CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01643850Updated Jan 5, 2021Results posted

MCS110 in Patients With Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS)

A Phase 2 interventional study of MCS110 and Placebo in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis, PVNS and Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 8 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-05.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study, designed as a proof of concept study of MCS110 in pigmented villonodular synovitis, assessed the clinical response to MCS110 treatment in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) patients, after a single or multiple intravenous doses of MCS110, using magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor volume, and evaluated the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability in this population.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
  • PVNS
  • Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath
  • GCCTS
  • Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor Localized or Diffused Type
  • GCTS

Keywords

  • Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis
  • PVNS
  • Giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath
  • GCCTS
  • Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (localized or diffused type)
  • GCTS
  • MCS110
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and Females aged ≥ 18 years (≥ 12 years in PART C) with PVNS or GCTTS with, at least, one measurable site of disease on MRI.
  • Patients expected to get surgery (PART A of study only).
  • Vital signs within the ranges: systolic blood pressure 80-150 mmHg , diastolic blood pressure 50-100 mmHg, pulse rate 40-100 bpm, oral body temperature 35.0-37.5°C.
  • Patients with normal level of serum ionized calcium and phosphate.
  • Women of child-bearing potential must use highly effective contraception during the study and for 84 days after the study drug infusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with major surgery less than 3 months prior to start study drug or who have still side effects of such therapy.
  • Presence of systemic illness precluding definitive surgery or increasing the risk to patients due to potential immunosuppression.
  • Use previously of intra-articular treatment within 4 weeks prior dosing.
  • Patients with dermal change indicative of lymphedema or phlebolymphedema. disease.
  • Patients with elevated troponin T and/or CK levels (> 1.5 x ULN for the laboratory) or with history of myositis, rhabdomyolysis or other myopathic disease.
  • Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment as well as corticosteroids which cannot be discontinued at least 4 weeks before dosing.
  • Patients engaged in a resistance exercise training program.
  • Patients with pacemakers or any metallic objects as exclusion for MRI
  • Patients with concomitant disease know to get influence on bone metabolism
  • Patients who have history of drug or alcohol abuse within 12 months prior study dosing.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MCS110

    Participants will receive a single dose of 10mg/kg on day 1 administered by regular infusion.

    Drug: MCS110

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Part A: single-dose placebo to match MCS110 (10 mg/kg, 1 h i.v. infusion) Part B: single dose placebo to match MCS110 (10 mg/kg, 1 h i.v. infusion administered i.v. at Day 1, followed by 6 doses of placebo to match MCS110 (10 mg/kg)

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    MCS110 3 mg/kg

    Part C: MCS110 3 mg/kg (i.v. infusion)

    Drug: MCS110

  • Experimental
    MCS110 5 mg/kg

    Part C: MCS110 5 mg/kg (i.v. infusion)

    Drug: MCS110

  • Experimental
    MCS110 10 mg/kg

    Part C: MCS110 10 mg/kg (i.v. infusion)

    Drug: MCS110

  • Experimental
    MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg

    Part C: MCS110 3 mg/kg (i.v. infusion) \& MCS110 10 mg/kg (i.v. infusion)

    Drug: MCS110

  • Experimental
    MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg

    Part C: MCS110 5 mg/kg (i.v. infusion) \& MCS110 10 mg/kg (i.v. infusion)

    Drug: MCS110

Interventions

  • DrugMCS110

    Patients will receive up to 6 doses of MCS110 (3 or 5 or 10mg/kg) administered intravenously once every 4 weeks. Before each dosing, safety will be assessed.

    Also known as: Intravenous infusion of MCS110.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Participants will receive a single dose of NaCl on day 1 through intravenous infusion.

    Also known as: Intravenous infusion of placebo.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor Size

    To assess the efficacy of a single i.v. dose of MCS110 in changing the size of PVNS tumors (as compared to baseline) compared to placebo over 4 weeks evaluated by volume of PVNS tumors by 3-dimensional MRI. This analysis includes all data from patients 4 weeks after receiving the first dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo and assesses the tumor volume changes at week 4 as compared to baseline. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".

    Time frame: Week 4

  2. Percent Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor Size

    To assess the efficacy of a single i.v. dose of MCS110 in percent change of the PVNS tumor volume at week 4 as compared to baseline and compared to placebo evaluated by volume of PVNS tumors by 3-dimensional MRI. This analysis includes all data from patients who received at least a single dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo and assesses the tumor volume changes at week 4 as compared to baseline. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".

    Time frame: Week 4

  3. Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor Size

    Assessment of maximum efficacy (multiple i.v.monthly doses (2 to 6) of 3, 5 or 10 mg/kg MCS110 or 3 \& 10 mg/kg or 5 \& 10 mg/kg in changing PVNS tumor volume (as compared to baseline) up to 8 weeks post last dose evaluated by MRI. Analysis included data starting from 1st dose of MCS110 in all treatment groups of Parts B and C. Part B patients who received placebo as 1st dose, measurement prior to receiving first dose of MCS110, was used as baseline and assessment time-points were adjusted accordingly. For Part C, participants starting treatment with low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. Analysis includes data from patients who received at least 2 doses. The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\]

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks post last dose

  4. Percentage Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor Size

    To assess the maximum efficacy of multiple monthly i.v. doses (2 to 6) of 3, 5 or 10 mg/kg MCS110 or 3 and 10 mg/kg or 5 and 10 mg/kg by percent change in the PVNS tumor volume (as compared to baseline) up to 8 weeks post last dose evaluated by MRI. Subjects starting treatment with a low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and the tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. This analysis includes data from all participants who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\].

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks post last dose

  5. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Overall incidence of Adverse Events

    Time frame: Approximately 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pharmacokinetics of MCS110 Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC)

    Pharmacokinetic for a single dose of MCS110 for serum concentration -time curve (AUC).

    Time frame: Day 1 (0 - 5 hr), Day 29, Day 85, Day 112, PART B (Day 1: (0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0 - 5 hr) PART C (Day 1: 0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0-5 hr)

  2. Pharmacokinetics of MCS110 Maximum Concentration (Cmax)

    Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for maximum serum concentration (Cmax)

    Time frame: Day 1 (0 - 5 hr), Day 29, Day 85, Day 112, PART B (Day 1: (0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0 - 5 hr) PART C (Day 1: 0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0-5 hr)

  3. Pharmacokinetics of MCS110 Total Maximum Concentration (Tmax)

    Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for time to maximum concentration (Tmax)

    Time frame: Day 1 (0 - 5 hr), Day 29, Day 85, Day 112, PART B (Day 1: (0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0 - 5 hr) PART C (Day 1: 0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0-5 hr)

  4. Change in Macrophage-colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF) Plasma Concentrations Over Time

    Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for evaluation of macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) plasma concentrations over time

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 85, Day 169

  5. Change in Serum C-terminal Type 1 Collagen Peptide Concentrations (CTX-I).

    Pharmacodynamic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 by measuring C-terminal telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen peptide (CTX-I), a biomarker of bone resorption. Data measured in participants from three arms: participants from Part A, B and C who received a single dose of 10 mg/kg and had assessment at week 4 (Part ABC4); participants from Part A and B who received placebo ; and participants from Part B and C who received multiple monthly doses of MCS110 (10 mg/kg.) Serum CTX-I data were generated in Part A and Part B. In Part C, samples were collected for serum bone CTX-I analysis. The analysis was not performed, as enough information on compound mode of action was obtained using creatine kinase (CK) and monocytes (hematology) data. Only data from 10mg/kg (single and multiple doses) are available.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 24, Week 104

  6. Number of Participants With Negative Anti-MCS110 Antibody

    To assess the immunogenicity of MCS110 in serum anti-MCS110 antibody concentrations

    Time frame: Baseline, throughout the study up to Day 505

  7. Assessment of Change From Baseline in Joint Range of Motion for Knee Extension and Flexion

    To assess the clinical response of joint range of motion following a single i.v. dose of MCS110 or placebo as compared to baseline 4 weeks post-dose evaluated in participants, who had a knee tumor, which was the majority of participants (75%). The analysis includes all data from patients 4 weeks after receiving the first dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".

    Time frame: Week 4

  8. Assessment of Change From Baseline in Joint Range of Motion for Knee Extension and Flexion

    To assess the clinical response of joint range of motion following multiple dose treatment with MCS110 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg evaluated in participants with knee tumor, which was the majority of participants (75%). The data presented are changes from baseline in degree. Participants, who started treatment with a low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and the tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. This analysis includes data from participants with knee tumor who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\].

    Time frame: Week 24/28, Week 104

  9. Change From Baseline in Joint Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Measurement of the participant's pain with a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) following treatment with MCS110 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg evaluated. Data presented are changes from baseline in degree. Participants were asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented her/his pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score was determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the participants mark, providing a score from 0-100. Analysis includes data from participants with knee tumor who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\].

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40, Week 48, Week 104

  10. Time to Relapse

    Time to relapse describes the time frame from baseline when the tumor volume increases again after the treatment with MCS110. To be considered a relapse tumor volume had to increase greater than 50% of the difference between tumor volume at baseline and the lowest tumor volume measured by MRI. In this assessment the Part B and Part C patients were analyzed separately. N/A (not available):Data analysis not performed as sample size was not analyzable as no patient had surgery/relapse.

    Time frame: Up to Week 104

  11. Time to Surgery

    Time to surgery describes the time frame from baseline to the time point when participants had surgical removement of PVNS tumor. This could be either residual tumor after the tumor volume was reduced or surgery due to relapse. In this assessment the Part B and Part C patients were analyzed separately. Not Available (NA): Data analysis not performed as sample size was not analyzable as no patient had surgery.

    Time frame: Up to Week 104

  12. Average of Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Score for mHAQ

    The mHAQ assesses 20 activities in 8 categories related to daily life, which are rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The mHAQ is calculated as the average of the single scores with the following scoring: without difficulty =0; with some difficulty =1; with much difficulty =2; unable to do =3. Total score is between 0 - 3.0. Values \<0.3 are considered normal. Data presented include only participants, who received multiple doses of MCS110.

    Time frame: up to 104 weeks

  13. Number of CD14+ Monocytes and Number of CD14 + Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes

    Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of CD14+ monocytes (using FACS) and CD14+ CD16+ monocytes. Based on preliminary analysis, the quality of the samples did not allow meaningful conclusions to be drawn. Thus, in Part B, the monocyte sample collection was discontinued.

    Time frame: Baseline Up to Week 104

  14. Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life (QOL), pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)

  15. Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Knee Related Quality of Life in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)

  16. Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Pain and Discomfort in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)

  17. Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Sport/Recreation in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)

  18. Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Symptoms in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)

  19. Change From Baseline Per Treatment Using EuroQol-5 Dimensional (EQ-5D VAS)Visual Analog Scale Quality of Life Questionnaire

    The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status. The EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS)has a range from 0-100: worst possible to perfect health. Data show the absolute change from baseline of EQ5D VAS and at the different visits for participants, who received multiple doses of MCS110. (PART B and PART C).

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 24, up to 104 weeks

06

Results

Posted Feb 27, 2020

Participant flow

Thirty-seven subjects diagnosed with PVNS or GCTTS were evaluated as part of this study. In all, 36 subjects were treated in three parts (Parts A, B and C) of the study, 30 of whom completed the study. At this final analysis, 6 treated subjects had discontinued from the study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)Placebo (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10mg/kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)
Started528333444
Completed527303343
Not completed001030101
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject000010000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up000000101
Withdrew: Adverse event000010000
Withdrew: Administrative problems001010000

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor Size

To assess the efficacy of a single i.v. dose of MCS110 in changing the size of PVNS tumors (as compared to baseline) compared to placebo over 4 weeks evaluated by volume of PVNS tumors by 3-dimensional MRI. This analysis includes all data from patients 4 weeks after receiving the first dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo and assesses the tumor volume changes at week 4 as compared to baseline. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · mm3
Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor Size
mm3Placebo (PART ABC4)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART ABC4)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART ABC4)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART ABC4)
Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor Size-4222.8 ± 6284.56-668.5 ± 18751.44-9998.4 ± 15628.40-38002.1 ± 57314.73
PrimaryPercent Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor Size

To assess the efficacy of a single i.v. dose of MCS110 in percent change of the PVNS tumor volume at week 4 as compared to baseline and compared to placebo evaluated by volume of PVNS tumors by 3-dimensional MRI. This analysis includes all data from patients who received at least a single dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo and assesses the tumor volume changes at week 4 as compared to baseline. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage
Percent Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor Size
PercentagePlacebo (PART ABC4)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART ABC4)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART ABC4)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART ABC4)
Percent Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) Tumor Size-7.7 ± 5.10-7.4 ± 13.21-24.8 ± 23.42-32.6 ± 16.61
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (PART ABC4) vs MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART ABC4) · ANCOVA · p = 0.915 · Mean difference (net): 0.98 · 95% CI 0.71 to 1.36
  • Placebo (PART ABC4) vs MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART ABC4) · ANCOVA · p = 0.117 · Median difference (net): 0.78 · 95% CI 0.57 to 1.07
  • Placebo (PART ABC4) vs MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART ABC4) · ANCOVA · p = 0.010 · Mean difference (net): 0.69 · 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91
PrimaryChange in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor Size

Assessment of maximum efficacy (multiple i.v.monthly doses (2 to 6) of 3, 5 or 10 mg/kg MCS110 or 3 \& 10 mg/kg or 5 \& 10 mg/kg in changing PVNS tumor volume (as compared to baseline) up to 8 weeks post last dose evaluated by MRI. Analysis included data starting from 1st dose of MCS110 in all treatment groups of Parts B and C. Part B patients who received placebo as 1st dose, measurement prior to receiving first dose of MCS110, was used as baseline and assessment time-points were adjusted accordingly. For Part C, participants starting treatment with low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. Analysis includes data from patients who received at least 2 doses. The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\]

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks post last dose
Reported as:
Mean · mm3
Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor Size
mm3MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (Part C)
Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor Size-2450.3 ± 2721.24-29164.3 ± 23286.18-37015.1 ± 29297.02-42420.1 ± 63812.69-3571.9 ± 3612.97
PrimaryPercentage Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor Size

To assess the maximum efficacy of multiple monthly i.v. doses (2 to 6) of 3, 5 or 10 mg/kg MCS110 or 3 and 10 mg/kg or 5 and 10 mg/kg by percent change in the PVNS tumor volume (as compared to baseline) up to 8 weeks post last dose evaluated by MRI. Subjects starting treatment with a low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and the tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. This analysis includes data from all participants who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\].

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks post last dose
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage
Percentage Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor Size
PercentageMCS110 3 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (Part BC)
Percentage Change in Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) or Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCTTS) Tumor Size-29.7 ± 33.73-56.3 ± 20.31-55.0 ± 19.02-45.8 ± 40.11-22.6 ± 16.21
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events

Overall incidence of Adverse Events

Time frame:
Approximately 2 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
ParticipantsMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)Placebo (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART C)
AEs of mild severity311117611
AEs of moderate severity1192425
AEs of severe severity0040214
Study drug related AEs31101758
Serious AEs0120314
AEs leading to discontinuation0000211
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of MCS110 Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC)

Pharmacokinetic for a single dose of MCS110 for serum concentration -time curve (AUC).

Time frame:
Day 1 (0 - 5 hr), Day 29, Day 85, Day 112, PART B (Day 1: (0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0 - 5 hr) PART C (Day 1: 0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0-5 hr)
Reported as:
Mean · h* ng/mL
Pharmacokinetics of MCS110 Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC)
h* ng/mLMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10 mg kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 mg/kg (PART C)
Day 175632187 ± 1666428244258092 ± 6489002—12900096 ± 237304914559871 ± 778307344854588 ± 9743190
Day 29——838099 ± 171148———
Day 85—256238447 ± 140220044——179084.13 ± 0999719 ± 278619
Day 112——238619590 ± 63815086———
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of MCS110 Maximum Concentration (Cmax)

Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for maximum serum concentration (Cmax)

Time frame:
Day 1 (0 - 5 hr), Day 29, Day 85, Day 112, PART B (Day 1: (0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0 - 5 hr) PART C (Day 1: 0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0-5 hr)
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pharmacokinetics of MCS110 Maximum Concentration (Cmax)
ng/mLMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10 mg kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 mg/kg (PART C)
Day 1234800 ± 40598206750 ± 32745—66983 ± 849385914 ± 15539214667 ± 39119
Day 29——194667 ± 36828———
Day 85—309429 ± 54464——97750 ± 11667255000 ± 30199
Day 112——239000 ± 55154———
SecondaryPharmacokinetics of MCS110 Total Maximum Concentration (Tmax)

Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for time to maximum concentration (Tmax)

Time frame:
Day 1 (0 - 5 hr), Day 29, Day 85, Day 112, PART B (Day 1: (0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0 - 5 hr) PART C (Day 1: 0 -5 hr), (Day 85: 0-5 hr)
Reported as:
Median · hour (h)
Pharmacokinetics of MCS110 Total Maximum Concentration (Tmax)
hour (h)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10 mg kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 mg/kg (PART C)
Day 12.083 (1.083 to 3.083)1.192 (1 to 5.05)—3.125 (1.083 to 5.083)5 (0 to 5.033)4 (1.083 to 5.067)
Day 29——1.467 (1 to 1.5)———
Day 85—1.25 (1 to 5)——3.533 (2.033 to 5.033)1.233 (1.083 to 5.05)
Day 112——3.1 (1.017 to 5.183)———
SecondaryChange in Macrophage-colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF) Plasma Concentrations Over Time

Pharmacokinetic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 for evaluation of macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) plasma concentrations over time

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 1, Day 85, Day 169
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Change in Macrophage-colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF) Plasma Concentrations Over Time
pg/mLMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)Placebo/MCS110 10mg/kg (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10 mg kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 mg/kg (PART C)
Baseline4694.0 ± 1375.404940.0 ± 650.545767.1 ± 1159.125056.7 ± 1769.674778.3 ± 2078.125420.0 ± 3126.203360.0 ± 747.46
Day 14762.5 ± 2256.345060.0 ± 06405.0 ± 4103.804916.7 ± 545.194688.3 ± 1506.465281.4 ± 2687.574423.3 ± 1134.43
Day 851697500.0 ± 646445.414235.0 ± 544.474238571.4 ± 1446575.604526666.7 ± 1127578.534750000.0 ± 04060000.0 ± 04580000.0 ± 575065.21
Day 169173750.0 ± 103345.30469.0 ± 1357.655668750.0 ± 1928829.685360000.0 ± 1173797.262290000.0 ± 04090000.0 ± 05480000.0 ± 1225724.28
SecondaryChange in Serum C-terminal Type 1 Collagen Peptide Concentrations (CTX-I).

Pharmacodynamic characterization of a single dose of MCS110 by measuring C-terminal telopeptide of Type 1 Collagen peptide (CTX-I), a biomarker of bone resorption. Data measured in participants from three arms: participants from Part A, B and C who received a single dose of 10 mg/kg and had assessment at week 4 (Part ABC4); participants from Part A and B who received placebo ; and participants from Part B and C who received multiple monthly doses of MCS110 (10 mg/kg.) Serum CTX-I data were generated in Part A and Part B. In Part C, samples were collected for serum bone CTX-I analysis. The analysis was not performed, as enough information on compound mode of action was obtained using creatine kinase (CK) and monocytes (hematology) data. Only data from 10mg/kg (single and multiple doses) are available.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 24, Week 104
Reported as:
Median · ng/mL
Change in Serum C-terminal Type 1 Collagen Peptide Concentrations (CTX-I).
ng/mLMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART ABC4)Placebo (PARTS A and B)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART BC)
Baseline0.3 (0.2 to 0.5)0.5 (0.4 to 1.0)0.4 (0.2 to 0.6)
Week 40.1 (0.0 to 0.1)0.6 (0.2 to 0.8)0.1 (0.0 to 0.2)
Week 24——0.1 (0.0 to 0.2)
Week 104——0.3 (0.2 to 0.8)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Negative Anti-MCS110 Antibody

To assess the immunogenicity of MCS110 in serum anti-MCS110 antibody concentrations

Time frame:
Baseline, throughout the study up to Day 505
Reported as:
Number · Number of Participants
Number of Participants With Negative Anti-MCS110 Antibody
Number of ParticipantsMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)Placebo (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)
Baseline518333344
Day 29428324443
Day 85327313334
Day 12731———————
Day 169427113334
Day 336——7——2———
Day 393————12442
Day 505——6—14432
SecondaryAssessment of Change From Baseline in Joint Range of Motion for Knee Extension and Flexion

To assess the clinical response of joint range of motion following a single i.v. dose of MCS110 or placebo as compared to baseline 4 weeks post-dose evaluated in participants, who had a knee tumor, which was the majority of participants (75%). The analysis includes all data from patients 4 weeks after receiving the first dose of MCS110 (3, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or placebo. As all parts (Part A, B and C) of the study are assessed after a single dose at week 4 the data set is called "ABC4".

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Degree
Assessment of Change From Baseline in Joint Range of Motion for Knee Extension and Flexion
DegreePlacebo (PART ABC4)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART ABC4)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART ABC4)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART ABC4)
Knee Extension-7.3 ± 4.99-12.3 ± 13.651.7 ± 2.89-10.3 ± 26.69
Knee Flexion-2.8 ± 8.853.7 ± 13.513.7 ± 19.76-15.4 ± 43.13
SecondaryAssessment of Change From Baseline in Joint Range of Motion for Knee Extension and Flexion

To assess the clinical response of joint range of motion following multiple dose treatment with MCS110 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg evaluated in participants with knee tumor, which was the majority of participants (75%). The data presented are changes from baseline in degree. Participants, who started treatment with a low dose of MCS110 of 3 or 5 mg/kg could switch to 10 mg/kg after 3 monthly doses, if MCS110 was well tolerated and the tumor volume reduction was ≤ 45%. This analysis includes data from participants with knee tumor who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\].

Time frame:
Week 24/28, Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Degree
Assessment of Change From Baseline in Joint Range of Motion for Knee Extension and Flexion
DegreeMCS110 3 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)
Week 24/28: Knee extension-10.0 ± 0.000.0 ± 0.0-10.5 ± 21.36-26 ± 0.01 ± 1.73
Week 24/28:(Knee Flexion)-2.0 ± 0.008 ± 0.009.9 ± 8.778 ± 0.053.0 ± 61.54
Week 104:(Knee Extension)—0 ± 0-3.5 ± 6.07-28.0 ± 0.002.5 ± 3.54
Week 104: (Knee Flexion)—-6 ± 07.5 ± 11.5610 ± 0.0070.0 ± 70.71
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Joint Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Measurement of the participant's pain with a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) following treatment with MCS110 3, 5, or 10 mg/kg evaluated. Data presented are changes from baseline in degree. Participants were asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represented her/his pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score was determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the participants mark, providing a score from 0-100. Analysis includes data from participants with knee tumor who received at least 2 doses of MCS110 and thus includes only patients from Part B and C of the study, thus the data set is called "Part BC". The following five groups were assessed: Subjects receiving only 3 mg/kg, only 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg and those who switched after 3 doses of 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[3/10 mg/kg\] or after 3 doses of 5 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg \[5/10 mg/kg\].

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40, Week 48, Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · millimeters (mm)
Change From Baseline in Joint Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
millimeters (mm)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART BC)
Baseline32 ± 4.249.3 ± 12.7428.6 ± 21.8239.3 ± 28.4351.0 ± 15.64
Week 422.5 ± 20.514 ± 5.2922.5 ± 23.8732.0 ± 24.5448.5 ± 30.71
Week 1220 ± 02.7 ± 3.0613.9 ± 16.0127.5 ± 26.5133 ± 26.72
Week 240 ± 00 ± 021.4 ± 22.078.5 ± 9.3320.3 ± 28.51
Week 2840 ± 010.7 ± 17.620 ± 00 ± 00 ± 0
Week 4031 ± 03.7 ± 5.5131.0 ± 31.3822 ± 15.8125.7 ± 31.56
Week 480 ± 00 ± 021.0 ± 0——
Week 1040 ± 016.0 ± 18.0322.4 ± 24.2317.8 ± 13.0225.7 ± 24.7
SecondaryTime to Relapse

Time to relapse describes the time frame from baseline when the tumor volume increases again after the treatment with MCS110. To be considered a relapse tumor volume had to increase greater than 50% of the difference between tumor volume at baseline and the lowest tumor volume measured by MRI. In this assessment the Part B and Part C patients were analyzed separately. N/A (not available):Data analysis not performed as sample size was not analyzable as no patient had surgery/relapse.

Time frame:
Up to Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Time to Relapse
DaysMCS110 10mg/kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 3/10 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5/10 mg/kg (PART C)
Time to Relapse337.0 ± 108.89454.0 ± 0477.0 ± 0296.0 ± 103.24NA ± NANA ± NA
SecondaryTime to Surgery

Time to surgery describes the time frame from baseline to the time point when participants had surgical removement of PVNS tumor. This could be either residual tumor after the tumor volume was reduced or surgery due to relapse. In this assessment the Part B and Part C patients were analyzed separately. Not Available (NA): Data analysis not performed as sample size was not analyzable as no patient had surgery.

Time frame:
Up to Week 104
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Time to Surgery
DaysMCS110 10mg/kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 3/10 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5/10 mg/kg (PART C)
Time to Surgery387.0 ± 116.250 ± 00 ± 0231.0 ± 0NA ± NANA ± NA
SecondaryAverage of Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Score for mHAQ

The mHAQ assesses 20 activities in 8 categories related to daily life, which are rated on a 4-point Likert scale. The mHAQ is calculated as the average of the single scores with the following scoring: without difficulty =0; with some difficulty =1; with much difficulty =2; unable to do =3. Total score is between 0 - 3.0. Values \<0.3 are considered normal. Data presented include only participants, who received multiple doses of MCS110.

Time frame:
up to 104 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Average of Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire Score for mHAQ
Scores on a scaleMCS110 3 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)
Baseline0.3 ± 0.350.1 ± 0.220.3 ± 0.200.3 ± 0.330.9 ± 0.52
Week 104—0.1 ± 0.140.2 ± 0.180.1 ± 0.190.3 ± 0.25
SecondaryNumber of CD14+ Monocytes and Number of CD14 + Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes

Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of CD14+ monocytes (using FACS) and CD14+ CD16+ monocytes. Based on preliminary analysis, the quality of the samples did not allow meaningful conclusions to be drawn. Thus, in Part B, the monocyte sample collection was discontinued.

Time frame:
Baseline Up to Week 104
Reported as:
Number · Number of Monocytes
Number of CD14+ Monocytes and Number of CD14 + Monocytes and CD16+ Monocytes
Number of MonocytesMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)
Number of CD14+ Monocytes and Number of CD14 + Monocytes and CD16+ MonocytesNANANANANANANA
SecondaryChange From Baseline Per Treatment for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life (QOL), pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Score on a scaleMCS110 3 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)
Baseline-ADL65.4 ± 3.1269.1 ± 0.0077.3 ± 7.8770.6 ± 0.0071.3 ± 30.16
Week 4-ADL79.4 ± 20.891.2 ± 0.0086.5 ± 10.3789.7 ± 0.0076.0 ± 18.97
Week 12-ADL72.1 ± 0.0097.1 ± 0.0087.4 ± 15.1094.1 ± 0.0076.5 ± 23.53
Week 24-ADL55.9 ± 0.000 ± 089.6 ± 10.7579.4 ± 073.0 ± 28.83
Week 28-ADL52.9 ± 083.8 ± 00 ± 0——
Week 40- ADL79.4 ± 095.6 ± 073.5 ± 29.1289.789.0 ± 15.6
Week 48-ADL——85.3 ± 13.50——
Week 72-ADL48.5 ± 088.2 ± 078.7 ± 20.8291.2 ± 0100 ± 0
Week 104- ADL—77.993.5 ± 7.7497.1 ± 087.5 ± 17.68
SecondaryChange From Baseline Per Treatment for Knee Related Quality of Life in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Knee Related Quality of Life in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Score on a scaleMCS110 3 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)
Baseline-Knee15.6 ± 13.2637.5 ± 029.5 ± 23.2350.0 ± 040.6 ± 4.42
Week 4-Knee31.3 ± 17.6856.3 ± 043.8 ± 22.8843.8 ± 045.8 ± 13.01
Week 12-Knee37.5 ± 056.3 ± 054.4 ± 28.7262.5 ± 043.8 ± 16.54
Week 24-Knee43.8 ± 0—50.7 ± 34.3043.8 ± 041.7 ± 21.95
Week 28-Knee12.5 ± 056.3 ± 046.9 ± 068.8 ± 056.3 ± 0
Week 40- Knee37.5 ± 062.5 ± 037.5 ± 050.0 ± 068.8 ± 8.84
Week 48-Knee——48.4 ± 25.61——
Week 72-Knee25.0 ± 056.3 ± 045.0 ± 26.8168.8 ± 068.8 ± 0
Week 104- Knee—50.0 ± 059.8 ± 21.6168.8 ± 062.5 ± 17.68
SecondaryChange From Baseline Per Treatment for Pain and Discomfort in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Pain and Discomfort in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Score on a scaleMCS110 3 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)
Baseline54.2 ± 5.8952.8 ± 062.6 ± 17.5066.7 ± 061.1 ± 23.57
Week 466.7 ± 19.6475.0 ± 073.5 ± 18.1975.0 ± 063.0 ± 0
Week 1255.6 ± 080.6 ± 075.6 ± 20.3275.0 ± 071.3 ± 15.80
Week 2452.8 ± 0—77.5 ± 21.2261.1 ± 069.4 ± 25.46
Week 2855.6 ± 069.4 ± 070.8 ± 41.2583.3 ± 088.9 ± 0
Week 4058.3 ± 077.8 ± 056.9 ± 080.6 ± 079.2 ± 21.61
Week 48——71.5 ± 21.45——
Week 7247.2 ± 066.7 ± 062.2 ± 25.4388.9 ± 091.7 ± 0
Week 104—58.3 ± 077.7 ± 13.1291.7 ± 072.2 ± 27.50
SecondaryChange From Baseline Per Treatment for Sport/Recreation in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Sport/Recreation in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Score on a scaleMCS110 3 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)
Baseline35.0 ± 7.0725.0 ± 029.5 ± 23.1570.0 ± 052.5 ± 31.82
Week 450.0 ± 21.2170.0 ± 040.9 ± 0100.0 ± 048.3 ± 45.37
Week 1245.0 ± 085.0 ± 058.0 ± 085.0 ± 045.0 ± 37.75
Week 2430.0 ± 0—55.6 ± 30.6650.0 ± 053.3 ± 37.53
Week 2835.0 ± 035.0 ± 050.0 ± 70.7195.0 ± 095.0 ± 0
Week 4035.0 ± 050.0 ± 037.5 ± 53.0390.0 ± 080.0 ± 21.21
Week 48——48.1 ± 39.27——
Week 7230.0 ± 040.0 ± 040.6 ± 36.2770.0 ± 095.0 ± 0
Week 104—30.0 ± 058.2 ± 21.5495.0 ± 070.0 ± 35.36
SecondaryChange From Baseline Per Treatment for Symptoms in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

The KOOS is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument developed to assess the subject's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS questionnaire collected data on 5 knee-specific patient-centered outcomes: activities of daily life (ADL), knee related quality of life, pain and discomfort, sport/recreation, symptoms. The 5 KOOS sub-scales were scored separately on a Likert scale scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems) and scores were transformed to a 0.100 scale with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no problems. The 5 dimensions were analyzed independently. Positive changes (i.e. increases in the score) are beneficial. KOOS was assessed in Part B and C only in participants with knee PVNS tumor.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 4, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 40, Week 72, Week 104 (end of study)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline Per Treatment for Symptoms in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Score on a scaleMCS110 3 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)
Baseline41.1 ± 12.6350.0 ± 050.0 ± 16.4450.0 ± 062.5 ± 27.78
Week 458.9 ± 32.8375.0 ± 059.4 ± 16.9257.1 ± 057.1 ± 24.74
Week 1271.4 ± 078.6 ± 069.3 ± 21.3164.3 ± 056.0 ± 26.33
Week 2450.0 ± 0—65.9 ± 25.4567.9 ± 067.9 ± 0
Week 2860.7 ± 060.7 ± 062.5 ± 53.0375.0 ± 089.3 ± 0
Week 4075.0 ± 064.3 ± 042.9 ± 60.6178.6 ± 073.2 ± 37.88
Week 48——62.1 ± 24.29——
Week 7250.0 ± 057.1 ± 040.6 ± 28.4378.6 ± 085.7 ± 0
Week 104—53.6 ± 067.3 ± 20.6385.7 ± 062.5 ± 32.83
SecondaryChange From Baseline Per Treatment Using EuroQol-5 Dimensional (EQ-5D VAS)Visual Analog Scale Quality of Life Questionnaire

The EQ-5D is a standardized measure of health status. The EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS)has a range from 0-100: worst possible to perfect health. Data show the absolute change from baseline of EQ5D VAS and at the different visits for participants, who received multiple doses of MCS110. (PART B and PART C).

Time frame:
Week 4, Week 24, up to 104 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline Per Treatment Using EuroQol-5 Dimensional (EQ-5D VAS)Visual Analog Scale Quality of Life Questionnaire
Score on a scaleMCS110 3 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part BC)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART BC)
Week 411.0 ± 1.413.7 ± 5.030.6 ± 25.071.3 ± 2.505.5 ± 10.85
Week 24-1.0 ± 0.0010.0 ± 0.009.5 ± 14.041.0 ± 8.549.8 ± 16.21
Up to Week 104—1.3 ± 5.516.9 ± 13.937.0 ± 8.9118.0 ± 25.63

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment-emergent adverse events .Adverse events and serious adverse events were collected for the maximum actual duration of treatment exposure and follow up for a participant per the protocol for approximately 2 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)3/5 (60%)
Placebo (PART A)0/2 (0%)1/2 (50%)1/2 (50%)
MCS110 10mg/kg (PART B)0/11 (0%)2/11 (18.2%)11/11 (100%)
Placebo/10mg/kg (PART B)0/3 (0%)0/3 (0%)3/3 (100%)
MCS110 3mg/kg (PART C)0/7 (0%)3/7 (42.9%)7/7 (100%)
MCS110 5mg/kg (PART C)0/7 (0%)1/7 (14.3%)6/7 (85.7%)
MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)0/12 (0%)4/12 (33.3%)11/12 (91.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent serious events
EventMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)Placebo (PART A)MCS110 10mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10mg/kg (PART B)MCS110 3mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)
Cholecystitis acuteHepatobiliary disorders0/51/20/110/30/70/70/12
Infusion related reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/50/20/110/32/70/70/12
Haemoglobin decreasedInvestigations0/50/20/110/31/70/70/12
DysarthriaNervous system disorders0/50/21/110/30/71/70/12
Facial paralysisNervous system disorders0/50/20/110/30/71/70/12
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/50/21/110/30/70/70/12
Oesophageal spasmGastrointestinal disorders0/50/21/110/30/70/70/12
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/50/21/110/30/70/70/12
Gait disturbanceGeneral disorders0/50/21/110/30/70/70/12
Non-cardiac chest painGeneral disorders0/50/21/110/30/70/70/12
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 113
Most frequent other events
EventMCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)Placebo (PART A)MCS110 10mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10mg/kg (PART B)MCS110 3mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 5mg/kg (PART C)MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)
Periorbital oedemaEye disorders0/50/24/110/35/73/74/12
FatigueGeneral disorders0/50/24/110/35/72/72/12
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/51/25/110/31/73/71/12
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations1/51/24/110/30/70/72/12
Peripheral swellingGeneral disorders0/50/22/110/32/73/73/12
Benign joint neoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/50/24/110/30/73/72/12
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/50/24/110/32/72/72/12
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/50/24/110/30/70/70/12
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations0/50/24/110/31/72/73/12
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/50/24/110/32/72/72/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)Placebo (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10mg/kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)Total
Mean51.4 ± 8.9630.0 ± 4.2446.3 ± 10.1426.7 ± 11.5945.7 ± 17.9338.0 ± 21.6643.8 ± 13.3846.3 ± 2.8729.0 ± 6.0641.3 ± 12.91
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)Placebo (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10mg/kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)Total
Female31621132322
Male21212212114
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART A)Placebo (PART A)MCS110 10 mg/kg (PART B)Placebo/10mg/kg (PART B)MCS110 3 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 10 mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 3 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (Part C)MCS110 5 mg/kg & MCS110 10mg/kg (PART C)Total
Caucasian41823334331
Black1000000012
Other0101001003
07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    San Diego, California 92103-8894, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Denver, Colorado 80237, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Washington, District of Columbia 20011, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Basel, 4056, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Blay JY, El Sayadi H, Thiesse P, Garret J, Ray-Coquard I. Complete response to imatinib in relapsing pigmented villonodular synovitis/tenosynovial giant cell tumor (PVNS/TGCT). Ann Oncol. 2008 Apr;19(4):821-2. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn033. Epub 2008 Feb 21. No abstract available. PubMed 18296418 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 3, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 23, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01643850
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 18, 2012
Start date
Apr 23, 2012
Primary completion
Dec 7, 2017
Completion
Dec 21, 2018
Results posted
Feb 27, 2020
Last update
Jan 5, 2021

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion