CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01701245Updated Apr 25, 2016Results posted

Prevention and Acute Treatment of Chronic Cluster Headache Compared to Standard of Care

A Phase 2 interventional study of GammaCore in Chronic Cluster Headache, sponsored by ElectroCore INC. Completed at 10 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-25.

Sponsored by ElectroCore INC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
97
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Subjects enrolled into this 10 week study will for the first two weeks document the number of cluster headaches and the means of treating (medication) of these attacks. Subjects will then be randomized to into either two groups. The first group is continuing with standard of care and the second group is treatment with the investigational device (GammaCore) for a period of 4 weeks. After this 4 week period, all subjects will treat with the GammaCore for another 4 week period. It is hypothesized the the treatment group will have a reduction in mean cluster headaches per week by 50% compared to the standard of care group.

Read the detailed description

The study is a prospective randomized controlled multi-center investigation designed for comparison of two parallel groups, GammaCore® (active treatment) and Standard of Care, SoC, (control). The study period begins with a 2 week run-in period, followed by a 4 week comparative period when the subjects are randomized to either active treatment or control 1:1. The comparative period will be followed by a period where all subject will receive GammaCore® for 4 weeks.After the subject signed the Consent Form for participation the baseline (visit1) data will be collected. Subject will be informed how to complete the 2 week diary during the run-in period During the run-in period, all subjects will use stable SoC according to their individual prescriptions. The subject will record as CH attack regarding duration and frequency and the use of medication and oxygen.

Once subjects have finalized the run-in period, they are randomized to continue in 4 weeks comparative period. During this period, the control group continues with stable SoC and the active group is provided with a GammaCore® device for prophylactic and acute treatment in addition to the stable SoC Subjects stimulate 3 x 2 times daily as part of the prophylactic treatment regimen (cervical vagal nerve). Three 90 second stimulations are self-administered by the subject with 5 minutes between each stimulation on the right side of the neck.

This preventive stimulation regimen is performed:

  • First Daily Treatment - within 1 hour of waking
  • Second Daily Treatment - 7-10 hours following the first daily treatment

Acute CH attack:

  • 3 x 90 second treatments consecutively at the onset of pain or symptoms. If the attack is not aborted within 15 minutes the subject should be informed to take SOC abortive medication.
  • If an acute cluster headache attack is treated with the GammaCore® device, the subject will try to work within the preventive treatment window to avoid a preventive treatment in the 2-hour refractory period following the acute treatment.

A total of minimally 6 stimulations for the preventive part and as needed for the acute attacks. The active group also continues with the stable SoC during the entire 4 weeks period. Both groups record all CH attacks in the diary together with medication and oxygen use. All adverse events shall also be recorded in the diary.

The end of the 4 week comparative period marks the completion of the randomized part of the study, however all subjects are provided the option to continue to a 4 week GammaCore® treatment with the same stimulation parameter as during the 4 week randomization period. All subjects randomized to the SoC group will receive training.

During the entire study period, subjects are allowed to take rescue medication including oxygen inhalation for abortion of CH attacks. The amount and doses of the medication and oxygen are recorded in the diary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Cluster Headache

Keywords

  • vagus nerve stimulation
  • vagal nerve stimulation
  • nVNS
  • VNS
  • cluster headache
  • chronic
  • non invasive
  • gammacore
03

In context

Cluster Headache

116 studies on the registry are indexed under Cluster Headache; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 97 is above the median of 42 across 86 interventional studies indexed under Cluster Headache.

Browse Cluster Headache studies →

Lead sponsor

ElectroCore INC is the lead sponsor of 19 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Signed Informed Consent Form 2. Subjects between the age of 18-70, both genders 3. Subjects diagnosed with chronic cluster headache for at least 1 year, without remission periods or with remission periods lasting \<1 month, in accordance with the ICHD-II classification criteria (2ndEd):

a. At least 5 attacks fulfilling the following criteria: i. Severe or very severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital and/or temporal pain lasting 15-180 minutes if untreated ii. Headache is accompanied by at least 1 of the following:

  1. Ipsilateral conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation
  2. Ipsilateral nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea
  3. Ipsilateral eyelid oedema
  4. Ipsilateral forehead and facial sweating
  5. Ipsilateral miosis and/or ptosis
  6. A sense of restlessness or agitation iii. Attacks have a frequency from 1 every other day to 8 per day and are not attributed to another disorder iv. Attacks recur over > 1 year without remission periods or with remission periods lasting \< 1 month.
  1. Has minimum mean attack frequency of 4 CH attacks per week. 5. Is able to distinguish CH from other headaches (i.e. tension-type headaches).
  1. Is capable of completing headache pain self-assessments. 7. Agrees to use the GammaCore® device as intended and follow all of the requirements of the study, including follow-up visit requirements.
  1. Is willing to keep all concomitant medication stable during the entire study period.
  1. Women of child-bearing potential must use 2 methods of contraceptive i.e. hormones and condom.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Is currently taking CH prophylactic medication for indications other than CH which in the opinion of the clinician may interfere with the study
  2. Has had a change in type or dosage of prophylactic headache medications \< 1 month prior to enrollment
  3. Has a history of intracranial or carotid aneurysm, intracranial hemorrhage, brain tumors or significant head trauma.
  4. Has a lesion (including lymphadenopathy), dysaesthesia, previous surgery or abnormal anatomy at the GammaCore® treatment site.
  5. Has other significant pain problem that might confound the study assessments in the opinion of the investigator.
  6. Has known or suspected severe atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, severe carotid artery disease (e.g. bruits or history of TIA or CVA), congestive heart failure (CHF), known severe coronary artery disease or recent myocardial infarction (within 5years).
  7. Has had a previous unilateral or bilateral vagotomy.
  8. Has uncontrolled high blood pressure.
  9. Is currently implanted with an electrical and/or neurostimulator device, including but not limited to cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, vagal neurostimulator, deep brain stimulator, spinal stimulator, bone growth stimulator, or cochlear implant.
  10. Has a history of carotid endarterectomy or vascular neck surgery on the right side.
  11. Has been implanted with metal cervical spine hardware or has a metallic implant near the GammaCore® stimulation site.
  12. Has a history, the last 12 month, of syncope.
  13. Has a history, the last 12 month of seizures.
  14. Has a known history or suspicion of substance abuse or addiction, or overuse of acute headache medication for headaches other than CH.
  15. Has psychiatric or cognitive disorder and/or behavioral problems which in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the study
  16. In the opinion of the investigator the subject is incapable of operating the GammaCore® device as intended and performing the data collection procedures.
  17. Is participating in any other therapeutic clinical investigation or has participated in a clinical trial in the preceding 30 days.
  18. Woman who are pregnant or lactating.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
97 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    No intervention, standard of care

  • Active comparator
    GammaCore

    Three stimulation treatments 2x/day 7 to 10 hours apart from one another. In addition, three stimulation treatments at the time of onset of symptoms of a headache attack.

    Device: GammaCore

Interventions

  • DeviceGammaCore

    vagal stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. A Change in the Frequency of Cluster Headache Attacks Per Week

    The primary endpoint is the reduction in mean number of CH attacks per week. The number of CH attacks will be calculated as the sum of all attacks over the days in the run-in period and divided by the number of weeks, respectively for the last 14 days of treatment during the randomised phase. The reduction will then be the number of CH attacks during treatment period (last 14 days of the randomized treatment period) - number of CH attacks during run-in.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Relief of Headache Attacks

    The median pain during baseline (2 weeks) will be compared with the last 14 days of the treatment period Scale 0-4 0= no pain 1. mild pain 2. moderate pain 3. severe pain 4. very severe pain

    Time frame: baseline (2 weeks) and random period(last 2 weeks)

  2. Adverse Events

    The frequency of device effects will be compared between the two treatment groups. Only effects which are new after baseline or have increased severity after baseline will be used in the comparison.

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  3. EQ-5D-3L (EuroQoL 5 Questions and 3 Answering Levels) and a VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)

    The EQ-5D-3L (EuroQoL 5 questions and 3 answering levels) during the run-in period will be compared with the EQ-5D-3L during the treatment period. And treatment period will be compared to open label. Rating of questions Level 1 no problems Level 2 some problems Level 3 Significant problems Worst case is 15 points and best case is 5 points using index Visual analogue scale VAS 0-100 where 0 is the worst imaginable health state and 100 the best imaginable health state

    Time frame: 10 weeks (baseline 2 weeks, random 4 weeks and open label 4 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Apr 25, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard of CareGammaCore
Started4948
Fas unmatched data4845
Fas matched data4232
Completed3733
Not completed1215
Withdrew: Protocol violation13
Withdrew: Did not complete the open label period1112

Outcome measures

PrimaryA Change in the Frequency of Cluster Headache Attacks Per Week

The primary endpoint is the reduction in mean number of CH attacks per week. The number of CH attacks will be calculated as the sum of all attacks over the days in the run-in period and divided by the number of weeks, respectively for the last 14 days of treatment during the randomised phase. The reduction will then be the number of CH attacks during treatment period (last 14 days of the randomized treatment period) - number of CH attacks during run-in.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · CH attacks per week
A Change in the Frequency of Cluster Headache Attacks Per Week
CH attacks per weekStandard of CareGammaCore
A Change in the Frequency of Cluster Headache Attacks Per Week-2.0 ± 7.6-7.6 ± 6.4
SecondaryPain Relief of Headache Attacks

The median pain during baseline (2 weeks) will be compared with the last 14 days of the treatment period Scale 0-4 0= no pain 1. mild pain 2. moderate pain 3. severe pain 4. very severe pain

Time frame:
baseline (2 weeks) and random period(last 2 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Pain Relief of Headache Attacks
participantsStandard of CareGammaCore
Mild baseline21
Mild random31
Moderate baseline168
Moderate random1511
Severe baseline1615
Severe random1612
Very severe baseline88
Very severe random88
SecondaryAdverse Events

The frequency of device effects will be compared between the two treatment groups. Only effects which are new after baseline or have increased severity after baseline will be used in the comparison.

Time frame:
10 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Adverse Events
participantsStandard of CareGammaCore
Mild69
Moderate21
Severe01
SecondaryEQ-5D-3L (EuroQoL 5 Questions and 3 Answering Levels) and a VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)

The EQ-5D-3L (EuroQoL 5 questions and 3 answering levels) during the run-in period will be compared with the EQ-5D-3L during the treatment period. And treatment period will be compared to open label. Rating of questions Level 1 no problems Level 2 some problems Level 3 Significant problems Worst case is 15 points and best case is 5 points using index Visual analogue scale VAS 0-100 where 0 is the worst imaginable health state and 100 the best imaginable health state

Time frame:
10 weeks (baseline 2 weeks, random 4 weeks and open label 4 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
EQ-5D-3L (EuroQoL 5 Questions and 3 Answering Levels) and a VAS (Visual Analogue Scale)
units on a scaleStandard of CareGammaCore
Baseline vs. Randomized period-0.049 (-0.837 to 0.856)0.145 (-0.532 to 0.807)
Randomized period vs. Open label perios0.078 (-0.601 to 1.01)0.155 (-0.568 to 1.01)
VAS Baseline vs. Randomized period0.27 (-81.0 to 40.0)9.20 (-20.0 to 40.0)
VAS Randomized period vs. Open label4.36 (-50.0 to 48.0)10.79 (-26.0 to 55.0)

Adverse events

Collected over 18 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard of Care—2/49 (4.1%)3/49 (6.1%)
GammaCore—2/48 (4.2%)3/48 (6.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventStandard of CareGammaCore
CholecystitisHepatobiliary disorders0/491/48
Scrotal HaematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/491/48
Genital herpes simplexInfections and infestations1/490/48
Cluster headacheNervous system disorders1/490/48
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventStandard of CareGammaCore
DizzinessNervous system disorders3/493/48

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Standard of CareGammaCoreTotal
Mean42.3 ± 11.045.4 ± 11.043.8 ± 11.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard of CareGammaCoreTotal
Female161430
Male333467
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Standard of CareGammaCoreTotal
Belgium549
Germany282957
United Kingdom131124
Italy347
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • University Department of Neurology CHR
    Liège, B-4000, Belgium
  • Westdeutsches Kopfschmerzzentrum
    Hufelandstr. 26, Essen D-45147, Germany
  • Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik
    Berlin, D-10117, Germany
  • Krankenhaus Lindenbrunn, Department of Neurology
    Coppenbrügge, D-31863, Germany
  • Migräne- und Kopfschmerzklinik Königstein
    Königstein im Taunus, D-61462, Germany
  • Department of Neurology, University of Munich
    Munich, D-813 77, Germany
  • Regional Referral Headache Centre Sant' Andrea Hospital
    Rome, IT-00189, Italy
  • The Southern Hospital, Neurology Department
    Glasgow, Scotland G51 4TF, United Kingdom
  • Hull Royal Infirmary, Neurology Department
    Hull, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
  • The Walton Centre, Neurology Department
    Liverpool, L9 7LJ, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Morris J, Straube A, Diener HC, Ahmed F, Silver N, Walker S, Liebler E, Gaul C. Cost-effectiveness analysis of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic cluster headache. J Headache Pain. 2016;17:43. doi: 10.1186/s10194-016-0633-x. Epub 2016 Apr 22. PubMed 27102120 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Not planned to share individual data

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 25, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01701245
Lead sponsor
ElectroCore INC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 5, 2012
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Mar 2014
Completion
Oct 2014
Results posted
Apr 25, 2016
Last update
Apr 25, 2016

Study contacts

Charly Gaul, Dr med
principal investigator · Migräne- und Kopfschmerzklinik Königstein

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion