ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04294368Updated Apr 7, 2026

Targeted Fortification of Donor Breast Milk in Preterm Infants

An interventional study of Similac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid and Similac Liquid Protein Fortifier in Prematurity; Extreme, Failure to Thrive in Newborn and Growth Retardation, sponsored by Columbia University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 21 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-07.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2020; still recruiting 6 years 8 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Day to 21 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing standard fortification of donor breast milk to targeted fortification of donor breast milk in preterm infants. The purpose of the study is to determine if there is a benefit to target fortifying donor breast milk in the preterm population. The investigators hypothesize that infants receiving targeted fortification of donor breast milk will have improved growth compared to infants receiving standard fortification of donor breast milk.

Read the detailed description

Breast milk is the best food for premature infants due to its ability to protect infants from necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late onset sepsis. When a premature infant's mother's own milk supply is not enough to provide all the milk that her premature infant needs, donated breast milk is the next best option. One of the downsides of donor breast milk is that it often does not contain as much nutrition for the developing infant compared to the milk of a mother of a premature infant. This means a higher likelihood for poor growth in infant receiving mostly donor breast milk compared to mom's own milk. Due to an inability to easily measure the nutritional content of donor breast milk, standard practice has been to assume that the milk has a certain amount of fat, carbohydrates, and protein. Based on these assumptions, a set amount of additional nutritional fortifier is added to both donor and mom's own breast milk prior to it being given to the infant. Studies show that there is often less nutrition in the donor breast milk to start with than assumed. Technology is now available which uses a small volume sample to measure fat, protein, and carbohydrates in human milk, and hence, calculate the calories in the milk. Using this technology, in this study, the investigators will customize the fortification of donor breast milk by first measuring what is in the milk and then adding any additional fortification that is needed to reach the recommended goals for fat, protein, and carbohydrates. The investigators hypothesize that infants receiving this customized milk, so-called "target" fortified donor breast milk, will have better growth than infants receiving the standard amount of fortification added to their donor breast milk.

The study design involves measurement of macronutrient and calorie content of donor breast milk using a point-of-care human milk analyzer (Miris, AB). The individual macronutrient (protein, fat, and carbohydrate) concentrations will be targeted in the intervention group such that the infant will receive protein of 4 g/kg/day, fat of 6.6 g/kg/day, and carbohydrates of 11.6-13.2 g/kg/day. Fortification will be added in a step-wise fashion daily over a 3-4 day period starting when the infant reaches about 80 ml/kg/day in feeding volume. Fortifiers that may be used in this study include: Abbott Similac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid, Abbott Liquid Protein, Nestle Microlipid, and Medica Nutrition SolCarb. Participants in the control arm will receive donor milk that is fortified in the standard fashion at this institution; that is, 4 packets of Human Milk Fortifier will be added to 100 ml of donor breast milk. Additional fortification such as liquid protein or microlipid may be added to the donor milk and mom's own milk in response to poor growth for participants in both groups, as is standard of care in this Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Patients in both experimental and control groups will always receive mom's own milk first when it is available. Mom's own milk will not be analyzed and will always be fortified in the standard fashion for both groups. The participants will be studied until they reach 34 weeks corrected gestational age.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prematurity; Extreme
  • Failure to Thrive in Newborn
  • Growth Retardation
  • Growth Failure
  • Infant Nutrition Disorders

Keywords

  • Human Milk Analyzer
  • Miris
  • Target Fortification
  • Targeted Fortification
  • Donor Breast Milk
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,550 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 500 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 84 across 1,666 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,136 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Of its 180 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 148 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 21 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Premature infants born \</= 30 weeks gestational age
  • Birth Weight \</= 1500 grams

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parents do no consent to donor milk
  • Confounders for poor growth such as congenital heart disease, GI diagnoses such as gastroschisis and omphalocele, and or major congenital anomalies
  • Grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage diagnoses prior to randomization
  • Small for gestational age (\<3% on Fenton Growth Curve)
  • Failure to initiate fortified feeds prior to 3 weeks of life
  • Diagnosis of necrotizing entercolitis prior to randomization
  • Diagnosis of early onset sepsis confirmed with positive culture
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Control

    Standard fortification of breast milk

    Dietary Supplement: Similac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid · Dietary Supplement: Similac Liquid Protein Fortifier · Dietary Supplement: Nestle Microlipid · Dietary Supplement: Medica Nutrition SolCarb · Other: Analysis with Miris (AB) Human Milk Analyzer

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    Targeted fortification of breast milk

    Dietary Supplement: Similac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid (Targeted Fortification) · Dietary Supplement: Similac Liquid Protein Fortifier (Targeted Fortification) · Dietary Supplement: Nestle Microlipid (Targeted Fortification) · Dietary Supplement: Medica Nutrition SolCarb (Targeted Fortification) · Other: Analysis with Miris (AB) Human Milk Analyzer

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementSimilac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid

    The control group will receive mother's breast milk when it is available. Mother's breast milk will be fortified with 4 packets of Similac Human Milk Fortifier (HMF) per 100 mL. When mother's breast milk is not available, participants will be fed donor breast milk with 4 packets of HMF.

  • Dietary supplementSimilac Liquid Protein Fortifier

    For participants in the control group, additional fortification can be added to the milk for patients in this group in response to poor growth, as is standard of care in the NICU. The standard dose is 1 ml per 30 ml of breast milk.

  • Dietary supplementNestle Microlipid

    For participants in the control group, additional fortification can be added to the milk for patients in this group in response to poor growth, as is standard of care in the NICU. The standard dose is 1 ml per 30 ml of breast milk.

  • Dietary supplementMedica Nutrition SolCarb

    For participants in the control group, additional fortification can be added to the milk for patients in this group in response to poor growth, as is standard of care in the NICU.

  • Dietary supplementSimilac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid (Targeted Fortification)

    The experimental group will receive mother's breast milk when it is available. Mother's breast milk will be fortified with 4 packets of Similac Human Milk Fortifier (HMF) per 100 mL. When mother's breast milk is not available, participants will be fed donor breast milk with 4 packets of HMF. For participants in the experimental group, the investigators will continue to add fortification. Two packets of HMF per day will be added until goal fortification is reached.

  • Dietary supplementSimilac Liquid Protein Fortifier (Targeted Fortification)

    Participants in the experimental group will receive a dose that will vary depending on the base protein content in the donor breast milk for each particular batch of donor breast milk.

  • Dietary supplementNestle Microlipid (Targeted Fortification)

    Participants in the experimental group will receive a dose that will vary depending on the base fat content in the donor breast milk for each particular batch of donor breast milk

  • Dietary supplementMedica Nutrition SolCarb (Targeted Fortification)

    Participants in the experimental group will receive a dose that will vary depending on the base carbohydrate content in the donor breast milk for each particular batch of donor breast milk

  • OtherAnalysis with Miris (AB) Human Milk Analyzer

    For participants in both the control and the experimental arms, each batch of donor milk will be analyzed using the Miris Human Milk Analyzer. Manufacturer recommendations for milk analysis will be strictly followed.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in weight

    Weight change in g/kg/day, z-score value, and change in z-score from week-to-week

    Time frame: Up to 11 weeks

  2. Change in length

    Length change in cm/kg/day, z-score value, and change in z-score from week-to-week

    Time frame: Up to 11 weeks

  3. Head circumference

    Head circumference change in cm/kg/day, z-score value, and change in z-score from week-to-week

    Time frame: Up to 11 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Number of Days of Length of Stay in NICU

    Today number of days in the NICU.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  2. Rate of Mortality

    Rate of morality during NICU hospitalization.

    Time frame: Up to one year

  3. Number of Feeding Intolerance Events

    The number of feeding intolerance events, defined as 1 or more feeds held.

    Time frame: Up to 34 weeks corrected gestational age

  4. Number of Necrotizing Enterocolitis Events

    Number of necrotizing enterocolotis events.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year of age

  5. Incidence of Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

    Incidence of supplemental oxygen requirement at 36 weeks corrected gestational age.

    Time frame: Up to 1 year of age

  6. Incidence of Retinopathy of prematurity

    Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity

    Time frame: Up to 1 year of age

  7. Percentage of Feeds with Donor Milk and Mother's Milk

    Percent of feeds that are donor milk and mom's own milk.

    Time frame: Up to 34 weeks corrected gestational age

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arslanoglu S, Boquien CY, King C, Lamireau D, Tonetto P, Barnett D, Bertino E, Gaya A, Gebauer C, Grovslien A, Moro GE, Weaver G, Wesolowska AM, Picaud JC. Fortification of Human Milk for Preterm Infants: Update and Recommendations of the European Milk Bank Association (EMBA) Working Group on Human Milk Fortification. Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 22;7:76. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00076. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30968003 ↗
  • Billard H, Simon L, Desnots E, Sochard A, Boscher C, Riaublanc A, Alexandre-Gouabau MC, Boquien CY. Calibration Adjustment of the Mid-infrared Analyzer for an Accurate Determination of the Macronutrient Composition of Human Milk. J Hum Lact. 2016 Aug;32(3):NP19-27. doi: 10.1177/0890334415588513. Epub 2015 Jun 2. PubMed 26037506 ↗
  • Fusch C. Avoiding Postnatal Growth Retardation by Individualized Fortification of Breast Milk: Implications for Somatic and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes. Breastfeed Med. 2019 Apr;14(S1):S15-S17. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2019.0031. No abstract available. PubMed 30985203 ↗
  • Fusch G, Rochow N, Choi A, Fusch S, Poeschl S, Ubah AO, Lee SY, Raja P, Fusch C. Rapid measurement of macronutrients in breast milk: How reliable are infrared milk analyzers? Clin Nutr. 2015 Jun;34(3):465-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 May 17. PubMed 24912866 ↗
  • Gidrewicz DA, Fenton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the nutrient content of preterm and term breast milk. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Aug 30;14:216. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-216. PubMed 25174435 ↗
  • Horbar JD, Ehrenkranz RA, Badger GJ, Edwards EM, Morrow KA, Soll RF, Buzas JS, Bertino E, Gagliardi L, Bellu R. Weight Growth Velocity and Postnatal Growth Failure in Infants 501 to 1500 Grams: 2000-2013. Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):e84-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0129. PubMed 26101360 ↗
  • John A, Sun R, Maillart L, Schaefer A, Hamilton Spence E, Perrin MT. Macronutrient variability in human milk from donors to a milk bank: Implications for feeding preterm infants. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210610. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30682200 ↗
  • Morlacchi L, Mallardi D, Gianni ML, Roggero P, Amato O, Piemontese P, Consonni D, Mosca F. Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study. J Transl Med. 2016 Jul 1;14(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0957-y. PubMed 27370649 ↗
  • Montjaux-Regis N, Cristini C, Arnaud C, Glorieux I, Vanpee M, Casper C. Improved growth of preterm infants receiving mother's own raw milk compared with pasteurized donor milk. Acta Paediatr. 2011 Dec;100(12):1548-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02389.x. Epub 2011 Jul 14. PubMed 21707744 ↗
  • O'Connor DL, Ewaschuk JB, Unger S. Human milk pasteurization: benefits and risks. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015 May;18(3):269-75. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000160. PubMed 25769062 ↗
  • Quan M, Wang D, Gou L, Sun Z, Ma J, Zhang L, Wang C, Schibler K, Li Z. Individualized Human Milk Fortification to Improve the Growth of Hospitalized Preterm Infants. Nutr Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;35(4):680-688. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10366. Epub 2019 Jul 3. PubMed 31268194 ↗
  • Rochow N, Fusch G, Choi A, Chessell L, Elliott L, McDonald K, Kuiper E, Purcha M, Turner S, Chan E, Xia MY, Fusch C. Target fortification of breast milk with fat, protein, and carbohydrates for preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;163(4):1001-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.052. Epub 2013 Jun 12. PubMed 23769498 ↗
  • Zhu M, Yang Z, Ren Y, Duan Y, Gao H, Liu B, Ye W, Wang J, Yin S. Comparison of macronutrient contents in human milk measured using mid-infrared human milk analyser in a field study vs. chemical reference methods. Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jan;13(1):10.1111/mcn.12248. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12248. Epub 2016 Feb 23. PubMed 26914990 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) may be shared with other researchers at Columbia University Medical Center at the end of the study for the purposes of creating a neurodevelopmental follow-up study that involves following participants in the study until they reach 2 years (corrected post-natal age) in neurodevelopment follow-up clinic. Permission for future contact is included in the consent form for participants in this study. Only participants who consent to future contact will be approached about a neurodevelopmental follow-up study.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 84 months after the start.

Of 741 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Premature Birth, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 84 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 759 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 2, 2020
First posted
Mar 4, 2020
StartActual
Mar 9, 2020
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2027
Last update
Apr 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04294368
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 4, 2020
Start date
Mar 9, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 7, 2026

Study contacts

Marianne Garland, MD
Contact
mg71@cumc.columbia.edu
212 305 0952
Marianne Garland, MD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion