CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01570192Updated Sep 29, 2017Results posted

Clinical Trials to Reduce the Risk of Antimicrobial Resistance

A Phase 2 interventional study of IV meropenem and I.V. Meropenem in Bacterial Pneumonia, sponsored by University of Florida. Terminated at 11 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-09-29.

Sponsored by University of Florida · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
NIAID terminated the study due to low subject enrollment
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate a low rate of emergence of antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp during the treatment of hospitalized patients with pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation treated with PD optimized meropenem administered as a prolonged infusion in combination with a parenteral aminoglycoside plus tobramycin by inhalation (Group 1) compared to therapy with meropenem alone (Group 2 - control arm).

Read the detailed description

The goal of this clinical study is to demonstrate that the application of pharmacodynamic dosing principles to the antibiotic treatment of hospitalized subjects with culture-documented pneumonia (including HABP, VABP and HCAP) requiring mechanical ventilation can inhibit the emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms during treatment and therefore may improve the rate of a satisfactory clinical response. Antibiotic resistance is defined as an increase in meropenem or aminoglycoside MIC by two tube dilutions (fourfold) from baseline. In animal models of infection, the pharmacodynamic driver for bactericidal effect by β lactam antibiotics such as meropenem is the proportion of the dosing interval during which plasma drug levels are maintained above the MIC of the causative pathogen. The hypothesis of this study is that prolongation of time above MIC by increasing total meropenem dose and the duration of infusion will counter-select for the emergence of antimicrobial resistance during the treatment of hospitalized subjects with pneumonia (i.e. HABP, VABP and HCAP) caused by P.aeruginosa, Acinetobacter species (spp), or other pathogens with intermediate susceptibility to meropenem, and that the addition of parenteral aminoglycosides (amikacin, tobramycin or gentamicin) and nebulized aminoglycoside (tobramycin) given along optimal pharmacodynamic principles will further reduce the likelihood of resistance emergence, particularly among the non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. The observed incidence of resistance emergence to meropenem will be compared across therapeutic regimens.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bacterial Pneumonia

Keywords

  • gram negative pathogens
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  • Acinetobacter
  • HCAP
  • VABP
  • HABP
03

In context

Pneumonia

2,044 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 106 across 1,247 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Florida is the lead sponsor of 1,254 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Written informed consent by the subject/subject's LAR.

Hospitalized males or females ≥ 18 yrs with respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and clinical suspicion of HABP, HCAP or VABP.

Onset or exacerbation of pneumonia at least 48 hours after admission to any patient health care facility or onset of pneumonia in a nursing home or rehabilitation facility with subsequent transfer to an acute care facility

Women of childbearing potential if their pregnancy test is negative

Subjects who have received previous antibacterial therapy within 14 days of pre-treatment bronchoscopy entry may be entered only if the subject has not responded clinically.). While less than 24 hours of pre-treatment antibiotics is preferential, recovery of >104 CFU/ml in the quantitative Bronchoscopic BAL will be seen as primary evidence that the prior therapy was not efficacious and enrollment will be allowed.)

Patients should have clinical findings that support a diagnosis of HABP/VABP/HCAP:

Within 48 hours before starting empiric therapy a subject's chest radiograph should show the presence of a NEW or progressive infiltrate, cavitation, or effusion suggestive of pneumonia

Within 36 hours before the start of empiric study therapy, a quantitative culture of Bronchoscopic BAL fluid must be obtained.

Patients with VABP should have a Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score of >/= 5.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects with pneumonia caused by pathogens resistant to meropenem (MIC greater than or equal to 16µg/ml) or a prior meropenem therapy failure.

Subjects with contra-indications to ANY study medication, in particular with known or suspected allergy or hypersensitivity.

Women who are pregnant or lactating.

Subjects taking anticonvulsant medications for a known seizure disorder.Patients with a history of seizures, AND who are stabilized on anti-seizure medication, may be enrolled into the study at the discretion of the site investigator.

Subjects with known or suspected community acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) or viral pneumonia; or Subjects with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis without evidence of pneumonia.

Subjects with primary lung cancer or another malignancy metastatic to the lungs.

Subjects who were previously enrolled in this study.

Subjects who have had an investigational drug or have used an investigational device within 30 days prior to entering the study.

Subjects with another focus of infection requiring concurrent antibiotics that would interfere with evaluation of the response to study drug.

Subjects with cystic fibrosis, AIDS with a CD4 lymphocyte count \<200 cells/µl, neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \<500 cells/ml), known or suspected active tuberculosis.

Subjects with little chance of survival for the duration of study therapy.

Subjects with an APACHE II score >35.

Subjects with underlying condition(s) which would make it difficult to interpret response to the study drugs.

Subjects with hypotension or acidosis despite attempts at fluid resuscitation. Subjects requiring ongoing treatment with vasopressors will be eligible for the study if their hypotension is controlled and acidosis has resolved. Subjects with intractable septic shock are not eligible for enrollment.

Subjects who have undergone bone marrow transplantation.

Subjects with profound hypoxia as defined by a PaO2/FiO2 ratio \<100.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    IV meropenem; parenteral aminoglycoside

    Subjects assigned to this group will receive: * IV meropenem (2 g infused over 3 hrs q 8 hr); * a parenteral aminoglycoside (tobramycin or gentamicin-5mg/kg IV Q24h or amikacin 20 mg/kg IV Q24h) * tobramycin nebulization Linezolid or vancomycin (per institutional guidelines) will be available for MRSA coverage to treat potential Gram-positive pathogens.

    Drug: IV meropenem · Drug: Parenteral aminoglycoside; tobramycin for injection USP OR gentamicin sulfate injection solution concentrate 5mg.kg IV q24h; amikacin sulfate injection USP 20 mg/kg IV q24h · Drug: Linezolid or Vancomycin (per institutional guidelines) will be available for MRSA coverage. · Device: tobramycin nebulization

  • Active comparator
    I.V. Meropenem

    Subjects assigned to this group will receive IV meropenem (2 g infused over 3 hrs q 8 hr). Linezolid or vancomycin (per institutional guidelines) will be available for MRSA coverage to treat Gram-positive pathogens. \*\*NOTE: Empiric MRSA coverage is allowed in both arms. This therapy is advised for any subjects with known or suspected MRSA entering the study. Once microbiologic results are available, this coverage may be discontinued at the investigator's discretion.

    Drug: I.V. Meropenem · Drug: Linezolid or Vancomycin (per institutional guidelines) will be available for MRSA coverage.

Interventions

  • DrugIV meropenem

    Subjects assigned to this group will receive IV meropenem (2 g infused over 3 hrs q 8 hr).

    Also known as: Merrem I.V.

  • DrugI.V. Meropenem

    Subjects assigned to this group will receive IV meropenem (2 g infused over 3 hrs q 8 hr). Linezolid or vancomycin (per institutional guidelines) will be available for MRSA coverage

    Also known as: Merrem I.V.

  • DrugParenteral aminoglycoside; tobramycin for injection USP OR gentamicin sulfate injection solution concentrate 5mg.kg IV q24h; amikacin sulfate injection USP 20 mg/kg IV q24h

    a parenteral aminoglycoside (tobramycin or gentamicin-5mg/kg IV Q24h or amikacin 20 mg/kg IV Q24h)

  • DrugLinezolid or Vancomycin (per institutional guidelines) will be available for MRSA coverage.

    Linezolid or vancomycin (per institutional guidelines) will be available for MRSA coverage.

  • Devicetobramycin nebulization

    tobramycin nebulization 600mg/day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Suppression and Emergence of Resistance

    The emergence of resistance is defined as a change of meropenem MIC or aminoglycoside MIC by two tube dilutions (fourfold) from baseline when assessed at the second BAL procedure on day 5/early extubation. Patients are evaluable for this endpoint IF they had baseline BAL and Day 5/early extubation and if they had positive cultures on baseline and Day/EE.

    Time frame: up to 28 days after enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Response

    Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

    Time frame: End of treatment - up to 28 days after enrollment

  2. Clinical Response in Subjects Who Received Prior Antibiotics

    Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

    Time frame: End of treatment - up to 28 days after enrollment

  3. Overall Microbiologic Response

    Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

    Time frame: End of treatment - up to 28 days after enrollment

  4. Pretreatment Pathogen Response

    Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

    Time frame: End of treatment - up to 28 days after enrollment

  5. Suppression of the Emergence of Resistance in Other Gram-negative Pathogens

    Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

    Time frame: Day 5/Early Extubation

  6. Occurrence of Repeat Negative Cultures

    Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

    Time frame: Day 5/Early Extubation

  7. Mortality

    Percentage of patients who died by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

    Time frame: 14 days

  8. Mortality

    Percentage of patients who died by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Results

Posted Apr 20, 2017

Participant flow

We had 8 clinical sites: recruitment into the study began September 2010 and ended April 10, 2015.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIV Meropenem; Parenteral AminoglycosideI.V. Meropenem
Started1330
Completed617
Not completed713
Withdrew: No qualifying organism612
Withdrew: Changed to palliative care10
Withdrew: Physician decision01

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Suppression and Emergence of Resistance

The emergence of resistance is defined as a change of meropenem MIC or aminoglycoside MIC by two tube dilutions (fourfold) from baseline when assessed at the second BAL procedure on day 5/early extubation. Patients are evaluable for this endpoint IF they had baseline BAL and Day 5/early extubation and if they had positive cultures on baseline and Day/EE.

Time frame:
up to 28 days after enrollment
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Suppression and Emergence of Resistance
participantsIV Meropenem; Parenteral AminoglycosideI.V. Meropenem
suppression of emergence of resistance—5
emergence of resistance—1
SecondaryClinical Response

Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

Time frame:
End of treatment - up to 28 days after enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Response
ParticipantsME Group - Meropenem Plus AminoglycosideMEGroup - Meropenem Onlym-MITT Group - Meropenem Plus Aminoglycosidem-MITT Group - Meropenem Only
Clinical Response2828
SecondaryClinical Response in Subjects Who Received Prior Antibiotics

Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

Time frame:
End of treatment - up to 28 days after enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Clinical Response in Subjects Who Received Prior Antibiotics
ParticipantsME Group - Meropenem Plus AminoglycosideME Group - Meropenem Onlym-MITT Group - Meropenem Plus Aminoglycosidem-MITT Group - Meropenem Only
Clinical Response in Subjects Who Received Prior Antibiotics1212
SecondaryOverall Microbiologic Response

Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

Time frame:
End of treatment - up to 28 days after enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Microbiologic Response
ParticipantsME Group - Meropenem Plus AminoglycosideME Group - Meropenem Onlym-MITT Group - Meropenem Plus Aminoglycosidem-MITT Group - Meropenem Only
Overall Microbiologic Response2627
SecondaryPretreatment Pathogen Response

Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

Time frame:
End of treatment - up to 28 days after enrollment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Pretreatment Pathogen Response
ParticipantsME Group - Meropenem Plus AminoglycosideME Group - Meropenem Onlym-MITT Group - Meropenem Plus Aminoglycosidem-MITT Group - Meropenem Only
Pretreatment Pathogen Response39311
SecondarySuppression of the Emergence of Resistance in Other Gram-negative Pathogens

Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

Time frame:
Day 5/Early Extubation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Suppression of the Emergence of Resistance in Other Gram-negative Pathogens
ParticipantsME Group - Meropenem Plus AminoglycosideME Group - Meropenem Onlym-MITT Group - Meropenem Plus Aminoglycosidem-MITT Group - Meropenem Only
Suppression of the Emergence of Resistance in Other Gram-negative Pathogens1112
SecondaryOccurrence of Repeat Negative Cultures

Percentage of patients with successful responses by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

Time frame:
Day 5/Early Extubation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Occurrence of Repeat Negative Cultures
ParticipantsME Group - Meropenem Plus AminoglycosideME Group - Meropenem Onlym-MITT Group - Meropenem Plus Aminoglycosidem-MITT Group - Meropenem Only
Occurrence of Repeat Negative Cultures3637
SecondaryMortality

Percentage of patients who died by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

Time frame:
14 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mortality
ParticipantsME Group - Meropenem Plus AminoglycosideME Group - Meropenem Onlym-MITT Group - Meropenem Plus Aminoglycosidem-MITT Group - Meropenem Only
Mortality1022
SecondaryMortality

Percentage of patients who died by efficacy endpoint, treatment group and population (n/N)

Time frame:
28 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mortality
ParticipantsME Group - Meropenem Plus AminoglycosideME Group - Meropenem Onlym-MITT Group - Meropenem Plus Aminoglycosidem-MITT Group - Meropenem Only
Mortality2133

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
IV Meropenem; Parenteral Aminoglycoside—6/13 (46.2%)0/13 (0%)
I.V. Meropenem—11/30 (36.7%)0/30 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent serious events
EventIV Meropenem; Parenteral AminoglycosideI.V. Meropenem
reinforced duodenal ulcerGastrointestinal disorders1/130/30
pneomoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/131/30
cardiac arrestCardiac disorders1/131/30
pneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/130/30
PEA arrestCardiac disorders1/130/30
multi-organ failure due to distributive and cardiogenic shockGeneral disorders1/130/30
multi-organ failureGeneral disorders0/132/30
cutaneous eruptionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/131/30
cardiogenic shockCardiac disorders0/131/30
COPD with acute exacerbationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/131/30

Baseline characteristics

Number of patients enrolled in the study and who had a baseline BAL.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)IV Meropenem; Parenteral AminoglycosideI.V. MeropenemTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years62026
>=65 years71017
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)IV Meropenem; Parenteral AminoglycosideI.V. MeropenemTotal
Mean61.2 ± 18.358.4 ± 12.659.2 ± 14.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)IV Meropenem; Parenteral AminoglycosideI.V. MeropenemTotal
Female71320
Male61723
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)IV Meropenem; Parenteral AminoglycosideI.V. MeropenemTotal
United States111829
France21113
Spain011
Baseline acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score
Baseline acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score(units on a scale)IV Meropenem; Parenteral AminoglycosideI.V. MeropenemTotal
Mean22.6 ± 4.621.0 ± 6.221.5 ± 5.8
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • InClin, Inc.
    San Mateo, California 94403, United States
  • UFL Department of Medicine: Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • Emory University
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322-4250, United States
  • Northwestern University
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • JMI Laboratories
    North Liberty, Iowa 52317, United States
  • Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63130, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical Center of Cornell University
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • Institut de Cardiologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere
    Paris, Cedex 13, France
  • Hannover Clinical Trial Center GmbH
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults: diagnosis, assessment of severity, initial antimicrobial therapy, and preventive strategies. A consensus statement, American Thoracic Society, November 1995. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 May;153(5):1711-25. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.153.5.8630626. No abstract available. PubMed 8630626 ↗
  • Bauernfeind A, Jungwirth R. In Vitro Activity of SM 7338 and Imipenem. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 599
  • Calandra GB, Hesney M, Brown KR. Imipenem/cilastatin therapy of serious infections: a U.S. multicenter noncomparative trial. Clin Ther. 1985;7(2):225-38. PubMed 3886144 ↗
  • Clarke AM, Zemcov SJV. SM 7338 (ICI 194,660), A New DHP-1 Stable Carbapenem; In Vitro Activity Against a Wide Range of Canadian Clinical Isolates. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 598.
  • Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Jan;26(1):1-10; quiz 11-2. doi: 10.1086/516284. PubMed 9455502 ↗
  • Craig WA. The pharmacology of meropenem, a new carbapenem antibiotic. Clin Infect Dis. 1997 Feb;24 Suppl 2:S266-75. doi: 10.1093/clinids/24.supplement_2.s266. PubMed 9126702 ↗
  • Dandekar PK, Maglio D, Sutherland CA, Nightingale CH, Nicolau DP. Pharmacokinetics of meropenem 0.5 and 2 g every 8 hours as a 3-hour infusion. Pharmacotherapy. 2003 Aug;23(8):988-91. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.8.988.32878. PubMed 12921245 ↗
  • Data on file. Drug Development Department, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington,DE 19897.
  • Drusano GL. Prevention of resistance: a goal for dose selection for antimicrobial agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jan 15;36(Suppl 1):S42-50. doi: 10.1086/344653. PubMed 12516029 ↗
  • Drusano GL, Liu W, Fregeau C, Kulawy R, Louie A. Differing effects of combination chemotherapy with meropenem and tobramycin on cell kill and suppression of resistance of wild-type Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and its isogenic MexAB efflux pump-overexpressed mutant. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Jun;53(6):2266-73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01680-08. Epub 2009 Mar 16. PubMed 19289521 ↗
  • Edwards JR, Wannop C. SM 7338, A New Carbapenem Antibacterial: In Vitro Activity Against Imipenem-Resistant Ps. aeruginosa. 27th ICAAC, New York October 1987, Abstract 754.
  • Edwards JR, Turner PJ, Withnell ES, et al. SM 7338, A New Carbapenem Antibacterial: In Vitro Activity Against Bacterial Strains of Clinical Origins. 27th ICAAC, New York, October 1987, Abstract 755.
  • Edwards JR, Turner PJ, Wannop C, Withnell ES, Grindey AJ, Nairn K. In vitro antibacterial activity of SM-7338, a carbapenem antibiotic with stability to dehydropeptidase I. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Feb;33(2):215-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.2.215. PubMed 2655530 ↗
  • Fagon JY, Chastre J, Novara A, Medioni P, Gibert C. Characterization of intensive care unit patients using a model based on the presence or absence of organ dysfunctions and/or infection: the ODIN model. Intensive Care Med. 1993;19(3):137-44. doi: 10.1007/BF01720528. PubMed 8315120 ↗
  • Fink MP, Snydman DR, Niederman MS, Leeper KV Jr, Johnson RH, Heard SO, Wunderink RG, Caldwell JW, Schentag JJ, Siami GA, et al. Treatment of severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial comparing intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem-cilastatin. The Severe Pneumonia Study Group. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 Mar;38(3):547-57. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.3.547. PubMed 8203853 ↗
  • Fukasawa M, Sumita Y, Tada E, et al. SM 7338, A New Carbapenem Antibacterial: In Vitro Activity Against 1607 Clinical Strains of Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Pathogens. 27th ICAAC, New York, October 1987, Abstract 753.
  • Fukasawa M, Tada E, Nouda H, et al. Induction and Inhibition of b-Lactamases by SM 7338; A Novel Carbapenem Antibacterial. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 606.
  • Hamacher J, Vogel F, Lichey J, Kohl FV, Diwok K, Wendel H, Lode H. Treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in hospitalised patients--a comparison of meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin. COPD Study Group. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jul;36 Suppl A:121-33. doi: 10.1093/jac/36.suppl_a.121. PubMed 8543488 ↗
  • Heyland DK, Cook DJ, Griffith L, Keenan SP, Brun-Buisson C. The attributable morbidity and mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia in the critically ill patient. The Canadian Critical Trials Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Apr;159(4 Pt 1):1249-56. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.159.4.9807050. PubMed 10194173 ↗
  • Investigational Brochure, Drug Development Department, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, Delaware 19897.
  • Jones RN, Barry AL, et al. Antimicrobial Activity of SM 7338, A New DHP-1 Stable Carbapenem. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 597.
  • Kayser FH, Morenzoni G. Activity of SM 7338, A New Carbapenem Antibacterial Against Gram-Positive Bacteria. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 603.
  • Kollef MH, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser VJ. Inadequate antimicrobial treatment of infections: a risk factor for hospital mortality among critically ill patients. Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):462-74. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.2.462. PubMed 10027448 ↗
  • Kollef MH, Silver P, Murphy DM, Trovillion E. The effect of late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia in determining patient mortality. Chest. 1995 Dec;108(6):1655-62. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.6.1655. PubMed 7497777 ↗
  • Lancero MG, Young LS. In Vitro Studies with SM 7338; A Novel Carbapenem with Broad Bactericidal Activity. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 602.
  • Lode H, Hamacher J, Eller J, Schaberg T. Changing role of carbapenems in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1995;96:17-23. PubMed 7652498 ↗
  • Luna CM, Vujacich P, Niederman MS, Vay C, Gherardi C, Matera J, Jolly EC. Impact of BAL data on the therapy and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 1997 Mar;111(3):676-85. doi: 10.1378/chest.111.3.676. PubMed 9118708 ↗
  • McEachern R, Campbell GD Jr. Hospital-acquired pneumonia: epidemiology, etiology, and treatment. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1998 Sep;12(3):761-79, x. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70209-9. PubMed 9779389 ↗
  • Meduri GU, Chastre J. The standardization of bronchoscopic techniques for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest. 1992 Nov;102(5 Suppl 1):557S-564S. doi: 10.1378/chest.102.5_supplement_1.557s. No abstract available. PubMed 1424930 ↗
  • Moellering RC Jr, Eliopoulos GM, Sentochnik DE. The carbapenems: new broad spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Sep;24 Suppl A:1-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/24.suppl_a.1. PubMed 2681123 ↗
  • Neu HG, Saha G, Chin NX. In Vitro Activity of SM 7338; A New Carbapenem, Compared with Other Antibacterials Against Multiply Resistant Bacteria. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 601.
  • Nord CE, Lindmark A, Persson I. Susceptibility of Anaerobic Bacteria to SM 7338. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 596.
  • Okuda T, Fukasawa M, Tanio T, et al. SM 7338, A New Carbapenem Antibacterial: In Vitro and In Vivo Antibacterial Activities. 27th ICAAC, New York, October 1987. Abstract 757.
  • Quinn JP, Studemeister AE, DiVincenzo CA, Lerner SA. Resistance to imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical experience and biochemical mechanisms. Rev Infect Dis. 1988 Jul-Aug;10(4):892-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/10.4.892. PubMed 3142013 ↗
  • Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy. Thirty-third Edition, 2003. Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Sande MA.
  • Scheld WM, Mandell GL. Nosocomial pneumonia: pathogenesis and recent advances in diagnosis and therapy. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jul-Aug;13 Suppl 9:S743-51. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.supplement_9.s743. PubMed 1925319 ↗
  • Slaney L, Chubb H, Mohammed Z, et al. In Vitro Activity of SM 7338 Against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Gc), Haemophilus ducreyi (Hd) and Haemophilus influenzae. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 604.
  • Strasbaugh LJ. Nosocomial repiratory infections. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious disease. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone, 2000: 3021-3026.
  • Sumita Y, Fukasawa M, Okunda T. SM 7338, A New Carbapenem Antibacterial: Affinities for PBP's and Morphological Changes. 27th ICAAC, New York, October 1987. Abstract 756.
  • Sumita Y, Inoue M, Mitsuhashi S. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of SM 7338. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 600.
  • Sunagawa M, Matsumura H, Inoue T, et al. SM 7338, A New Carbapenem Antibacterial: Structure-Activity Relations and Physiochemical Properties. 27th ICAAC, New York, October 1987. Abstract 752.
  • TALKE H, SCHUBERT GE. [ENZYMATIC UREA DETERMINATION IN THE BLOOD AND SERUM IN THE WARBURG OPTICAL TEST]. Klin Wochenschr. 1965 Feb 1;43:174-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01484513. No abstract available. German. PubMed 14258517 ↗
  • Torres A, Aznar R, Gatell JM, Jimenez P, Gonzalez J, Ferrer A, Celis R, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Incidence, risk, and prognosis factors of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990 Sep;142(3):523-8. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/142.3.523. PubMed 2202245 ↗
  • Torres A, Bauer TT, Leon-Gil C, Castillo F, Alvarez-Lerma F, Martinez-Pellus A, Leal-Noval SR, Nadal P, Palomar M, Blanquer J, Ros F. Treatment of severe nosocomial pneumonia: a prospective randomised comparison of intravenous ciprofloxacin with imipenem/cilastatin. Thorax. 2000 Dec;55(12):1033-9. doi: 10.1136/thorax.55.12.1033. PubMed 11083889 ↗
  • Trouillet JL, Chastre J, Vuagnat A, Joly-Guillou ML, Combaux D, Dombret MC, Gibert C. Ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by potentially drug-resistant bacteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;157(2):531-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.9705064. PubMed 9476869 ↗
  • Vetter N. The Use of Meropenem ('Merrem'/'Meronen') in the Therapy of Hospital-acquired Lower Respiratory Infections: a Review of Clinical Experience. 18th International Congress of Chemotherapy, Stockholm, Sweden, 27 June-2 July, 1993. Abstract 70.
  • Wise R, Andrews JM, Ashby JP. The Bactericidal Activity of the Carbapenem, SM 7338, Alone and in Combination. 28th ICAAC, Los Angeles, October 1988. Abstract 605.
  • World Health Organization. Draft Global Strategy for the Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance. Available on the Internet at http://www.who.int/emc/amr.htm
  • Drusano GL, Corrado ML, Girardi G, Ellis-Grosse EJ, Wunderink RG, Donnelly H, Leeper KV, Brown M, Malek T, Hite RD, Ferrari M, Djureinovic D, Kollef MH, Mayfield L, Doyle A, Chastre J, Combes A, Walsh TJ, Dorizas K, Alnuaimat H, Morgan BE, Rello J, Mazo CA, Jones RN, Flamm RK, Woosley L, Ambrose PG, Bhavnani S, Rubino CM, Bulik CC, Louie A, Vicchiarelli M, Berman C. Dilution Factor of Quantitative Bacterial Cultures Obtained by Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Patients with Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Dec 21;62(1):e01323-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01323-17. Print 2018 Jan. Erratum In: Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Mar 27;62(4):e00198-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00198-18. PubMed 29038277 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 29, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01570192
Lead sponsor
University of Florida
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 4, 2012
Start date
Sep 2010
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Results posted
Apr 20, 2017
Last update
Sep 29, 2017

Study contacts

George L Drusano, MD
principal investigator · University of Florida

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion