CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01749800Updated May 31, 2017Results posted

Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation and Motor Training in Traumatic Brain Injury Survivors

An interventional study of GVS and Sham GVS in TBI, Attention Deficits and Motor Impairments, sponsored by Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-31.

Sponsored by Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Lack of funding
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
7
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall goal of the proposed project is to perform a preliminary study to assess the potential effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on the outcomes of a cognitive test of attention and the outcomes of robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation.

Read the detailed description

We plan to explore the use of GVS on the severity of attention span deficits and motor training delivered using a spring-based robot. We intend to carry out the study in a small cohort of traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors (20 subjects). Subjects with attention span deficits but no significant motor impairments will solely undergo a cognitive test of attention with/without GVS. Subjects with both attention span deficits and significant motor impairments will undergo a cognitive test of attention and robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation with/without GVS.

02

Conditions studied

  • TBI
  • Attention Deficits
  • Motor Impairments

Keywords

  • TBI
  • Attention deficits
  • Upper extremity weakness
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 7 is below the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital is the lead sponsor of 114 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury involving cognitive and/or motor deficits.
  • Neurological injury >1 year prior to study enrollment
  • Significant attention deficit
  • For subjects with motor deficits (arms 2 and 3), sufficient voluntary movement and range of motion in the most-affected upper extremity to use the robotic arm system (Armeo Spring)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • History of seizures within 6 months of study enrollment
  • Major depression
  • Cognitive impairment that may interfere with understanding instructions
  • Severe limitations of upper extremity range of motion
  • Agitation
  • Other major neurological or psychiatric diseases
  • Participation in other forms of therapy/ intervention for upper extremity motor recovery
  • End-stage liver, kidney, cardiac or pulmonary disease
  • A terminal medical diagnosis with survival \<1 year
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse in the last 3 years
  • Adjustment of, or plan to adjust, psychoactive medications within the preceding 1 month, or within the study period.
  • Current participation in another interventional trial targeting TBI
  • Previous GVS treatment
  • Contraindications to GVS such as implants
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
7 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitive test with/without GVS

    Subjects with attention span deficits and no significant motor impairments undergo solely a cognitive test. The test is carried out in multiple trials. For some of the trials (randomly selected), subjects receive galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). For other trials, subjects received sham GVS. GVS is delivered using a device by A-M Systems.

    Device: GVS · Device: Sham GVS

  • Active comparator
    Armeo Spring +GVS

    Subjects with both attention span deficits and significant motor impairments undergo robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in combination with galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS). Robot-assisted training is carried out using the Armeo Spring system by Hocoma AG. GVS is delivered using a device by A-M Systems.

    Device: GVS · Device: Armeo Spring

  • Sham comparator
    Armeo Spring + sham GVS

    Subjects with both attention span deficits and significant motor impairments undergo robot-assisted upper-limb rehabilitation in combination with sham GVS. Robot-assisted training is carried out using the Armeo Spring system by Hocoma AG. Sham stimulation is delivered by connecting the subject to a device by A-M Systems, but the device is not active.

    Device: Sham GVS · Device: Armeo Spring

Interventions

  • DeviceGVS

    A small current is delivered to the vestibular system via electrodes placed over the subject's mastoid processes.

    Also known as: Device: Model 2200 Analog Stimulus Isolator, Produce by: A-M Systems, Inc., WA, USA

  • DeviceSham GVS

    Electrodes are placed over the subject's mastoid processes and connected to the device, but the device is not active.

    Also known as: Device: Model 2200 Analog Stimulus Isolator, Produce by: A-M Systems, Inc., WA, USA

  • DeviceArmeo Spring

    A robotic system supports the weak arm of the subject to make it easier to perform therapeutic exercises.

    Also known as: Device: Armeo Spring, Produced by: Hocoma

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sustained Attention to Response Task

    Subjects are presented with objects (one at the time) on a computer screen and are instructed to press a key on the keyboard according to the characteristics of the object shown on the computer screen. Error rates are measured as percentage of erroneous key selections.

    Time frame: Baseline and end-of-treatment data (up to 2 weeks)

07

Results

Posted May 31, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCognitive Test With/Without GVSArmeo Spring +GVSArmeo Spring + Sham GVS
Started610
Completed300
Not completed310
Withdrew: Not meeting inclusion criteria300
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject010

Outcome measures

PrimarySustained Attention to Response Task

Subjects are presented with objects (one at the time) on a computer screen and are instructed to press a key on the keyboard according to the characteristics of the object shown on the computer screen. Error rates are measured as percentage of erroneous key selections.

Time frame:
Baseline and end-of-treatment data (up to 2 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage errors
Sustained Attention to Response Task
percentage errorsCognitive Test With/Without GVSArmeo Spring +GVSArmeo Spring + Sham GVS
Sustained Attention to Response Task26 (7 to 45)——

Adverse events

Collected over Data was collected through study completion (i.e. up to two weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cognitive Test With/Without GVS—0/6 (0%)—
Armeo Spring +GVS—0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
Armeo Spring + Sham GVS———
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCognitive Test With/Without GVSArmeo Spring +GVSArmeo Spring + Sham GVS
Skin damage caused on the stimulation electrodesGeneral disorders0/60/1—
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventCognitive Test With/Without GVSArmeo Spring +GVSArmeo Spring + Sham GVS
Skin irritation caused by the straps of the robotGeneral disorders—0/1—

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cognitive Test With/Without GVSArmeo Spring +GVSArmeo Spring + Sham GVSTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years6107
>=65 years0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cognitive Test With/Without GVSArmeo Spring +GVSArmeo Spring + Sham GVSTotal
Female0101
Male6006
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cognitive Test With/Without GVSArmeo Spring +GVSArmeo Spring + Sham GVSTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian0000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American1001
White5106
More than one race0000
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Cognitive Test With/Without GVSArmeo Spring +GVSArmeo Spring + Sham GVSTotal
United States61—7
Sustained Attention to Response Task
Sustained Attention to Response Task(percentage error)Cognitive Test With/Without GVSArmeo Spring +GVSArmeo Spring + Sham GVSTotal
Mean23 (7 to 33)20 (20 to 20)—22 (7 to 33)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02129, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 31, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01749800
Lead sponsor
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Responsible party
Paolo Bonato (Director, Motion Analysis Lab, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 17, 2012
Start date
Jul 2011
Primary completion
Nov 2014
Completion
Nov 2014
Results posted
May 31, 2017
Last update
May 31, 2017

Study contacts

Paolo Bonato, PhD
principal investigator · Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion