An observational study in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, sponsored by Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto. Status unknown at 37 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-05.
Sponsored by Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto · Observational
The GIMEMA CML Working Party promotes a multicentric, observational, non company sponsored, prospective study of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients treated frontline with dasatinib. Patients will be followed for 5 years. This study will help the definition of guidelines for the treatment of CML patients in early phases.
The primary objective of the study is to describe, in the clinical practice, the rate of events leading to permanent discontinuation after 2 years of treatment with dasatinib as frontline therapy in newly diagnosed CML patients.
The primary objective is to describe, in the clinical practice, the rate of events leading to permanent discontinuation after 2 years of treatment with dasatinib as frontline therapy in newly diagnosed CML patients. Imatinib mesylate, a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting BCR-ABL, has become in the last decade the standard of care for Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP)1-3. Dasatinib is a second generation TKI, effective in imatinib-resistant and imatinib-intolerant patients, which demonstrated superior efficacy to imatinib in early CP BCR-ABL+ CML patients 4,6,7. Most data on second generation TKIs are from company-sponsored studies, generally implemented in selected referral centres. The long-term outcome is still unknown. The high rate of study discontinuation observed within the phase 3 study may influence the mid-term and the long-term data interpretation6,7. A long-term post-marketing surveillance in large independent trial is extremely important to confirm the feasibility of a frontline treatment with the second generation TKI dasatinib and to evaluate the efficacy in a nationwide experience. Moreover, obtaining a deep molecular response is extremely relevant in order to consider TKIs discontinuation. This condition is known as "Complete Molecular Response" (CMR) and is further defined according to the sensitivity achieved (for the definition see the "Criteria of evaluation" section). As far as treatment discontinuation, two experiences have been published so far, aimed at evaluating the persistence of the CMR after imatinib discontinuation. The first was a pilot study32 where 12 patients were included. These 12 patients discontinued imatinib after at least 2 years of CMR (median duration of negativity, 32 months). Six patients displayed a molecular relapse with a detectable BCR-ABL transcript at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 months. Imatinib was then reintroduced and led to a novel molecular response. Six other patients (50%) still have an undetectable level of BCR-ABL transcript after a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 9-24 months). The results of this pilot trial have been confirmed and extended in a second trial, the STIM trial33: 100 patients were enrolled, median follow-up 17 months, 69 patients with at least 12 months follow-up: 42 (61%) of these 69 patients relapsed (40 before 6 months, one patient at month 7, and one at month 19). At 12 months, the probability of persistent CMR for these 69 patients was 41% (95% CI 29-52). All patients who relapsed responded to reintroduction of imatinib. An increase of the CMR rate could possibly translate in a higher proportion of patients candidate to stopping anti-CML treatment, with higher probability of remaining disease-free in the long term. Interestingly, dasatinib was able to induce higher 36-month cumulative MR4 and MR4.5 rates than imatinib7. The advantages of this possible future scenario could be: first, the possibility of treatment discontinuation at least in patients with chronic clinical adverse events; second, a potential reduction of the costs of TKI treatment (after the introduction of TKI, the costs of CML treatment is increasing year by year, with the increasing prevalence of CML patients).
In summary, 1) Most data on second generation TKIs are from company-sponsored studies; 2) The high rate of study discontinuation observed within the phase III study may influence the data interpretation; 3) A long-term post-marketing surveillance in large independent trial is extremely important to confirm the efficacy in a nationwide experience; 4) The persistence of CMR after TKI discontinuation have been described in selected patients with "deep" molecular response; 5) A stable CMR is a pre-requisite for treatment discontinuation; 6) A detailed description of the kinetic of the molecular response, potentially related to a subsequent treatment discontinuation, will be done.
5,441 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 636 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 147 is above the median of 120 across 744 observational studies indexed under Leukemia.
Browse Leukemia studies →Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto is the lead sponsor of 132 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
This is a multicentre, observational, prospective study of newly diagnosed chronic phase CML patients treated frontline with Dasatinib 100 mg QD.
Exclusion Criteria:
Behavioral: Dasatinib discontinuation
Treatment decision is at the discretion of the investigator and must not be made on the basis of this observational study. Patients should have their treatment initiated in accordance with the summary of product characteristics.
Number of dasatinib permanent discontinuing patients.
The cumulative rate of dasatinib permanent discontinuation by 2 years.
Time frame: After 2 years from study entry.
Number of dasatinib permanent discontinuing patients.
The cumulative rate of dasatinib permanent discontinuation by 5 years.
Time frame: After 5 years from study entry.
Number of confirmed MR4 and MR4.5.
The rate of confirmed MR4 and MR4.5 by 24 months.
Time frame: After 2 years from study entry.
Number of confirmed MR4 and MR4.5.
The rate of confirmed MR4 and MR4.5 by 60 months.
Time frame: After 60 months from study entry.
Number of stable MR4 and MR4.5 and characteristics.
The stability of MR4 and MR4.5.
Time frame: After 60 months from study entry.
Number of Complete Cytogenetic Responses (CCgR)
The rate of Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCgR) at 1 year.
Time frame: After one year from study entry.
Number of Major Molecular Response (MMR).
The rate of Major Molecular Response (MMR) at 1 year.
Time frame: After one year from study entry.
Number of days to response (CCgR, MMR, MR4, MR4.5).
The median time to response and the overall estimated probability of response (CCgR, MMR, MR4, MR4.5).
Time frame: After 4 years from study entry.
Number of overal surviving patients
Time frame: After five years from study entry.
Number of progression-free survival patients.
Time frame: After five years from study entry.
Number of failure-free survival patients.
Time frame: After five years from study entry.
Number of event-free survival patients.
Time frame: After five years from study entry.
Number of responses
Overall responses and long-term outcome according to baseline prognostic factors (including: Sokal score34, Euro score35 and EUTOS score36; presence of additional chromosomal abnormalities in Ph+ cells; BCR-ABL transcript type; comorbidity score index).
Time frame: After 7 years from study entry.
Number of responses according to BCR-ABL transcript levels.
Overall responses and long-term outcome according to BCR-ABL transcript levels and CgR at 3 months and at 6 months.
Time frame: After 3 and 6 months from study entry.
Number of patients with fasting glucose modifications.
Fasting glucose modifications (diabetic and normo-glycemic patients) and HbA1C modifications (diabetic patients only) during the first 24 months.
Time frame: After 24 months from study entry.
Number of patients with modifications of body mass index during treatment compared to baseline.
Modifications of body mass index during treatment compared to baseline.
Time frame: After 7 years from study entry.
Number of patients with modifications of serum lipids during treatment compared to baseline.
Modifications of serum lipids during treatment compared to baseline.
Time frame: After 7 years from study entry.
Patient reported quality of life.
Time frame: At 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months from study entry.
Number of adverse events.
Time frame: At 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 months from study entry.
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto