ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01777347GUERANDEUpdated Jul 28, 2014

Efficacy of 3% Hypertonic Saline in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of 3% Saline and 0.9% Normal Saline in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Completed at 21 sites in France. Open to participants aged 6 Weeks to 12 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-28.

Primary conditionBronchiolitis, ViralRegistry: BronchiolitisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Bronchiolitis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Bronchiolitis, Viral
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Bronchiolitis, Viral, a narrower term within Bronchiolitis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
778
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Weeks to 12 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether nebulized hypertonic saline solution reduces the admission rate 48 hours after initial treatment in the emergency department, when compared to normal saline solution (control).

Read the detailed description

Acute viral bronchiolitis remains a significant cause of hospitalization and to date, no treatment reduce the rate of hospitalization. The only accepted treatment for bronchiolitis is nasal cleaning, hydration and for hospitalized hypoxemic infants, oxygen administration.

Several studies shown that nebulization of hypertonic saline solution reduce length of stay in hospital for hospitalized infant but effect on rate of hospitalization remains unclear.

The investigators propose a randomized double blind multicenter clinical trial on infants 6 weeks to 12 months old with moderate or severe bronchiolitis, in 21 emergency departments of hospitals situated France, during 2 winter seasons.

The investigators hypothesize that infants with bronchiolitis treated with nebulized hypertonic 3% saline solution would have less risk of being hospitalized. Our principal objective is to determine if nebulized 3% hypertonic saline solution reduces admission rate 24 hours after treatment compared to placebo.

Secondary objectives are to compare between groups intensity of respiratory symptoms measured by RDAI clinical score, duration of symptoms, length of hospital stay for hospitalized infants, adverse effects and health care utilization.

Patients presenting to the Emergency Department with a diagnosis of moderately severe bronchiolitis will be approached for entry into the study. After the initial routine assessment, informed consent will be obtained and the infant will be randomized to receive treatment in a double-blinded fashion 4 ml of nebulized study solution either 3% hypertonic saline (HS, study group) or 0.9% saline (NS, control group) every 20 minutes for a total of 2 doses. After an observation period of 20 minutes following the last dose, the infant will be reassessed by the attending physician in the ER for disposition (admit, discharge home). All subsequent therapy, if needed, will be at the sole discretion of the attending physician. The family of each recruited subject will be contacted by phone 2, 7, 14 and 28 days later to assess resolution of symptoms.

Clinical response to the above treatment will also be determined independently by the study physician utilizing a standardized respiratory scoring system, the Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI), at study entry and after each nebulization. The primary outcome measure is the rate of admission to hospital between the study and control groups 24 hours after inclusion. Secondary outcomes measure will involve the assessment of change in the RDAI between study entry and post-treatment, adverse effects, length of stay for hospitalized infant and health care utilization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Viral Bronchiolitis

Keywords

  • Keywords provided by ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HOPITAUX DE PARIS:
  • Acute Viral bronchiolitis
  • Hypertonic saline
  • Hospitalization
  • Infants
  • Hospital admissions
  • Additional relevant MeSH terms:
  • Bronchiolitis
  • Bronchiolitis, Viral
  • Bronchial Diseases
  • Respiratory Tract Diseases
  • Lung Diseases, Obstructive
  • Respiratory Tract Infections
  • Virus Diseases
03

In context

Bronchiolitis, Viral Reclassified

30 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiolitis, Viral; 2 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 778 is above the median of 85 across 25 interventional studies indexed under Bronchiolitis, Viral.

Browse Bronchiolitis, Viral studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Compared within Bronchiolitis, Viral, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Bronchiolitis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Weeks to 12 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 6 weeks through 12 months
  • First moderate to severe episode of acute viral bronchiolitis (history of viral upper respiratory tract infection plus wheezing and/or crackles on chest auscultation with respiratory distress ).
  • Admission in Emergency Department
  • Parental/guardian permission ()

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prematurity \< 37 weeks
  • artificial ventilation in the neonatal period
  • Chronic lung or heart disease
  • history of immunodeficiency
  • past use of nebulized HS
  • initial need for intensive care of assisted ventilation
  • Non-French speaking parent/guardian
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
778 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    3% Saline

    Nebulized 3% Saline

    Drug: 3% Saline

  • Placebo comparator
    0.9% Normal Saline

    Nebulized 0.9% normal saline

    Drug: 0.9% Normal Saline

Interventions

  • Two 4 mL nebulization of 3% saline with 20 minutes interval

    Also known as: 3% Hypertonic Saline Solution for Inhalation (Mucoclear 3%)

  • Drug0.9% Normal Saline

    Two 4 mL nebulization of 0.9% normal saline with 20 minutes interval

    Also known as: 0.9% Saline Solution for Inhalation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Admission rate

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. change in RDAI score

    Time frame: 2 hours

  2. Number of Participants with Adverse Events

    Time frame: 2 hours

  3. length of hospitalization for hospitalized infant

    Time frame: 1 month

  4. health care utilisation

    Time frame: 1 month

07

Study locations

21 sites
  • Hôpital Jean Verdier
    Bondy, 93140, France
  • Hôpital Ambroise Paré
    Boulogne, 92100, France
  • CHU
    Caen, France
  • Hôpital Antoine Béclère
    Clamart, 92141, France
  • Hôpital Louis Mouriez
    Colombes, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
    Corbeil, 91100, France
  • Centre Hospitalier intercommunal de Créteil
    Créteil, 94000, France
  • Centre Hospitalier de Fontainebleau
    Fontainebleau, 77305, France
  • Hôpital Kremlin Bicêtre
    Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
  • Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre
    Lille, France
  • Hôpital Hôpital Mère Enfants
    Limoges, France
  • Hôpital Hôpital Femme Mère Enfants
    Lyon, France
  • Hôpital Nord
    Marseille, France
  • Hôpital d'enfants
    Nancy, France
  • Hôpital Mère - Enfants
    Nantes, France
  • CHU Lenval
    Nice, France
  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
    Paris, 75007, France
  • Hôpital Robert Debré
    Paris, 75019, France
  • Hôp Charles Nicolle - CHU Rouen
    Rouen, 76000, France
  • Hôpital des enfants
    Toulouse, France
  • André Mignot
    Versailles, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Angoulvant F, Bellettre X, Milcent K, Teglas JP, Claudet I, Le Guen CG, de Pontual L, Minodier P, Dubos F, Brouard J, Soussan-Banini V, Degas-Bussiere V, Gatin A, Schweitzer C, Epaud R, Ryckewaert A, Cros P, Marot Y, Flahaut P, Saunier P, Babe P, Patteau G, Delebarre M, Titomanlio L, Vrignaud B, Trieu TV, Tahir A, Regnard D, Micheau P, Charara O, Henry S, Ploin D, Panjo H, Vabret A, Bouyer J, Gajdos V; Efficacy of 3% Hypertonic Saline in Acute Viral Bronchiolitis (GUERANDE) Study Group. Effect of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline Treatment in Emergency Departments on the Hospitalization Rate for Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Aug 7;171(8):e171333. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1333. Epub 2017 Aug 7. PubMed 28586918 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2012, a primary completion of Apr 2014 and a completion of Apr 2014. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 14, 2012
First posted
Jan 28, 2013
Start
Oct 2012
Primary completionActual
Apr 2014
CompletionActual
Apr 2014
Last update
Jul 28, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01777347
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 28, 2013
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Apr 2014
Completion
Apr 2014
Last update
Jul 28, 2014

Study contacts

Vincent Gajdos, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris - Paris Sud Medical School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Saline Solution

Start the discussion