CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01596166EDMigraine-4Updated Jan 26, 2015

Intravenous Ketorolac and Metoclopramide for Pediatric Migraine in the Emergency Department

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ketorolac Tromethamine and Metoclopramide in Probable Migraine, Migraine With Aura and Migraine Without Aura, sponsored by University of Alberta. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-01-26.

Sponsored by University of Alberta · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
56
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Migraine headaches are a common problem for children. When treatment at home fails, children may benefit from intravenous treatment administered in a hospital setting like the Emergency Department. Most treatments used however have only been tested in adults and the best treatment strategy for children is not always clear. The combination of more than one medication is frequently prescribed in Canadian Emergency Departments. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the combination of ketorolac (an anti-inflammatory pain medication) and metoclopramide (an anti-nauseant that may also relieve migraine headaches) is better than metoclopramide by itself.

Read the detailed description

Migraine headache is a painful condition of recurrent moderate to severe head pain associated with nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. The condition is highly prevalent and a significant community health problem with considerable impact on the health care system. To alleviate the pain and morbidity associated with a migraine attack, drug therapies are often employed including simple analgesics like ibuprofen and migraine-specific medications like sumatriptan. When these treatments fail or in severe, intractable cases, patients and families may present to the Emergency Department (ED).

Ketorolac in combination with metoclopramide or prochlorperazine was the most common multi-drug combination used in 36% of ED presentations for migraine across Canada in our national practice variation study. The scientific rationale for combining a non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with inhibition of both the cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 and 2 isoenzymes with other migraine therapies is enticing; however, no studies have specifically examined the relative efficacy of the practice. Why would the combination of a non-selective NSAID like ketorolac with other migraine therapies improve treatment outcomes? The benefit of multi-target combinations may be relate to the duration of the migraine and the multiple brain areas involved in sustained pain. It has long been recognized that patients who treat their migraine headaches early at the onset have a better response. The underlying mechanism for this phenomenon has now been identified. The initiation of migraine pain requires activation of the trigeminal (5th cranial nerve) nociceptive (pain) system. Activation of these sensory fibers within the arachnoid membrane on the surface of the brain produces the first and most common painful manifestation of migraine - the pulsatile headache. With each heartbeat, minor dilation of the cerebral blood vessels produces stretch and a painful activation of the trigeminal fibers known as peripheral sensitization. The second phase in the maintenance of a migraine attack over several hours is the sensitization of trigeminal pain pathways leading to higher brain centers known as central sensitization. The efficacy of medications like the triptans is greater early in the course of a migraine attack when there is only peripheral sensitization and before the onset of central sensitization. Non-selective NSAIDs like naproxen sodium and ketorolac may be uniquely effective in the reduction of central sensitization in the animal model of migraine and the reduction of migraine pain in adult patients late in the course of a migraine headache.

The population of patients in the ED is uniquely different from outpatients in that most have developed their migraine headache hours or days before presenting. In our practice variation study, the mean duration of the migraine prior to presenting to the ED was 2 days. Including an NSAID when treating a prolonged migraine in the ED may thus increase the therapeutic window and improve outcomes. While many Canadian ED physicians have adopted the practice of combining ketorolac with other migraine therapies, the gold standard assessment of efficacy and safety in a randomized clinical trial has not been applied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Probable Migraine
  • Migraine With Aura
  • Migraine Without Aura

Keywords

  • migraine
  • pediatric
  • childhood
  • emergency department
  • ketorolac
  • metoclopramide
  • intravenous
03

In context

Migraine Disorders

1,528 studies on the registry are indexed under Migraine Disorders; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 80 across 1,175 interventional studies indexed under Migraine Disorders.

Browse Migraine Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Alberta is the lead sponsor of 800 studies on the registry; 168 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

A patient is legible to participate in this study if they meet the following criteria:

  1. Patient is between 6 and 17 years of age inclusive
  2. Treatment with usual therapy at home or at least one dose of oral ibuprofen or acetaminophen has not provided satisfactory relief
  3. Intravenous therapy is indicated in the opinion of the treating ED physician
  4. Patient has a history of migraine as defined by the International Classification of Headache Disorders - 2nd edition (Appendix 1) and meets the following criteria:

    1. During headache, at least 1 of the following: nausea and/or vomiting; two of five symptoms (photophobia, phonophobia, difficulty thinking, lightheadedness, or fatigue). Symptoms may be inferred from patient's behavior.
    2. Headache has at least 2 of the following characteristics: bifrontal/bitemporal or unilateral location; pulsating/throbbing quality; moderate or severe pain intensity; aggravation by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity. Symptoms may be inferred from patient's behavior.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

A patient is not eligible to participate in the study if any of the following criteria apply:

  1. Patient has a contraindication to the use of metoclopramide or ketorolac in the opinion of the ED physician
  2. Patient has a ventriculoperitoneal shunt
  3. Patient has a fever (temperature > 38.5 oC)
  4. Patient has meningismus or clinical suspicion of meningitis in the opinion of the ED physician
  5. Patient has a history of head trauma causing headache in the last 1 week prior to presentation to the ED
  6. Patient is unable to complete the efficacy assessments (e.g. language barrier)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
56 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Metoclopramide, Ketorolac

    1. 10 mL/kg IV 0.9% sodium chloride 2. Metoclopramide 0.2 mg/kg (max 10 mg) IV 3. Ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg (max 30 mg) IV

    Drug: Ketorolac Tromethamine · Drug: Metoclopramide

  • Placebo comparator
    Metoclopramide, Placebo

    1. 10 mL/kg IV 0.9% sodium chloride 2. Metoclopramide 0.2 mg/kg (max 10 mg) IV 3. Placebo (normal saline)

    Drug: Metoclopramide

Interventions

  • DrugKetorolac Tromethamine

    Ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg (max 30 mg) IV

    Also known as: Toradol, 74103-07-4

  • DrugMetoclopramide

    Metoclopramide 0.2 mg/kg (max 10 mg) IV

    Also known as: Maxeran, Reglan, 364-62-5

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean reduction in pain intensity

    Measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

    Time frame: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain freedom

    VAS=0

    Time frame: 2 hours

  2. Headache relief - 33

    Defined as a 33% reduction on the VAS.

    Time frame: 2 hours

  3. Headache relief - 50

    Defined as a 50% reduction on the VAS

    Time frame: 2 hours

  4. Presence of nausea

    Time frame: 2 hours

  5. Presence of vomiting

    Time frame: 2 hours

  6. Use of rescue medications

    Permitted per protocol 60 minutes after start if intravenous infusion.

    Time frame: 2 hours

  7. Sustained pain-free

    No recurrence of headache within 24 hours if pain was completely eliminated (VAS = 0) prior to discharge.

    Time frame: 25 hours

  8. Sustained headache relief

    No increase in headache by 33% on the VAS or 50% on the VAS if headache relief was initially achieved.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  9. Minimum clinically significant difference

    1. "I would take the medication again" 2. "My headache is a bit better/worse" 3. "My headache is a lot better/worse"

    Time frame: 2 hours

  10. Adverse events

    All serious and non-serious adverse events including akathisia and dystonia.

    Time frame: 2 hours

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Alberta Children's Hospital
    Calgary, Alberta T3B 6A8, Canada
  • Stollery Children's Hospital
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2C8, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01596166
Lead sponsor
University of Alberta
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 10, 2012
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Apr 2014
Completion
Apr 2014
Last update
Jan 26, 2015

Study contacts

Lawrence P. Richer, MD, MSc
principal investigator · University of Alberta

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion