CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01521559VIBRANTUpdated Nov 13, 2014Results posted

Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) in Patients With Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Macular Laser Photocoagulation and Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, sponsored by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 56 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-11-13.

Sponsored by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
183
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a phase III, double-masked, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, 52-week study to assess the efficacy and safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) compared to laser treatment in patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO.

02

Conditions studied

  • Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
03

In context

Retinal Vein Occlusion

282 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinal Vein Occlusion; 27 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 183 is above the median of 49 across 211 interventional studies indexed under Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Browse Retinal Vein Occlusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 400 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Of its 120 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 77 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The following inclusion criteria include, but are not limited to:

  1. Adults ≥ 18 years of age with foveal center-involved macular edema (ME) secondary to BRVO diagnosed within 12 months before the screening visit
  2. ETDRS BCVA: letter score of 73 to 24 (20/40 to 20/320) in the study eye at screening and at day 1
  3. Provide signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The following exclusion criteria include, but are not limited to:

  1. Current bilateral manifestation of BRVO
  2. Uncontrolled glaucoma defined as ≥ 25 mmHg on optimal medical regimen, or previous filtration surgery in either the study eye or the fellow eye
  3. Insufficient clearing of macular hemorrhage that would prevent the patient from receiving laser treatment safely on day 1 (patients that meet this criterion may be rescreened once the macular hemorrhage resolves)
  4. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM)
  5. Previous use of intraocular corticosteroids or anti-angiogenic drugs in the study eye
  6. Use of periocular corticosteroids in the study eye within 3 months before day 1
  7. Use of intraocular or periocular corticosteroids or anti-angiogenic drugs in the fellow eye within 3 months before day 1
  8. Previous administration of systemic anti-angiogenic medications
  9. Panretinal scatter photocoagulation, sector laser photocoagulation, or macular grid photocoagulation in the study eye
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
183 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)

    Participants will receive macular laser treatment at Baseline and then according to laser re-treatment criteria up to week 24. Participants will receive treatment with Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) starting at week 24 if they met rescue criteria. Treatment with IAI once initiated was 3 initial monthly doses followed by Q8 week dosing.

    Procedure: Macular Laser Photocoagulation

  • Experimental
    Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) 2Q4

    Participants will receive 2 milligrams (mg) Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI) every 4 weeks (2Q4) through week 24 followed by injections every 8 weeks (2Q8) through week 48. Participants in this group may receive laser rescue at week 36.

    Drug: Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)

Interventions

  • ProcedureMacular Laser Photocoagulation
  • DrugIntravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 24 - LOCF

    Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at every visit from baseline through week 24. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in BCVA Score - LOCF

    Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at every visit from baseline through week 24 - Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Week 24 - LOCF

    CRT was evaluated at every visit from baseline through week 24 using spectral domain Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

  3. Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 24 - LOCF

    The NEI VFQ-25 total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales that are all scored from 0-100. Near activities are defined as reading ordinary print in newspapers, performing work or hobbies requiring near vision, or finding something on a crowded shelf.

    Time frame: Baseline to week 24

07

Results

Posted Nov 13, 2014

Participant flow

Participants with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) involving the center of the macula in the study eye were eligible to participate in the study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMacular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
Started9291
Completed week 248385
Completed week 527773
Completed7773
Not completed1518
Withdrew: Adverse event04
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject911
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up31
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Other12

Outcome measures

PrimaryParticipants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 24 - LOCF

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at every visit from baseline through week 24. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 24
Reported as:
Number · participants
Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 24 - LOCF
participantsMacular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
Participants Who Gained at Least 15 Letters in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) at Week 24 - LOCF2448
Statistical analysis
  • Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control) vs Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0003 (P-value was calculated using 2-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted by regions (Japan vs North America) and baseline Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA ≤20/200 and BCVA \>20/200).) · Mean difference (net): 26.6 · 95% CI 13.0 to 40.1Difference was IAI group minus laser group; Difference and confidence interval were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel weighting scheme adjusted by regions (Japan vs North America) and baseline BCVA (BCVA ≤20/200 and BCVA \>20/200).
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 24 in BCVA Score - LOCF

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol at every visit from baseline through week 24 - Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · letters correctly read
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in BCVA Score - LOCF
letters correctly readMacular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in BCVA Score - LOCF6.9 ± 12.9117.0 ± 11.88
Statistical analysis
  • Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control) vs Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (net): 10.5 · 95% CI 7.1 to 14.0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Week 24 - LOCF

CRT was evaluated at every visit from baseline through week 24 using spectral domain Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).

Time frame:
Baseline to week 24
Reported as:
Mean · microns
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Week 24 - LOCF
micronsMacular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
Change From Baseline in Central Retinal Thickness (CRT) at Week 24 - LOCF-128.0 ± 195.02-280.5 ± 189.7
Statistical analysis
  • Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control) vs Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (net): -148.6 · 95% CI -179.8 to -117.4
SecondaryChange From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 24 - LOCF

The NEI VFQ-25 total score ranges from 0-100 with a score of 0 being the worst outcome and 100 being the best outcome. The NEI VFQ questionnaire is organized as a collection of subscales that are all scored from 0-100. Near activities are defined as reading ordinary print in newspapers, performing work or hobbies requiring near vision, or finding something on a crowded shelf.

Time frame:
Baseline to week 24
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 24 - LOCF
scores on a scaleMacular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25) Questionnaire Total Score at Week 24 - LOCF6.3 ± 12.347.7 ± 11.08
Statistical analysis
  • Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control) vs Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0833 · Mean difference (net): 2.6 · 95% CI -0.3 to 5.5

Adverse events

Collected over Through Week 52 (end of study). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)—10/92 (10.9%)30/92 (32.6%)
Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)—13/91 (14.3%)25/91 (27.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 44
Most frequent serious events
EventMacular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/922/91
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/922/91
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/920/91
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/921/91
Atrioventricular block second degreeCardiac disorders0/921/91
BradycardiaCardiac disorders0/921/91
Breast cancer metastaticNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/921/91
CardiomyopathyCardiac disorders0/921/91
Cataract traumaticInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/921/91
Chest painGeneral disorders0/921/91
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMacular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)
Conjunctival haemorrhageEye disorders14/9222/91
HypertensionVascular disorders15/929/91
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations8/928/91
Eye irritationEye disorders1/927/91
Eye painEye disorders7/925/91
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations7/923/91
BronchitisInfections and infestations2/926/91
Blood pressure increasedInvestigations5/924/91

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set (FAS): All enrolled subjects who received any investigational product, had a baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessment, and at least 1 post-baseline BCVA assessment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)Total
Mean63.9 ± 11.3767.0 ± 10.4165.5 ± 10.98
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Macular Laser Photocoagulation Treatment (Control)Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection (IAI;EYLEA®;BAY86-5321)Total
Female364783
Male544498
08

Study locations

56 sites
  • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Tucson, Arizona, United States
  • Beverly Hills, California, United States
  • La Jolla, California, United States
  • Mountain View, California, United States
  • Palm Desert, California, United States
  • Sacramento, California, United States
  • Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
  • Fort Myers, Florida, United States
  • Miami, Florida, United States
  • Plantation, Florida, United States
  • Stuart, Florida, United States
  • Tampa, Florida, United States
  • Winter Haven, Florida, United States
  • Augusta, Georgia, United States
  • Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Baltimore (2 locations), Maryland, United States
  • Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
  • Boston (2 locations), Massachusetts, United States
  • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
  • Jackson, Michigan, United States
  • Southfield, Michigan, United States
  • Florissant, Missouri, United States
  • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
  • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
  • Teaneck, New Jersey, United States
  • Orchard Park, New York, United States
  • Syracuse, New York, United States
  • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
  • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Kingston, Pennsylvania, United States
  • West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Florence, South Carolina, United States
  • Ladson, South Carolina, United States
  • West Columbia, South Carolina, United States
  • Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
  • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
  • Abilene, Texas, United States
  • Ft. Worth, Texas, United States
  • Harlingen, Texas, United States
  • Houston, Texas, United States
  • San Antonio, Texas, United States
  • Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
  • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
  • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
  • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Urayasu-shi, Chiba, Japan
  • Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan
  • Kagoshima-shi, Kagoshima, Japan
  • Hamamatsu-shi, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Fukushima, Japan
  • Kyoto, Japan
  • Osaka, Japan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shalchi Z, Mahroo O, Bunce C, Mitry D. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 7;7(7):CD009510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009510.pub3. PubMed 32633861 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 13, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01521559
Lead sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
Bayer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 30, 2012
Start date
Apr 2012
Primary completion
Aug 2013
Completion
Mar 2014
Results posted
Nov 13, 2014
Last update
Nov 13, 2014

Study contacts

Clinical Trial Management
study director · Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion