CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01606410Updated Nov 20, 2013

The Impact of Age and Fitness on Reperfusion Injury and Ischemic Preconditioning to Prevent This Injury

An observational study in Cardiovascular Disease, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-11-20.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rationale: Ischaemic preconditioning (IP) refers to the reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury induced by a brief preceding period of ischemia. Also the arterial endothelium can be protected by IP. Several studies performed in animals and humans have demonstrated that the protective effects of IP are attenuated with aging. However, no previous study directly examined the underlying mechanisms of this observation. Possibly, the reduced protective effect of IP with aging relates to a direct effect on the endothelium, consequently leading to an attenuated ability of IP to prevent endothelial dysfunction after ischaemia reperfusion injury.

Several previous studies failed to demonstrate the ability of pharmacological stimuli to mimic the beneficial effects of IP in aged vessels. Restoration of the age-related reduction in effectiveness of IP may be possible through exercise training. In aged animals, physical training restores the efficacy of ischemic preconditioning. Indirect evidence indicates that physical activity, independent of other cardiovascular risk factors, protects against a occurrence as well as the severity of a myocardial infarction in humans. Although this suggests that physical activity may beneficially influence the age-related reduction in IP, no previous study provided direct evidence for this hypothesis.

Objective: To examine the impact of age and physical fitness on the ability of ischaemic preconditioning to protect endothelial damage in response to ischaemia reperfusion injury in healthy humans. A secondary objective is to explore the role of Toll-like receptor (TLR) signalling in the induction of IP in young and old subjects.

Read the detailed description

Cardiovascular disease has become a worldwide burden. In the Netherlands over 40.000 persons die annually due to coronary artery disease, either acute myocardial infarction or heart failure.1 Through plaque formation and negative vascular remodelling, significant stenotic lesions develop in the coronary arteries that subsequently limit coronary blood flow and ultimately can cause ischemic events. Reperfusion therapy (either pharmacologic, endovascular or surgical) is mandatory for salvage of ischemic tissue. However, during reperfusion several deleterious events take place causing further damage. Murry found that ischemia and reperfusion injury (IR-injury) could be reduced by a phenomenon called ischemic preconditioning.2 Short lasting repetitive episodes of ischemia prior to an ischemic event can induce tissue tolerance against IR-injury.

After discovery of this phenomenon, ample research has been devoted to elucidation of the underling protective mechanism, but also factors that improve or impair the ability of this phenomenon to protect arteries against ischaemia reperfusion injury. Several studies performed in animals and humans have demonstrated that the protective effects of IP are attenuated with aging. Much of this work has been performed in animal models or in human in vitro studies. Interestingly, no previous study directly examined the underlying mechanisms of this observation in humans using in vivo techniques. One potential explanation for an age-related reduction of the protective effect of IP relates to a direct effect on the endothelium.

Much scientific effort has been devoted to develop a human in vivo model to study ischemia and reperfusion injury. Recently, publications emerged using the flow mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial or radial artery before and after a sustained ischaemic stimulus (20 minutes) to establish the presence of a blunted endothelial function after ischaemia reperfusion injury.3, 4 This effect of reperfusion injury on the endothelial function can be abrogated by ischemic preconditioning.3 Endothelial dysfunction is acknowledged to be the first (subclinical) manifestation of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.5, 6 It is significantly correlated to occurrence of myocardial infarction and stroke.6 Assessment of the flow mediated dilation of the brachial artery as measure of endothelial (dys)function, is a validated model to research effects of possible protective strategies3, 4 and perform mechanistic experiments4, 7, 8 on IR-injury in humans in vivo.

Several previous studies failed to demonstrate the ability of pharmacological stimuli to mimic the beneficial effects of IP in aging vessels.9 Restoration of the age-related reduction in effectiveness of IP may be possible through exercise training. Indirect evidence indicates that physical activity, independent of other cardiovascular risk factors, protects against an occurrence as well as the severity of a myocardial infarction in humans.10 Although this suggests that physical activity may beneficially influence the age-related reduction in IP, no previous study provided direct evidence for this hypothesis in humans.

In this cross-sectional observational experiment we will study the impact of aging (young versus older subjects) and physical fitness (sedentary versus trained older subjects) on the protective effects of ischaemic preconditioning on brachial artery endothelial function after ischaemia-reperfusion injury in healthy humans in vivo.

We hypothesize that aging is associated with an attenuated ability of ischaemic preconditioning to prevent the decrease in brachial artery endothelial function observed after ischaemia reperfusion injury. Moreover, we expect that the age-related reduction in effectiveness of ischaemic preconditioning to prevent endothelial dysfunction after reperfusion injury is (at least partly) preserved in trained older subjects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Disease
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

4,904 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 920 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 573 across 1,483 observational studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 959 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Study population: Young sedentary volunteers (n=23, age 18-30), young active volunteers (n=23, age 18-30), older sedentary subjects (n=23, >55 years) and older physically active subjects (n=23, >55 years).

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy young volunteers : age 18-30
  • Healthy older volunteers: age >55 years
  • Sedentary: \<1 h exercise per week
  • Trained: >5 h exercise per week
  • All subjects: written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking
  • History of any cardiovascular disease
  • Hypertension (in supine position: systole >140 mmHg, diastole >90 mmHg)
  • Diabetes Mellitus (fasting glucose >7.0 mmol/L or random glucose >11.0 mmol/L)
  • Hyperlipidaemia (fasting total cholesterol >6.5 mmol/L)
  • Chronic use of medication known to interfere with the cardiovascular system
  • Professional athletes
  • BMI >30 kg/m2
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • young, sedentary

    Other: IPC

  • young, active

    Other: IPC

  • old, sedentary

    Other: IPC

  • old, active

    Other: IPC

Interventions

  • OtherIPC

    repeated cuff inflation (220 mmhg) around an upper limb for 5 minutes, followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion (repeated 4 times)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. endothelial reperfusion injury

    Change in endothelial function (measured with flow mediated dilation) after ischaemia reperfusion injury (induced by 20 minutes ischemia) with and without precedence of ischaemic preconditioning (by 3 cycles of 5-minutes of ischaemia).

    Time frame: cross-sectional observation (single time point)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Physiology
    Nijmegen, 6525 EX, Netherlands
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01606410
Lead sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2012
Start date
Apr 2011
Primary completion
Nov 2013
Completion
Nov 2013
Last update
Nov 20, 2013

Study contacts

Dick Thijssen, PhD
principal investigator · Radboud University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion