CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01751191Updated Dec 17, 2012

HVPG for Rebleeding Risk Stratification

An observational study in Liver Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertension, sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Completed at 2 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-12-17.

Sponsored by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
338
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: In patients with cirrhosis on secondary prevention of variceal rebleeding with non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs), the risk of rebleeding and death is markedly higher in those failing to achieve a good hemodynamic response (HVPG reduction ≥20% of baseline values or ≤12mmHg). However a substantial proportion of non-responders will never rebleed, thus appearing protected by NSBBs although non-detected by HVPG response. This low sensitivity hampers risk stratification and diminishes the cost-effectiveness of assessing the hemodynamic response to NSBBs. This is particularly relevant in prevention of rebleeding since in this scenario the risk of rebleeding and of other portal hypertension related complications is very high, which calls for early institution of effective therapy.

Baseline HVPG bears prognostic significance with regards to risk of developing varices, decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma and death1,2,7,8,18-27. However, no studies have investigated whether adding data from baseline HVPG may improve the sensitivity of the criteria defining a good or poor hemodynamic response.

Hypothesis: Adding data from baseline HVPG may improve the sensitivity of the criteria defining a good or poor hemodynamic response.

Objective: Exploring the prognostic value of basal HVPG that better discriminate those non-responders who do not re-bleed under prophylactic treatment with NSBBs.

Methods: Observational cohort study. Training set: patients from two longitudinal studies conducted at the Hepatic Hemodynamic laboratory of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona to assess the prognostic value of HVPG changes during continuous therapy with NSBBs for preventing variceal rebleeding. Validation set for chronic hemodynamic response: patients from two longitudinal studies conducted at the Hepatic Hemodynamic laboratory of the Hospital de Sant Pau of Barcelona to assess the prognostic value of HVPG changes during continuous therapy with NSBBs for preventing variceal rebleeding; a third cohort composed of patients undergoing acute hemodynamic response to intravenous propranolol will be studied.

All patients received a preplanned follow-up in the outpatient clinic at 1, 3, and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter in the original studies.

End-point: bleeding from portal hypertensive sources (esophago-gastric varices or portal hypertensive gastropathy) (defined according to Baveno criteria 32), death or liver transplantation.

Ethical aspects: All patients have given their written informed consent to use their data in the original studies.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Liver Cirrhosis

1,642 studies on the registry are indexed under Liver Cirrhosis; 358 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 338 is above the median of 151 across 587 observational studies indexed under Liver Cirrhosis.

Browse Liver Cirrhosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona is the lead sponsor of 319 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with liver cirrhosis who already experienced a esophageal variceal bleeding, requiring therapy with non-selective beta-blockers for their portal hypertension.

Inclusion criteria

Liver Cirrhosis Admission for bleeding from esophageal varices in the previous 7 days Baseline HVPG >12 mmHg Subsequent long-term treatment with NSBB (propranolol or nadolol) Second measurement of HVPG after 1-3 months of therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Hepatocellular carcinoma Portal vein thrombosis Contraindications to beta-blockers Cholestatic liver disease

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
338 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Training set-chronic response to propranolol
  • Validation set-chronic response to propranolol
  • Acute response to propranolol
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. bleeding from portal hypertensive sources (esophago-gastric varices or portal hypertensive gastropathy), death or liver transplantation.

    Time frame: 4 years

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Hospital Clinic
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • Hospital de Sant Pau
    Barcelona, Spain
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01751191
Lead sponsor
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Responsible party
Jaime Bosch (Prof., Hospital Clinic of Barcelona) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 17, 2012
Start date
Aug 2011
Primary completion
Nov 2012
Completion
Dec 2012
Last update
Dec 17, 2012

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion