An interventional study of Optic Nerve Stimulation in Optic Nerve Injuries, Sellar Tumor and Skull Base Neoplasms, sponsored by University of California, San Francisco. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-12.
Sponsored by University of California, San Francisco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
Assessing the function of the optic nerve is paramount during various neurosurgical procedures. Effective optic nerve monitoring has remained elusive as Visual Evoked Potentials (the current existing tool) provides only diffuse and delayed assessment of nerve function. Here, the investigators propose a prospective study involving adult patients (aged 18 years and older) undergoing endonasal or open cranial approaches around the optic nerves, who will receive pre- and post-operative visual evaluations. During surgery, the optic nerve and chiasm will be stimulated, and the response will be recorded in both eyes and the occipital cortex via skin electrodes. The investigators aim to utilize anterograde optic nerve microstimulation to assess the nerve's integrity during open and endoscopic cranial approaches. Electrophysiological readings will be acquired, as is routine in the operating room, by our team of experts, and intraoperative findings will be correlated with post- surgical clinical outcomes. Our objective is to utilize existing technology in the operating room to safely and effectively monitor optic nerve function during surgery.
Our hypothesis is that utilizing anterograde optic nerve microstimulation during open and endoscopic cranial approaches will allow for more accurate and real-time assessment of optic nerve function compared to the current standard of Visual Evoked Potentials. The investigators predict that this novel approach will lead to improved intraoperative monitoring and better correlation with post- surgical clinical outcomes.
The study design proposed is interventional and prospective. It involves implementing a novel approach, anterograde optic nerve microstimulation, during surgical procedures to assess optic nerve integrity. This design entails actively intervening during the surgical process to stimulate the optic nerve and record responses, indicating an interventional approach.
20 studies on the registry are indexed under Skull Base Neoplasms; 7 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 30 across 12 interventional studies indexed under Skull Base Neoplasms.
Browse Skull Base Neoplasms studies →University of California, San Francisco is the lead sponsor of 2,169 studies on the registry; 372 are open to participants now.
Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 202 (76%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The most significant procedure will be using an anterograde microstimulator and provoke stimulations to the optic nerve as the surgery proceeds. During surgery, the optic nerve and chiasm will be stimulated and the response recorded in both eyes and occipital cortex via skin electrodes. These responses will be monitored at all times by the neuromonitorig team who will inform if changes in neural responses change. The use of microstimulator has been proven safe in other surgical approaches.
Procedure: Optic Nerve Stimulation
Patients receiving regular standard of care in endoscopic endonasal approaches within the same case series.
Anterograde Stimulation of the Optic Neve.
Visual Deficits
Patients that received our intervention will be evaluated post operatively for regular standard of care six weeks post-operatively. During visual evaluation, the PI of this study will determine post-operative visual field and visual acuity. These parameters will be compared to pre-operative visual acuity and visual field status.
Time frame: 6 weeks after surgery date.
Plan to share: No
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of California, San Francisco →