CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01686373tDCSUpdated Aug 20, 2019Results posted

Brain Stimulation and Aphasia Treatment

A Phase 2 interventional study of Activa Dose II Real tDCS and Activa Dose II Sham tDCS in Aphasia, sponsored by University of South Carolina. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-20.

Sponsored by University of South Carolina · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
74
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the changes in language processing of patients with chronic, post-stroke aphasia following the application of brain stimulation. The brain stimulation the investigators administer is called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). It involves passing a weak electrical current through the brain between two electrodes in the form of damp sponges. One sponge will be placed over a specified area on the damaged left hemisphere, while the other sponge will be placed on the right scalp. Computer-controlled speech-language treatment will be administered during the application of tDCS.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is the leading cause of adult disability in the United States. Approximately one-third of all strokes result in acute language impairment (aphasia), with approximately one-fifth suffering from chronic aphasia. Unfortunately, the prognosis for moderate to severe chronic aphasia remains grim, as current behavioral treatment approaches usually offer only limited-to-modest benefit. Recent advancements in understanding the relationship between low current electrical brain stimulation and cortical plasticity suggest that the effect of behavioral aphasia treatment could possibly be enhanced using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (A-tDCS). Indeed, we have shown how A-tDCS can significantly boost the effect of behavioral aphasia treatment. Based on these results as well as our other studies aimed at understanding how favorable brain plasticity correlates with positive treatment outcome in aphasia, we propose to conduct a Phase II clinical trial utilizing a futility design. Consistent with the goals of Program Announcement PAR-08-204 by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), we plan to "evaluate whether there is sufficient evidence of short term improvement in humans to justify a phase III trial."

02

Conditions studied

  • Aphasia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Aphasia
  • Brain
  • Stimulation
  • Communication
  • Stoke
  • Post
  • Phase II Clinical Trial
  • Treatment
  • tDCS
  • Fridriksson
03

In context

Aphasia

365 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphasia; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 74 is above the median of 30 across 316 interventional studies indexed under Aphasia.

Browse Aphasia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients must be willing and able to give informed consent.
  2. Patients must be willing and able to comply with study requirements.
  3. Patients must be between 25- and 80-years of age.
  4. Patients must be native English speakers.
  5. Patients must be pre-morbidly right-handed.
  6. Patients must have sustained a one-time ischemic stroke in the left-hemisphere.
  7. Patients must be greater than 6-months post-stroke.
  8. Patients must have an aphasia diagnosis as confirmed by the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised.
  9. Patients must be MRI-compatible (e.g., no metal implants, not claustrophobic, etc.).
  10. Patients must achieve at least 65% accuracy on naming task during screening -

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of brain surgery
  2. Seizures during the previous 12 months
  3. Sensitive scalp (per patient report)
  4. Able to overtly name more than an average of 140 out of 175 items during the pre-treatment picture naming test (Philadelphia Naming Test) during Visits 2 or 3.
  5. Unable to overtly name at least an average of 5 out of 80 items during the pre-treatment functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions during Visits 2 or 3.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
74 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Activa Dose II Real tDCS

    Actual delivery of electrical stimulation

    Device: Activa Dose II Real tDCS

  • Placebo comparator
    Activa Dose II Sham tDCS

    Sham delivery of electrical stimulation

    Device: Activa Dose II Sham tDCS

Interventions

  • DeviceActiva Dose II Real tDCS

    20 minutes of 1 milliamp active tDCS per treatment day (15 total sessions)

  • DeviceActiva Dose II Sham tDCS

    20 minutes of sham stimulation per treatment day (15 total sessions)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) Plus the Naming 80 (a Portion of the Trained Items).

    The PNT includes 175 items and has a minimum score of 0 (zero items named correctly) and a maximum score of 175 (all items named correctly). The Naming 80 includes a portion of the trained treatment items (N=80) with a minimum score of 0 (zero items named correctly) and a maximum score of 80 (all items named correctly). For both scales, higher values represent better outcome. The average of two administrations of the PNT were added to the the average of two administrations of the Naming 80 for both time points. The outcome measure is the change in that value (averaged PNT + averaged Naming 80) from baseline to immediately post-treatment. Only two timepoints are used for this calculation: baseline and immediately post-treatment.

    Time frame: Immediately post-treatment

07

Results

Posted Aug 20, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActiva Dose II Real tDCSActiva Dose II Sham tDCS
Started3440
Received 15 treatment sessions3339
Completed3138
Not completed32
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up30
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01
Withdrew: Adverse event01

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) Plus the Naming 80 (a Portion of the Trained Items).

The PNT includes 175 items and has a minimum score of 0 (zero items named correctly) and a maximum score of 175 (all items named correctly). The Naming 80 includes a portion of the trained treatment items (N=80) with a minimum score of 0 (zero items named correctly) and a maximum score of 80 (all items named correctly). For both scales, higher values represent better outcome. The average of two administrations of the PNT were added to the the average of two administrations of the Naming 80 for both time points. The outcome measure is the change in that value (averaged PNT + averaged Naming 80) from baseline to immediately post-treatment. Only two timepoints are used for this calculation: baseline and immediately post-treatment.

Time frame:
Immediately post-treatment
Reported as:
Mean · PNT and Naming 80 score
The Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) Plus the Naming 80 (a Portion of the Trained Items).
PNT and Naming 80 scoreActiva Dose II Real tDCSActiva Dose II Sham tDCS
The Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) Plus the Naming 80 (a Portion of the Trained Items).13.9 (9.0 to 18.7)8.2 (3.8 to 12.6)

Adverse events

Collected over Non-serious adverse events were collected until immediate post treatment testing sessions (2 weeks), and serious adverse events were collected until end of study (24 weeks).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Activa Dose II Real tDCS0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)3/34 (8.8%)
Activa Dose II Sham tDCS0/40 (0%)1/40 (2.5%)3/40 (7.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventActiva Dose II Real tDCSActiva Dose II Sham tDCS
ConvulsionNervous system disorders0/341/40
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventActiva Dose II Real tDCSActiva Dose II Sham tDCS
ErythemaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/340/40
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/342/40
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/341/40
HypertensionVascular disorders0/341/40

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Activa Dose II Real tDCSActiva Dose II Sham tDCSTotal
Mean60 ± 1160 ± 1060 ± 10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Activa Dose II Real tDCSActiva Dose II Sham tDCSTotal
Female101222
Male242852
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Activa Dose II Real tDCSActiva Dose II Sham tDCSTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native112
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American6410
White273562
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Activa Dose II Real tDCSActiva Dose II Sham tDCSTotal
United States344074
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • University of South Carolina (USC)
    Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fridriksson J, Rorden C, Elm J, Sen S, George MS, Bonilha L. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Dec 1;75(12):1470-1476. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2287. PubMed 30128538 ↗

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Aug 29, 2012
  • Study protocol · Dec 20, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01686373
Lead sponsor
University of South Carolina
Collaborators
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), Medical University of South Carolina
Responsible party
Julius Fridriksson (Professor, University of South Carolina) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2012
Start date
Apr 2012
Primary completion
May 2017
Completion
Oct 2017
Results posted
Aug 20, 2019
Last update
Aug 20, 2019

Study contacts

Julius Fridriksson, PhD
principal investigator · Director

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion