CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01659112Updated Oct 17, 2012

Effects of Core Stabilization Approach on Patients With Upper Extremity Injuries

An interventional study of Core Stabilization and Traditional upper extremity rehabilitation in Upper Extremity Injuries, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-10-17.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the effects of the addition of core stabilization exercises to a traditional upper extremity rehabilitation program in upper extremity injuries.

Read the detailed description

Abnormal movement patterns are one of the most challenging problems during rehabilitation of the patients with upper extremity injuries. They usually decrease the functional status of the upper extremity and prevent isolated muscle activations. Dysfunction of the kinetic chain system plays an important role in the development of these movement patterns. Thus, multi-segmental rehabilitation strategies has recently gained considerable importance in upper extremity rehabilitation. Core stabilization is one of the most popular rehabilitation approaches preferred to enhance functional stability of the kinetic chain system and dynamic postural alignment during activities. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of core stabilization approach on functional status of the upper extremity and the amount of abnormal movement patterns. In addition, the factors affecting the abnormal movement patterns will be determined.

02

Conditions studied

  • Upper Extremity Injuries

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • core stabilization, upper extremity, kinetic chain, movement
03

In context

Arm Injuries

65 studies on the registry are indexed under Arm Injuries; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 55 across 46 interventional studies indexed under Arm Injuries.

Browse Arm Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 983 studies on the registry; 212 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Traumatic distal segment injuries (elbow and wrist)
  • Patients in their subacute stage.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple joint problems
  • Bilateral extremity problems
  • Reflex sympathetic dystrophy
  • Trunk and lower extremity problems
  • Non-union fractures
  • Malignant ans systemic diseases
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stabilization Group

    A core stabilization plus traditional upper extremity rehabilitation approach was performed.

    Other: Core Stabilization · Other: Traditional upper extremity rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    A traditional upper extremity rehabilitation-only approach was performed.

    Other: Traditional upper extremity rehabilitation

Interventions

  • OtherCore Stabilization

    A 6-week (3 days a week) exercise intervention including progressive core exercises was performed.

  • OtherTraditional upper extremity rehabilitation

    A 6-week (3 days a week) exercise intervention of the injured joint based on the recovery process was performed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Upper extremity functional status

    Pain Range of motion Endurance Fatigue severity DASH

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measurement of abnormal movement patterns

    Video analysis during two daily living activities (hand to mouth and opening doorknob) was recorded for both injured and uninjured extremity before and after the intervention.

    Time frame: 1 hour

Other outcomes

  1. Trunk muscle strength

    Time frame: 5 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
    Ankara, 06100, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ayhan C, Unal E, Yakut Y. Core stabilisation reduces compensatory movement patterns in patients with injury to the arm: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Jan;28(1):36-47. doi: 10.1177/0269215513492443. Epub 2013 Jul 3. PubMed 23823711 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 17, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01659112
Lead sponsor
Hacettepe University
Responsible party
Cigdem Ayhan (Lecturer, Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 7, 2012
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
Sep 2008
Completion
Mar 2010
Last update
Oct 17, 2012

Study contacts

Edibe Ünal, PhD, Prof
study director · Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion