CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01528878Updated Jul 26, 2018Results posted

Safety, Efficacy, and Dosing of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Hepato-cellular Carc/Colo-rectal Liver Metastases

An interventional study of Stereotactic Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife System. in Liver Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms and Metastatic Cancer to Liver, sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-26.

Sponsored by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine a tolerable dose of radiation delivered by the CyberKnife system in two groups of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Read the detailed description

The CyberKnife system has been cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat lesions, tumors and conditions anywhere in the body when radiation treatment is indicated. In order to treat tumors during the respiratory cycle (vs. increasing the margin of treatment around the tumor to compensate for movement or requiring the patient to breath hold during the delivery of each beam), the Synchrony™ option, a system option that enables dynamic radiosurgery during respiration, will be used. The purpose of this study is to determine a tolerable dose of radiation delivered by the CyberKnife in two groups of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Group 1: Patients with HCC and Childs A cirrhosis, and patients with colorectal liver metastases. Group 2: Patients with Childs B cirrhosis. Patients will be irradiated with radiation doses using the CyberKnife system in 3-5 radiation fractions using guidance from fiducials placed by interventional radiology. Treatments will be delivered with standard CyberKnife procedures to account for respiratory motion and set up variations. The fiducial location will be the prime determinant of the delivery site and respiratory motion and fiducial markers will be placed via percutaneous approach by interventional radiology.

02

Conditions studied

  • Liver Neoplasms
  • Colonic Neoplasms
  • Metastatic Cancer to Liver

Keywords

  • Liver Cancer
  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • HCC
  • Metastatic Cancer to Liver
  • Metastatic Colon Cancer
  • Metastatic Colo-rectal Cancer
  • mCRC
  • Liver Function
  • Child-Pugh
03

In context

Neoplasms

9,359 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,486 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 7,250 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 414 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 25 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Hepatocellular carcinoma (as defined by biopsy or alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) greater than 1000ng/dL with appropriate imaging) or liver metastases from colorectal cancer or other tumor (as defined by biopsy or elevated Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) or a positive positron emission tomography (PET) scan in conjunction with a mass on CT or MRI in a patient with previously resected cancer). Patients with at least one measurable liver lesion and no more than 3 are eligible if they meet all other eligibility criteria including the dose constraints on the composite plan.
  2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1.
  3. Patients are not candidates for definitive surgical resection because of tumor location, hepatic function, or other medical or personal reasons.
  4. Patients with HCC who are being considered for liver transplant may be entered as a bridge to transplant if it is considered by the transplant team that an ablative therapy would be of value while awaiting transplant.
  5. If cirrhosis is present, patients will have Child-Pugh score of A or B (see Appendix A in the Master Protocol).
  6. Patients will have tumors not optimally treated with radio-frequency ablation by interventional radiology, or by GI/transplant surgery. This could be for reasons of size, tumor location, or other reasons.
  7. Ability to place fiducial markers in the vicinity of the tumor to allow for radiographic tracking of respiratory motion and tumor localization. Fiducial placement will generally be done by interventional radiology.
  8. Estimates of hepatic tolerance must meet the criteria as defined in Section III. This eligibility will not be able to made definitively until the patient has agreed to participate. in the study and the appropriate scan analyses and dosimetry have been performed. No more than one decrement in dose from the planned dose level will be allowed for an individual patient because of exceeding the maximal liver doses before the patient is declared ineligible for study.
  9. Adequate bone marrow and renal function as assessed by the following:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1000/mm3
    • Platelet count > 80,000/mm3
    • Creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dL OR Creatinine clearance > 45 mL/min based on Cockcroft-Gault formula).
  10. Patients with extra hepatic metastatic disease are eligible if it is the opinion of the treating physician that local therapy to the liver may produce worthwhile clinical benefits
  11. Patient is able to understand fully the potential risks and benefits of this approach and signs an appropriate informed consent.
  12. Male and female of >18 years of age. Male or female patients capable of reproduction must agree to use medically acceptable methods of contraception, such as an intrauterine device, diaphragm, with spermicide, condom with spermicide or abstinence. Inclusion of females of childbearing potential requires a negative pregnancy test within 14 days prior to study initiation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Child-Pugh Class C cirrhosis
  2. Patients with clinically apparent central nervous system (CNS) disease.
  3. Medical or psychiatric illness that would not allow the patient to tolerate the proposed treatment including inability to lie flat for an extended period of time, severe claustrophobia or other reasons.
  4. Uncontrolled or significant cardiovascular disease including: myocardial infarction within 6 months, uncontrolled angina within 6 months, Class III-IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) congestive heart failure, grade 3 cardiac valve dysfunction
  5. Evidence of decompensated liver disease as evidenced by: clinically significant ascites refractory to diuretic therapy) evidence of hepatic encephalopathy, coagulopathy not corrected by conservative measures.
  6. A history of CTCAE Grade 3 bleeding esophageal or gastric varices within the past 2 months. Prior variceal bleed permitted if patient has undergone banding or sclerotherapy and there has been no evidence of bleeding for 2 months. Patients at risk for varices (based on the following: known history of esophageal or gastric varices; evidence of hepatic cirrhosis and/or portal hypertension including biopsy-proven cirrhosis, hypersplenism, or radiographic findings of varices) will be screened for esophageal varices. If varices are identified that require intervention (banding), patient will not be eligible until varices adequately treated.
  7. Prisoners or patients who are compulsorily detained (involuntarily incarcerated) for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (e.g., infectious disease) illness must not be enrolled into this study.
  8. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness.
  9. Inability to comply with study and/or follow-up procedures.
  10. A patient with Child-Pugh Class A will not be eligible for study if the liver dose constraint described in Section 3.2 cannot be met after two decrements in dose per fraction as described above.
  11. A patient with Child-Pugh Class B will not be eligible for study if the liver dose constraint described in Section 3.2 cannot be met after two decrements in dose per fraction as described above.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Good liver function.

    Patients with good liver function as defined by no more than Child-Pugh Class A.

    Radiation: Stereotactic Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife System.

  • Experimental
    Compromised liver function.

    Patients with compromised liver function as defined by patients with Child-Pugh Class B.

    Radiation: Stereotactic Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife System.

Interventions

  • RadiationStereotactic Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife System.

    Radiation: Stereotactic Radiosurgery using the CyberKnife System. The CyberKnife system has been cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat lesions, tumors and conditions, anywhere in the body when radiation treatment is indicated. To address movement of target lesion during the respiratory cycle, the Synchrony™ option will be used. The Synchrony option precisely tracks tumors in or near the target organ as they move, enabling the highly focused beams of radiation to destroy the tumors with minimal injury to adjacent normal tissue. The Synchrony option records the breathing movements of a patient's chest and combines that information with sequential x-ray pictures of tiny markers inserted inside or in the proximity of the tumor to enable precise delivery of radiation during any point in the respiration cycle. The CyberKnife system with the Synchrony option enables reduced normal tissue exposure by using smaller treatment margins and increased accuracy.

    Also known as: Radiotherapy, CyberKnife, Stereotactic Radiosurgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tolerability of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Based on Number of Cumulative Acute Toxicities Occurring Within 90 Days of Treatment and Related to SBRT.

    To determine a tolerable dose, cumulative acute toxicity was collected (defined as toxicity occurring within 90 days of treatment initiation). Adverse events were graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Tolerability was based on hepatic toxicity. A grading (severity) scale is provided for each adverse event (AE) term. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Local Tumor Control to Doses of Radiation in Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver

    1 year local control defined as percentage of patients with freedom from local progression at a median follow-up time of 12.7 months. Progressive disease is defined as increase by \>= 50% of product of the two perpendicular diameters of an irradiated lesion.

    Time frame: 12.7 months

  2. Percentage of Local Response to Doses of Radiation in Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver

    Complete response (CR) is defined as disappearance of the target lesion, partial response (PR) as regression of measureable disease, progressive disease (PD) as increase by \>= 50% in product of the two perpendicular diameters of an irradiated lesion, and stable disease (SD) as all others not meeting criteria for CR, PR, or PD.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Overall Survival of Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver

    Overall survival is defined as percentage of patients remaining alive from start of study treatment to 1 year.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Results

Posted May 15, 2018

Participant flow

Patients were enrolled from June, 2009 to March, 2014 at two institutions.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSingle Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Started30
Completed30
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryTolerability of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Based on Number of Cumulative Acute Toxicities Occurring Within 90 Days of Treatment and Related to SBRT.

To determine a tolerable dose, cumulative acute toxicity was collected (defined as toxicity occurring within 90 days of treatment initiation). Adverse events were graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Tolerability was based on hepatic toxicity. A grading (severity) scale is provided for each adverse event (AE) term. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.

Time frame:
90 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Tolerability of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Based on Number of Cumulative Acute Toxicities Occurring Within 90 Days of Treatment and Related to SBRT.
ParticipantsGrade 2 Adverse EventsGrade 3 Adverse Events
Elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase51
Elevated Bilirubin40
Low Hemoglobin40
Fatigue40
Increased Alanine Aminotransferase30
Decreased Leukocyte21
Nausea20
Abdominal pain20
Increased alkaline phosphatase20
international normalized ratio increased20
Decreased Platelets20
Dyspnea10
Acute total142
SecondaryLocal Tumor Control to Doses of Radiation in Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver

1 year local control defined as percentage of patients with freedom from local progression at a median follow-up time of 12.7 months. Progressive disease is defined as increase by \>= 50% of product of the two perpendicular diameters of an irradiated lesion.

Time frame:
12.7 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Local Tumor Control to Doses of Radiation in Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver
percentage of participantsSingle Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Local Tumor Control to Doses of Radiation in Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver81
SecondaryPercentage of Local Response to Doses of Radiation in Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver

Complete response (CR) is defined as disappearance of the target lesion, partial response (PR) as regression of measureable disease, progressive disease (PD) as increase by \>= 50% in product of the two perpendicular diameters of an irradiated lesion, and stable disease (SD) as all others not meeting criteria for CR, PR, or PD.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Local Response to Doses of Radiation in Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver
percentage of participantsSingle Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Complete Response7
Partial Response13
Stable Disease80
SecondaryOverall Survival of Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver

Overall survival is defined as percentage of patients remaining alive from start of study treatment to 1 year.

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Survival of Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver
percentage of participantsSingle Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Overall Survival of Patients With Liver Cancer or Metastases to the Liver62

Adverse events

Collected over 44 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Single Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases15/30 (50%)1/30 (3.3%)27/30 (90%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSingle Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Pain- chest wallMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/30
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent other events
EventSingle Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Fatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise)General disorders16/30
AST, SGOT(serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase)Investigations14/30
LymphopeniaInvestigations14/30
Alkaline phosphataseInvestigations13/30
PlateletsInvestigations11/30
ALT, SGPT (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase)Investigations9/30
Albumin, serum-low (hypoalbuminemia)Metabolism and nutrition disorders7/30
Bilirubin (hyperbilirubinemia)Investigations7/30
HemoglobinBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/30
Leukocytes (total WBC)Investigations7/30

Baseline characteristics

The original cohort was not analyzed between good vs compromised liver function because there were only 2 patients with Child-Pugh Class B and secondary outcomes measured are thought to be more influenced by disease rather than liver function (which may be more relevant for toxicity).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Single Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Median65.5 (23 to 86)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Single Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Female11
Male19
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Single Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American9
White18
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported2
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Single Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
United States30
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status(Participants)Single Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
017
113
Child Pugh Score
Child Pugh Score(Participants)Single Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
5 (Class A)22
6 (Class A)6
>=7 (Class B)2
Primary Disease
Primary Disease(Participants)Single Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Hepatocellular carcinoma11
Metastatic cancer19
Prior liver-directed therapies
Prior liver-directed therapies(Participants)Single Arm Patients With HCC or Liver Metastases
Any local therapy14
Liver resection9
Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE)7
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA)6
> 1 prior local therapy9
Resection + RFA3
Resection + TACE2
Resection x2 + RFA1
TACE + RFA x31
TACE x 2 + RFA1
TACE x 21

10 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • East Carolina Medical School
    Greenville, North Carolina 27858, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 6, 2011

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 26, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01528878
Lead sponsor
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 8, 2012
Start date
Apr 2009
Primary completion
Aug 18, 2014
Completion
Jan 28, 2016
Results posted
May 15, 2018
Last update
Jul 26, 2018

Study contacts

Joel Tepper, MD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion