ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01546987Updated Mar 6, 2026Results posted

Hormone Therapy, Radiation Therapy, and Steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase TAK-700 in Treating Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of GnRH agonist and Anti-androgen in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Completed at 172 sites in 2 countries. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-06.

Sponsored by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
239
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Androgens can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Drugs, such as steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase TAK-700, when used with other hormone therapy, may lessen the amount of androgens made by the body. Radiation therapy uses high energy x rays to kill tumor cells. This may be an effective treatment for prostate cancer when combined with hormone therapy. Studying quality-of-life in patients having cancer treatment may help identify the intermediate- and long-term effects of treatment on patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying the use of hormone therapy, including TAK-700, together with radiation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • To evaluate the difference in overall survival of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer with unfavorable prognostic features between a) standard treatment (androgen-deprivation therapy [ADT] + radiotherapy) and b) standard treatment with the addition of 24 months of steroid 17alpha-monooxygenase TAK-700 (TAK-700).

Secondary

  • To characterize differences between the treatment groups with respect to incidence of unexpected grade ≥ 3 adverse events and/or clinically significant decrement in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) among subjects treated with TAK-700.
  • To compare rates and cumulative incidence of biochemical control (freedom from PSA failure), local/regional progression, and distant metastases.
  • To compare rate and cumulative incidence of clinical failure, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 25 ng/mL, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of ADT.
  • To compare prostate cancer-specific survival and other-cause mortality.
  • To compare the change in severity of fatigue as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue short form.
  • To compare changes in patient-reported QOL as measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC).
  • To assess quality-adjusted survival using the EQ-5D.
  • To compare nadir and average serum testosterone at 12 and 24 months during treatment.
  • To compare changes in hemoglobin A1C, fasting glucose, and fasting insulin during 24 months of systemic treatment and during the first three years of follow-up.
  • To compare changes in fasting lipid levels during 24 months of treatment and during the first three years of follow-up.
  • To compare changes in body mass index (BMI) during 24 months of treatment and during the first three years of follow-up.
  • To compare the incidence of adverse events ascertained via CTCAE version 4.
  • To compare the rate of recovery of testosterone to > 230 ng/dL (accepted threshold for supplementation) after 12 and 24 months of follow-up.
  • To compare the median time to recovery of testosterone to > 230 ng/dL during the first five years of follow-up.
  • To assess cumulative incidence of relevant clinical survivorship endpoints including new diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, or osteoporotic fracture.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, randomized study. Patients are stratified according to risk group (see Disease Characteristics) and type of radiation therapy (RT) boost (intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) vs brachytherapy). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 1 year, and then annually thereafter.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • stage I prostate cancer
  • stage IIA prostate cancer
  • stage IIB prostate cancer
  • stage III prostate cancer
  • stage IV prostate cancer
03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 239 is above the median of 60 across 5,348 interventional studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group is the lead sponsor of 155 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate within 180 days prior to registration at high risk for recurrence as determined by one of the following combinations:

    • Gleason Score (GS) ≥ 9, PSA ≤ 150 ng/mL, any T stage
    • GS ≥ 8, PSA \< 20 ng/mL, T stage ≥ T2
    • GS ≥ 8, PSA ≥ 20-150 ng/mL, any T stage
    • GS ≥ 7, PSA ≥ 20-150 ng/mL, any T stage
  2. History/physical examination within 60 days prior to registration.
  3. Clinically negative lymph nodes as established by imaging [abdominal and/or pelvic computerized tomography (CT) or abdominal and/or pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)], nodal sampling, or dissection within 90 days prior to registration.

    •Patients with lymph nodes equivocal or questionable by imaging are eligible if the nodes are \< 2.0 cm.

  4. No distant (M0) on bone scan within 90 days prior to registration (18F-Na bone scan is an acceptable substitute).

    •Equivocal bone scan findings are allowed if plain films are negative for metastasis.

  5. Baseline serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value performed with an FDA-approved assay (e.g., Abbott, Hybritech), obtained prior to any luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) or anti-androgen therapy, within 180 days of randomization.
  6. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), such as LHRH agonists (e.g., goserelin, leuprolide), anti-androgens (e.g., flutamide, bicalutamide), estrogens (e.g., DES), or surgical castration (orchiectomy), may have been started prior to registration, provided that registration is within 50 days of beginning ADT. Please note: If the patient has started ADT he will not be eligible to participate in the quality of life component of this study.
  7. Prior testosterone administration is allowed if last administered at least 90 days prior to registration.
  8. Zubrod Performance Status 0-1 within 21 days prior to registration
  9. Age ≥ 18
  10. Complete blood count (CBC)/differential obtained within 14 days prior to registration on study, with adequate bone marrow function defined as follows:

    • (ANC) ≥ 1,800 cells/mm3
    • ≥ 100,000 cells/mm3
    • ≥ 8.0 g/dl (Note: The use of transfusion or other intervention to achieve Hgb ≥ 8.0 g/dl is acceptable.)
  11. Serum creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dl and (can be calculated) > 40 mL/minute within 21 days prior to registration
  12. \< 1.5x (ULN) and (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \< 2.5x ULN within 21 days prior to registration
  13. Serum testosterone within 21 days prior to registration
  14. Chemistry (including sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate (carbon dioxide), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), glucose, calcium, magnesium and phosphorous) and liver panels (including albumin and alkaline phosphatase) obtained within 21 days prior to registration
  15. Fasting glucose, fasting insulin, lipid panel [cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)], and within 21 days prior to registration
  16. Screening calculated of ≥ to institutional lower limit of normal by multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or by echocardiogram (ECHO).
  17. Baseline (ECG) within 180 days prior to registration
  18. Patients, even if surgically sterilized (ie, status post vasectomy), who:

    1. Agree to practice effective barrier during the entire study treatment period and for 4 months (120 days) after the last dose of study drug, or
    2. Agree to completely abstain from intercourse.
  19. Patient must be able to provide study-specific prior to study entry.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. PSA > 150
  2. Definite evidence of disease.
  3. Pathologically positive lymph nodes or nodes > 2.0 cm on imaging.
  4. Prior radical prostatectomy, cryosurgery for prostate cancer, or bilateral orchiectomy for any reason.
  5. Prior invasive (except non-melanoma skin cancer) unless disease-free or not requiring systemic therapy for a minimum of 3 years.
  6. Prior systemic chemotherapy for prostate cancer (Note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowed).
  7. Prior radiotherapy, including brachytherapy, to the region of the prostate that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields.

    •Any patient undergoing brachytherapy must have transrectal ultrasound confirmation of prostate volume \<60 cc, American Urological Association (AUA) score ≤15 within 60 days of registration, and no history of prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP); prior TURP is permitted for patients who receive external beam radiation therapy [EBRT] only).

  8. Previous hormonal therapy for > 50 days.
  9. Known to TAK-700 or related compounds
  10. A history of adrenal insufficiency
  11. History of myocardial infarction, unstable symptomatic ischemic heart disease, ongoing arrhythmias of Grade > 2 [, version 4.02] (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute, 2009), thromboembolic events (eg, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or symptomatic cerebrovascular events), or any other cardiac condition (e.g., pericardial effusion restrictive cardiomyopathy) within 6 months prior to registration. Chronic stable atrial fibrillation on stable anticoagulant therapy is allowed.
  12. Class III or IV heart failure.
  13. abnormalities of:

    1. Q-wave infarction, unless identified 6 or more months prior to screening
    2. > 460 msec
  14. Patients who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of ; this exclusion is necessary because the treatment involved in this study may be significantly teratogenic.
  15. Prior allergic reaction to the drugs involved in this protocol.
  16. Study entry PSA obtained during the following time frames:

    1. 10-day period following prostate ;
    2. following initiation of hormonal therapy.
  17. Cushing's syndrome
  18. Severe chronic renal disease (serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dl and confirmed by \< 40 mL/minute)
  19. Chronic liver disease ( > 1.5x , or AST > 2.5x ULN)
  20. Chronic treatment with within one year
  21. Uncontrolled hypertension despite appropriate medical therapy within 21 days prior to registration (blood pressure of greater than 150 mm Hg systolic and 90 mm Hg diastolic at 2 separate measurements no more than 60 minutes apart during Screening visit)
  22. Unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol or cooperate fully with the investigator and site personnel.
  23. Major surgery within 14 days prior to registration
  24. Serious infection within 14 days prior to registration
  25. Uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade ≥ 3] despite appropriate medical therapy at the time of registration
  26. Known gastrointestinal (GI) disease or GI procedure that could interfere with the oral absorption or tolerance of TAK-700, including difficulty swallowing tablets
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(21)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
239 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    ADT + RT

    Standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) beginning two months prior to radiation therapy (RT). ADT comprised of anti-androgen continuing for two years and GnRH agonist stopping at end of RT.

    Drug: GnRH agonist · Drug: Anti-androgen · Radiation: Radiation therapy

  • Experimental
    TAK-700 + ADT + RT

    TAK-700 and standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) beginning two months prior to radiation therapy (RT). ADT comprised of anti-androgen continuing for two years and GnRH agonist stopping at end of RT. TAK-700 continues for two years.

    Drug: GnRH agonist · Drug: Anti-androgen · Drug: TAK-700 · Radiation: Radiation therapy

Interventions

  • LHRH agonists are administered with a variety of techniques. The manufacturer's instructions should be followed. Begins within 6 weeks after registration (if not started prior) at same time as anti-androgen and TAK-700 (if applicable).

    Also known as: LHRH analog, leuprolide, goserelin, buserelin, triptorelin, Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) Agonist, LHRH agonist

  • Starts at same time as GnRH agonist, ends at end of radiation therapy. Either flutamide (orally 250 mg three times a day) or bicalutamide (orally 50 mg once a day).

    Also known as: flutamide, bicalutamide, androgen suppression

  • 300 mg twice daily (BID) (600 mg per day) orally, continuously for 2 years starting with ADT.

  • RadiationRadiation therapy

    Starts 8-10 weeks after initiation of ADT. Initially 45 Gy (1.8 Gy / fraction) to prostate and pelvic lymph nodes delivered with 3DCRT/IMRT, then a boost using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy, or high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)

    Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)

    Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from primary (original protocol) to secondary. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. 5-year rates are provided.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

    Time to grade 3 or higher adverse event (event) is defined as time from randomization to the date of first event, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Event rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Local Progression

    Local recurrence (failure) is defined as biopsy proven recurrence within the prostate gland. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates reported.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases

    Distant metastases (failure) is defined as imaging or biopsy demonstrated evidence for systemic recurrence. Biopsy was not required, however it was encouraged in absence of a rising PSA. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. Note, the protocol lists this endpoint as regional or distant metastasis, but regional progression data was not collected.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

  5. Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure

    General clinical treatment failure (GCTF) is defined as: PSA \> 25 ng/ml, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from registration to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer

    Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer, last known follow-up (censored), or death due to other causes (competing risk). Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method. If too few events occur for meaningful estimates, then only counts of events will be reported.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

  7. Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year

    The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year.

    Time frame: Baseline, one year

  8. Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year

    The EPIC-Short Form is a 26-item, validated self-administered tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies consisting of five summary domains (bowel, urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, sexual, and hormonal function). Responses for each item form a Likert scale which are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A domain score is the average of the transformed domain item scores, ranging from 0-100 with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Change at one year is defined as one-year value - baseline value. Positive change at one year indicates improved quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, one year

  9. Serum Testosterone

    Time frame: Baseline,12 months, 24 months

  10. Fasting Total Cholesterol

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  11. Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  12. Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  13. Hemoglobin A1c

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  14. Fasting Plasma Glucose

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  15. Fasting Plasma Insulin

    Time frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months

  16. Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Body Mass Index (BMI) is a person's weight in kilograms (or pounds) divided by the square of height in meters (or feet). Change from baseline = time point value - baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline and yearly to five years.

  17. Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event

    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data

    Time frame: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

  18. Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months

    Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Time to testosterone recovery is defined as time from randomization to the date of testosterone recovery, biochemical, local, or distant failure (competing risk), salvage therapy (competing risk), death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method.

    Time frame: From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years.

  19. Median Testosterone Recovery Time

    Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring for biochemical, local, or distant failure, salvage therapy, death, and otherwise alive without event. Testosterone recovery time is defined as time from randomization to testosterone recovery or censoring.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

  20. Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events

    Clinical survivorship events are defined as the following newly diagnosed non-fatal cardiovascular events or other clinical endpoints relevant to prostate cancer survivorship: type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and osteoporotic fracture.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol) by Ethnicity

    Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol) by Race

    Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

    Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.

07

Results

Posted Apr 18, 2023
Limitations and caveats
This study closed to accrual early at 238 participants out of 900 planned due to discontinuation of support from the industry partner (Takeda/Millenium) for further development of TAK-700 in prostate cancer. The study endpoints and statistical considerations were revised to take the smaller sample size into account. The revised protocol contains both the original and revised statistical sections.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Started118120
Eligible115116
Eligible participants who consented to quality of life (qol) component10394
Completed115116
Not completed34
Withdrew: Protocol violation34

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol)17.3 (10.7 to 25.2)12.8 (7.1 to 20.1)
Statistical analysis
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · Log Rank · p = 0.55 (One-sided significance level = 0.05) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.83 · 95% CI 0.47 to 1.48Reference level = ADT + RT
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from primary (original protocol) to secondary. Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. 5-year rates are provided.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Percentage of Patients Alive [Overall Survival] (Primary Endpoint of Original Protocol)89.4 (83.5 to 95.3)88.1 (81.8 to 94.4)
Statistical analysis
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · Log Rank · p = 0.27 (Two-sided significance level = 0.05) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.71 · 95% CI 0.38 to 1.31Reference level = ADT + RT
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

Time to grade 3 or higher adverse event (event) is defined as time from randomization to the date of first event, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Event rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events34.9 (26.0 to 43.9)58.9 (48.8 to 67.6)
Statistical analysis
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · Log Rank · p = <0.001 · Hazard ratio (hr): 2.29 · 95% CI 1.54 to 3.40Reference level = ADT + RT arm
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Local Progression

Local recurrence (failure) is defined as biopsy proven recurrence within the prostate gland. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates reported.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Local Progression
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Percentage of Participants With Local Progression2.9 (0.8 to 7.6)0.0 (0.0 to 0.0)
Statistical analysis
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · Log Rank · p = 0.99 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.01 · 95% CI 0.33 to 3.13
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Distant Metastases

Distant metastases (failure) is defined as imaging or biopsy demonstrated evidence for systemic recurrence. Biopsy was not required, however it was encouraged in absence of a rising PSA. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here. Note, the protocol lists this endpoint as regional or distant metastasis, but regional progression data was not collected.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastases6.8 (3.0 to 12.7)2.9 (0.8 to 7.7)
Statistical analysis
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · Log Rank · p = 0.48 (Two-sided significance level = 0.05) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.71 · 95% CI 0.29 to 1.75Reference level = ADT + RT arm
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure

General clinical treatment failure (GCTF) is defined as: PSA \> 25 ng/ml, documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, or initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Failure time is defined as time from registration to the date of failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Percentage of Participants With General Clinical Treatment Failure12.5 (7.0 to 19.6)6.8 (3.0 to 12.8)
Statistical analysis
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · Log Rank · p = 0.65 (Two-sided significance level = 0.05) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.86 · 95% CI 0.45 to 1.63Reference level = ADT + RT
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer

Time to prostate cancer death is defined as time from randomization to the date of death due to prostate cancer, last known follow-up (censored), or death due to other causes (competing risk). Failure rates were to be estimated using the cumulative incidence method. If too few events occur for meaningful estimates, then only counts of events will be reported.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Percentage of Participants With Death Due to Prostate Cancer7.7 (3.6 to 13.9)4.9 (1.8 to 10.5)
SecondaryChange in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year

The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year.

Time frame:
Baseline, one year
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year
T-scoreADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Change in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form at One Year2.78 ± 7.213.16 ± 8.24
Statistical analysis
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.76
SecondaryChange in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year

The EPIC-Short Form is a 26-item, validated self-administered tool to assess disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and its therapies consisting of five summary domains (bowel, urinary incontinence, urinary irritation/obstruction, sexual, and hormonal function). Responses for each item form a Likert scale which are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A domain score is the average of the transformed domain item scores, ranging from 0-100 with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Change at one year is defined as one-year value - baseline value. Positive change at one year indicates improved quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline, one year
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life as Measured by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form at One Year
score on a scaleADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Bowel domain-5.45 ± 9.10-7.04 ± 15.50
Urinary domain-1.67 ± 13.90-5.31 ± 15.46
Sexual domain-24.18 ± 27.64-27.26 ± 25.98
Hormonal domain-17.31 ± 15.36-17.45 ± 16.59
Statistical analysis
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.44
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.13
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.50
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.96
SecondarySerum Testosterone
Time frame:
Baseline,12 months, 24 months
Reported as:
Mean · ng/dL
Serum Testosterone
ng/dLADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Baseline355.75 ± 225.65357.73 ± 217.26
12 months35.68 ± 68.3925.22 ± 67.49
24 months86.47 ± 182.4017.36 ± 32.71
SecondaryFasting Total Cholesterol
Time frame:
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Fasting Total Cholesterol
mg/dLADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Baseline149.71 ± 68.20154.20 ± 71.05
12 months160.27 ± 73.22154.74 ± 70.85
24 months163.20 ± 168.63160.61 ± 77.55
SecondarySerum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
Time frame:
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Serum High-density Lipoprotein (HDL)
mg/dLADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Baseline40.91 ± 20.9641.32 ± 20.93
12 months44.94 ± 24.2144.50 ± 24.21
24 months42.16 ± 23.7744.85 ± 23.36
SecondarySerum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)
Time frame:
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Serum High-density Lipoprotein (LDL)
mg/dLADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Baseline88.78 ± 45.6487.85 ± 47.33
12 months86.18 ± 47.1183.73 ± 46.86
24 months81.35 ± 47.7395.34 ± 59.22
SecondaryHemoglobin A1c
Time frame:
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Reported as:
Mean · g/dL
Hemoglobin A1c
g/dLADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Baseline6.12 ± 1.056.01 ± 1.05
12 months6.33 ± 1.185.95 ± 0.73
24 months6.30 ± 1.596.04 ± 0.76
SecondaryFasting Plasma Glucose
Time frame:
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Fasting Plasma Glucose
mg/dLADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Baseline98.99 ± 51.87100.52 ± 45.54
12 months102.27 ± 53.06117.39 ± 118.40
24 months104.24 ± 67.43105.51 ± 40.53
SecondaryFasting Plasma Insulin
Time frame:
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Reported as:
Mean

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryChange From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)

Body Mass Index (BMI) is a person's weight in kilograms (or pounds) divided by the square of height in meters (or feet). Change from baseline = time point value - baseline value.

Time frame:
Baseline and yearly to five years.
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m^2
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
kg/m^2ADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
1 year0.64 ± 2.19-0.84 ± 4.28
2 years0.67 ± 3.76-0.34 ± 2.55
3 years0.75 ± 3.900.25 ± 2.32
4 years-0.02 ± 6.950.46 ± 2.70
5 years-0.52 ± 3.010.15 ± 2.71
SecondaryNumber of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data

Time frame:
From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants by Highest Grade Adverse Event
ParticipantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Grade 1172
Grade 25445
Grade 33155
Garde 449
Grade 531
SecondaryTestosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Time to testosterone recovery is defined as time from randomization to the date of testosterone recovery, biochemical, local, or distant failure (competing risk), salvage therapy (competing risk), death (competing risk), or last known follow-up (censored). Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method.

Time frame:
From registration to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Testosterone Recovery at 12 and 24 Months
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
12 months19.4 (12.5 to 27.3)12.5 (7.0 to 19.6)
24 months32.9 (24.1 to 41.9)17.4 (10.8 to 25.4)
SecondaryMedian Testosterone Recovery Time

Testosterone recovery is defined as testosterone level after treatment greater than 230 ng/dL. Testosterone recovery rates are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring for biochemical, local, or distant failure, salvage therapy, death, and otherwise alive without event. Testosterone recovery time is defined as time from randomization to testosterone recovery or censoring.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Median · years
Median Testosterone Recovery Time
yearsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Median Testosterone Recovery TimeNA (4.2 to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • ADT + RT vs TAK-700 + ADT + RT · Log Rank · p = 0.0104 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.51 · 95% CI 0.29 to 0.89Reference arm = ADT + RT arm
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events

Clinical survivorship events are defined as the following newly diagnosed non-fatal cardiovascular events or other clinical endpoints relevant to prostate cancer survivorship: type 2 diabetes, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and osteoporotic fracture.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Clinical Survivorship Events
ParticipantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Type 2 diabetes3018
Coronary artery disease1614
Myocardial infarction68
Stroke56
Pulmonary embolism105
Deep vein thrombosis87
Osteoporotic fracture61
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol) by Ethnicity

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol) by Ethnicity
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Hispanic or Latino0 (NA to NA)0 (NA to NA)
Not Hispanic or Latino17.6 (10.9 to 25.6)13.6 (7.6 to 21.3)
Unknown or Not Reported0 (NA to NA)0 (NA to NA)
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol) by Race

Note, the revised protocol (see Limitations and Caveats) changed this outcome measure from secondary (original protocol) to primary. Biochemical failure will be defined by the Phoenix definition (PSA ≥ 2 ng/ml over the nadir PSA, the presence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, or the initiation of salvage androgen deprivation therapy. Time to failure is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method, while treatment effect comparisons are based on cause-specific hazards (deaths censored). Five-year rates are provided here.

Time frame:
From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure (Primary Endpoint of Revised Protocol) by Race
percentage of participantsADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
American Indian or Alaska Native0 (NA to NA)—
Asian0 (NA to NA)0 (NA to NA)
Black or African American15.4 (2.2 to 39.9)25.0 (2.9 to 58.3)
White17.9 (10.5 to 26.8)12.2 (6.5 to 20.0)
Unknown or Not Reported20.0 (0.4 to 62.1)0 (NA to NA)

Adverse events

Collected over From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: every 3 months from start of treatment for 2 years, then every 6 months for 3 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 9.1 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ADT + RT24/115 (20.9%)19/112 (17%)108/112 (96.4%)
TAK-700 + ADT + RT19/116 (16.4%)38/115 (33%)112/115 (97.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 76
Most frequent serious events
EventADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders3/1124/115
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/1123/115
StrokeNervous system disorders1/1123/115
Renal calculiRenal and urinary disorders0/1123/115
Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders1/1123/115
Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders2/1121/115
SyncopeNervous system disorders2/1120/115
HematuriaRenal and urinary disorders2/1121/115
Aortic valve diseaseCardiac disorders0/1122/115
FatigueGeneral disorders and administration site conditions1/1122/115
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 81
Most frequent other events
EventADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RT
FatigueGeneral disorders and administration site conditions72/11291/115
Hot flashesVascular disorders83/11289/115
Urinary frequencyRenal and urinary disorders74/11283/115
DiarrheaGastrointestinal disorders61/11269/115
Urinary urgencyRenal and urinary disorders49/11237/115
Erectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disorders49/11247/115
Renal and urinary disorders - OtherRenal and urinary disorders42/11246/115
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders33/11239/115
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders9/11238/115
HypertensionVascular disorders18/11237/115

Baseline characteristics

Eligible participants

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)ADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RTTotal
≤ 49 years213
50 - 59 years162238
60 - 69 years444185
≥ 70 years5352105
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RTTotal
Female000
Male115116231
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RTTotal
Hispanic or Latino257
Not Hispanic or Latino111109220
Unknown or Not Reported224
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RTTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian112
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American141024
White93101194
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported6410
Zubrod Performance Status
Zubrod Performance Status(Participants)ADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RTTotal
099104203
1161228
Gleason Score
Gleason Score(Participants)ADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RTTotal
7161834
8373067
≥96268130
Study Entry PSA
Study Entry PSA(Participants)ADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RTTotal
< 20.0 ng/ml7575150
20.0-150.0 ng/ml404181
T-Stage
T-Stage(Participants)ADT + RTTAK-700 + ADT + RTTotal
T1a-T1c222345
T2-T2c6658124
T3-T3b243357
T4325

5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

172 sites
  • The Kirklin Clinic at Acton Road
    Birmingham, Alabama 35243, United States
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
  • Arizona Oncology-Deer Valley Center
    Phoenix, Arizona 85027, United States
  • Arizona Oncology Services Foundation
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85260, United States
  • Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Auburn
    Auburn, California 95603, United States
  • Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Cameron Park
    Cameron Park, California 95682, United States
  • Mercy San Juan Medical Center
    Carmichael, California 95608, United States
  • Veterans Administration Long Beach Medical Center
    Long Beach, California 90822, United States
  • Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • University of Southern California/Norris Cancer Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center
    Pomona, California 91767, United States
  • Rohnert Park Cancer Center
    Rohnert Park, California 94928, United States
  • Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Roseville
    Roseville, California 95661, United States
  • Sutter General Hospital
    Sacramento, California 95816, United States
  • University of California At San Diego
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • UCSF-Mount Zion
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Santa Clara
    Santa Clara, California 95051, United States
  • Kaiser Permanente Cancer Treatment Center
    South San Francisco, California 94080, United States
  • Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Sutter Cancer Centers Radiation Oncology Services-Vacaville
    Vacaville, California 95687, United States
  • Sutter Solano Medical Center
    Vallejo, California 94589, United States
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center - Anschutz Cancer Pavilion
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Poudre Valley Radiation Oncology
    Fort Collins, Colorado 80528, United States
  • Hartford Hospital
    Hartford, Connecticut 06102, United States
  • The Hospital of Central Connecticut
    New Britain, Connecticut 06050, United States
  • William Backus Hospital
    Norwich, Connecticut 06360, United States
  • Helen F Graham Cancer Center
    Newark, Delaware 19713, United States
  • Christiana Care Health System-Christiana Hospital
    Newark, Delaware 19718, United States
  • University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at Deerfield Beach
    Deerfield Beach, Florida 33442, United States
  • University of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Cancer Center
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Florida Hospital
    Orlando, Florida 32803, United States
  • Grady Health System
    Atlanta, Georgia 30303, United States
  • Piedmont Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30309, United States
  • Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Atlanta VA Medical Center
    Decatur, Georgia 30033, United States
  • Saint Joseph's-Candler Health System
    Savannah, Georgia 31405, United States
  • Queen's Medical Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center
    Boise, Idaho 83706, United States
  • Idaho Urologic Institute PA
    Meridian, Idaho 83642, United States
  • Weiss Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60640, United States
  • Decatur Memorial Hospital
    Decatur, Illinois 62526, United States
  • Hines Veterans Administration Hospital
    Hines, Illinois 60141, United States
  • Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, Illinois 60153, United States
  • OSF Saint Francis Medical Center
    Peoria, Illinois 61637, United States
  • Radiation Oncology Associates PC
    Fort Wayne, Indiana 46804, United States
  • Parkview Hospital Randallia
    Fort Wayne, Indiana 46805, United States
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Kansas City Cancer Centers-Southwest
    Overland Park, Kansas 66210, United States
  • University of Kentucky
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
  • Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809, United States
  • Touro Infirmary
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70115, United States
  • Ochsner Medical Center Jefferson
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70121, United States
  • Maine Medical Center- Scarborough Campus
    Scarborough, Maine 04074, United States
  • Saint Agnes Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21229, United States
  • Peninsula Regional Medical Center
    Salisbury, Maryland 21801, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Saint Anne's Hospital
    Fall River, Massachusetts 02721, United States
  • Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center at Milford Regional
    Milford, Massachusetts 01757, United States
  • North Shore Medical Center Cancer Center
    Peabody, Massachusetts 01960, United States
  • Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center at South Shore
    South Weymouth, Massachusetts 02190, United States
  • Bixby Medical Center
    Adrian, Michigan 49221, United States
  • Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106-0995, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • McLaren-Flint
    Flint, Michigan 48532, United States
  • West Michigan Cancer Center
    Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007, United States
  • Great Lakes Cancer Institute-Lapeer Campus
    Lapeer, Michigan 48446, United States
  • McLaren Cancer Institute-Owosso
    Owosso, Michigan 48867, United States
  • Northern Michigan Regional Hospital
    Petoskey, Michigan 49770, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital-Royal Oak
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital - Troy
    Troy, Michigan 48098, United States
  • Sanford Clinic North-Bemidgi
    Bemidji, Minnesota 56601, United States
  • Saint Luke's Hospital of Duluth
    Duluth, Minnesota 55805, United States
  • Regions Hospital
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, United States
  • Southeast Cancer Center
    Cape Girardeau, Missouri 63703, United States
  • Siteman Cancer Center - Saint Peters
    City of Saint Peters, Missouri 63376, United States
  • Kansas City Cancer Center - South
    Kansas City, Missouri 64131, United States
  • Kansas City Cancer Centers - North
    Kansas City, Missouri 64154, United States
  • Kansas City Cancer Center-Lee's Summit
    Lee's Summit, Missouri 64064, United States
  • Mercy Hospital Springfield
    Springfield, Missouri 65804, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Siteman Cancer Center-South County
    St Louis, Missouri 63129, United States
  • Missouri Baptist Medical Center
    St Louis, Missouri 63131, United States
  • Barnes-Jewish West County Hospital
    St Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Saint John's Mercy Medical Center
    St Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
  • Benefis Healthcare- Sletten Cancer Institute
    Great Falls, Montana 59405, United States
  • Nebraska Methodist Hospital
    Omaha, Nebraska 68114, United States
  • The Nebraska Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • Concord Hospital
    Concord, New Hampshire 03301, United States
  • Exeter Hospital
    Exeter, New Hampshire 03833, United States
  • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Elliot Hospital
    Manchester, New Hampshire 03103, United States
  • Cooper Hospital University Medical Center
    Camden, New Jersey 08103, United States
  • Saint Peter's University Hospital
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper-Voorhees
    Voorhees Township, New Jersey 08043, United States
  • Sanford Bismarck Medical Center
    Bismarck, North Dakota 58501, United States

Showing the first 100 of 172 sites across 2 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from May 2012 to primary completion in Nov 2021, 114 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2023, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

Of 139 non-industry phase 3 interventional studies under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 99 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 57 and three quarters within 144. This study's 114 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 265 studies reached it within 57 months; a quarter within 31 and three quarters within 100.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 3, 2012
First posted
Mar 7, 2012
StartActual
May 2012
Primary completionActual
Nov 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Sep 4, 2025
Results first posted
Apr 18, 2023
Last update
Mar 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01546987
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI), NRG Oncology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 7, 2012
Start date
May 2012
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2021
Completion
Sep 4, 2025
Results posted
Apr 18, 2023
Last update
Mar 6, 2026

Study contacts

M. Dror Michaelson, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Orteronel

Start the discussion