ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01586741Updated Dec 23, 2020Results posted

A Study to Evaluate Two Different Surgical Methods for Treatment for Abdominal Wall Diastasis

An interventional study of Quill suture application for repair or polypropylene mesh in Abdominal Hernias and Other Abdominal Wall Conditions, Post-operative Pain and Recurrence, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-23.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2009, registered Nov 2011).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a three armed prospective randomized trial that will compare two different surgical techniques for reconstruction of the abdominal wall diastasis with a conservative treatment procedure.

The study hypothesis:

Which surgical approach provides the safest and best long term results for patients with abdominal wall diastasis either the insertion of net alternative with a double row suture or exercise alone?

Read the detailed description

The conservative control group will receive a special training program for abdominal muscle training for 3 months,and all groups wearing girdle for 3 months.

All patients examined with a CT scan before randomization and then a Biodex measurement of abdominal muscle strength.

All patients must also complete the SF-36 (scientifically tested instruments to measure self-reported physical and mental health) and VHPQ (ventral hernia Pain Questionnaire).

Two-thirds of patients receive surgery and followed up with a 3 month and 1-year control.At 1 year of control, all go through a CT scan and a Biodex measurement of muscle strength.

The control group followed up after one and half months and 3 months. In the surgery group, patients may not know what reconstruction they received before the final assessment after 1 year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Abdominal Hernias and Other Abdominal Wall Conditions
  • Post-operative Pain
  • Recurrence
03

In context

Hernia, Abdominal

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Abdominal; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 96 is close to the median of 90 across 48 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Abdominal.

Browse Hernia, Abdominal studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,148 studies on the registry; 276 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Abdominal wall diastasis> 3 cm
  2. Discomfort or tenderness in the abdominal wall
  3. Desire for abdominal wall reconstruction
  4. Women have undergone at least one birth
  5. Smoking cessation 1 month pre-and 3 months post-operatively

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. \<18 years old
  2. Ongoing pregnancy
  3. Ongoing breastfeeding
  4. Current therapy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Polypropylene mesh

    Reconstruction of the abdominal wall diastasis with insertion of a polypropylene mesh on 30 patients.

    Procedure: Quill suture application for repair or polypropylene mesh

  • Active comparator
    quill suture

    Reconstruction of the abdominal wall diastasis with double row absorbable suture ( Quill Self-retaining system) on 30 patients.

    Procedure: Quill suture application for repair or polypropylene mesh

  • No intervention
    conservative treatment

    Regular abdominal exercises workout for three months for 30 patients.

Interventions

  • ProcedureQuill suture application for repair or polypropylene mesh

    The first arm may be insertion of the-mesh The second arm may double row- suture The third arm may be conservative -training

    Also known as: Quill suture, And Soft mesh Polypropylene mesh

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of Diastasis One Year Post-operatively That Indicated by CT Scan or Clinical Investigation.

    All patients go through a CT scan and clinical examination one year after surgery

    Time frame: follow-up 1 year after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse Event Indicated in Case Report Formulary During the First 12 Months

    adverse event categorize as superficial wound infection, seroma, fistula or deep wound infection

    Time frame: follow-up 1 year after surgery

  2. Pain Post Operatively Measured by the VHPQ Questionnaires

    The validity and reliability of the VHPQ make it a useful tool in assessing postoperative pain and patient satisfaction. PMID: 22446989 PubMed - as supplied by publisher

    Time frame: follow-up 1 year after surgery

07

Results

Posted Dec 23, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneQuill SuturePolypropylene MeshConservative Treatment
Started282932
Completed272930
Not completed102

Outcome measures

PrimaryRecurrence of Diastasis One Year Post-operatively That Indicated by CT Scan or Clinical Investigation.

All patients go through a CT scan and clinical examination one year after surgery

Time frame:
follow-up 1 year after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Recurrence of Diastasis One Year Post-operatively That Indicated by CT Scan or Clinical Investigation.
ParticipantsPolypropylene MeshQuill SutureConservative Treatment
Recurrence of Diastasis One Year Post-operatively That Indicated by CT Scan or Clinical Investigation.2326
SecondaryAdverse Event Indicated in Case Report Formulary During the First 12 Months

adverse event categorize as superficial wound infection, seroma, fistula or deep wound infection

Time frame:
follow-up 1 year after surgery

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

SecondaryPain Post Operatively Measured by the VHPQ Questionnaires

The validity and reliability of the VHPQ make it a useful tool in assessing postoperative pain and patient satisfaction. PMID: 22446989 PubMed - as supplied by publisher

Time frame:
follow-up 1 year after surgery

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Quill Suture0/27 (0%)0/27 (0%)0/27 (0%)
Polypropylene Mesh0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)
Conservative Treatment0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Polypropylene MeshQuill SutureConservative TreatmentTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years29283188
>=65 years0011
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Polypropylene MeshQuill SutureConservative TreatmentTotal
Median42 (27 to 62)39.6 (24 to 61)44.2 (28.9 to 66.9)41.9 (24 to 66.9)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Polypropylene MeshQuill SutureConservative TreatmentTotal
Female28273287
Male1102
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Polypropylene MeshQuill SutureConservative TreatmentTotal
Count of participants———0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Polypropylene MeshQuill SutureConservative TreatmentTotal
Sweden29283289
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Clintec, Karolinska Institutet
    Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Emanuelsson P, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K, Stark B. Early complications, pain, and quality of life after reconstructive surgery for abdominal rectus muscle diastasis: a 3-month follow-up. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Aug;67(8):1082-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 2. PubMed 24880577 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2009 to primary completion in Nov 2011, 23 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2020, 9 years 1 month after primary completion.

Of 31 interventional studies with no phase under Hernia, Abdominal, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 60. This study's 23 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 21, 2011
First posted
Apr 27, 2012
StartActual
Dec 2009
Primary completionActual
Nov 2011
CompletionActual
Dec 2012
Results first posted
Dec 23, 2020
Last update
Dec 23, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 23, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01586741
Responsible party
Peter Emanuelsson (MD, consultant in plastic surgery, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 27, 2012
Start date
Dec 2009
Primary completion
Nov 2011
Completion
Dec 2012
Results posted
Dec 23, 2020
Last update
Dec 23, 2020

Study contacts

Ulf S Gunnarsson, professor
study director · Karolinska Institutet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion