With HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Received Two or More Prior HER2 Directed Regimens in the Metastatic Setting

A Phase 3 interventional study of neratinib and capecitabine in HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC), sponsored by Puma Biotechnology, Inc.. Completed at 252 sites in 28 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-11.

Sponsored by Puma Biotechnology, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
621
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, multi-center, multinational, open-label, active-controlled, parallel design study of the combination of neratinib plus capecitabine versus the combination of lapatinib plus capecitabine in HER2+ MBC patients who have received two or more prior HER2 directed regimens in the metastatic setting.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, multi-center, multinational, open-label, active-controlled, parallel design study of the combination of neratinib plus capecitabine versus the combination of lapatinib plus capecitabine in HER2+ MBC patients who have received two or more prior HER2 directed regimens in the metastatic setting. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment arms:

  • Arm A: neratinib (240 mg once daily) + capecitabine (1500 mg/m\^2 daily, 750 mg/m\^2 twice daily [BID])
  • Arm B: lapatinib (1250 mg once daily) + capecitabine (2000 mg/m\^2 daily, 1000 mg/m\^2 BID)

Patients will receive either neratinib plus capecitabine combination or lapatinib plus capecitabine combination until the occurrence of death, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other specified withdrawal criterion.

02

Conditions studied

  • HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Neratinib
  • Nerlynx
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 621 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Puma Biotechnology, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged ≥18 years at signing of .
  • confirmed MBC, current stage IV.
  • Documented overexpression or gene-amplified tumor immunohistochemistry 3+ or 2+, with confirmatory fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) +.
  • Prior treatment with at least two (2) HER2-directed regimens for breast cancer.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received previous therapy with capecitabine, neratinib, lapatinib, or any other directed tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Note: There are additional inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study center will determine if you meet all of the criteria.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
621 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    neratinib plus capecitabine

    neratinib 240 mg orally, once daily with food, continuously in 21 day cycles, and capecitabine 1500 mg/m\^2 daily in 2 evenly divided doses, orally with water within 30 minutes after a meal, taken on days 1 to 14 of each 21 day cycle.

    Drug: neratinib · Drug: capecitabine

  • Active comparator
    lapatinib plus capecitabine

    lapatinib 1250 mg orally, once daily, continuously in 21 day cycles, and capecitabine 2000 mg/m\^2 daily in 2 evenly divided doses, orally with water within 30 minutes after a meal, taken on days 1 to 14 of each 21 day cycle.

    Drug: capecitabine · Drug: lapatinib

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Centrally Assessed Progression Free Survival

    Progression Free Survival (PFS), Measured in Months, for Randomized Subjects of the Central Assessment. The time interval from the date of randomization until the first date on which recurrence, progression (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) v1.1), or death due to any cause, is documented. For subjects without recurrence, progression or death, it is censored at the last valid tumor assessment. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Here, the time to event was reported as the restricted mean survival time. The restricted mean survival time was defined as the area under the curve of the survival function up to 24 months.

    Time frame: From randomization date to recurrence, progression or death, assessed up to 38 months. The result is based on primary analysis data cut.

  2. Overall Survival

    Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censored at the last date known alive on or prior to the data cutoff employed for the analysis, whichever was earlier. Here, the time to event was reported as the restricted mean survival time. The restricted mean survival time was defined as the area under the curve of the survival function up to 48 months.

    Time frame: From randomization date to death, assessed up to 59 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intervention for Symptomatic Metastatic Central Nervous System Disease

    Intervention for symptomatic metastatic central nervous system disease is defined as the time from randomization to the first start date of an intervention for symptomatic metastatic CNS disease. Subjects that do not have an intervention for symptomatic metastatic CNS and do not die will be censored at the last date known alive on or prior to the data cutoff. Deaths are treated as competing events. Percentage of participants with intervention for CNS, estimated by cumulative incidence methods. Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring.

    Time frame: From randomization date to first intervention for symptomatic metastatic CNS disease, assessed up to 59 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.

  2. Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Central Assessment (ITT Population With Measurable Disease at Screening)

    Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants demonstrating an objective response during the study. Objective response includes confirmed complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR) as defined in the RECIST criteria included in the study protocol. The ORR is for Central Assessment for subjects that had measurable disease at screening. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

    Time frame: From randomization date to first confirmed Complete or Partial Response, whichever came earlier, up to 42 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.

  3. Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) - Central Assessment (ITT Population With Measurable Disease at Screening)

    Clinical benefit rate is the percentage of participants who achieve overall tumor response (confirmed CR or PR) or stable disease (SD) lasting for at least 24 weeks from randomization. The CBR was for Central Assessment for subjects who had Measurable Disease at Screening.

    Time frame: From randomization date to either first confirmed CR or PR or Stable Disease, whichever came earlier, up to 42 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.

  4. Duration of Response (DOR) - Central Assessment (Population That Had a Response With Measurable Disease at Screening)

    The Duration of Response (DOR) is for Central Assessment for the Population that Had a Response with Measurable Disease at Screening. Duration of response is measured from the time at which measurement criteria are first met for CR or PR (whichever status is recorded first) until the first date of recurrence or progressive disease (PD) or death is objectively documented, taking as a reference for PD the smallest measurements recorded since enrollment, per RECIST v1.1. This value is censored at the last valid tumor assessment if PD or death has not been documented.

    Time frame: From start date of response after randomization to first PD, up to 33 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events)

    Adverse Events to be measured are Treatment-Emergent and Serious AEs that occurred on or after first dose of investigational product and up to 28 days after the last dose

    Time frame: From first dose through last dose + 28 days, up to 41 months. The result is based on final data cut.

07

Results

Posted Dec 11, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
Started307314
Received treatment303311
Completed00
Not completed307314
Withdrew: Death212240
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1210
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up30
Withdrew: Discontinuation of study by sponsor7964
Withdrew: Randomized in error10

Outcome measures

PrimaryCentrally Assessed Progression Free Survival

Progression Free Survival (PFS), Measured in Months, for Randomized Subjects of the Central Assessment. The time interval from the date of randomization until the first date on which recurrence, progression (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) v1.1), or death due to any cause, is documented. For subjects without recurrence, progression or death, it is censored at the last valid tumor assessment. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions. Here, the time to event was reported as the restricted mean survival time. The restricted mean survival time was defined as the area under the curve of the survival function up to 24 months.

Time frame:
From randomization date to recurrence, progression or death, assessed up to 38 months. The result is based on primary analysis data cut.
Reported as:
Mean · months
Centrally Assessed Progression Free Survival
monthsNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
Centrally Assessed Progression Free Survival8.8 (7.8 to 9.8)6.6 (5.9 to 7.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Neratinib Plus Capecitabine vs Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine · Log Rank · p = 0.0059 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.762 · 95% CI 0.626 to 0.926Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine is the reference. Stratified by hormone receptor status, number of prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting, and visceral disease vs. non-visceral.
PrimaryOverall Survival

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause, censored at the last date known alive on or prior to the data cutoff employed for the analysis, whichever was earlier. Here, the time to event was reported as the restricted mean survival time. The restricted mean survival time was defined as the area under the curve of the survival function up to 48 months.

Time frame:
From randomization date to death, assessed up to 59 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.
Reported as:
Mean · months
Overall Survival
monthsNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
Overall Survival24.0 (22.1 to 25.9)22.2 (20.4 to 24.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Neratinib Plus Capecitabine vs Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine · Log Rank · p = 0.2086 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.881 · 95% CI 0.723 to 1.073Lapatinib plus Capecitabine is the reference. Stratified by hormone receptor status, number of prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting, and visceral disease vs. non-visceral.
SecondaryIntervention for Symptomatic Metastatic Central Nervous System Disease

Intervention for symptomatic metastatic central nervous system disease is defined as the time from randomization to the first start date of an intervention for symptomatic metastatic CNS disease. Subjects that do not have an intervention for symptomatic metastatic CNS and do not die will be censored at the last date known alive on or prior to the data cutoff. Deaths are treated as competing events. Percentage of participants with intervention for CNS, estimated by cumulative incidence methods. Cumulative incidence methods are the standard way to estimate incidence of an endpoint in the presence of competing risks and censoring.

Time frame:
From randomization date to first intervention for symptomatic metastatic CNS disease, assessed up to 59 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Intervention for Symptomatic Metastatic Central Nervous System Disease
percentage of participantsNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
Intervention for Symptomatic Metastatic Central Nervous System Disease22.76 (15.48 to 30.91)29.19 (22.54 to 36.14)
Statistical analysis
  • Neratinib Plus Capecitabine vs Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine · Gray's test · p = 0.043Stratified by hormone receptor status, number of prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting and visceral disease vs. non-visceral disease.
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) - Central Assessment (ITT Population With Measurable Disease at Screening)

Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants demonstrating an objective response during the study. Objective response includes confirmed complete responses (CR) and partial responses (PR) as defined in the RECIST criteria included in the study protocol. The ORR is for Central Assessment for subjects that had measurable disease at screening. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Time frame:
From randomization date to first confirmed Complete or Partial Response, whichever came earlier, up to 42 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Central Assessment (ITT Population With Measurable Disease at Screening)
percentage of participantsNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
Objective Response Rate (ORR) - Central Assessment (ITT Population With Measurable Disease at Screening)32.8 (27.1 to 38.9)26.7 (21.5 to 32.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Neratinib Plus Capecitabine vs Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.1201Stratified by hormone receptor status, number of prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting and visceral disease vs. non-visceral.
SecondaryClinical Benefit Rate (CBR) - Central Assessment (ITT Population With Measurable Disease at Screening)

Clinical benefit rate is the percentage of participants who achieve overall tumor response (confirmed CR or PR) or stable disease (SD) lasting for at least 24 weeks from randomization. The CBR was for Central Assessment for subjects who had Measurable Disease at Screening.

Time frame:
From randomization date to either first confirmed CR or PR or Stable Disease, whichever came earlier, up to 42 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) - Central Assessment (ITT Population With Measurable Disease at Screening)
percentage of participantsNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) - Central Assessment (ITT Population With Measurable Disease at Screening)44.5 (38.3 to 50.8)35.6 (29.8 to 41.6)
Statistical analysis
  • Neratinib Plus Capecitabine vs Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0328Stratified by hormone receptor status, number of prior HER2-directed regimens in the metastatic setting and visceral disease vs. non-visceral.
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) - Central Assessment (Population That Had a Response With Measurable Disease at Screening)

The Duration of Response (DOR) is for Central Assessment for the Population that Had a Response with Measurable Disease at Screening. Duration of response is measured from the time at which measurement criteria are first met for CR or PR (whichever status is recorded first) until the first date of recurrence or progressive disease (PD) or death is objectively documented, taking as a reference for PD the smallest measurements recorded since enrollment, per RECIST v1.1. This value is censored at the last valid tumor assessment if PD or death has not been documented.

Time frame:
From start date of response after randomization to first PD, up to 33 months.The result is based on primary analysis data cut.
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response (DOR) - Central Assessment (Population That Had a Response With Measurable Disease at Screening)
monthsNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
Duration of Response (DOR) - Central Assessment (Population That Had a Response With Measurable Disease at Screening)8.54 (5.62 to 11.17)5.55 (4.21 to 6.41)
Statistical analysis
  • Neratinib Plus Capecitabine vs Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine · Log Rank · p = 0.0004 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.495 · 95% CI 0.332 to 0.736Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine is the reference.
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events)

Adverse Events to be measured are Treatment-Emergent and Serious AEs that occurred on or after first dose of investigational product and up to 28 days after the last dose

Time frame:
From first dose through last dose + 28 days, up to 41 months. The result is based on final data cut.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events)
percentage of participantsNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
All Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events99.799.4
Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events34.029.9

Adverse events

Collected over From time of first dose, through 28 days after last dose, assessed up to 41 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Neratinib Plus Capecitabine219/307 (71.3%)103/303 (34%)301/303 (99.3%)
Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine243/314 (77.4%)93/311 (29.9%)309/311 (99.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 155
Most frequent serious events
EventNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders22/30313/311
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders10/30311/311
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders9/3036/311
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders7/3036/311
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders7/3031/311
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/3037/311
PneumoniaInfections and infestations6/3035/311
Metastases to central nervous systemNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)6/3032/311
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/3036/311
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders1/3035/311
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 45
Most frequent other events
EventNeratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus Capecitabine
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders248/303205/311
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndromeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders139/303175/311
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders161/303130/311
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders138/30395/311
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders107/30367/311
FatigueGeneral disorders102/30397/311
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders95/30340/311
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders63/30383/311
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders31/30369/311
Weight decreasedInvestigations60/30341/311

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Neratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus CapecitabineTotal
Mean55.04 ± 11.3754.32 ± 11.3654.67 ± 11.36
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Neratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus CapecitabineTotal
Female307311618
Male033
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Neratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus CapecitabineTotal
Hispanic or Latino404282
Not Hispanic or Latino256259515
Unknown or Not Reported111324
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Neratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus CapecitabineTotal
Race — Asian109105214
Race — Black or African American91524
Race — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander112
Race — White178177355
Race — Other71017
Race — Unknown/Missing369
Previous HER2 Regimens
Previous HER2 Regimens(Participants)Neratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus CapecitabineTotal
2215215430
>=39299191
Disease Location
Disease Location(Participants)Neratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus CapecitabineTotal
Non Visceral6061121
Visceral247253500
Hormone Receptor Status
Hormone Receptor Status(Participants)Neratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus CapecitabineTotal
Negative126128254
Positive181186367
Geographic Region
Geographic Region(Participants)Neratinib Plus CapecitabineLapatinib Plus CapecitabineTotal
Europe121123244
North America5965124
Rest of World127126253
08

Study locations

252 sites
  • Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
    Gilbert, Arizona 95297, United States
  • Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
    Mesa, Arizona 85206, United States
  • Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85202, United States
  • UCLA Hematology Oncology
    Alhambra, California 91801, United States
  • CBCC Global Research, Inc. at Comprehensive Blood and Caner Center
    Bakersfield, California 93309, United States
  • Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group Inc.
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • St. Jude Heritage Medical Group
    Fullerton, California 92834, United States
  • St. Jude Heritage Medical Group
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • Marin Cancer Care, Inc.
    Greenbrae, California 94904, United States
  • UCLA Hematology Oncology
    Irvine, California 92604, United States
  • University of California San Diego Medical Center
    La Jolla, California 92037, United States
  • University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center
    La Jolla, California 92093-0698, United States
  • Breastlink Medical Group, Inc.
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • UCLA Hematology Oncology
    Pasadena, California 91005, United States
  • UCLA Hematology Oncology
    Porter Ranch, California 91326, United States
  • Emad Ibrahim, MD
    Redlands, California 92373, United States
  • Cancer Care Associates Medical Group, Inc
    Redondo Beach, California 90277, United States
  • Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group
    Riverside, California 92501, United States
  • University of California San Diego Medical Center - Hillcrest
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Sharp Memorial Hospital
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Breastlink Medical Group, Inc.
    Santa Ana, California 92705, United States
  • Cancer Center of Santa Barbara Sansum Clinic
    Santa Barbara, California 93105, United States
  • Central Coast Medical Oncology
    Santa Maria, California 93454, United States
  • UCLA Hematology Oncology
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Cancer Center of Santa Barbara
    Solvang, California 93463, United States
  • UCLA Healthcare Santa Clarita Oncology
    Valencia, California 91355, United States
  • UCLA Hematology/Oncology
    Westlake Village, California 91361, United States
  • Sibley Memorial Hospital
    Washington, District of Columbia 20016, United States
  • Broward Medical Oncology Office
    Plantation, Florida 33313, United States
  • Florida Cancer Research Institute
    Plantation, Florida 33324, United States
  • Emory University Hospital Midtown
    Atlanta, Georgia 30308, United States
  • Emory Clinic
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Emory University Winship Cancer Institute
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • OnCare Hawaii
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • Queen's Medical Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • Straub Clinic and Hospital
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • University of Hawaii Cancer Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • Resurrection Medical Group
    Chicago, Illinois 60057, United States
  • North Shore Oncology-Hematology Associates, Ltd.
    Crystal Lake, Illinois 60014, United States
  • Primary Healthcare Associates, SC
    Harvey, Illinois 60426, United States
  • North Shore Hematology Oncology
    Highland Park, Illinois 60035, United States
  • North Shore Oncology-Hematology Associates, Ltd.
    Libertyville, Illinois 60048, United States
  • Orchard Healthcare Research Inc
    Skokie, Illinois 60077, United States
  • Primary Health Oncology
    Hobart, Indiana 46342, United States
  • St. Mary Medical Center
    Hobart, Indiana 46342, United States
  • Community Hospital
    Munster, Indiana 46321, United States
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21231, United States
  • Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at John Hopkins at Greenspring Station
    Lutherville, Maryland 21093, United States
  • The Cancer Institute at University of Maryland St. Joseph Medical Center
    Towson, Maryland 21204, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Karmanos Cancer Institute
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Washington University in St. Louis
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Siteman Cancer Center - South County
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63129, United States
  • Siteman Cancer Center - West County
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Siteman Cancer Center - St. Peters
    Saint Peters, Missouri 63376, United States
  • Cancer Institute of New Jersey
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
  • North Shore Hematology Oncology Association PC
    East Setauket, New York 11733, United States
  • Clinical Research Alliance
    Lake Success, New York 11042, United States
  • NYU Langone Medical Center
    Lake Success, New York 11042, United States
  • Clinical Research Alliance, Inc.
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • University Hospitals Case Medical Center
    Orange Village, Ohio 44122, United States
  • UPMC Cancer Pavillion
    Greensburg, Pennsylvania 15601, United States
  • Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
  • UPMC Cancer Pavillion
    Monroeville, Pennsylvania 15146, United States
  • Magee Women's Hospital
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • UPMC Cancer Pavillion
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15215, United States
  • Hillman Cancer Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, United States
  • UPMC Cancer Pavillion
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15237, United States
  • UPMC Cancer Pavillion
    Uniontown, Pennsylvania 15401, United States
  • UPMC Cancer Pavillion
    West Mifflin, Pennsylvania 15122, United States
  • West Clinic PC
    Germantown, Tennessee 38138, United States
  • West Clinic PC
    Memphis, Tennessee 38120, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • COIBA Centro de Oncología e Investigación Buenos Aires
    Berazategui, Buenos Aires B1880BBF, Argentina
  • Fundación Investigar
    Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma De BuenosAires C1025ABI, Argentina
  • The Tweed Hospital
    Tweed Heads, New South Wales 2485, Australia
  • Sunshine Coast University Hospital
    Birtinya, Queensland 4575, Australia
  • Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital
    Bankstown, NSW 2200, Australia
  • St. George Hospital
    Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
  • Box Hill Hospital, Oncology Department
    Melbourne, 3128, Australia
  • Maroondah Hospital, Maroondah Breast Clinic
    Melbourne, 3135, Australia
  • Sydney Adventist Hospital
    Wahroonga, 8833, Australia
  • University Hospital Innsbruck - Tyrolean Hospital, Department of Gynecology
    Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
  • Our Dear Lady Hospital, Aalst Campus
    Aalst, Belgium
  • Institut Jules Bordet - Medical Oncology
    Brussels, 1000, Belgium
  • University Hospital Saint-Luc
    Brussels, 1200, Belgium
  • Antwerp University Hospital
    Edegem, B-2650, Belgium
  • Leuven University Hospitals
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Clinic Saint-Joseph
    Liege, 4000, Belgium
  • St. Elizabeth Maternity Clinic
    Namur, B-5000, Belgium
  • AZ Damiaan General Hospital, Sint-Jozef Oncology Center
    Ostend, Belgium
  • Saint-Augustinus Hospital
    Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium
  • Núcleo de Oncologia da Bahia - NOB
    Salvador, Bahia 40170-110, Brazil
  • Ensino E Terapia de Inovação Clínica Assistência Multidiciplinar Em Oncologia Ética
    Salvador, Bahia 41950-610, Brazil

Showing the first 100 of 252 sites across 28 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dai MS, Feng YH, Chen SW, Masuda N, Yau T, Chen ST, Lu YS, Yap YS, Ang PCS, Chu SC, Kwong A, Lee KS, Ow S, Kim SB, Lin J, Chung HC, Ngan R, Kok VC, Rau KM, Sangai T, Ng TY, Tseng LM, Bryce R, Bebchuk J, Chen MC, Hou MF. Analysis of the pan-Asian subgroup of patients in the NALA Trial: a randomized phase III NALA Trial comparing neratinib+capecitabine (N+C) vs lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C) in patients with HER2+metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with two or more HER2-directed regimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;189(3):665-676. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06313-5. Epub 2021 Sep 23. PubMed 34553296 ↗
  • Saura C, Oliveira M, Feng YH, Dai MS, Chen SW, Hurvitz SA, Kim SB, Moy B, Delaloge S, Gradishar W, Masuda N, Palacova M, Trudeau ME, Mattson J, Yap YS, Hou MF, De Laurentiis M, Yeh YM, Chang HT, Yau T, Wildiers H, Haley B, Fagnani D, Lu YS, Crown J, Lin J, Takahashi M, Takano T, Yamaguchi M, Fujii T, Yao B, Bebchuk J, Keyvanjah K, Bryce R, Brufsky A; NALA Investigators. Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With >/= 2 HER2-Directed Regimens: Phase III NALA Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3138-3149. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00147. Epub 2020 Jul 17. PubMed 32678716 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Puma Biotechnology is committed to sharing clinical trial data and information to help physicians and patients make informed treatment decisions, and to help qualified researchers advance scientific knowledge. In accordance with legal and regulatory requirements, Puma publishes study protocol information and clinical study results on clinical trial registries, including ClinicalTrials.gov and EU Clinical Trials Register. Puma also publishes information about clinical studies in peer-reviewed scientific journals and shares data in scientific meetings. Puma commits to safeguarding confidentiality and patient privacy throughout the clinical trial data and information sharing process. Any patient-level data will be anonymized to protect personally identifiable information. Qualified researchers and study participants may submit requests for other study documentation and clinical trial data to clinicaltrials@pumabiotechnology.com for consideration.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: Clinical study documents and clinical trial data may be requested by qualified researchers and study participants for studies that have been completed for at least 18 months, and for which the indication of the drug has been approved in the US and/or EU, as applicable. Requests will be accepted for up to 24 months after the criteria described in this section are met.

Access criteria: Requestors must provide organizational contact information; a detailed research plan, including outcomes; timeline for completion of the research; qualifications of the research team; funding source; and potential conflicts of interest. Puma will not provide access to patient-level data if there is a reasonable likelihood that individual patients could be identified, or in cases where confidentiality or consent provisions prohibit transfer of data or information to third parties. Additionally, Puma will not disclose information that jeopardizes intellectual property rights or divulges confidential commercial information.

Data sharing details ↗ · pumabiotechnology.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2013 to primary completion in Sep 2018, 65 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2019, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

Of 272 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 40 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 63. This study's 65 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 600 studies reached it within 59 months; a quarter within 36 and three quarters within 96.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 4, 2013
First posted
Mar 11, 2013
StartActual
Mar 29, 2013
Primary completionActual
Sep 28, 2018
CompletionActual
Dec 9, 2019
Results first posted
Dec 11, 2019
Last update
Jun 11, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01808573
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2013
Start date
Mar 29, 2013
Primary completion
Sep 28, 2018
Completion
Dec 9, 2019
Results posted
Dec 11, 2019
Last update
Jun 11, 2021

Study contacts

Senior Vice President Clinical Science and Pharmacology
study director · Puma Biotechnology, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Neratinib

Start the discussion