CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01552473Updated Mar 10, 2025Results posted

Brain Training to Enhance Frontal Lobe Reasoning

An interventional study of Brain Training Program 1 and Brain Training Program 2 in Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by The University of Texas at Dallas. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-10.

Sponsored by The University of Texas at Dallas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being done to improve the ability to diagnose and to achieve higher-levels of functional recovery in soldiers and civilians who have suffered either mild Traumatic Brain Injury (TBIs) or moderate-to-severe TBIs at chronic stages of brain recovery (greater than 12 months).

Read the detailed description

In the current randomized control trial, we study the efficacy of a functionally relevant cognitive training program applied to individuals who are experiencing the effects of chronic TBI. The top-down training program labeled SMART (Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training) adopts an integrative approach to train functionally relevant complex reasoning abilities (versus specific skills). This integrative approach focused on frontal lobe functions has shown promising results in a preliminary study. SMART is compared to an equally engaging education-based program labeled BHW (Brain Health Workshop). Both SMART and BHW are short-term, intensive (18 h of training over 8 weeks) group training programs that are comparable with regard to training time, amount of information, group discussions, and homework assignments. The overall goal of this trial is to examine how training integrative frontal lobe-mediated processes might improve functioning in brain injury survivors, including military service and civilian populations. We include a range of individuals with different injury types and functional abilities. We use a broad variety of assessment tools, including cognitive, neuroimaging, and functional measures, to compare the training groups.

Our overall goal is to improve the fidelity of TBI diagnoses and to achieve higher levels of functional recovery in soldiers and civilians who have suffered mild to moderate TBIs and are at the chronic stage of brain recovery. This study is also to determine the efficacy of an empirically and theoretically driven framework to enhance frontal lobe-mediated reasoning ability in individuals with TBI, given a relatively short training duration, on trained and untrained cognitive skills, on brain changes, and on measures of real-life function. Toward these aims, this trial is enrolling both soldiers and civilians with a TBI (approximately 50 mild and 50 moderate chronic TBI patients). We use cognitive tests (assessing memory, reasoning, and comprehension abilities), functional MRI scans (performing tests of cognitive function while the subject is receiving an MRI scan), and white matter maps constructed using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) scans. The MRI scans will be used to provide biomarkers of the contributions of different brain regions to performing cognitive tasks (e.g., memory, reasoning, etc.), as well as assessments of brain efficiency, functional brain connectivity, and brain morphology. We use these measurements to gain an understanding of each individual's cognitive skills and neural measures prior to cognitive intervention. These measures also serve as indicators of the baseline function of each soldier or civilian, to be compared with after intervention, at which point they undergo post-training cognitive, MRI, and DTI assessments, enabling us to make outcome comparisons between the two different cognitive interventions. Finally, we conduct a follow-up assessment with neuropsychological and cognitive measures and neuroimaging 3 months after the interventions to assess how individuals maintain any functional changes that may occur because of the cognitive interventions.

We are targeting this intervention toward mild and moderate TBI participants, who have relatively high functioning skills. The demands of the training can be too high for some individuals falling into the more severe range, in the frequency, duration, and type of strategies and skills emphasized. We also aim to address the high level of need placed upon studies of milder TBI cases, particularly with military populations. This priority is also emphasized by the sponsoring agency, the US Department of Defense, advocating for more studies of mild TBI under the funding mechanism supporting this work.

02

Conditions studied

  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • TBI
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • combat related injury
  • blast injury
  • concussion
  • sleep problems
  • attention problems
  • memory problems
  • headaches
  • dizziness
  • OEF
  • OIF
  • Veterans
  • Civilian
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 108 is above the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas at Dallas is the lead sponsor of 59 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 15 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 19-65 years of age
  • Sustained a traumatic brain injury at least 6 months previously
  • Comprehend simple instructions, perform tasks and take part in intervention
  • Read, speak and comprehend English
  • Participate in tasks involving motor abilities such as use of at least one arm or hand

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not proficient in reading, comprehending or speaking English
  • Pre-existing Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation, Autism, Epilepsy, Schizophrenia, or Pervasive Developmental Disorder
  • Individuals with Psychosis, Active Behavioral Disorder, or uncontrolled epilepsy
  • Women who are pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Brain Training Program 1

    Training Program focusing on providing educational information of cognitive issues related to TBI

    Behavioral: Brain Training Program 1

  • Experimental
    Brain Training Program 2

    Program focuses on strategies to address cognitive issues following TBI

    Behavioral: Brain Training Program 2

Interventions

  • BehavioralBrain Training Program 1

    The training program includes 12 sessions conducted over 8 weeks. The goal of these treatment sessions is to provide information on brain injury and its recovery process. Activities involved in the sessions include discussion of study material. Participants will be encouraged to apply the information to their daily lives. The program includes additional outside practice of the activities.

  • BehavioralBrain Training Program 2

    The training program includes 12 sessions conducted over 8 weeks. The goal of these treatment sessions is to provide strategies to improve brain injury and its recovery process. Activities involved in the sessions include strategies and discussion of study material. Participants will be encouraged to apply the strategies and information to their daily lives. The program includes additional outside practice of the activities.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended

    Assesses disability after brain injury (1 dead to 8 good recovery). A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Pre-training (Baseline) Neuropsychological Test

  2. Community Integration Questionnaire

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on cognition and real-life outcomes relating to how successful someone is able to integrate within their community (0 lowest integration (worst outcome) to 40 maximal integration (best outcome)). A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Neuropsychological changes from baseline to 10 weeks post-training

  3. Functional Status Exam

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on outcomes. - (0 highest function (best outcome) to 31 lowest function (worst outcome)). A lower score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure at 10 weeks post-training

  4. Daneman-Carpenter Reading Span Test

    Scored as 0 words to 7 words comprehended. Higher scores indicate better comprehension and thus a better outcome. Lower scores indicates a lower degree of comprehension. A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure at 10 weeks post-training

  5. Hayling Sentence Completion Test

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on cognition by working memory. The Hayling Sentence Completion test measures response initiation (range 0 best to 30 worst). A lower score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure at 10 weeks post-training

  6. Awareness Questionnaire

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on real-life outcomes. This test measures impaired self-awareness after brain injury. The scale ranges from 17 (lowest self-awareness level, worst outcome) to 85 (highest self-awareness level, best outcome). A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure at 10 weeks post-training

Secondary outcomes

  1. Network Based Statistics in Brain Connectivity

    Brain network connectivity from functional brain imaging was computed using Network-Based Statistics. Data were adjusted to form one number to characterize the significant connection changes associated with the training. This was accomplished by computing a change score. This change score combined the post-training (10 weeks), and 3-months post-training imaging data and compared that to the baseline (pre-training imaging data). This measure allows for an estimation of the number of statistically increased connections observed between different areas of the brain. A higher score indicates more significant connections and is considered to be a better outcome.

    Time frame: MRI measures taken at 10 weeks and 3 months post-training are combined and compared to baseline MRI yielding one number

  2. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on measures current depressive symptoms from 0 (no depressive symptoms (best outcome)) to 63 (maximum depressive symptoms (worst outcome)). A lower score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  3. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on self-reported measure of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. The test ranges from 0 minimal stress symptoms to 80 maximum stress symptoms. A lower score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  4. Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on problem substance use. The range is from 0 low levels of problem substance use to 414 (maximum level of problem substance use). A lower score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  5. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on real-life outcomes on alcohol use disorder. The test ranges from 0 lowest use (best outcome) to 40 maximal use (worst outcome). A lower score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  6. Digit Vigilence Test

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on attention. The test is scored as time in seconds with the lowest amount of time indicating the best performance. A lower score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  7. Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on resilience. the scores range from 0 (lowest reslience and worst outcome) to 100 (highest resilience and best outcome). A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  8. Wechsler Memory Scale

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on memory. The scores range from 0 (lowest memory level) to 20 (higher memory level). A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  9. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Vocabulary Scale

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on vocabulary ability Score ranges from 20 (a lower level of vocabulary) to 80 (a higher level of vocabulary). A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  10. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Matrix Reasoning

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on cognition with fluid reasoning being the measure ranging from 20 (lowest performance) to 80 (highest performance). A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  11. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Similarities

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on cognition with a score of 20 indicating lowest similarities performance to 80 indicating the highest similarities performance. A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

  12. Satisfaction With Life Scale

    To examine short-term effects of treatment on real-life outcomes. This ranges from 5 lowest satisfaction with life to 35 highest satisfaction with one's life. A higher score is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training

07

Results

Posted Mar 10, 2025

Participant flow

Pre-training Testing
Participant flow — Pre-training Testing
MilestoneBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Started5256
Completed5256
Not completed00
Post-training Testing
Participant flow — Post-training Testing
MilestoneBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Started5256
Completed3538
Not completed1718
Delayed Post-training Testing
Participant flow — Delayed Post-training Testing
MilestoneBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Started3538
Completed3535
Not completed03

Outcome measures

PrimaryGlasgow Outcome Scale-Extended

Assesses disability after brain injury (1 dead to 8 good recovery). A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Pre-training (Baseline) Neuropsychological Test
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended
units on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended6.21 ± 0.756.30 ± 0.76
PrimaryCommunity Integration Questionnaire

To examine short-term effects of treatment on cognition and real-life outcomes relating to how successful someone is able to integrate within their community (0 lowest integration (worst outcome) to 40 maximal integration (best outcome)). A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Neuropsychological changes from baseline to 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Community Integration Questionnaire
units on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Community Integration Questionnaire16.91 ± 5.0418.71 ± 5.08
PrimaryFunctional Status Exam

To examine short-term effects of treatment on outcomes. - (0 highest function (best outcome) to 31 lowest function (worst outcome)). A lower score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Functional Status Exam
units on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Functional Status Exam24.02 ± 6.9322.14 ± 6.23
PrimaryDaneman-Carpenter Reading Span Test

Scored as 0 words to 7 words comprehended. Higher scores indicate better comprehension and thus a better outcome. Lower scores indicates a lower degree of comprehension. A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Daneman-Carpenter Reading Span Test
units on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Daneman-Carpenter Reading Span Test2.81 ± 0.892.89 ± 1.07
PrimaryHayling Sentence Completion Test

To examine short-term effects of treatment on cognition by working memory. The Hayling Sentence Completion test measures response initiation (range 0 best to 30 worst). A lower score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hayling Sentence Completion Test
units on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Hayling Sentence Completion Test5.96 ± 1.226.05 ± 1.35
PrimaryAwareness Questionnaire

To examine short-term effects of treatment on real-life outcomes. This test measures impaired self-awareness after brain injury. The scale ranges from 17 (lowest self-awareness level, worst outcome) to 85 (highest self-awareness level, best outcome). A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Awareness Questionnaire
units on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Awareness Questionnaire34.94 ± 9.0838.00 ± 9.48
SecondaryNetwork Based Statistics in Brain Connectivity

Brain network connectivity from functional brain imaging was computed using Network-Based Statistics. Data were adjusted to form one number to characterize the significant connection changes associated with the training. This was accomplished by computing a change score. This change score combined the post-training (10 weeks), and 3-months post-training imaging data and compared that to the baseline (pre-training imaging data). This measure allows for an estimation of the number of statistically increased connections observed between different areas of the brain. A higher score indicates more significant connections and is considered to be a better outcome.

Time frame:
MRI measures taken at 10 weeks and 3 months post-training are combined and compared to baseline MRI yielding one number
Reported as:
Number · number of significant brain connections
Network Based Statistics in Brain Connectivity
number of significant brain connectionsBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Network Based Statistics in Brain Connectivity014
Statistical analysis
  • Brain Health Workshop (BHW) vs Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART) · Network Based Statistics analysis · p = 0.01 (This is a p-value that is used in Network Based Statistics analysis for resting-state functional brain network data.) · Pnbs: .0001This analysis evaluated monotonic changes from time point 1 (pre-intervention) to time points 2 (immediate post-intervention) and 3 (12 weeks post-intervention) that may have occurred between the SMART and BHW groups.
SecondaryBeck Depression Inventory (BDI)

To examine short-term effects of treatment on measures current depressive symptoms from 0 (no depressive symptoms (best outcome)) to 63 (maximum depressive symptoms (worst outcome)). A lower score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)18.28 ± 12.5118.41 ± 10.59
SecondaryPost Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist

To examine short-term effects of treatment on self-reported measure of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. The test ranges from 0 minimal stress symptoms to 80 maximum stress symptoms. A lower score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Checklist46.76 ± 18.0344.09 ± 15.84
SecondaryAlcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test

To examine short-term effects of treatment on problem substance use. The range is from 0 low levels of problem substance use to 414 (maximum level of problem substance use). A lower score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test19.40 ± 15.5022.18 ± 19.12
SecondaryAlcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

To examine short-term effects of treatment on real-life outcomes on alcohol use disorder. The test ranges from 0 lowest use (best outcome) to 40 maximal use (worst outcome). A lower score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test2.94 ± 3.783.39 ± 4.12
SecondaryDigit Vigilence Test

To examine short-term effects of treatment on attention. The test is scored as time in seconds with the lowest amount of time indicating the best performance. A lower score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Digit Vigilence Test
secondsBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Digit Vigilence Test413.06 ± 99.06359.20 ± 72.74
SecondaryConnor-Davidson Resilience Scale

To examine short-term effects of treatment on resilience. the scores range from 0 (lowest reslience and worst outcome) to 100 (highest resilience and best outcome). A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale61.26 ± 12.8664.38 ± 22.40
SecondaryWechsler Memory Scale

To examine short-term effects of treatment on memory. The scores range from 0 (lowest memory level) to 20 (higher memory level). A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Wechsler Memory Scale
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Wechsler Memory Scale12.96 ± 4.0512.79 ± 4.08
SecondaryWechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Vocabulary Scale

To examine short-term effects of treatment on vocabulary ability Score ranges from 20 (a lower level of vocabulary) to 80 (a higher level of vocabulary). A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Vocabulary Scale
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Vocabulary Scale61.44 ± 7.8458.14 ± 8.14
SecondaryWechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Matrix Reasoning

To examine short-term effects of treatment on cognition with fluid reasoning being the measure ranging from 20 (lowest performance) to 80 (highest performance). A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Matrix Reasoning
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Matrix Reasoning26.56 ± 4.3027.64 ± 4.68
SecondaryWechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Similarities

To examine short-term effects of treatment on cognition with a score of 20 indicating lowest similarities performance to 80 indicating the highest similarities performance. A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Similarities
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence Similarities37.69 ± 4.3936.96 ± 3.71
SecondarySatisfaction With Life Scale

To examine short-term effects of treatment on real-life outcomes. This ranges from 5 lowest satisfaction with life to 35 highest satisfaction with one's life. A higher score is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Measure taken at 10 weeks post-training
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Satisfaction With Life Scale
scores on a scaleBrain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)
Satisfaction With Life Scale17.56 ± 7.6016.54 ± 7.85

Adverse events

Collected over Each participant was involved in the study for a total of twenty-one weeks. This consisted of one week during which the first assessment took place followed by eight weeks of cognitive intervention training in either of the two arms of the study and the first post-training assessment). Lastly, there was one additional testing session carried out twelve weeks after the completion of the training (and the first post-training assessment).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training Group0/56 (0%)0/56 (0%)0/56 (0%)
Brain Health Workshop0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)0/52 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Brain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)Total
Mean42.19 ± 13.3740.59 ± 13.0541.36 ± 13.17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Brain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)Total
Female202141
Male323567
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Brain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)Total
Hispanic or Latino358
Not Hispanic or Latino455196
Unknown or Not Reported404
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Brain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American6814
White424789
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported404
Years of Education
Years of Education(years)Brain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)Total
Mean16.34 ± 3.0715.80 ± 2.4316.05 ± 2.74
Socio-economic Status (SES)
Socio-economic Status (SES)(units on a scale)Brain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)Total
Mean44.81 ± 13.0940.44 ± 14.8542.48 ± 14.16
Civilian/Military
Civilian/Military(Participants)Brain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)Total
Civilian213152
Military (Veteran)312556
Marital Status
Marital Status(Participants)Brain Health Workshop (BHW)Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART)Total
Married221739
Single232952
Widow101
Divorced41014
Separated202

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Center for BrainHealth
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Krawczyk DC, Marquez de la Plata C, Schauer GF, Vas AK, Keebler M, Tuthill S, Gardner C, Jantz T, Yu W, Chapman SB. Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol. Trials. 2013 Jan 30;14:29. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-29. PubMed 23363480 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01552473
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas at Dallas
Collaborators
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
Responsible party
Dan Krawczyk (Professor, The University of Texas at Dallas) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2012
Start date
Mar 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Oct 2015
Results posted
Mar 10, 2025
Last update
Mar 10, 2025

Study contacts

Daniel Krawcyzk, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Texas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion