CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01800747DAPUpdated Jul 31, 2017

Clinical Trial for the Assessment of Delayed Antibiotic Treatment in Pediatric (DAP-Pediatrics)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Antibiotic prescription strategies in Rhinosinusitis, Acute Bronchitis and Acute Otitis Media, sponsored by Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-31.

Sponsored by Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2012, registered Feb 2013).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
450
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
2 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The general hypothesis is that delayed antibiotic treatment strategy present similar effectiveness, when compared with non-prescription of antibiotics or the prescription of antibiotics, in the non-complicated acute respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients.

Read the detailed description

The current project (DAP Pediatrics) is a study that explores the optimization of antibiotic prescribing in our country by evaluating the delayed prescription of antibiotics. The proposed trial will take place in the context of a prior similar study we conducted in adults. The study currently underway is the DAP-Adults study (a randomised controlled trial that evaluates several antibiotic prescribing strategies, including de delayed prescription in uncomplicated acute respiratory infections in adults in primary care).

The aim of this study DAP-Pediatrics (randomized, multicenter parallel) to determine the efficacy and safety of delayed prescription of antibiotics compared to direct prescription and non-prescription of antibiotic in uncomplicated acute respiratory infections in pediatric patients. This 3 arms clinical trial will include 450 children and will evaluate the duration and severity of symptoms, antibiotic consumption, parents' satisfaction, the perceived efficacy of antibiotics and the number of visits generated. The project also includes a qualitative study, by means of structured interviews, to assess the perception and attitudes of parents towards the different treatment strategies and carry out a full analysis of economic evaluation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rhinosinusitis
  • Acute Bronchitis
  • Acute Otitis Media
  • Pharyngotonsillitis

Keywords

  • Delayed antibiotic treatment
  • Acute respiratory infections
  • Pediatrics
  • Satisfaction
03

In context

Rhinosinusitis

330 studies on the registry are indexed under Rhinosinusitis; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 450 is above the median of 60 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Rhinosinusitis.

Browse Rhinosinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

General Inclusion Criteria:

In this study can be enrolled children (2 to 14 ages) with non-complicated acute respiratory tract infections, including pharyngotonsillitis, rhinosinusitis, acute bronchitis and acute media otitis. The doctors include children with these infections if they have reasonable doubts if they should treat with antibiotics.

General Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not aged between 2 and 14.
  • Patients have participated in the DAP-pediatrics previously.
  • Patients are severely affected or patients has been felt severely affected for one week (all time).
  • Patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of serious illness or severely affected and/or complications (particularly pneumonia, mastoiditis, peritonsillar abscess, peritonsillar cellulitis, intraorbital or intracranial complications).
  • Patients at high risk of serious complications due to prior comorbidity. This includes significant heart disease, lung, kidney, liver or neuromuscular, immunosuppression, cystic fibrosis.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
450 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Direct antibiotic treatment

    The doctor gives to parents an antibiotic prescription for their son's respiratory infection which he should start immediately.

    Other: Antibiotic prescription strategies

  • No intervention
    No antibiotic treatment

    The doctor does not give to parents an antibiotic prescription for their son's respiratory infection.

  • Experimental
    Delayed antibiotic prescription

    The doctor gives to parents an antibiotic prescription for their son's respiratory infection with the advice to use it if needed, in case of worsening of symptoms or not improve.

    Other: Antibiotic prescription strategies

Interventions

  • OtherAntibiotic prescription strategies

    The patients enrolled will be randomized between three treatment strategies or arms. Patients randomized to delayed treatment arm or direct treatment, doctors can choose the antibiotic that they consider appropriate depending on such local resistance or practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration and severity of symptoms

    Coordination Centre performed telephone interviews.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Antibiotic consumption

    Self-reported by the patients and checked at the Regional Pharmacy's Units.

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Parents satisfaction with treatment

    Likert scale.

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Parents' belief in the efficacy of antibiotics

    Likert scale

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Impact of DAP strategy on the reconsultation

    Medical history review

    Time frame: 1 year

  5. The prescription of antibiotics in the previous two years predicts the effect of prescribing strategies in reconsultation.

    Medical history review

    Time frame: 1 year

Other outcomes

  1. Complications of disease

    Included by doctors or coordination centre

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Asociación Colaboración Cochrane Iberoamericana
    Barcelona, 08041, Spain
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01800747
Lead sponsor
Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana
Collaborators
Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Health, Spain
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 28, 2013
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
Jun 7, 2016
Completion
Jun 7, 2016
Last update
Jul 31, 2017

Study contacts

Pablo Alonso Coello, PhD
principal investigator · Asociación Colaboración Cochrane Iberoamericana

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion