A Phase 3 interventional study of CARTISTEM and Microfracture in Degenerative Osteoarthritis and Defect of Articular Cartilage, sponsored by Medipost Co Ltd.. Completed at 10 sites in South Korea. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-20.
Sponsored by Medipost Co Ltd. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a long term follow-up study to investigate the safety and efficacy of CARTISTEM®, human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells, in repair of cartilage injury or defects, compared with microfracture. Subjects who participated in and completed the Phase III trial (NCT01041001) will be tracked until the 60 month post-treatment timepoint.
This long term follow-up study is performed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of CARTISTEM®, human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells, in repair of cartilage injury or defects, compared with microfracture. Subjects, who were either administered CARTISTEM or treated with conventional microfracture in the primary phase III study (NCT01041001), will be further observed using various subjective knee assessments and MRI T2 mapping until the 60 month post-treatment timepoint.
716 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Diseases; 127 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 103 is above the median of 60 across 473 interventional studies indexed under Joint Diseases.
Browse Joint Diseases studies →Medipost Co Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
A single dose of 500㎕/㎠ of cartilage defect
Biological: CARTISTEM
conventional treatment method
Procedure: Microfracture
A single dose of 500㎕/㎠ of cartilage defect
Also known as: hUCB-MSCs
Active control
Also known as: Conventional surgical treatment
Degree of improvement in knee assessments compared to the active control (microfracture)
Knee assessments will be performed using the following tools: * IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) * Pain score on VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) * WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index)
Time frame: 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months
Number of subjects with adverse events
Systemic and local adverse events especially attributable to the implanted cells will be assessed. * General physical examinations: vital signs, blood tests * Physical assessments of the knee: swelling, tenderness, pain, range of motion * Tumor formation at the implantation site: radiological evaluation using MRI(T1(dGEMRIC)and T2 mapping)
Time frame: 36 months, 48 months, and 60 months
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Medipost Co Ltd.