A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) and Observation in Traumatic Optic Neuropathy, sponsored by Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Completed at 3 sites in Iran. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-07.
Sponsored by Tehran University of Medical Sciences · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
The pathophysiology of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy (TON) is thought to be multifactorial, and some researchers have also postulated a primary and secondary mechanism of injury.TON is categorized as direct or indirect.In indirect TON cases, the injury to the axons is thought to be induced by shearing forces that are transmitted to the fibers or to the vascular supply of the nerve. Studies have shown that forces applied to the frontal bone and malar eminences are transferred and concentrated in the area near the optic canal. The tight adherence of the optic nerve's dural sheath to the periosteum within the optic canal is also thought to contribute to this segment of the nerve being extremely susceptible to the deformative stresses of the skull bones. Such injury leads to ischemic injury to the axons of the retinal ganglion cells within the optic canal. At present, no studies validate a particular approach to the management of TON. There are three management lines for these patients that include 1)observation only;2)medical treatment with high or megadoses of methylprednisolone; and 3)surgical intervention. Generally no line precedes the others and additionally, medical or surgical interventions may result in serious side effects or complications. In 2005, the results of the Corticosteroid Randomization after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) trial raised concerns regarding the use of mega dose steroids in traumatic brain injury. This study was the largest randomized study that evaluated steroids in patients with traumatic brain injury and was stopped early due to the significantly increased risk of death in patients that received mega dose steroids at their 6-month follow-up when compared with the placebo group (25.7% vs 22.3%; Relative Risk 1.15 Confidence Interval 1.07 to 1.24; p=0.0001). Although the etiology of the increased risk of death was not determined, the findings of this study should be taken into consideration when managing cases of TON with concurrent traumatic brain injury. Very recently it has been shown the cytokine hormone erythropoietin (EPO) that had been long known and used as a valuable agent to promote hematopoiesis has been protective in experimental models of mechanical trauma, neuroinflammation, cerebral and retinal ischemia, and even in a human stroke trial, and most notably in optic nerve transection. A double blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial on EPO add-on treatment in chronic schizophrenic men was performed. Treatment over 12 weeks with high-dose weekly (40,000 IU intravenously) EPO led to significant improvement of cognitive performance compared to placebo controls. Different studies have been performed on the effect of EPO on neuropathy in different studies. The investigators recently published our results on treating patients with TON with EPO and found it safe and effective. Patients were compared with a historical control group of patients who received no treatment for TON. A better visual recovery was found. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of EPO on TON in a Multi- center clinical trial using a semi-experimental design.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences is the lead sponsor of 231 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Intravenous EPO 10,000 IU for 5-13 years of age and 20,000 IU for \>13 years/ day for 3 days
Drug: Recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO)
Just Intravenous Methyl prednisolone 250 mg every 6 hours for 3 days.
Drug: Methyl prednisolone
Observation
Other: Observation
4000 units per vial
Also known as: EPO (Pooyesh darou Co., Tehran)
Just observation
250 mg every 6 hours for 3 days.
Also known as: Depo-Medrol
Number of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline
Best corrected visual acuity will measure at 1,2,3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month and at least 3 months after treatment. Improvement is defined based on 1) mean logMAR\[12\], 2) 0.3 change in logMAR (improvement, deterioration, and no change) \[12,16\] , 3) mean improvement percentage which is calculated as: improvement%= (logMar ( of VA after treatment)-logMar ( of initial VA))/(logMar(20/13)˟-logMar ( of initial VA) 4) percentage of patients at different ordinal categorization of the BCVA as no light perception (NLP), light perception (LP)and hand motion (HM), count fingers (CF), and ≥ 20/200.
Time frame: Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatment
Number of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +4
A positive RAPD means there are differences between the two eyes in the afferent pathway due to retinal or optic nerve disease. Graded from +1 to +4. The higher one is a better grade
Time frame: Change from baseline at least 3 months after treatment
| Milestone | Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | Methylprednisolone | Observation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 85 | 16 | 16 |
| Completed | 69 | 15 | 16 |
| Not completed | 16 | 1 | 0 |
Best corrected visual acuity will measure at 1,2,3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month and at least 3 months after treatment. Improvement is defined based on 1) mean logMAR\[12\], 2) 0.3 change in logMAR (improvement, deterioration, and no change) \[12,16\] , 3) mean improvement percentage which is calculated as: improvement%= (logMar ( of VA after treatment)-logMar ( of initial VA))/(logMar(20/13)˟-logMar ( of initial VA) 4) percentage of patients at different ordinal categorization of the BCVA as no light perception (NLP), light perception (LP)and hand motion (HM), count fingers (CF), and ≥ 20/200.
| Participants | Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | Methylprednisolone | Observation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Change/Improvement Visual Acuity From the Beseline | 28 | 3 | 5 |
A positive RAPD means there are differences between the two eyes in the afferent pathway due to retinal or optic nerve disease. Graded from +1 to +4. The higher one is a better grade
| Participants | Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | Methylprednisolone | Observation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Relative Afferent Papillary Defect (RAPD) Grade +4 | 26 | 7 | 8 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | 0/69 (0%) | 0/69 (0%) | 0/69 (0%) |
| Methylprednisolone | 0/15 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) |
| Observation | 0/16 (0%) | 0/16 (0%) | 0/16 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | Methylprednisolone | Observation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 20 | 6 | 4 | 30 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 64 | 10 | 12 | 86 |
| >=65 years | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | Methylprednisolone | Observation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 28.4 ± 13.9 | 23.5 ± 9.4 | 29.0 ± 13.7 | 27.8 ± 13.4 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | Methylprednisolone | Observation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 11 | 0 | 3 | 14 |
| Male | 74 | 16 | 13 | 103 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (EPO) | Methylprednisolone | Observation | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 85 | 16 | 16 | 117 |
The record gives a start of Feb 2015, a primary completion of Apr 2016 and a completion of Feb 2017. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Sep 2018, 2 years 5 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Optic Nerve Injuries
Tehran University of Medical Sciences →