CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01669304Updated Aug 24, 2015

Verapamil vs. Sertraline for Vestibular Migraine & Chronic Subjective Dizziness

A Phase 1 interventional study of Verapamil and Sertraline in Vestibular Migraine and Chronic Subjective Dizziness, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-24.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 1, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Vestibular migraine (VM) and chronic subjective dizziness (CSD) commonly cause vertigo, unsteadiness and dizziness. Clinical investigators are studying these illnesses to understand them better. VM and CSD occur together in about 1/3 of patients. That makes it hard to diagnose them accurately and decide what treatments to use. As a result, doctors and patients may be confused about these diagnoses. The goal of this study was use two different medications to tease apart the symptoms of VM and CSD.

Patients who have VM and CSD together were given either verapamil or sertraline for 12 weeks. These medications are used to treat VM and CSD, though they are not approved for this purpose. Verapamil is believed to have stronger effects on symptoms of VM. Sertraline is believed to have stronger effects on symptoms of CSD. By comparing the responses of patients to these two medications, the researchers hoped to learn more about the key features of VM and CSD.

Read the detailed description

Chronic dizziness and recurrent vertigo are frequent complaints in primary and specialty medical care settings. Two common causes of these symptoms are vestibular migraine (VM) and chronic subjective dizziness (CSD), which may be seen in up to 25% of patients examined in tertiary neurotology centers. However, VM and CSD are relatively new diagnoses that have not yet been validated. Furthermore, recent research found that they co-exist 30% of the time with overlap in several features. From a clinical standpoint, this makes it difficult to diagnose and treat them well. From a research standpoint, it confounds subject selection for mechanistic investigations.

The primary goal of this study was to dissect VM and CSD in order to identify the key features and clarify the diagnostic criteria of each condition. Subjects diagnosed with coexisting VM-CSD were treated with either verapamil or sertraline. It was hypothesized that a differential treatment response to these two pharmacologic probes would help to tease apart the unique clinical features of VM and CSD and identify risk factors that are shared or separate between the two conditions. It was hoped that the different mechanisms of action of the two study medications might also shed light on the physiologic underpinnings of VM and CSD.

This project was a 14-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, pharmacologic dissection (PD) trial. A 12-week treatment period followed 2 weeks of baseline observation. Patients charted daily headache and vestibular symptoms. VM and CSD symptoms and potential confounds such as anxiety and depression were measured at two week intervals. Data were analyzed for differential and shared treatment effects that align with or oppose current concepts of VM and CSD.

A PD trial uses response to one or more pharmaceutical probes (drugs) to study physiologic mechanisms of illness. A PD trial may provide data to separate overlapping manifestations of comorbid illnesses. This is useful for conditions that lack biomarkers. It also may provide data to identify characteristics of illnesses (symptoms, signs, cellular processes) that are associated with specific pharmacologic mechanisms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vestibular Migraine
  • Chronic Subjective Dizziness

Keywords

  • migraine variant
  • chronic dizziness
  • pharmacologic dissection
03

In context

Vertigo

248 studies on the registry are indexed under Vertigo; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 57 across 186 interventional studies indexed under Vertigo.

Browse Vertigo studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Neurotologic diagnoses of both vestibular migraine and chronic subjective dizziness
  2. All other co-existing medical or psychiatric conditions are stable, and no greater than moderate severity
  3. Able to complete study assessments in person and by phone
  4. Able to travel to Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota for first and last study visits
  5. Willing to avoid pregnancy during study (abstinence or acceptable birth control)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Presence of any other active neurotologic diagnoses
  2. Medical or psychiatric conditions that would preclude or confound study drugs
  3. Use of medications or supplements that would preclude or confound study drugs
  4. Past treatment of headache or dizziness with a full trial of a calcium channel blocker or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
  5. Allergy to verapamil or sertraline
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Verapamil

    Verapamil extended release oral tablets administered in a flexible dose format ranging from 120 mg to 360 mg daily, as determined by severity of headache and dizziness.

    Drug: Verapamil

  • Experimental
    Sertraline

    Sertraline oral tablets administered in a flexible dose format ranging from 25 mg to 150 mg daily depending on severity of headache and dizziness.

    Drug: Sertraline

Interventions

  • DrugVerapamil

    Also known as: Calan SR, Covera-HS, Isoptin SR, Verelan PM

  • DrugSertraline

    Also known as: Zoloft

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 2-week Average Rating of Severity of Headache from the Daily Symptom Diaries

    Daily ratings of headache will be evaluated at 2 week intervals for 12 weeks.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

  2. 2-week Average Rating of Severity of Dizziness/Unsteadiness from the Daily Symptom Diaries

    Daily ratings of dizziness/unsteadiness will be evaluated at 2 week intervals for 12 weeks.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

  3. 2-week Average Rating of Sensitivity to Motion of Self from the Daily Symptom Diaries

    Daily ratings of sensitivity to motion of self will be evaluated at 2 week intervals for 12 weeks.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

  4. 2-week Average Rating of Sensitivity to Motion in the Environment from the Daily Symptom Diaries

    Daily ratings of sensitivity to motion in the environment will be evaluated at 2 week intervals for 12 weeks.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

  5. 2-week Average Rating of Difficulty of Performing Precision Visual Tasks from the Daily Symptom Diaries

    Daily ratings of difficulty of performing precision visual tasks will be evaluated at 2 week intervals for 12 weeks.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Number of Acute Attacks Per Two Week Period

    Acute attacks will be assessed every 2 weeks for 12 weeks.

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

  2. Mean Score of Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)

    Dizziness related handicap will be assessed every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) consists of 25 questions, with a total possible score ranging from 0 (no dizziness) to 50 (severe dizziness).

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

  3. Mean Score of Migraine-Specific Quality of Life (MSQ)

    Quality of life related to headache will be assessed at 4 week intervals for 12 weeks. The Migraine-Specific Quality of Life 2.1 (MSQ) consists of 14 items, with a total possible score ranging from 14 (affected none of the time) to 84 (affected all of the time).

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

Other outcomes

  1. Mean score for Dizziness on the Sheehan Disability Scale/Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (SDS-MIDAS)

    Dizziness symptoms will be assessed at 2 week intervals for 12 weeks. The Sheehan Disability Scale/Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (SDS-MIDAS) consists of 5 questions, with a total possible score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 72 (extremely disruptive).

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

  2. Mean score for Headache on the Sheehan Disability Scale/Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (SDS-MIDAS)

    Headache symptoms will be assessed at 2 week intervals for 12 weeks. The Sheehan Disability Scale/Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (SDS-MIDAS) consists of 5 questions, with a total possible score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 72 (extremely disruptive).

    Time frame: Week 0 to Week 12

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Staab JP, Ruckenstein MJ. Expanding the differential diagnosis of chronic dizziness. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):170-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.2.170. PubMed 17309987 ↗
  • Ruckenstein MJ, Staab JP. Chronic subjective dizziness. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009 Feb;42(1):71-7, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2008.09.011. PubMed 19134491 ↗
  • Eggers SD, Staab JP, Neff BA, Goulson AM, Carlson ML, Shepard NT. Investigation of the coherence of definite and probable vestibular migraine as distinct clinical entities. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Sep;32(7):1144-51. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822a1c67. PubMed 21799457 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01669304
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Jeffrey P. Staab (Associate Professor, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2012
Start date
Aug 2012
Primary completion
Oct 2014
Completion
Oct 2014
Last update
Aug 24, 2015

Study contacts

Jeffrey Staab, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion