ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01584440Updated Nov 26, 2021Results posted

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Study of AVP-923 (Dextromethorphan/Quinidine) for Treatment of Symptoms of Agitation in Participants With Alzheimer's Disease

A Phase 2 interventional study of AVP-923-20 and Placebo in Agitation and Alzheimer's Disease, sponsored by Avanir Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 44 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-26.

Primary conditionAlzheimer DiseaseRegistry: Psychomotor AgitationReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Psychomotor Agitation — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Alzheimer Disease
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Psychomotor Agitation to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Alzheimer Disease.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Avanir Pharmaceuticals (part of Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd.) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AVP-923 compared to placebo, for the treatment of symptoms of agitation in participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

Read the detailed description

Eligible participants for this study must have a diagnosis of probable AD and must have clinically meaningful agitation secondary to AD.

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-dummy, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, consisting of 10 weeks of treatment.

Up to 200 participants will be enrolled at approximately 30-40 centers in the US.

Study medication will be administered orally twice-daily from Day 1 through Day 70. Screening must occur within within approximately 4 weeks prior to randomization. Following screening procedures for assessment of inclusion and exclusion criteria, eligible participants will be randomized into the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Agitation
  • Alzheimer's Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • AVP-923-20
  • AVP-923-30
  • AVP-923
  • Dextromethorphan
  • Quinidine
  • Neuropsychiatric Inventory
  • Aggression
  • Efficacy
  • Safety
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease Reclassified

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 220 is above the median of 70 across 3,019 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Avanir Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Avanir Pharmaceuticals became part of Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd..

Compared within Alzheimer Disease, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Psychomotor Agitation. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD).

The participant has symptoms of agitation secondary to AD, that interfere with daily routine and for which a prescription medication is deemed indicated, in the opinion of the investigator.

Either out-patients or residents of an assisted-living facility or a skilled nursing home.

CGI-S score is ≥ 4 (moderately ill) at screening and baseline.

(MMSE) score at screening between 8 and 28 (inclusive).

Caregiver who is able and willing to comply with all required study procedures, ensuring that the participant attends all study visits and takes the study medication as instructed. In order to qualify as a caregiver for this study, the individual should spend time with the participant for a minimum of 4 hours on 4 separate days per week.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

Participant has other type of dementia (e.g., vascular dementia, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease, substance-induced dementia).

Participant with co-existent clinically significant or unstable systemic diseases that could confound the interpretation of the safety results of the study (e.g. , poorly controlled diabetes, poorly controlled hypertension, unstable pulmonary, renal or hepatic disease, unstable ischemic cardiac disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, certain cardiac conduction abnormalities including prolongation, or unstable valvular heart disease).

Participant with myasthenia gravis.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
220 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants will receive placebo during Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the study.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    AVP-923

    Participants will receive AVP-923-20 and AVP-923-30 in a sequential manner during Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the study.

    Drug: AVP-923-20 · Drug: AVP-923-30

  • Experimental
    Placebo then AVP-923

    Participants will receive placebo in Stage 1 followed by AVP-923 in Stage 2.

    Drug: AVP-923-20 · Drug: Placebo · Drug: AVP-923-30

Interventions

  • AVP-923-20: 20 mg of dextromethorphan and 10 mg of quinidine

    Also known as: Nuedexta

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo capsule

  • DrugAVP-923-30

    AVP-923-30: 30 mg of dextromethorphan and 10 mg of quinidine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Agitation/Aggression Domain Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. The Agitation/Aggression domain was designed to collect information on the behavioral aspects of agitation/aggression in participants with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and clinically meaningful agitation secondary to AD. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score. Data are reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Adverse Event

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as AEs that first occurred, or worsened, after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the permanent discontinuation of the study medication (first dose date ≤ AE start date ≤ date of last dose + 30 days)

    Time frame: up to Week 10

  2. Change in the Total NPI Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. The total score is calculated as a sum of all 12 domain scores and thus ranges from 12 to 144. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  3. Change in the Individual NPI Domain Scores From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score. Sleep/nighttime behavior disorders = S/NB disorders.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  4. Change in the Sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Disinhibition, and Aberrant Motor Behavior NPI Domain (NPI4D) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. The NPI4D score is the sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Disinhibition, and Aberrant Motor Behavior domain scores, and thus ranges from 4 to 48. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  5. Change in the Sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Anxiety, and Aberrant Motor Behavior NPI Domain (NPI4A) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. The NPI4A score is the sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Anxiety, and Aberrant Motor Behavior domain scores, and thus ranges from 4 to 48. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  6. Change in the Total Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Caregiver Distress Score (NPI-CDS) From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. For each domain, the caregiver is asked to rate how emotionally distressing they find the symptom behavior on the following scale: 0, not at all; 1, minimally; 2, mildly; 3, moderately; 4, severely; 5, very severely or extremely. The total NPI-CDS score is calculated as the sum of all 12 domain scores and thus ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score represents increased distress. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  7. Change in the NPI-CDS for the Agitation/Aggression Domain From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. For the Agitation/Aggression domain, the caregiver is asked to rate how emotionally distressing they find the symptom behavior on the following scale: 0, not at all; 1, minimally; 2, mildly; 3, moderately; 4, severely; 5, very severely or extremely. A higher score represents increased distress. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  8. Change in the NPI-CDS NPI4D Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. For the NPI4D NPI-CDS score, the caregiver is asked to rate how emotionally distressing they find the symptom behavior (for the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Disinhibition, and Aberrant Motor Behavior domains) on the following scale: 0, not at all; 1, minimally; 2, mildly; 3, moderately; 4, severely; 5, very severely or extremely. The NPI4D NPI-CDS score ranges from 0 to 20. A higher score represents increased distress. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  9. Change in the NPI-CDS NPI4A Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. For the NPI4A NPI-CDS score, the caregiver is asked to rate how emotionally distressing they find the symptom behavior (for the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Anxiety, and Aberrant Motor Behavior domains) on the following scale: 0, not at all; 1, minimally; 2, mildly; 3, moderately; 4, severely; 5, very severely or extremely. The NPI4A NPI-CDS score ranges from 0 to 20. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  10. Change in the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The CSI is a 13-question tool that is used to measure strain related to care provision and to identify families with potential caregiving concerns. There is at least one item for each of the following major domains: Employment, Financial, Physical, Social, and Time. A 0 (No) to 1 (Yes) scale is used for each of the 13 questions; thus the total score ranges from 0 to 13. Higher scores signify higher stress levels. Positive responses to 7 or more items on the index indicate a greater level of strain. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  11. Change in the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The CSDD is a 19-item interview specifically developed to assess the signs and symptoms of major depression in participants with dementia. Each of the 19 items is rated for severity on a scale of 0 to 2 (0, absent; 1, mild or intermittent; 2, severe). The total score is calculated as the sum of the item scores and thus ranges from 0 to 38. Higher scores signify more severe depression. Scores above 10 indicate probable major depression. Scores above 18 indicate definite major depression. Scores below 6, as a rule, are associated with the absence of significant depressive symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  12. Change in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline), as Analyzed by the Specified SPCD Methodology

    The MMSE is a brief test that is used to screen for cognitive impairment. The MMSE scale comprises 11 questions or simple tasks concerning orientation, memory, attention, and language to evaluate the participant's cognitive state. The anchor values are not consistent for each task. The MMSE total score is calculated by summing the item scores across all 11 tasks. A participant's total possible MMSE score ranges from 0 to 30 points. Higher scores indicate milder cognitive impairment. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  13. Change in the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The QoL-AD is a brief, 13-item measure designed specifically to obtain a rating of the participant's quality of life (QoL) from both the participant and the caregiver. It uses simple and straightforward language and responses and includes assessments of the individual's relationships with friends and family, concerns about finances, physical condition, mood, and an overall assessment of life quality. Caregivers complete the measure as a questionnaire about the participants' QoL, whereas participants complete it in interview format about their own QoL. Each of the 13 items is rated on a 4-point scale, with 1 indicating a poor QoL and 4 indicating an excellent QoL. Total scores range from 13 to 52, with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  14. Change in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

    The ADCS-ADL inventory measures basic activities of daily living such as dressing, conversation, eating, bathing, and grooming. The 19-item version, covering mainly basic ADL, is used to assess participants with more severe disabilities. The ADCS-ADL uses a scale from 0 to 54. Lower scores indicate declining ability. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  15. Change in the NPI Agitation/Aggression Domain Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 8 and Day 22 and From Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) to Day 43 and Day 57

    The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. The Agitation/Aggression domain was designed to collect information on the behavioral aspects of agitation/aggression in participants with probable AD and clinically meaningful agitation secondary to AD. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Days 8 and 22; Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Days 43 and 57

  16. Number of Participants With the Indicated Response on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change Rating (mADCS-CGIC) Scale Agitation Domain at Day 36 and Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline)

    The intent of the ADCS version of the CGIC is to provide a means to reliably assess the global impression of change from Baseline in a clinical trial. The mADCS-CGIC is a modification of the ADCS-CGIC instrument that focuses specifically on agitation. The participant is asked to rate their impression of change from Baseline as: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to Stage 1 randomization.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  17. Number of Participants With the Indicated Response on the mADCS-CGIC Scale Agitation Domain at Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline)

    The intent of the ADCS version of the CGIC is to provide a means to reliably assess the global impression of change from Baseline in a clinical trial. The mADCS-CGIC is a modification of the ADCS-CGIC instrument that focuses specifically on agitation. The participant is asked to rate their impression of change from Baseline as: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. For placebo non-responders re-randomized to AVP-923 or placebo at Stage 2, Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to Stage 2 re-randomization.

    Time frame: Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  18. Number of Participants With the Indicated Categorical Response on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for the Caregiver Domain at Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline)

    The PGI-C uses a 7-point scale to assess treatment response and to rate the global impression of clinical change in a participant's agitation. The participant is asked to rate their impression of change from Baseline as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; 7, very much worse. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to Stage 1 randomization.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70

  19. Number of Participants With the Indicated Categorical Response on the PGI-C for the Caregiver Domain at Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline)

    The PGI-C uses a 7-point scale to assess treatment response and to rate the global impression of clinical change in a participant's agitation. The participant is asked to rate their impression of change from Baseline as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; 7, very much worse. For placebo non-responders re-randomized to AVP-923 or placebo at Stage 2, Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to Stage 2 re-randomization.

    Time frame: Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 70

  20. Number of Participants With the Indicated Change in the Concomitant Use of Allowed Psychotropic Drugs Compared to Their Baseline Use

    Concomitant medications (CMs) are defined as non-study medications with a start date on or before the final study visit, and that were either ongoing at the end of the study or had a stop date on or after the date of first dose of study drug. Drugs for the treatment of AD (e.g., donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, memantine) were allowed when administered at stable dose for at least 2 months prior to randomization. Concomitant use of the following medications was allowed, provided the participant had been on a stable dose for at least 1 month prior to randomization and remained stable throughout the study: medications for agitation secondary to AD; medications for nighttime management of insomnia or behavioral disturbances that included short-acting benzodiazepines, a low dose of alprazolam up to 0.5 milligrams (mg)/day, and a low dose of trazodone up to 50 mg/day; hypnotics for the treatment of insomnia; and certain classes of antidepressants.

    Time frame: up to Week 10

  21. Number of Participants Using Rescue Medications

    Participants were allowed to receive oral lorazepam as rescue medication for the short-term treatment of symptoms of agitation, if deemed necessary by the investigator. Lorazepam was to be administered at doses up to 1.5 mg/day, and dosing was not to exceed 3 days in any 7-day period.

    Time frame: up to Week 10

07

Results

Posted Nov 26, 2021

Participant flow

Stage 1 (5 Weeks)
Participant flow — Stage 1 (5 Weeks)
MilestoneStage 1: AVP-923Stage 1: PlaceboAVP-923 in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/Placebo in Stage 2
Started93127000
Completed83119000
Not completed108000
Withdrew: Advised not to take study medication10000
Withdrew: Adverse event53000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10000
Withdrew: Protocol violation23000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by parent/guardian02000
Stage 2 (5 Weeks)
Participant flow — Stage 2 (5 Weeks)
MilestoneStage 1: AVP-923Stage 1: PlaceboAVP-923 in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/Placebo in Stage 2
Started00835960
Completed00805559
Not completed00341
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject00120
Withdrew: Adverse event00121
Withdrew: Unable to return to site: rehabilitation00100

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Agitation/Aggression Domain Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. The Agitation/Aggression domain was designed to collect information on the behavioral aspects of agitation/aggression in participants with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and clinically meaningful agitation secondary to AD. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score. Data are reported for only those participants contributing data to the analysis.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Agitation/Aggression Domain Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-1.7 ± 3.10-3.3 ± 2.98
Day 70-0.8 ± 3.59-2.0 ± 3.19
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = <=0.001 · Ordinary least squares (ols) z-statistic: -1.50Sequential Parallel Comparison Design (SPCD): data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.50Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.59Day 70
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Type of Adverse Event

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are defined as AEs that first occurred, or worsened, after the first dose of study medication and within 30 days after the permanent discontinuation of the study medication (first dose date ≤ AE start date ≤ date of last dose + 30 days)

Time frame:
up to Week 10
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Type of Adverse Event
ParticipantsAll AVP-923Placebo
Participants with ≥ 1 TEAE9355
Participants with discontinuations due to a TEAE84
Participants who died00
SecondaryChange in the Total NPI Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. The total score is calculated as a sum of all 12 domain scores and thus ranges from 12 to 144. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Total NPI Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-8.5 ± 14.35-13.5 ± 17.48
Day 70-2.5 ± 11.82-6.0 ± 2.48
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.014 · Ols z-statistic: -2.46SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -4.20
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -3.78Day 70
SecondaryChange in the Individual NPI Domain Scores From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score. Sleep/nighttime behavior disorders = S/NB disorders.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Individual NPI Domain Scores From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36, Delusions-0.6 ± 2.93-0.8 ± 2.89
Day 36, Hallucinations-0.1 ± 1.680.2 ± 1.76
Day 36, Depression/dysphoria-1.0 ± 2.89-0.9 ± 2.49
Day 36, Anxiety-1.2 ± 3.69-0.6 ± 3.21
Day 36, Euphoria/elation-0.1 ± 1.27-0.3 ± 1.85
Day 36, Apathy/indifference-0.5 ± 3.69-0.9 ± 4.11
Day 36, Disinhibition-0.7 ± 3.04-0.9 ± 3.46
Day 36, Irritability/lability-1.2 ± 3.23-2.2 ± 4.08
Day 36, Aberrant motor behavior-0.4 ± 3.95-1.2 ± 3.98
Day 36, S/NB disorders-0.1 ± 2.50-1.0 ± 3.82
Day 36, Appetite/eating changes-1.2 ± 3.25-1.2 ± 3.68
Day 70, Delusions-0.7 ± 3.090.1 ± 3.17
Day 70, Hallucinations-0.4 ± 1.60-0.1 ± 2.03
Day 70, Depression/dysphoria0.2 ± 2.360.2 ± 2.20
Day 70, Anxiety-0.3 ± 2.89-1.0 ± 2.76
Day 70, Euphoria/elation-0.0 ± 1.25-0.2 ± 0.95
Day 70, Apathy/indifference0.4 ± 1.96-0.5 ± 3.43
Day 70, Disinhibition-0.8 ± 2.51-0.8 ± 2.67
Day 70, Irritability/lability-0.7 ± 3.71-1.0 ± 3.40
Day 70, Aberrant motor behavior0.4 ± 3.15-0.8 ± 2.52
Day 70, S/NB disorders-0.1 ± 2.040.0 ± 2.46
Day 70, Appetite/eating changes0.4 ± 2.280.1 ± 2.73
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.444 · Ols z-statistic: 0.77Delusions Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.27Delusions Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 0.78Delusions Domain; Day 70
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.861 · Ols z-statistic: -0.18Hallucinations Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.29Hallucinations Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 0.22Hallucinations Domain; Day 70
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.749 · Ols z-statistic: -0.32Depression/Dysphoria Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.07Depression/Dysphoria Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.10Depression/Dysphoria Domain; Day 70
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.416 · Ols z-statistic: -0.81Anxiety Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 0.28Anxiety Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.81Anxiety Domain
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.287 · Ols z-statistic: -1.07Euphoria/Elation Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 0.04Euphoria/Elation Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.34Euphoria/Elation Domain; Day 70
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.191 · Ols z-statistic: -1.31Apathy/Indifference Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.16Apathy/Indifference Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.77Apathy/Indifference Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.271 · Ols z-statistic: -1.10Disinhibition Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.22Disinhibition Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.37Disinhibition Domain; Day 70
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.029 · Ols z-statistic: -2.18Irritability/Lability Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.70Irritability/Lability Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.93Irritability/Lability Domain; Day 70
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.027 · Ols z-statistic: -2.21Aberrant Motor Behavior Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.38Aberrant Motor Behavior Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.22Aberrant Motor Behavior Domain; Day 70
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.274 · Ols z-statistic: -1.09Sleep/Nighttime Behavior Disorders Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.57Sleep/Nighttime Behavior disorders Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.08Sleep/Nighttime Behavior disorders Domain; Day 70
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.513 · Ols z-statistic: -0.65Appetite/Eating Changes Domain. SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.16Appetite/Eating Changes Domain; Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.24Appetite/Eating Changes Domain; Day 70
SecondaryChange in the Sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Disinhibition, and Aberrant Motor Behavior NPI Domain (NPI4D) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. The NPI4D score is the sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Disinhibition, and Aberrant Motor Behavior domain scores, and thus ranges from 4 to 48. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Disinhibition, and Aberrant Motor Behavior NPI Domain (NPI4D) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-4.0 ± 8.24-7.6 ± 9.08
Day 70-1.9 ± 7.65-4.6 ± 7.31
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = <=0.001 · Ols z-statistic: -3.53SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -3.01Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -3.49Day 70
SecondaryChange in the Sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Anxiety, and Aberrant Motor Behavior NPI Domain (NPI4A) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. The NPI4A score is the sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Anxiety, and Aberrant Motor Behavior domain scores, and thus ranges from 4 to 48. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Sum of the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Anxiety, and Aberrant Motor Behavior NPI Domain (NPI4A) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-4.5 ± 8.53-7.3 ± 9.08
Day 70-1.4 ± 7.94-4.8 ± 7.05
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.001 · Ols z-statistic: -3.34SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -2.41Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -3.94Day 70
SecondaryChange in the Total Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Caregiver Distress Score (NPI-CDS) From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. For each domain, the caregiver is asked to rate how emotionally distressing they find the symptom behavior on the following scale: 0, not at all; 1, minimally; 2, mildly; 3, moderately; 4, severely; 5, very severely or extremely. The total NPI-CDS score is calculated as the sum of all 12 domain scores and thus ranges from 0 to 60. A higher score represents increased distress. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Total Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Caregiver Distress Score (NPI-CDS) From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-3.6 ± 6.64-6.6 ± 7.81
Day 70-2.0 ± 5.74-2.6 ± 5.52
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.014 · Ols z-statistic: -2.46SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -2.65Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.01
SecondaryChange in the NPI-CDS for the Agitation/Aggression Domain From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. For the Agitation/Aggression domain, the caregiver is asked to rate how emotionally distressing they find the symptom behavior on the following scale: 0, not at all; 1, minimally; 2, mildly; 3, moderately; 4, severely; 5, very severely or extremely. A higher score represents increased distress. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the NPI-CDS for the Agitation/Aggression Domain From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-0.6 ± 1.32-1.4 ± 1.54
Day 70-0.7 ± 1.38-0.5 ± 1.44
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.010 · Ols z-statistic: -2.57SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.68Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.20Day 70
SecondaryChange in the NPI-CDS NPI4D Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. For the NPI4D NPI-CDS score, the caregiver is asked to rate how emotionally distressing they find the symptom behavior (for the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Disinhibition, and Aberrant Motor Behavior domains) on the following scale: 0, not at all; 1, minimally; 2, mildly; 3, moderately; 4, severely; 5, very severely or extremely. The NPI4D NPI-CDS score ranges from 0 to 20. A higher score represents increased distress. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the NPI-CDS NPI4D Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-1.5 ± 3.39-3.3 ± 4.11
Day 70-1.2 ± 3.08-1.8 ± 3.12
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.002 · Ols z-statistic: -3.08SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.56Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.90Day 70
SecondaryChange in the NPI-CDS NPI4A Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. For the NPI4A NPI-CDS score, the caregiver is asked to rate how emotionally distressing they find the symptom behavior (for the Agitation/Aggression, Irritability/Lability, Anxiety, and Aberrant Motor Behavior domains) on the following scale: 0, not at all; 1, minimally; 2, mildly; 3, moderately; 4, severely; 5, very severely or extremely. The NPI4A NPI-CDS score ranges from 0 to 20. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the NPI-CDS NPI4A Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-1.7 ± 3.34-3.3 ± 3.84
Day 70-1.0 ± 3.51-1.5 ± 2.70
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.008 · Ols z-statistic: -2.66SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.43Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.75Day 70
SecondaryChange in the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The CSI is a 13-question tool that is used to measure strain related to care provision and to identify families with potential caregiving concerns. There is at least one item for each of the following major domains: Employment, Financial, Physical, Social, and Time. A 0 (No) to 1 (Yes) scale is used for each of the 13 questions; thus the total score ranges from 0 to 13. Higher scores signify higher stress levels. Positive responses to 7 or more items on the index indicate a greater level of strain. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-0.6 ± 2.06-1.2 ± 2.37
Day 700.1 ± 1.88-0.2 ± 1.62
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.050 · Ols z-statistic: -1.96SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.62Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.30Day 70
SecondaryChange in the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The CSDD is a 19-item interview specifically developed to assess the signs and symptoms of major depression in participants with dementia. Each of the 19 items is rated for severity on a scale of 0 to 2 (0, absent; 1, mild or intermittent; 2, severe). The total score is calculated as the sum of the item scores and thus ranges from 0 to 38. Higher scores signify more severe depression. Scores above 10 indicate probable major depression. Scores above 18 indicate definite major depression. Scores below 6, as a rule, are associated with the absence of significant depressive symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 360.6 ± 3.84-1.0 ± 3.43
Day 70-0.7 ± 2.58-0.9 ± 2.93
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.020 · Ols z-statistic: -2.33SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.57Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.18Day 70
SecondaryChange in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline), as Analyzed by the Specified SPCD Methodology

The MMSE is a brief test that is used to screen for cognitive impairment. The MMSE scale comprises 11 questions or simple tasks concerning orientation, memory, attention, and language to evaluate the participant's cognitive state. The anchor values are not consistent for each task. The MMSE total score is calculated by summing the item scores across all 11 tasks. A participant's total possible MMSE score ranges from 0 to 30 points. Higher scores indicate milder cognitive impairment. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline), as Analyzed by the Specified SPCD Methodology
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-0.3 ± 2.770.2 ± 3.02
Day 70-0.5 ± 2.530.3 ± 2.76
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.053 · Ols z-statistic: 1.94SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 0.52Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 0.84Day 70
SecondaryChange in the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The QoL-AD is a brief, 13-item measure designed specifically to obtain a rating of the participant's quality of life (QoL) from both the participant and the caregiver. It uses simple and straightforward language and responses and includes assessments of the individual's relationships with friends and family, concerns about finances, physical condition, mood, and an overall assessment of life quality. Caregivers complete the measure as a questionnaire about the participants' QoL, whereas participants complete it in interview format about their own QoL. Each of the 13 items is rated on a 4-point scale, with 1 indicating a poor QoL and 4 indicating an excellent QoL. Total scores range from 13 to 52, with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36, Cargiver0.3 ± 4.660.4 ± 4.28
Day 70, Caregiver0.9 ± 4.27-0.3 ± 3.93
Day 36, Participant-0.0 ± 5.181.3 ± 6.12
Day 70, Participant0.7 ± 4.261.5 ± 5.06
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.469 · Ols z-statistic: -0.72Caregiver
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 0.28Caregiver: Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.06Caregiver: Day 70
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.159 · Ols z-statistic: 1.41Participant
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 1.09Participant: Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 0.70Participant: Day 70
SecondaryChange in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70

The ADCS-ADL inventory measures basic activities of daily living such as dressing, conversation, eating, bathing, and grooming. The 19-item version, covering mainly basic ADL, is used to assess participants with more severe disabilities. The ADCS-ADL uses a scale from 0 to 54. Lower scores indicate declining ability. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory (ADCS-ADL) Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and From Day 36 to Day 70
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 36-0.8 ± 3.89-0.9 ± 4.27
Day 70-0.6 ± 3.45-2.0 ± 4.64
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.163 · Ols z-statistic: -1.40SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.07Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.39Day 70
SecondaryChange in the NPI Agitation/Aggression Domain Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 8 and Day 22 and From Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) to Day 43 and Day 57

The NPI is a retrospective interview covering 12 neuropsychiatric symptom domains and is used to evaluate psychopathology, neuropsychiatric manifestations, and caregiver distress. The Agitation/Aggression domain was designed to collect information on the behavioral aspects of agitation/aggression in participants with probable AD and clinically meaningful agitation secondary to AD. Each NPI domain is rated by the caregiver for symptom frequency and severity. Symptom frequency is rated as: 1, occasionally; 2, often; 3, frequently; 4, very frequently. Symptom severity is rated as: 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. The total domain score is calculated as the frequency score multiplied by the severity score and thus ranges from 1 to 12. A higher score represents worsening symptoms. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-Baseline score minus the Baseline score.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Days 8 and 22; Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Days 43 and 57
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in the NPI Agitation/Aggression Domain Score From Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline) to Day 8 and Day 22 and From Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) to Day 43 and Day 57
score on a scalePlaceboAVP-923
Day 8-1.4 ± 2.73-2.2 ± 2.93
Day 22-1.6 ± 2.86-2.7 ± 3.18
Day 43-1.3 ± 2.92-0.5 ± 2.31
Day 57-1.3 ± 2.86-1.2 ± 3.12
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.279 · Ols z-statistic: -1.08SPCD: data from the Stages 1 and 2 are analyzed together using the mITT Population
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.76Day 8
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -1.02Day 22
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: 0.74Day 43
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · Ancova least squares mean difference: -0.05Day 57
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Response on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change Rating (mADCS-CGIC) Scale Agitation Domain at Day 36 and Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline)

The intent of the ADCS version of the CGIC is to provide a means to reliably assess the global impression of change from Baseline in a clinical trial. The mADCS-CGIC is a modification of the ADCS-CGIC instrument that focuses specifically on agitation. The participant is asked to rate their impression of change from Baseline as: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to Stage 1 randomization.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Response on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change Rating (mADCS-CGIC) Scale Agitation Domain at Day 36 and Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline)
participantsPlaceboAVP-923
Day 36, Marked improvement18
Day 36, Moderate improvement1322
Day 36, Minimal improvement4328
Day 36, No change4822
Day 36, Minimal worsening127
Day 36, Moderate worsening61
Day 36, Marked worsening00
Day 70, Marked improvement44
Day 70, Moderate improvement510
Day 70, Minimal improvement1110
Day 70, No change1412
Day 70, Marked worsening93
Day 70, Moderate worsening03
Day 70, Minimal worsening10
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 2.70 · 95% CI 1.62 to 4.50Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.2184 · Odds ratio (or): 1.61 · 95% CI 0.75 to 3.43Day 70
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Response on the mADCS-CGIC Scale Agitation Domain at Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline)

The intent of the ADCS version of the CGIC is to provide a means to reliably assess the global impression of change from Baseline in a clinical trial. The mADCS-CGIC is a modification of the ADCS-CGIC instrument that focuses specifically on agitation. The participant is asked to rate their impression of change from Baseline as: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. For placebo non-responders re-randomized to AVP-923 or placebo at Stage 2, Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to Stage 2 re-randomization.

Time frame:
Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Response on the mADCS-CGIC Scale Agitation Domain at Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline)
participantsPlaceboAVP-923
Marked improvement40
Moderate improvement211
Minimal improvement815
No change1911
Marked worsening64
Moderate worsening21
Minimal worsening10
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.0266 · Odds ratio (or): 2.45 · 95% CI 1.11 to 5.42
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Categorical Response on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for the Caregiver Domain at Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline)

The PGI-C uses a 7-point scale to assess treatment response and to rate the global impression of clinical change in a participant's agitation. The participant is asked to rate their impression of change from Baseline as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; 7, very much worse. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to Stage 1 randomization.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Categorical Response on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) for the Caregiver Domain at Day 36 (Stage 2 Baseline) and Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline)
participantsPlaceboAVP-923
Day 36, Very much improved210
Day 36, Much improved2324
Day 36, Minimally improved3020
Day 36, No change4020
Day 36, Minimally worse2313
Day 36, Much worse41
Day 36, Very much worse10
Day 70, Very much improved33
Day 70, Much improved410
Day 70, Minimally improved1114
Day 70, No change1310
Day 70, Minimally worse94
Day 70, Much worse42
Day 70, Very much worse00
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.002 · Odds ratio (or): 2.16 · 95% CI 1.31 to 3.55Day 36
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.031 · Odds ratio (or): 2.32 · 95% CI 1.08 to 5.00Day 70
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Categorical Response on the PGI-C for the Caregiver Domain at Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline)

The PGI-C uses a 7-point scale to assess treatment response and to rate the global impression of clinical change in a participant's agitation. The participant is asked to rate their impression of change from Baseline as: 1, very much improved; 2, much improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, much worse; 7, very much worse. For placebo non-responders re-randomized to AVP-923 or placebo at Stage 2, Baseline is defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to Stage 2 re-randomization.

Time frame:
Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline); Day 70
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Categorical Response on the PGI-C for the Caregiver Domain at Day 70 Compared to Their Response at Day 1 (Stage 1 Baseline)
participantsPlaceboAVP-923
Very much improved59
Much improved926
Minimally improved1725
No change1413
Minimally worse105
Much worse43
Very much worse00
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs AVP-923 · ANCOVA · p = 0.0048 · Odds ratio (or): 2.41 · 95% CI 1.31 to 4.46
SecondaryNumber of Participants With the Indicated Change in the Concomitant Use of Allowed Psychotropic Drugs Compared to Their Baseline Use

Concomitant medications (CMs) are defined as non-study medications with a start date on or before the final study visit, and that were either ongoing at the end of the study or had a stop date on or after the date of first dose of study drug. Drugs for the treatment of AD (e.g., donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, memantine) were allowed when administered at stable dose for at least 2 months prior to randomization. Concomitant use of the following medications was allowed, provided the participant had been on a stable dose for at least 1 month prior to randomization and remained stable throughout the study: medications for agitation secondary to AD; medications for nighttime management of insomnia or behavioral disturbances that included short-acting benzodiazepines, a low dose of alprazolam up to 0.5 milligrams (mg)/day, and a low dose of trazodone up to 50 mg/day; hypnotics for the treatment of insomnia; and certain classes of antidepressants.

Time frame:
up to Week 10
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With the Indicated Change in the Concomitant Use of Allowed Psychotropic Drugs Compared to Their Baseline Use
participantsAVP-923 in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/Placebo in Stage 2
Any change9813
Dose reduced101
Dose increased011
Change in frequency111
Use discontinued222
New usage7611
SecondaryNumber of Participants Using Rescue Medications

Participants were allowed to receive oral lorazepam as rescue medication for the short-term treatment of symptoms of agitation, if deemed necessary by the investigator. Lorazepam was to be administered at doses up to 1.5 mg/day, and dosing was not to exceed 3 days in any 7-day period.

Time frame:
up to Week 10
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Using Rescue Medications
participantsAVP-923 in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/Placebo in Stage 2
Overall5117
Day 8 (Visit 2)031
Day 22 (Visit 3)333
Day 36 (Visit 4)533
Day 43 (Visit 5)235
Day 57 (Visit 6)134
Day 70 (Visit 70)233

Adverse events

Collected over up to Week 10. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AVP-923 in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 20/93 (0%)9/93 (9.7%)24/93 (25.8%)
Placebo in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 20/59 (0%)3/59 (5.1%)12/59 (20.3%)
Placebo in Stage 1/Placebo in Stage 20/68 (0%)6/68 (8.8%)17/68 (25%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent serious events
EventAVP-923 in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/Placebo in Stage 2
Chest PainGeneral disorders2/930/590/68
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/931/591/68
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/931/590/68
AggressionPsychiatric disorders0/931/590/68
AgitationPsychiatric disorders0/931/591/68
Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic PurpuraBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/930/591/68
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/930/591/68
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/930/591/68
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/930/591/68
Transient Ischaemic AttackNervous system disorders0/930/591/68
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAVP-923 in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/AVP-923 in Stage 2Placebo in Stage 1/Placebo in Stage 2
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications10/933/594/68
AgitationPsychiatric disorders3/931/595/68
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/934/594/68
DizzinessNervous system disorders6/931/592/68
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations5/933/594/68
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/933/591/68

Baseline characteristics

Baseline data were collected in members of the Stage 1 modified Intent-to-Treat Population, comprised of all participants randomized in Stage 1 who had at least one post-Baseline Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) agitation/aggression score in Stage 1.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)AVP-923PlaceboTotal
Mean77.8 ± 8.0177.6 ± 7.1977.7 ± 7.53
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)AVP-923PlaceboTotal
Female5274126
Male415192
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)AVP-923PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian314
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American5611
White84116200
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported022
08

Study locations

44 sites
  • Phoenix, Arizona 85006, United States
  • Sun City, Arizona 85351, United States
  • Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • Fullerton, California 92835, United States
  • Los Angeles, California 90073, United States
  • Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • San Francisco, California 94109, United States
  • Sherman Oaks, California 91403, United States
  • Temecula, California 92591, United States
  • Boynton Beach, Florida 33426, United States
  • Deerfield Beach, Florida 33064, United States
  • Hialeah, Florida 33012, United States
  • Miami, Florida 33122, United States
  • Miami, Florida 33137, United States
  • Miami, Florida 33173, United States
  • Ocala, Florida 34471, United States
  • Orlando, Florida 32806, United States
  • Sunrise, Florida 33351, United States
  • Tampa, Florida 33609, United States
  • West Palm Beach, Florida 33407, United States
  • West Palm Beach, Florida 33409, United States
  • Weston, Florida 33331, United States
  • Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007, United States
  • Las Vegas, Nevada 89106, United States
  • Las Vegas, Nevada 89147, United States
  • Summit, New Jersey 07902, United States
  • Toms River, New Jersey 08757, United States
  • Orangeburg, New York 10962, United States
  • Rochester, New York 14620, United States
  • White Plains, New York 10605, United States
  • Centerville, Ohio 45459, United States
  • Cincinnati, Ohio 45227, United States
  • Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Columbus, Ohio 43221, United States
  • Lakewood, Ohio 44107, United States
  • Allentown, Pennsylvania 18104, United States
  • Reading, Pennsylvania 19604, United States
  • Charleston, South Carolina 29401, United States
  • Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • San Antonio, Texas 78238, United States
  • Salt Lake City, Utah 84106, United States
  • Bennington, Vermont 05201, United States
  • Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Cummings JL, Lyketsos CG, Peskind ER, Porsteinsson AP, Mintzer JE, Scharre DW, De La Gandara JE, Agronin M, Davis CS, Nguyen U, Shin P, Tariot PN, Siffert J. Effect of Dextromethorphan-Quinidine on Agitation in Patients With Alzheimer Disease Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Sep 22-29;314(12):1242-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10214. PubMed 26393847 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2012 to primary completion in Jul 2014, 23 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2021, 7 years 3 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Jan 2018.

Of 130 industry-sponsored phase 2 interventional studies under Alzheimer Disease, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 39. This study's 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 257 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 21 and three quarters within 58.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 23, 2012
First posted
Apr 25, 2012
StartActual
Aug 13, 2012
Primary completionActual
Jul 30, 2014
CompletionActual
Jul 30, 2014
Results delay requested
Jan 8, 2018
Results first posted
Nov 26, 2021
Last update
Nov 26, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 26, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01584440
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 25, 2012
Start date
Aug 13, 2012
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2014
Completion
Jul 30, 2014
Results posted
Nov 26, 2021
Last update
Nov 26, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion