A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Axitinib and Sandostatin LAR in Neuroendocrine Tumors and Advanced Cancer, sponsored by Grupo Espanol de Tumores Neuroendocrinos. Completed at 26 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-28.
Sponsored by Grupo Espanol de Tumores Neuroendocrinos · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment
Assess whether therapy with axitinib, a potent angiogenic inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase receptors of VEGF bioavailable by oral administration, is capable of improving PFS in patients with advanced G1-G2 NETs of nonpancreatic origin with progressive disease documented in the 12 months prior to entering the study.
Phase II/III, prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of axitinib in patients diagnosed with advanced G1-G2 neuroendocrine tumors (WHO 2010) of nonpancreatic origin that have presented documented disease progression in the 12 months prior to entering the study. In the first part of the study (Phase II), 105 patients were enrolled. The second part of the study is the expansion to Phase III, which is expected to include 148 additional patients. Patients will be randomized to receive Sandostatin LAR with axitinib or Sandostatin LAR with placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Randomization will be stratified by the time from diagnosis to enrollment in the study (more vs less than or equal to 12 months), the origin of the primary tumor (gastrointestinal tract vs non-gastrointestinal tract [lung or other sites]) and ki-67 (\< 5% vs > 5%).
542 studies on the registry are indexed under Neuroendocrine Tumors; 135 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 256 is above the median of 41 across 387 interventional studies indexed under Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Browse Neuroendocrine Tumors studies →Grupo Espanol de Tumores Neuroendocrinos is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Adequate organ function as defined by the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Subjects must be evaluated with regard to the following exclusion criteria:
Gastrointestinal abnormalities, including:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).
Your pathology report is the document that shows this.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.
The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.
The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.
“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.
The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.
It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.
“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.
Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.
Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).
Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.
A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.
Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.
On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.
The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Histologically or cytologically confirmed
The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).
Your pathology report is the document that shows this.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Measurable disease
The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.
The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
RECIST
The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.
“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)
The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.
It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Platelets
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hemoglobin (Hb)
The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Creatinine clearance (CrCl)
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ECOG performance status
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Life expectancy
The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
CTCAE grade
The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.
“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Postmenopausal
Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Clinically significant
Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers
CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.
Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Corticosteroids (steroids)
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Brain metastases
Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).
Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
TIA (transient ischaemic attack)
A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.
Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
QT and QTc
On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.
The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Axitinib 5 mg BID + Sandostatin LAR 30mg/28 days
Drug: Axitinib · Drug: Sandostatin LAR
Placebo BID + Sandostatin LAR 30mg/28 days
Drug: Sandostatin LAR · Drug: Placebo
Orally, 5mg, twice daily, until progression or until unacceptable toxicity, with or without food intake.
Intramuscular, 30mg, single injection every 28 days, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
orally, twice daily, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with or without food intake.
Efficacy of Axitinib in Terms of PFS (Investigator Assessment)
Calculated from the date of random assignment until the date of first progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first. Progression of the disease was assessed by investigators using tumor imaging computed tomography scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 PFS was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Patients alive with no event at data cut off were censored on their last tumor assessment
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (Investigator Assessment)
Measured changes in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions measured in mm according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Assessed by investigators. Patients are categorized depending on the percentage of tumor redution: Complete response (CR): dissapearance of all lesions Partial response (PR): reduction \> 30% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Stable disease (SD): Tumor size betwee 30% reduction and 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Progressive disease (PD): increase \> 20% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions ORR comprise all patients who achieved at least a CR or PR at any timepoint during follow-up.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 months
Biochemical Response (5-OH-indoleacetic Acid and Chromogranin A)
measurable in mL/ 24h and ng/ml respectively, through blood and urine test in patients with baseline elevation of CgA or 5-HIAA levels. This endpoint measures the negativization of these two tumor biomarkers.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 months
Safety and Tolerability of Axitinib (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE], Version 4.0)
All adverse events and serious adverse events will be monitored with regular monitoring of hematology and blood chemistry parameters and regular physical examinations. Adverse events will be evaluated continuously throughout the study. Safety and tolerability will be assessed according to the National Institute of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAE v4)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 months
Efficacy of Axitinib in Terms of PFS (Central Blinded Assessment)
Calculated from the date of random assignment until the date of first progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first. Progression of the disease was assessed by central blinded reviewers using tumor imaging by computed tomography scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 PFS was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Patients alive with no event at data cut off were censored on their last tumor assessment
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (Central Blinded Assessment)
Measured changes in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions measured in mm according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Assessed by central blinded reviewers. Patients are categorized depending on the percentage of tumor redution: Complete response (CR): dissapearance of all lesions Partial response (PR): reduction \> 30% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Stable disease (SD): Tumor size betwee 30% reduction and 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Progressive disease (PD): increase \> 20% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions ORR comprise all patients who achieved at least a CR or PR at any timepoint during follow-up.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to approximately 25 months
Patients enrolled and randomized
| Milestone | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 126 | 130 |
| Completed | 125 | 130 |
| Not completed | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 |
Calculated from the date of random assignment until the date of first progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first. Progression of the disease was assessed by investigators using tumor imaging computed tomography scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 PFS was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Patients alive with no event at data cut off were censored on their last tumor assessment
| months | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy of Axitinib in Terms of PFS (Investigator Assessment) | 17.2 (13.6 to 24.7) | 13.1 (10.9 to 18.6) |
Measured changes in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions measured in mm according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Assessed by investigators. Patients are categorized depending on the percentage of tumor redution: Complete response (CR): dissapearance of all lesions Partial response (PR): reduction \> 30% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Stable disease (SD): Tumor size betwee 30% reduction and 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Progressive disease (PD): increase \> 20% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions ORR comprise all patients who achieved at least a CR or PR at any timepoint during follow-up.
| Participants | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Complete response | 2 | 1 |
| Partial response | 20 | 5 |
| Stable disease | 87 | 96 |
| Progressive disease | 9 | 25 |
| Not evaluable | 8 | 3 |
measurable in mL/ 24h and ng/ml respectively, through blood and urine test in patients with baseline elevation of CgA or 5-HIAA levels. This endpoint measures the negativization of these two tumor biomarkers.
| Participants | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR |
|---|---|---|
| CgA response — Response | 31 | 27 |
| CgA response — No response | 38 | 45 |
| 5-HIAA response — Response | 19 | 16 |
| 5-HIAA response — No response | 29 | 30 |
All adverse events and serious adverse events will be monitored with regular monitoring of hematology and blood chemistry parameters and regular physical examinations. Adverse events will be evaluated continuously throughout the study. Safety and tolerability will be assessed according to the National Institute of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (CTCAE v4)
| Participants | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Any grade AEs — Yes, reported events | 121 | 124 |
| Any grade AEs — No, no events reported | 4 | 6 |
| SAEs — Yes, reported events | 48 | 30 |
| SAEs — No, no events reported | 77 | 100 |
| Toxicities requiring end of treatment — Yes, reported events | 23 | 4 |
| Toxicities requiring end of treatment — No, no events reported | 102 | 126 |
| Toxicities requiring treatment temporary interruption — Yes, reported events | 76 | 55 |
| Toxicities requiring treatment temporary interruption — No, no events reported | 49 | 75 |
| Toxicities requiring dose reductions — Yes, reported events | 44 | 10 |
| Toxicities requiring dose reductions — No, no events reported | 81 | 120 |
Calculated from the date of random assignment until the date of first progressive disease or death, whichever occurs first. Progression of the disease was assessed by central blinded reviewers using tumor imaging by computed tomography scans and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 PFS was analysed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Patients alive with no event at data cut off were censored on their last tumor assessment
| months | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy of Axitinib in Terms of PFS (Central Blinded Assessment) | 16.6 (13.5 to 24.2) | 9.9 (8.2 to 13.9) |
Measured changes in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions measured in mm according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Assessed by central blinded reviewers. Patients are categorized depending on the percentage of tumor redution: Complete response (CR): dissapearance of all lesions Partial response (PR): reduction \> 30% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Stable disease (SD): Tumor size betwee 30% reduction and 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions Progressive disease (PD): increase \> 20% in the sum of longest diameter of target lesions ORR comprise all patients who achieved at least a CR or PR at any timepoint during follow-up.
| Participants | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR |
|---|---|---|
| Complete response | 2 | 0 |
| Partial response | 13 | 4 |
| Stable disease | 98 | 109 |
| Progressive disease | 1 | 12 |
| Not evaluable | 3 | 1 |
Collected over Throughout study period, approximately 5 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | 68/125 (54.4%) | 48/125 (38.4%) | 121/125 (96.8%) |
| Placebo + Sandostatin LAR | 48/130 (36.9%) | 30/130 (23.1%) | 124/130 (95.4%) |
| Event | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR |
|---|---|---|
| PyrexiaGeneral disorders | 0/125 | 4/130 |
| HyperbilirubinaemiaHepatobiliary disorders | 3/125 | 2/130 |
| DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders | 3/125 | 0/130 |
| Intestinal obstructionGastrointestinal disorders | 3/125 | 3/130 |
| COVID-19Infections and infestations | 0/125 | 3/130 |
| Angina pectorisCardiac disorders | 2/125 | 0/130 |
| CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders | 2/125 | 0/130 |
| Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders | 2/125 | 0/130 |
| PyrexiaGeneral disorders | 2/125 | 1/130 |
| Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders | 2/125 | 0/130 |
| Event | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR |
|---|---|---|
| DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders | 81/125 | 52/130 |
| HypertensionVascular disorders | 66/125 | 45/130 |
| AstheniaGeneral disorders | 66/125 | 45/130 |
| Mucosal inflammationGastrointestinal disorders | 37/125 | 17/130 |
| Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 33/125 | 16/130 |
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndromeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 25/125 | 4/130 |
| AphoniaNervous system disorders | 19/125 | 1/130 |
| DysphoniaNervous system disorders | 19/125 | 1/130 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 18/125 | 17/130 |
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 18/125 | 15/130 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 62 (21 to 85) | 60 (26 to 83) | 61 (21 to 85) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 55 | 63 | 118 |
| Male | 71 | 67 | 138 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | — | — | 0 |
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS)(Participants) | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Score 0 | 75 | 88 | 163 |
| Score 1 | 49 | 41 | 90 |
| Score 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unknown | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Tumor grade (WHO)(Participants) | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | 32 | 46 | 78 |
| Grade 2 | 94 | 83 | 177 |
| Unknown | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ki-67(Participants) | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| ki-67 0-2 | 31 | 43 | 74 |
| ki-67 >2-5 | 45 | 39 | 84 |
| ki-67 >5 - 10 | 26 | 27 | 53 |
| ki-67 >10 - 20 | 23 | 19 | 42 |
| Not specified | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Time from initial cancer diagnosis to study entry(Participants) | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 12 months | 54 | 51 | 105 |
| > 12 months | 72 | 79 | 151 |
| Primary tumour location(Participants) | Axitinib + Sandostatin LAR | Placebo + Sandostatin LAR | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lung | 38 | 34 | 72 |
| Gastric | 3 | 4 | 7 |
| Small intestine | 60 | 67 | 127 |
| Colorectal | 13 | 11 | 24 |
| Unknown primary | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| Other locations | 3 | 7 | 10 |
8 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Axitinib
Grupo Espanol de Tumores Neuroendocrinos