ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01767129LID in PDUpdated Apr 29, 2022Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of AVP-923 in the Treatment of Levodopa-induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease Patients

A Phase 2 interventional study of AVP-923-45 and Placebo in Dyskinesia and Parkinson's Disease, sponsored by Avanir Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-29.

Sponsored by Avanir Pharmaceuticals (part of Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd.) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AVP-923 capsules containing 45 mg dextromethorphan and 10 mg quinidine (AVP-923-45) compared to placebo for the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).

Read the detailed description

Proof-of-concept phase 2a, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dyskinesia
  • Parkinson's Disease

Keywords

  • levodopa
  • dyskinesia
  • parkinson's disease
  • AVP-923
  • dextromethorphan
  • quinidine
03

In context

Dyskinesias

179 studies on the registry are indexed under Dyskinesias; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 36 across 139 interventional studies indexed under Dyskinesias.

Browse Dyskinesias studies →

Lead sponsor

Avanir Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Avanir Pharmaceuticals became part of Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd..

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females 30 to 80 years of age, inclusive.
  • Diagnosis of idiopathic PD meeting the United Kingdom Parkinson's disease Society Brain Bank criteria.
  • Levodopa-induced dyskinesia present greater than 25% of the day as per MDS-UPDRS.
  • Dyskinesia of at least moderate severity as per MDS-UPDRS
  • Amantadine and Monoamine Oxidase (MAO) inhibitors must be discontinued at least three weeks prior to randomization.
  • Subjects currently receiving anti-parkinsonian medications, including all Levodopa preparations are eligible provided they have been on a stable dose of these medications for at least 1 month prior to randomization.
  • Concomitant use of antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are allowed, provided the dose has been stable for at least 1 month prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject had a prior surgery for PD except Deep Brain Stimulation (Deep Brain Stimulation must not have been performed within one year of screening)
  • Hoehn and Yahr score of 5 when "off".
  • Subject with Cognitive impairment and/or history of psychiatric manifestations or active hallucinations.
  • Subjects with any history of complete heart block, prolongation, or torsades de pointes.
  • Subjects with any family history of congenital QT interval prolongation syndrome.
  • Subjects with history of postural syncope, or any history of unexplained syncope within the last 12 months.
  • Subjects with a history of substance and/or alcohol abuse within the past 2 years.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AVP-923-45

    AVP-923-45 twice daily for 14 days

    Drug: AVP-923-45

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo twice a day for 14 days

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugAVP-923-45

    One capsule twice daily for 14 days

    Also known as: dextromethorphan/quinidine

  • DrugPlacebo

    One capsule twice daily for 14 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Least Squares Mean Dyskinesia Severity Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score As Assessed By Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (MDS-UDysRS) Part 3

    The MDS-UDysRS was developed to evaluate involuntary movements often associated with treated Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia severity was assessed via video analysis by unbiased blinded central raters, and was calculated using the Intensity Scale from Part 3 of the MDS-UDysRS. The Intensity Scale was made up of seven body parts: face, neck, right arm/shoulder, left arm/shoulder, trunk, right leg/hip, and left leg/hip. Each body part was scored on a variety of disability items (communication, drinking, and ambulation \[walking\]) on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (incapacitating dyskinesia) with a maximum total score of 28. For each body part, the highest disability score was summed to calculate the intensity score. A score of '0' was assigned to questions associated with the dressing task which were not performed due to the placement of the treatment infusion (IV) line. A higher score indicated more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Over the 2-hour levodopa infusion period on the last day of each treatment period (Day 14 and Day 42)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Least Squares Mean Disability Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score As Assessed By Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (MDS-UDysRS) Part 4

    The MDS-UDysRS was developed to evaluate involuntary movements often associated with treated PD. Part 4 of the MDS-UDysRS objectively measures the disability associated with levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Disability was assessed via video analysis by unbiased blinded central raters. Disability was evaluated for communication, drinking from a cup, and ambulation items. Each item was rated from 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (most severe disability), with a sum range of 0 to 12. A score of '0' was assigned to questions associated with the dressing task because it was not performed due to placement of the IV line. A higher score indicated more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Over the 2-hour levodopa infusion period on the last day of each treatment period (Day 14 and Day 42)

  2. Least Squares Mean Motor Movement Area Under the Curve Score As Assessed by Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III

    The Modified MDS-UPDRS (4 parts) was used to assess the severity of parkinsonian disability. Part III of the MDS-UPDRS was used as an objective measure of the severity of parkinsonian disability per motor examination with focus on the treated side tremor and motor fluctuations. The motor examination were videotaped using a standardized protocol for review by an expert central rater blinded to the treatment schedule. A total of 11 items were scored as follows: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), with a maximum total score of 44. For each part, a higher score indicated more severe symptoms. Due to placement of the IV line, a score of '0' was assigned to rigidity questions.

    Time frame: Over the 2-hour levodopa infusion period on the last day of each treatment period (Day 14 and Day 42)

  3. Least Squares Mean Timed Finger Tapping Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score

    Timed finger tapping test was used to quantify the upper extremity impairment in participants with idiopathic PD. Timed finger tapping was assessed using the Objective Parkinson's Disease Measurement (OPDM) System. Participants were instructed to tap for 60 seconds while speed and accuracy were assessed across 4 tests; right and left two finger test (m,n keystrokes) and one finger test (p,q keystrokes). The mean peak finger tapping score was calculated using the individual peak values. A higher score signifies improvement (faster typing, more accuracy), while a lower score signifies increased symptom severity.

    Time frame: Over the 2-hour levodopa infusion period on the last day of each treatment period (Day 14 and Day 42)

  4. Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Scores for Part I, II, and IV

    The MDS-UPDRS was used to assess the status of PD. Parts I and II (completed by the participant) and Part IV (completed by a rater) of the MDS-UPDRS provided a subjective measure of parkinsonian disability. Part I measured non-motor experiences of daily living, Part II measured motor experiences of daily living, and Part IV measures motor complications associated with PD. Each part was comprised of a series of questions, and each question was scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Part I and Part II were each comprised of 13 items; the total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). Part III was comprised of 33 items; the total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 132 (severe). Part IV was comprised of 6 items; the total score ranged from 0 (normal) to 24 (severe). For each part, a higher score indicated more severe symptoms. Post-Baseline was Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1); Post-Baseline (Day 14 or 42)

  5. Change From Baseline in MDS-UDysRS Scores for Part 1 and 2

    The MDS-UDysRS was developed to evaluate involuntary movements often associated with treated PD. Part 1 (On-Dyskinesia \['jerking or twisting movements that occur when your medicine is working'\]) and Part 2 (Off-Dyskinesia \["spasms or cramps that can be painful and occur when your PD medications are not taken or are not working\]) of the MDS-UDysRS were assessed by a blinded rater. Parts 1B and 2B (participant questionnaires) were completed at home by the participant. Part 1 comprised of 11 items, and Part 2 comprised of 4 items. All items were assigned a score of: 0, normal; 1, slight; 2, mild; 3, moderate; 4, severe. The total score for Parts 1 and 2 ranged from 0 to 44 and from 0 to 16, respectively. Higher scores indicate increased symptom severity. Post-Baseline was Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1); Post-Baseline (Day 14 or 42)

  6. Change From Baseline in PD Motor Diary Ratings Of Duration Of "On-time Without Bothersome Dyskinesia"

    The PD motor diary is a home diary used to assess functional status in participants with PD with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Participants were instructed to complete the PD motor diary at home for a minimum of 3 consecutive days within the 7 days prior to Visits 2 and 4 (Days 14 and 42). Baseline is Visit 1 (Day 1) or Visit 3 (Day 29); Post-Baseline is Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Post-Baseline (Days 14 and 42)

  7. Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) Domain Scores at the End of Each Treatment Period

    The PDQ-39 was a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 39 questions assessing Parkinson's disease-specific health quality of life covering 8 aspects of quality of life: mobility; activities of daily living; emotional wellbeing; stigma; social support; cognitive impairment (cognitions); communication; bodily discomfort. Each item was scored on 5-point scale: 0 = Never (better in outcome), 1 = Occasionally, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always (worse in outcome). Total scores ranged between 0 to 156. Higher scores indicated poor quality of life. Baseline was Visit 1 (Day 1) or Visit 3 (Day 29); Post-Baseline was Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Post-Baseline (Day 14 or 42)

  8. Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Single Index (PDQ-39-SI) Scores at the End of Each Treatment Period

    The PDQ-39 was the most widely used PD-specific measure of health status. It consists of 39 questions, covering 8 aspects of quality of life: mobility; activities of daily living; emotional wellbeing; stigma; social support; cognitive impairment (cognitions); communication; bodily discomfort. The instrument was developed on the basis of interviews with people diagnosed with PD. The PDQ-39-SI) score was calculated as the weighted addition of scores on all 8 dimensions of the PDQ-39. The total score ranged from 0 (no disease impact) to 100 (severe disease impact). Baseline was Visit 1 (Day 1) or Visit 3 (Day 29); Post-Baseline was Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Post-Baseline (Day 14 or 42)

  9. Change From Screening in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Calculated Score at the End of Each Treatment Period

    The MoCA was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The total score is calculated by summing the items from each domain. Total scores can range from 0 to 30; lower scores indicate cognitive dysfunction. A final total score of 26 and above is considered normal. Change from Screening was calculated as the post-Screening value minus the Screening value.

    Time frame: Screening (Day -28); End of each treatment period (Days 14 or 42)

  10. Change From Baseline in the Dyskinesia and Other PD Symptoms Score As Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    The PGIC was a 7-point scale used to assess treatment response as judged by the participant. The participant was asked to assess change in dyskinesia symptoms and change in overall PD symptoms (e.g., slowness, stiffness, balance) on a score range of 1, much improved; 2, improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, worse; 7, much worse. The average PGIC score was calculated at each visit by treatment group. Baseline is Visit 1 (Day 1) or Visit 3 (Day 29); Post-Baseline is Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline; Post-Baseline (Days 14 and 42)

07

Results

Posted Apr 29, 2022

Participant flow

Treatment Period 1 (14 Days)
Participant flow — Treatment Period 1 (14 Days)
MilestoneAVP-923-45; PlaceboPlacebo; AVP-923-45
Started77
Completed67
Not completed10
Withdrew: Adverse event10
Treatment Period 2 (14 Days)
Participant flow — Treatment Period 2 (14 Days)
MilestoneAVP-923-45; PlaceboPlacebo; AVP-923-45
Started67
Completed67
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryLeast Squares Mean Dyskinesia Severity Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score As Assessed By Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (MDS-UDysRS) Part 3

The MDS-UDysRS was developed to evaluate involuntary movements often associated with treated Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia severity was assessed via video analysis by unbiased blinded central raters, and was calculated using the Intensity Scale from Part 3 of the MDS-UDysRS. The Intensity Scale was made up of seven body parts: face, neck, right arm/shoulder, left arm/shoulder, trunk, right leg/hip, and left leg/hip. Each body part was scored on a variety of disability items (communication, drinking, and ambulation \[walking\]) on a scale of 0 (normal) to 4 (incapacitating dyskinesia) with a maximum total score of 28. For each body part, the highest disability score was summed to calculate the intensity score. A score of '0' was assigned to questions associated with the dressing task which were not performed due to the placement of the treatment infusion (IV) line. A higher score indicated more severe symptoms.

Time frame:
Over the 2-hour levodopa infusion period on the last day of each treatment period (Day 14 and Day 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · (Score on a scale)*hour
Least Squares Mean Dyskinesia Severity Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score As Assessed By Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (MDS-UDysRS) Part 3
(Score on a scale)*hourAVP-923-45Placebo
Least Squares Mean Dyskinesia Severity Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score As Assessed By Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (MDS-UDysRS) Part 3966.0 ± 42.221049.4 ± 42.22
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1907 · Mean difference (final values): -83.4 · 95% CI -215.02 to 48.23The least squares (LS) mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryLeast Squares Mean Disability Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score As Assessed By Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (MDS-UDysRS) Part 4

The MDS-UDysRS was developed to evaluate involuntary movements often associated with treated PD. Part 4 of the MDS-UDysRS objectively measures the disability associated with levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Disability was assessed via video analysis by unbiased blinded central raters. Disability was evaluated for communication, drinking from a cup, and ambulation items. Each item was rated from 0 (no dyskinesia) to 4 (most severe disability), with a sum range of 0 to 12. A score of '0' was assigned to questions associated with the dressing task because it was not performed due to placement of the IV line. A higher score indicated more severe symptoms.

Time frame:
Over the 2-hour levodopa infusion period on the last day of each treatment period (Day 14 and Day 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · (Score on a scale)*hour
Least Squares Mean Disability Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score As Assessed By Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (MDS-UDysRS) Part 4
(Score on a scale)*hourAVP-923-45Placebo
Least Squares Mean Disability Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score As Assessed By Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (MDS-UDysRS) Part 4409.4 ± 14.87428.3 ± 14.87
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.3880 · Median difference (final values): -18.9 · 95% CI -65.28 to 27.42The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryLeast Squares Mean Motor Movement Area Under the Curve Score As Assessed by Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III

The Modified MDS-UPDRS (4 parts) was used to assess the severity of parkinsonian disability. Part III of the MDS-UPDRS was used as an objective measure of the severity of parkinsonian disability per motor examination with focus on the treated side tremor and motor fluctuations. The motor examination were videotaped using a standardized protocol for review by an expert central rater blinded to the treatment schedule. A total of 11 items were scored as follows: 0 (normal), 1 (slight), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), with a maximum total score of 44. For each part, a higher score indicated more severe symptoms. Due to placement of the IV line, a score of '0' was assigned to rigidity questions.

Time frame:
Over the 2-hour levodopa infusion period on the last day of each treatment period (Day 14 and Day 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · (Score on a scale)*hour
Least Squares Mean Motor Movement Area Under the Curve Score As Assessed by Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III
(Score on a scale)*hourAVP-923-45Placebo
Least Squares Mean Motor Movement Area Under the Curve Score As Assessed by Modified Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III6568.9 ± 383.266397.0 ± 383.26
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7574 · Mean difference (final values): 171.9 · 95% CI -1022.79 to 1366.64The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryLeast Squares Mean Timed Finger Tapping Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score

Timed finger tapping test was used to quantify the upper extremity impairment in participants with idiopathic PD. Timed finger tapping was assessed using the Objective Parkinson's Disease Measurement (OPDM) System. Participants were instructed to tap for 60 seconds while speed and accuracy were assessed across 4 tests; right and left two finger test (m,n keystrokes) and one finger test (p,q keystrokes). The mean peak finger tapping score was calculated using the individual peak values. A higher score signifies improvement (faster typing, more accuracy), while a lower score signifies increased symptom severity.

Time frame:
Over the 2-hour levodopa infusion period on the last day of each treatment period (Day 14 and Day 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · (Score on a scale)*hour
Least Squares Mean Timed Finger Tapping Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score
(Score on a scale)*hourAVP-923-45Placebo
Least Squares Mean Timed Finger Tapping Area Under the Curve (AUC) Score820.9 ± 40.80772.1 ± 40.80
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4203 · Mean difference (final values): 48.8 · 95% CI -80.63 to 178.30The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Scores for Part I, II, and IV

The MDS-UPDRS was used to assess the status of PD. Parts I and II (completed by the participant) and Part IV (completed by a rater) of the MDS-UPDRS provided a subjective measure of parkinsonian disability. Part I measured non-motor experiences of daily living, Part II measured motor experiences of daily living, and Part IV measures motor complications associated with PD. Each part was comprised of a series of questions, and each question was scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (severe). Part I and Part II were each comprised of 13 items; the total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 52 (severe). Part III was comprised of 33 items; the total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 132 (severe). Part IV was comprised of 6 items; the total score ranged from 0 (normal) to 24 (severe). For each part, a higher score indicated more severe symptoms. Post-Baseline was Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1); Post-Baseline (Day 14 or 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in MDS-UPDRS Scores for Part I, II, and IV
score on a scaleAVP-923-45Placebo
Part I-1.2 ± 0.43-0.1 ± 0.43
Part II-0.0 ± 0.92-0.2 ± 0.92
Part IV-2.9 ± 0.84-0.5 ± 0.84
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1067 · Mean difference (final values): -1.1 · 95% CI -2.41 to 0.27The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.8650 · Mean difference (final values): 0.2 · 95% CI -2.64 to 3.09The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0745 · Mean difference (final values): -2.3 · 95% CI -4.94 to 0.27The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MDS-UDysRS Scores for Part 1 and 2

The MDS-UDysRS was developed to evaluate involuntary movements often associated with treated PD. Part 1 (On-Dyskinesia \['jerking or twisting movements that occur when your medicine is working'\]) and Part 2 (Off-Dyskinesia \["spasms or cramps that can be painful and occur when your PD medications are not taken or are not working\]) of the MDS-UDysRS were assessed by a blinded rater. Parts 1B and 2B (participant questionnaires) were completed at home by the participant. Part 1 comprised of 11 items, and Part 2 comprised of 4 items. All items were assigned a score of: 0, normal; 1, slight; 2, mild; 3, moderate; 4, severe. The total score for Parts 1 and 2 ranged from 0 to 44 and from 0 to 16, respectively. Higher scores indicate increased symptom severity. Post-Baseline was Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline (Day 1); Post-Baseline (Day 14 or 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in MDS-UDysRS Scores for Part 1 and 2
score on a scaleAVP-923-45Placebo
Part 1-3.9 ± 1.340.00 ± 1.34
Part 2-0.7 ± 0.770.6 ± 0.77
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0625 · Mean difference (final values): -3.9 · 95% CI -8.10 to 0.24The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.2474 · Mean difference (final values): -1.3 · 95% CI -3.74 to 1.07The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PD Motor Diary Ratings Of Duration Of "On-time Without Bothersome Dyskinesia"

The PD motor diary is a home diary used to assess functional status in participants with PD with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Participants were instructed to complete the PD motor diary at home for a minimum of 3 consecutive days within the 7 days prior to Visits 2 and 4 (Days 14 and 42). Baseline is Visit 1 (Day 1) or Visit 3 (Day 29); Post-Baseline is Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Post-Baseline (Days 14 and 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · hours
Change From Baseline in PD Motor Diary Ratings Of Duration Of "On-time Without Bothersome Dyskinesia"
hoursAVP-923-45Placebo
Change From Baseline in PD Motor Diary Ratings Of Duration Of "On-time Without Bothersome Dyskinesia"0.5 ± 1.010.5 ± 0.93
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.9764 · Mean difference (final values): -0.0 · 95% CI -3.10 to 3.01The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) Domain Scores at the End of Each Treatment Period

The PDQ-39 was a self-reported questionnaire consisting of 39 questions assessing Parkinson's disease-specific health quality of life covering 8 aspects of quality of life: mobility; activities of daily living; emotional wellbeing; stigma; social support; cognitive impairment (cognitions); communication; bodily discomfort. Each item was scored on 5-point scale: 0 = Never (better in outcome), 1 = Occasionally, 2 = Sometimes, 3 = Often, 4 = Always (worse in outcome). Total scores ranged between 0 to 156. Higher scores indicated poor quality of life. Baseline was Visit 1 (Day 1) or Visit 3 (Day 29); Post-Baseline was Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Post-Baseline (Day 14 or 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) Domain Scores at the End of Each Treatment Period
score on a scaleAVP-923-45Placebo
Mobility0.2 ± 2.452.0 ± 2.69
Activities of Daily Living-4.6 ± 2.143.9 ± 2.14
Emotional Well Being-4.5 ± 2.902.9 ± 2.90
Stigma-3.7 ± 4.100.3 ± 4.10
Social support-6.0 ± 3.603.8 ± 3.60
Cognitive impairment (Cognitions)-4.1 ± 3.640.2 ± 3.64
Communication-3.7 ± 2.432.4 ± 2.43
Bodily discomfort-7.4 ± 4.60-2.2 ± 4.60
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.6359 · Mean difference (final values): -1.8 · 95% CI -9.94 to 6.36The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0167 · Mean difference (final values): -8.5 · 95% CI -15.20 to -1.87The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0959 · Mean difference (final values): -7.5 · 95% CI -16.54 to 1.56The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.5108 · Mean difference (final values): -3.9 · 95% CI -16.72 to 8.83The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0806 · Mean difference (final values): -9.8 · 95% CI -21.06 to 1.42The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4205 · Mean difference (final values): -4.3 · 95% CI -15.66 to 7.03The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1065 · Mean difference (final values): -6.1 · 95% CI -13.63 to 1.53The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.4456 · Mean difference (final values): -5.2 · 95% CI -19.51 to 9.19The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in PDQ-39 Single Index (PDQ-39-SI) Scores at the End of Each Treatment Period

The PDQ-39 was the most widely used PD-specific measure of health status. It consists of 39 questions, covering 8 aspects of quality of life: mobility; activities of daily living; emotional wellbeing; stigma; social support; cognitive impairment (cognitions); communication; bodily discomfort. The instrument was developed on the basis of interviews with people diagnosed with PD. The PDQ-39-SI) score was calculated as the weighted addition of scores on all 8 dimensions of the PDQ-39. The total score ranged from 0 (no disease impact) to 100 (severe disease impact). Baseline was Visit 1 (Day 1) or Visit 3 (Day 29); Post-Baseline was Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Post-Baseline (Day 14 or 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Single Index (PDQ-39-SI) Scores at the End of Each Treatment Period
score on a scaleAVP-923-45Placebo
Change From Baseline in PDQ-39 Single Index (PDQ-39-SI) Scores at the End of Each Treatment Period-4.2 ± 1.602.2 ± 1.76
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0233 · Mean difference (final values): -6.4 · 95% CI -11.72 to -1.07The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryChange From Screening in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Calculated Score at the End of Each Treatment Period

The MoCA was designed as a rapid screening instrument for mild cognitive dysfunction. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. The total score is calculated by summing the items from each domain. Total scores can range from 0 to 30; lower scores indicate cognitive dysfunction. A final total score of 26 and above is considered normal. Change from Screening was calculated as the post-Screening value minus the Screening value.

Time frame:
Screening (Day -28); End of each treatment period (Days 14 or 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Screening in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Calculated Score at the End of Each Treatment Period
score on a scaleAVP-923-45Placebo
Change From Screening in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Calculated Score at the End of Each Treatment Period0.1 ± 0.270.6 ± 0.27
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.1930 · Mean difference (final values): -0.5 · 95% CI -1.39 to 0.31The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the Dyskinesia and Other PD Symptoms Score As Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

The PGIC was a 7-point scale used to assess treatment response as judged by the participant. The participant was asked to assess change in dyskinesia symptoms and change in overall PD symptoms (e.g., slowness, stiffness, balance) on a score range of 1, much improved; 2, improved; 3, minimally improved; 4, no change; 5, minimally worse; 6, worse; 7, much worse. The average PGIC score was calculated at each visit by treatment group. Baseline is Visit 1 (Day 1) or Visit 3 (Day 29); Post-Baseline is Visit 2 (Day 14) or Visit 4 (Day 42). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline; Post-Baseline (Days 14 and 42)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in the Dyskinesia and Other PD Symptoms Score As Assessed by Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
score on a scaleAVP-923-45Placebo
Dyskinesia2.7 ± 0.353.7 ± 0.35
Other PD symptoms4.2 ± 0.264.1 ± 0.26
Statistical analysis
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.0511 · Mean difference (final values): -1.1 · 95% CI -2.17 to 0.01The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.
  • AVP-923-45 vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.7745 · Mean difference (final values): 0.1 · 95% CI -0.70 to 0.91The LS mean difference was calculated as the AVP-923-45 LS mean minus the placebo LS mean.

Adverse events

Collected over up to Day 42. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
AVP-923-450/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)11/14 (78.6%)
Placebo0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)2/13 (15.4%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventAVP-923-45Placebo
FatigueGeneral disorders3/140/13
SomnolenceNervous system disorders3/140/13
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders2/141/13
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/140/13
ParkinsonismNervous system disorders2/140/13
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/141/13
PalpitationsCardiac disorders1/140/13
TinnitusEar and labyrinth disorders1/140/13
FlatulenceGastrointestinal disorders1/140/13
Paraesthesia oralGastrointestinal disorders1/140/13

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Study Participants
Mean64.1 ± 7.32
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Study Participants
Female9
Male5
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)All Study Participants
White13
Indian Sub-Continent1
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Toronto, Ontario M5T 2S8, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fox SH, Metman LV, Nutt JG, Brodsky M, Factor SA, Lang AE, Pope LE, Knowles N, Siffert J. Trial of dextromethorphan/quinidine to treat levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2017 Jun;32(6):893-903. doi: 10.1002/mds.26976. Epub 2017 Mar 30. PubMed 28370447 ↗

Related links

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01767129
Collaborators
Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2013
Start date
Oct 16, 2013
Primary completion
Feb 5, 2015
Completion
Feb 5, 2015
Results posted
Apr 29, 2022
Last update
Apr 29, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion