ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06788093ROADSUpdated Jan 22, 2026

Reducing Overuse of Antibiotics With Decision Support

An interventional study of ED Clinical Decision Support (CDS-ED) and Transitions Clinical Decision Support (CDS-Tr) in Lower Respiratory Tract Infection, Pneumonia and Asthma, sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-22.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,800
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Eliminating inappropriate antibiotic use in pediatric lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) is the central focus of this research. LRTIs (pneumonia, bronchiolitis, and infection-related exacerbations of asthma) account for nearly one-third of all emergency department (ED) visits and 40% of all infection-related hospitalizations in US children. LRTIs also account for more antibiotic use in children's hospitals than any other condition, despite most LRTIs being viral in nature. Inappropriate antibiotics are associated with substantial adverse effects. Accordingly, national guidelines strongly discourage routine antibiotic use for bronchiolitis and acute asthma and argue for significantly reducing antibiotic exposure (initiation, spectrum, and duration) in pneumonia.

To address the problem of inappropriate antibiotic use, hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are now common nationwide, and these programs have demonstrated effectiveness in some hospital settings. Unfortunately, traditional ASP approaches do not translate well to the fast-paced and unpredictable ED environment, and hospital-based ASP resources are finite and not always immediately available.

Clinical decision support (CDS) embedded within the electronic health record (EHR) is a strategy that could address the ED antibiotic stewardship gap. Informed by a deep understanding of the key facilitators and barriers to using CDS to support appropriate antibiotic use in ED and hospital settings, the investigators have developed two stewardship-focused CDS interventions for pediatric LRTI. The overarching goal of this research is to rigorously evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of these CDS tools, alone and in combination, against usual care only in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial at 3 U.S. children's hospitals.

Read the detailed description

This is a usual care-controlled superiority clinical trial platform designed to evaluate the effects of hospital-based CDS in the ED (CDS-ED) and after transitioning to the hospital setting (CDS-TR) on antibiotic prescribing and related clinical outcomes for child and adolescent LRTI encounters at 3 U.S. children's hospitals. The investigators hypothesize that both interventions will be superior to usual care and, among patients presenting in the ED and subsequently admitted to the hospital, the combined interventions (CDS-ED + CDS-TR) will be most effective overall. Randomization will occur sequentially in two stages corresponding to the ED CDS and Transitions CDS populations. The first stage of randomization will allocate qualifying ED encounters 1:1 to CDS-ED vs. usual care alone in the ED. The second stage of randomization will allocate participants requiring hospitalization (those discharged from the hospital are not eligible) 1:1 to CDS-TR vs. usual care at the time of admission. To minimize bias, the trial will be embedded within clinical care with minimal exclusions and disruption to usual care activities. Investigators will be blinded to study arm assignment, though blinding of treating clinicians is not possible due to the nature of the study. The trial will also evaluate process and implementation outcomes throughout the study period within the platform population. A formal interim analysis is not planned.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
  • Pneumonia
  • Asthma
  • Bronchiolitis, Viral
03

In context

Pneumonia

1,564 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 265 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,800 is above the median of 129 across 975 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 833 studies on the registry; 155 are open to participants now.

Of its 125 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ED encounter or admission to an inpatient hospital team.
  2. EHR-based positive screen for suspected LRTI, defined as a qualifying chief complaint (e.g., cough, shortness of breath, etc.), plus triage documentation of abnormal respiratory effort and/or cough.

Exclusion Criteria: None

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Usual Care: Emergency Department

    No experimental decision support will be provided to the emergency medicine providers in encounters randomized to the control arm. All patients will receive usual care and treatment will not be restricted or altered in any way by the study.

  • Experimental
    CDS-ED

    The ED clinical decision support tool will be offered to emergency department providers in these enrolled encounters.

    Behavioral: ED Clinical Decision Support (CDS-ED)

  • No intervention
    Usual Care: Inpatient

    No experimental decision support will be provided to the inpatient/ICU providers in encounters randomized to the control arm. All patients will receive usual care and treatment will not be restricted or altered in any way by the study.

  • Experimental
    CDS-Tr

    The Transitions clinical decision support tool will be offered to inpatient/ICU providers in these enrolled encounters.

    Behavioral: Transitions Clinical Decision Support (CDS-Tr)

Interventions

  • BehavioralED Clinical Decision Support (CDS-ED)

    The ED-CDS intervention is designed as a discrete decision support aid to influence initial antibiotic decision-making in the ED. This intervention will feature a clinician-facing LRTI dashboard for end-users that assimilates relevant clinical data (e.g., vital signs, select diagnostic tests, links to reference information) and offers tailored suggestions for antibiotic initiation, related diagnostic testing, and in those receiving antibiotics, preferred options and alternatives for antibiotic choice, route, dose, and duration.

  • BehavioralTransitions Clinical Decision Support (CDS-Tr)

    The CDS-Tr intervention is designed as a longitudinal decision support aid to influence initial and ongoing (i.e., continuation, discontinuation, escalation, or de-escalation) antibiotic decision-making in the hospital setting. This intervention will also feature the LRTI dashboard along with additional tailored suggestions and recommendations for antibiotic decision-making upon hospital admission, and for those receiving antibiotics, at the time of discharge. Additionally, CDS-Tr will be active at the time of any service transition (i.e., hospital to intensive care or vice versa) and at pre-specified time points (e.g., approximately 48 hours and 120 hours following ED triage for encounters remaining in the hospital).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Effectiveness: 10-day Longitudinal Antimicrobial Spectrum Index

    The Antibiotic Spectrum Index (ASI) is a numerical metric which quantifies the relative breadth of antimicrobial activity of a given antibiotic medication. Tracking the 10-day trajectory of ASI will capture changes in antibiotic use resulting from changes in antibiotic initiation, spectrum of antibiotic activity, and duration of antibiotic use.

    Time frame: 10 days

  2. Primary Safety: Proportion of Participants Experiencing Escalation in Treatment

    Treatment escalation will capture the escalation to higher level of care and/or antibiotic treatment strategy

    Time frame: 10 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness: Proportion of Participants Experiencing Reduction of ASI Score

    De-escalation of antibiotic exposure intensity (1+ level decrease in daily antibiotic exposure intensity) for a duration of at least 72 hours during the first 10 days of treatment

    Time frame: 10 days

  2. Effectiveness: Total Treatment Duration

    Days until cessation of antibiotic exposure (i.e., daily periods with an ASI score greater than 0) for the index encounter, inclusive of antibiotics received in the ED and hospital, as well as any additional days of antibiotics prescribed at discharge up to 42 days after enrollment.

    Time frame: 42 days

  3. Effectiveness: ASI per Exposure Day

    The numerator is the cumulative ASI during the first 10 days of treatment (T0-T240) and the denominator is the number of days of antibiotic exposure (i.e., daily periods with an ASI score greater than 0) during this same period.

    Time frame: 10 days

  4. Safety: Need for Intensive Care

    Use of intensive care at any point during index encounter

    Time frame: 42 days

  5. Safety: Need for Invasive Mechanical Ventilation or Shock Requiring Vasoactive Medications

    Need for intubation and/or need for vasoactive medications to manage uncompensated shock at any point during the index encounter (excludes intubation or vasoactive medications used for or during planned procedures or surgical intervention)

    Time frame: 42 days

  6. Safety: 3- and 14-day ED Reutilization

    Any ED revisit occurring within 72 and 336 hours of index discharge that does not result in hospitalization

    Time frame: 14 days

  7. Safety: 3- and 14-day Hospital Reutilization

    Any re-hospitalization occurring within 72 and 336 hours of index discharge

    Time frame: 14 days

  8. Death within 14 days of index discharge

    Death by any cause occurring: 1) during the index encounter; 2) within 14 days of the index discharge, or 3) reutilization occurring within 14 days of the index discharge and that results in death at any time during that encounter

    Time frame: 14 days

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Benioff Children's Hospital - Oakland
    Oakland, California 94609, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Suni Kaiser, MD, MSc · Contactsunitha.kaiser@ucsf.edu · 415-476-3392
    • Suni Kaiser, MD, MSc · Principal investigator
  • Benioff Children's Hospital - San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
    Not yet recruiting
    • Suni Kaiser, MD, MSc · Contactsunitha.kaiser@vumc.org · 415-476-3392
    • Suni Kaiser, MD, MSc · Principal investigator
  • Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06788093
Collaborators
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), University of California, San Francisco
Responsible party
Derek Williams (Professor of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 22, 2025
Start date
Nov 12, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 22, 2026

Study contacts

Justine Stassun, MS
Contact
justine.c.stassun@vumc.org
615-936-7276
Derek J Williams, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion