ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01603368PROPELUpdated Aug 13, 2024Results posted

Prophylactic Probiotics to Extremely Low Birth Weight Prematures

A Phase 2 interventional study of Lactobacillus reuteri and Placebo in Feeding; Difficult, Newborn, Growth Failure and Necrotizing Enterocolitis, sponsored by Ostergotland County Council, Sweden. Completed at 2 sites in Sweden. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 3 Days, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-13.

Sponsored by Ostergotland County Council, Sweden · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
134
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Day to 3 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Mortality and incidence of severe complications is still high among extremely premature infants. Common causes of severe complications in this population are poor nutrition, necrotizing enterocolitis, and severe infections. Feeding intolerance is also a common problem resulting in prolonged need for intravenous lines and poor nutrition.

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether supplementation with the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 daily to premature infants with extremely low birth weight increases feeding tolerance to breast milk and thereby improves nutrition, increases growth and reduces serious complications and mortality in this population. Beyond this, possible mechanisms underlying these effects will be analyzed in stool, breast milk and blood samples.

Read the detailed description

RATIONALE Mortality and incidence of severe complications is still high among extremely premature infants. Common causes of severe complications in this population are poor nutrition, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and severe infections. Feeding intolerance is also a common problem resulting in prolonged need for intravenous lines and poor nutrition. There is scientific evidence that dietary supplements with probiotics may have an effect on these manifestations.

Lactobacillus reuteri is a well studied probiotic bacterium that has been tested in several clinical studies in premature infants and older children, and the results of these studies and animal studies suggest that this bacterium may also have an effect on growth and mortality in extremely premature infants. Lactobacillus reuteri reduces colonization with pathogenic microbes, stimulates gastric and intestinal motility and shortens hospital stay in moderately premature infants. In animal models, L. reuteri also induces anti-inflammatory immune responses, reduces the symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease and the incidence of NEC. Administration of L. reuteri also improves the intestinal barrier both in human studies in children and in animal studies. Dietary supplements of L. reuteri to extremely premature infants may therefore improve feeding tolerance and nutrition and reduce the incidence of severe complications in this population.

HYPOTHESIS Premature infants with extremely low birth weight receiving daily supplements of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 will reach full enteral feeding faster compared with children receiving placebo.

STUDY DESIGN This study will be conducted as a prospective multi-center double blind placebo-controlled study in neonatal intensive care units in Sweden. In total 134 neonates with extremely low birth weight (\<1000g) and gestational age \<28+0 weeks will be randomized to receive either dietary supplements of Lactobacillus reuteri or placebo. Study product will be identical to the active and placebo group besides the addition of Lactobacillus reuteri (1.25 x 100 million bacteria=0.2 ml oil drops per day) in the active group. The supplementation will commence within 1-3 days after birth and will be given daily until gestational week 36+0. The infants will be followed until gestational week 36+0 and data on feeding tolerance, nutrition, growth, infections, NEC, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, death, and potential confounders will be entered in an individual study protocol. Stool, breast milk, and blood samples will be collected for analyses of possible underlying mechanisms.

A 2-year follow up including examination by pediatrician, growth parameters, questionnaire and psychology testing (Bayley´s test) will be performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Feeding; Difficult, Newborn
  • Growth Failure
  • Necrotizing Enterocolitis
  • Sepsis

Keywords

  • Probiotics
  • Lactobacillus reuteri
  • Prematures
  • Enteral feeding
  • Motility
  • Necrotizing enterocolitis
  • Sepsis
  • Weight
03

In context

Failure to Thrive

84 studies on the registry are indexed under Failure to Thrive; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 134 is above the median of 100 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Failure to Thrive.

Browse Failure to Thrive studies →

Lead sponsor

Ostergotland County Council, Sweden is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 3 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Birth weight \< 1000 g
  • Gestational age: v23+0-V27 +6.
  • Age \< 72 hours at inclusion.
  • Signed by parents.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fatal or complex congenital malformation at inclusion time.
  • Chromosomal defect at inclusion time.
  • No realistic hope of survival at inclusion time.
  • Gastrointestinal malformation at inclusion time.
  • Participation in another study which aims to influence nutrition, growth, feeding tolerance or necrotizing enterocolitis.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
134 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Lactobacillus reuteri

    Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938, 125 million bacteria/day

    Dietary Supplement: Lactobacillus reuteri

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    The same oil drops as the active study product but without Lactobacillus reuteri

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementLactobacillus reuteri

    Oil drops with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938, 125 million bacteria=0.2 ml per day

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo

    Oil drops without Lactobacillus reuteri

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Establish Full Enteral Feeds

    The age of the infants in days when the infant receive 150 ml/kg/day via enteral feeding for the first time.

    Time frame: Birth to gestational week 36+0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Days With Halted Feeding Due to Food Intolerance

    Episode with food intolerance. Retention volume\> food volume given the last 2 hours (retention checked routinely every 4 hours) and/or clinical signs consistent with necrotizing enterocolitis (reduced general condition and inflated abdomen). The number of such events will also be indicated.

    Time frame: Birth to gestational week 36

  2. Number of Stools

    Time frame: Recorded over the first four weeks

  3. Time Until Birth Weight is Regained. Specifies the Number of Full Days the Child Has Lived.

    Specifies the number of full days the child has lived.

    Time frame: Birth to gw 36+0

  4. Weight Gain (SD)

    In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

    Time frame: At 14th day of life

  5. Mortality

    Time frame: Birth to gw 36+0

  6. Necrotizing Enterocolitis

    Bell´s criteria II-III

    Time frame: Birth to gw 36+0

  7. Sepsis

    Blood culture positive sepsis

    Time frame: Birth to gw 36+0

  8. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

    Need of oxygen or CPAP/ventilator at gw 36+0

    Time frame: Gw 36+0

  9. Weight Gain (SD)

    In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

    Time frame: At 28th day of life

  10. Weight Gain (SD)

    In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

    Time frame: At gestational week 36+0

  11. Length Gain (SD)

    In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

    Time frame: At 14th day of life

  12. Length Gain (SD)

    In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

    Time frame: At 28th day of life

  13. Length Gain (SD)

    In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

    Time frame: At gestational week 36+0

  14. Head Circumference Growth (SD)

    In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

    Time frame: At 14th day of life

  15. Head Circumference Growth (SD)

    In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

    Time frame: At 28th day of life

  16. Head Circumference Growth (SD)

    In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

    Time frame: At gestational week 36+0

  17. Neurological Development

    Bayleys´s test by psychologist

    Time frame: At 2 years corrected age

  18. Neurological Development Impairment

    A composite of several outcomes: impaired cognition at the Bayleys´test, cerebral palsy, blindness and deafness, divided into normal, mild, moderate and severe. Mild -1SD to -2SD, Moderate \<-2D to 3 SD and Severe \<3SD

    Time frame: At 2 years corrected age

07

Results

Posted Apr 27, 2020

Participant flow

Extremely preterm infants with a birth weight \<1000 g were recruited within 72 hours after birth in two level 3 NICUs .

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Started6866
Completed6866
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Establish Full Enteral Feeds

The age of the infants in days when the infant receive 150 ml/kg/day via enteral feeding for the first time.

Time frame:
Birth to gestational week 36+0
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Establish Full Enteral Feeds
daysLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Time to Establish Full Enteral Feeds15 (11 to 23)15 (10 to 20)
SecondaryDays With Halted Feeding Due to Food Intolerance

Episode with food intolerance. Retention volume\> food volume given the last 2 hours (retention checked routinely every 4 hours) and/or clinical signs consistent with necrotizing enterocolitis (reduced general condition and inflated abdomen). The number of such events will also be indicated.

Time frame:
Birth to gestational week 36
Reported as:
Median · days
Days With Halted Feeding Due to Food Intolerance
daysLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Days With Halted Feeding Due to Food Intolerance5.5 (3 to 9.5)6 (4 to 10)
SecondaryNumber of Stools
Time frame:
Recorded over the first four weeks
Reported as:
Mean · number of stools
Number of Stools
number of stoolsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Number of Stools69.6 (64.1 to 75.1)69.9 (63.8 to 75.9)
SecondaryTime Until Birth Weight is Regained. Specifies the Number of Full Days the Child Has Lived.

Specifies the number of full days the child has lived.

Time frame:
Birth to gw 36+0

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryWeight Gain (SD)

In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

Time frame:
At 14th day of life
Reported as:
Mean · change in standard deviations
Weight Gain (SD)
change in standard deviationsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Weight Gain (SD)-0.88 ± 0.81-0.88 ± 0.81
SecondaryMortality
Time frame:
Birth to gw 36+0
Reported as:
Number · participants
Mortality
participantsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Mortality55
SecondaryNecrotizing Enterocolitis

Bell´s criteria II-III

Time frame:
Birth to gw 36+0
Reported as:
Number · participants
Necrotizing Enterocolitis
participantsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Necrotizing Enterocolitis78
SecondarySepsis

Blood culture positive sepsis

Time frame:
Birth to gw 36+0
Reported as:
Number · participants
Sepsis
participantsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Sepsis2523
SecondaryBronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Need of oxygen or CPAP/ventilator at gw 36+0

Time frame:
Gw 36+0
Reported as:
Number · participants
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
participantsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia4039
SecondaryWeight Gain (SD)

In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

Time frame:
At 28th day of life
Reported as:
Mean · change in standard deviations
Weight Gain (SD)
change in standard deviationsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Weight Gain (SD)-1.14 ± 1.07-1.25 ± 0.95
SecondaryWeight Gain (SD)

In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

Time frame:
At gestational week 36+0
Reported as:
Mean · change in standard deviations
Weight Gain (SD)
change in standard deviationsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Weight Gain (SD)-0.40 ± 1.30-0.24 ± 1.10
SecondaryLength Gain (SD)

In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

Time frame:
At 14th day of life
Reported as:
Mean · change in standard deviations
Length Gain (SD)
change in standard deviationsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Length Gain (SD)-1.02 ± 1.00-1.20 ± 1.01
SecondaryLength Gain (SD)

In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

Time frame:
At 28th day of life
Reported as:
Mean · change in standard deviations
Length Gain (SD)
change in standard deviationsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Length Gain (SD)-1.67 ± 1.47-1.96 ± 1.28
SecondaryLength Gain (SD)

In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

Time frame:
At gestational week 36+0
Reported as:
Mean · change in standard deviations
Length Gain (SD)
change in standard deviationsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Length Gain (SD)-1.44 ± 1.65-1.34 ± 1.52
SecondaryHead Circumference Growth (SD)

In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

Time frame:
At 14th day of life
Reported as:
Mean · change in standard deviations
Head Circumference Growth (SD)
change in standard deviationsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Head Circumference Growth (SD)-0.92 ± 0.56-1.11 ± 0.82
SecondaryHead Circumference Growth (SD)

In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

Time frame:
At 28th day of life
Reported as:
Mean · change in standard deviations
Head Circumference Growth (SD)
change in standard deviationsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Head Circumference Growth (SD)-1.21 ± 0.85-1.73 ± 0.91
Statistical analysis
  • Lactobacillus Reuteri vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = =0.001
SecondaryHead Circumference Growth (SD)

In this analysis, the difference in standard deviation score (delta z-scores) for weight, height and head circumference at birth and 14 and 28 days and gestational week 36+0 will be calculated. At gestational week 36+0 also absolute values will be analyzed. A positive delta z-score indicates faster growth than the growth chart would predict.

Time frame:
At gestational week 36+0
Reported as:
Mean · change in standard deviations
Head Circumference Growth (SD)
change in standard deviationsLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Head Circumference Growth (SD)-0.57 ± 1.29-0.79 ± 1.24
SecondaryNeurological Development

Bayleys´s test by psychologist

Time frame:
At 2 years corrected age

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryNeurological Development Impairment

A composite of several outcomes: impaired cognition at the Bayleys´test, cerebral palsy, blindness and deafness, divided into normal, mild, moderate and severe. Mild -1SD to -2SD, Moderate \<-2D to 3 SD and Severe \<3SD

Time frame:
At 2 years corrected age

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over From birth until 36+0 weeks corrected postmenstrual age. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lactobacillus Reuteri5/68 (7.4%)55/68 (80.9%)0/68 (0%)
Placebo5/66 (7.6%)52/66 (78.8%)0/66 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLactobacillus ReuteriPlacebo
Severe morbidity or deathGeneral disorders55/6852/66
Infection by the probiotic bacteriumInfections and infestations0/680/66

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(age in postmenstrual weeks at birth)ProbioticPlaceboTotal
Mean25.5 ± 1.225.5 ± 1.325.5 ± 1.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ProbioticPlaceboTotal
Female362460
Male324274
Birth weight
Birth weight(gram)ProbioticPlaceboTotal
Mean731 ± 129740 ± 148735 ± 138
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Vrinnevi Hospital in Norrköping
    Norrköping, 60379, Sweden
  • Karolinska
    Stockholm, SE-171 76, Sweden
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Spreckels JE, Wejryd E, Marchini G, Jonsson B, de Vries DH, Jenmalm MC, Landberg E, Sverremark-Ekstrom E, Marti M, Abrahamsson T. Lactobacillus reuteri Colonisation of Extremely Preterm Infants in a Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. Microorganisms. 2021 Apr 24;9(5):915. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9050915. PubMed 33923278 ↗
  • Marti M, Spreckels JE, Ranasinghe PD, Wejryd E, Marchini G, Sverremark-Ekstrom E, Jenmalm MC, Abrahamsson T. Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri supplementation on the gut microbiota in extremely preterm infants in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Cell Rep Med. 2021 Feb 22;2(3):100206. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100206. eCollection 2021 Mar 16. PubMed 33763652 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01603368
Lead sponsor
Ostergotland County Council, Sweden
Collaborators
BioGaia AB, Ekhaga Foundation, Sweden, Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden, University Hospital, Linkoeping, The Swedish Research Council, The Swedish Society of Medicine
Responsible party
Thomas Abrahamsson, MD, PhD (MD, PhD, Neonatologist, Ostergotland County Council, Sweden) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 22, 2012
Start date
Jun 2012
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Results posted
Apr 27, 2020
Last update
Aug 13, 2024

Study contacts

Thomas Abrahamsson, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Linköping University Hospital; County Council of Östergötland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lactobacillus reuteri

Start the discussion