CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01504308SOFIAUpdated Apr 5, 2017

Sonalleve Fibroid Ablation Pivotal Clinical Trial for MR-HIFU of Uterine Fibroids

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of MR-HIFU treatment and Sham treatment in Uterine Fibroids, sponsored by Philips Healthcare. Terminated at 9 sites in 3 countries. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-05.

Sponsored by Philips Healthcare · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
It was not possible to enroll patients into the study in a realistic timeframe.

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Mar 2016, 10 years 7 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to determine whether treatment with the Philips Sonalleve Magnetic Resonance-guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) system is effective in the treatment symptomatic uterine leiomyomas (uterine fibroids).

Read the detailed description

Uterine Fibroids are the most common benign tumors in pre- and peri-menopausal women. Fibroids occur in 20-50% of women over 30 years of age, and with increasing size can produce pain, menorrhagia, pressure, bloating and urinary and bowel compression symptoms. Fibroids may also cause infertility. Symptomatic fibroids impact health and well-being of the female including lost work hours and reduced quality of life.

Current medical treatments include invasive removal of the fibroid (hysterectomy, myomectomy), drug therapy, or treatments causing necrosis of the fibroid tissue such as ablation (freezing or heating) or embolization. It has been estimated that 600,000 hysterectomies are performed per year in the United States and more than half of the conducted hysterectomies are due to fibroids. For the relief of symptoms, women wishing to preserve the uterus may choose between invasive procedures of myomectomy, Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE), ablation or cryotherapy. The surgically invasive procedures require anesthesia, hospital stays, and long recovery periods. However, High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) shows promising results in relieving fibroid symptoms.

This study will confirm the safety and clinical effectiveness of Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU Fibroid Therapy system for ablating symptomatic fibroids.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uterine Fibroids

Keywords

  • uterine fibroids
  • uterine leiomyomas
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • focused ultrasound
03

In context

Leiomyoma

490 studies on the registry are indexed under Leiomyoma; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is below the median of 62 across 345 interventional studies indexed under Leiomyoma.

Browse Leiomyoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Philips Healthcare is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Women, age between 18 and 50 years
  • Ethnicity has a match with the intended profile for the site
  • Weight \< 140kg or 310lbs
  • Pre- or peri-menopausal as indicated by clinical evaluation or Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH) level \< 40 IU/L
  • Willing and able to attend all study visits
  • Willing and able to complete Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) assessment with Alkaline Hematin (AH) method
  • Willing and able to use reliable contraception methods
  • Uterine size \< 24 weeks
  • Cervical cell assessment by Pap smear: Normal, Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (SIL), Low risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) or Atypical Squamous Cells of Uncertain Significance (ASCUS) subtypes of cervical tissue
  • MR-HIFU device accessibility to fibroids such that at least 50% of the total fibroid volume can be treated.
  • Fibroids selected for treatment meeting the following criteria (further extrapolated in the protocol):

    1. Total planned ablation volume of all fibroids should not exceed 250 ml and
    2. No more than 5 fibroids should be planned for ablation and
    3. Dominant fibroid (diameter) is greater than or equal to 3 cm and
    4. Completely non-enhancing fibroids should not be treated as the identification of treated volume becomes ambiguous
  • Patient's self-assessment indicates that she has had episodes of heavy menstrual bleeding in the past 6 months.
  • Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) ≥150 ml and ≤ 500 ml

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other Pelvic Disease (Other mass, endometriosis, ovarian tumor, acute pelvic disease, significant adenomyosis)
  • Desire for future pregnancy
  • Significant systemic disease even if controlled
  • Positive pregnancy test
  • Hematocrit \< 25%
  • Extensive scarring along anterior lower abdominal wall (>50% of area)
  • Surgical clips in the potential path of the HIFU beam
  • MRI contraindicated
  • MRI contrast agent contraindicated (including renal insufficiency)
  • Calcifications around or throughout uterine tissues that may affect treatment
  • Communication barrier
  • Highly perfused or brighter than myometrium in T2-weighted MRI (according to the T2 contrast obtained using the Philips MR-HIFU MR protocol) fibroids
  • Fibroids not quantifiable on MRI (e.g. multi-fibroid cases where volume measurements are not feasible)
  • Menses lasting > 7 days or intermenstrual bleeding (patient can be included if there is endometrial biopsy within 6 months to exclude malignancy)
  • Patient is currently on hormonal medication for fibroids or has a hormonal medication history as described below:

    1. 1-month Lupron dose or equivalent: less than 1 month prior to MBL measurement or
    2. 3-month Lupron dose or equivalent: less than 3 months prior to MBL measurement or
    3. Depo Provera or equivalent: less than 6 months prior to MBL measurement
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MR-HIFU treatment

    Patients receiving MR-HIFU treatment

    Device: MR-HIFU treatment

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Treatment

    Patients receiving sham treatment

    Device: Sham treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceMR-HIFU treatment

    A treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU device for thermal ablation of uterine fibroids with high-intensity focused ultrasound.

    Also known as: Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU Uterine Fibroid Therapy

  • DeviceSham treatment

    A pretend treatment session with the Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU system in which no therapeutic ultrasound doses are delivered.

    Also known as: pretend treatment with Philips Sonalleve MR-HIFU

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Alternative Interventional Treatment (AIT)

    AIT is scored dichotomously as follows: 0 = Failure. Failure occurs if an AIT for fibroid related symptoms is administered within 12 months of study treatment. 1 = Success. Success occurs if no AIT is administered for fibroid related symptoms within 12 months of study treatment. An AIT is defined as being one of the following: hysterectomy, myomectomy, uterine artery embolization, endometrial ablation and resection, or another MR-HIFU treatment (with the exception of a 're-treatment' as defined in the protocol, e.g. because of temporarily inaccessible fibroids).

    Time frame: 12 months after HIFU treatment

  2. Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL)

    Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) scored dichotomously as follows: 0 = Failure. Failure occurs if the change from baseline in MBL measurement is \< 50 % as measured with alkaline hematin test (AHT) method. 1 = Success. Success occurs if the change from baseline in MBL measurement is \>= 50 %, or if the MBL is \< 80 ml as measured with the AHT method.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 12 months following treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Return to Activity

    Length for Return to Activity after HIFU treatment measured dichotomously: 0 = Failure. If subject takes longer than 72 hours to return to work or normal activity. 1 = Success. If subject returns to work or normal activity within 72 hours inclusive.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  2. Symptom Severity Score (SSS)

    Symptom Severity Score (SSS) of Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire (UFS-QoL), assessed dichotomously at 12 months: 0 = Failure. Reduction of less than 10 points on SSS. 1 = Success. Reduction of at least 10 points on SSS.

    Time frame: at baseline and at 12 months following treatment

07

Study locations

9 sites
  • University of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • University of Michigan
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Montefiore Medical Center
    Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • Oregon Science and Health University
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Vanderbilt Medical Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Samsung Medical Center
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Voogt MJ, Trillaud H, Kim YS, Mali WP, Barkhausen J, Bartels LW, Deckers R, Frulio N, Rhim H, Lim HK, Eckey T, Nieminen HJ, Mougenot C, Keserci B, Soini J, Vaara T, Kohler MO, Sokka S, van den Bosch MA. Volumetric feedback ablation of uterine fibroids using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy. Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):411-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2262-8. Epub 2011 Sep 8. PubMed 21901565 ↗
  • Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1. PubMed 11814511 ↗
  • Stewart EA, Gedroyc WM, Tempany CM, Quade BJ, Inbar Y, Ehrenstein T, Shushan A, Hindley JT, Goldin RD, David M, Sklair M, Rabinovici J. Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):48-54. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.345. PubMed 12861137 ↗
  • Hindley J, Gedroyc WM, Regan L, Stewart E, Tempany C, Hynyen K, Mcdannold N, Inbar Y, Itzchak Y, Rabinovici J, Kim HS, Geschwind JF, Hesley G, Gostout B, Ehrenstein T, Hengst S, Sklair-Levy M, Shushan A, Jolesz F. MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1713-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831713. Erratum In: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jan;184(1):348. Hynnen, Kullvro [corrected to Hynyen, Kullervo]; Macdanold, Nathan [corrected to Mcdannold, Nathan]; Kim, Kevin [corrected to Kim, Hyun S]; Gostout, Brian [corrected to Gostout, Bobbie]. PubMed 15547216 ↗
  • Leon-Villapalos J, Kaniorou-Larai M, Dziewulski P. Full thickness abdominal burn following magnetic resonance guided focused ultrasound therapy. Burns. 2005 Dec;31(8):1054-5. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.019. Epub 2005 Jun 20. No abstract available. PubMed 15970389 ↗
  • Fennessy FM, Tempany CM. MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas. Acad Radiol. 2005 Sep;12(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.05.018. PubMed 16099686 ↗
  • Stewart EA, Rabinovici J, Tempany CM, Inbar Y, Regan L, Gostout B, Hesley G, Kim HS, Hengst S, Gedroyc WM. Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. Fertil Steril. 2006 Jan;85(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.072. Erratum In: Fertil Steril. 2006 Apr;85(4):1072. Gastout, Bobbie [corrected to Gostout, Bobbie]; Gedroye, Wladyslaw M [corrected to Gedroyc, Wladyslaw M]. PubMed 16412721 ↗
  • Fennessy FM, Tempany CM, McDannold NJ, So MJ, Hesley G, Gostout B, Kim HS, Holland GA, Sarti DA, Hynynen K, Jolesz FA, Stewart EA. Uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery--results of different treatment protocols. Radiology. 2007 Jun;243(3):885-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2433060267. Epub 2007 Apr 19. PubMed 17446521 ↗
  • Mara M, Fucikova Z, Maskova J, Kuzel D, Haakova L. Uterine fibroid embolization versus myomectomy in women wishing to preserve fertility: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Jun 1;126(2):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.008. Epub 2005 Nov 15. PubMed 16293363 ↗
  • Stewart EA, Gostout B, Rabinovici J, Kim HS, Regan L, Tempany CM. Sustained relief of leiomyoma symptoms by using focused ultrasound surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;110(2 Pt 1):279-87. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275283.39475.f6. PubMed 17666601 ↗
  • Taran FA, Tempany CM, Regan L, Inbar Y, Revel A, Stewart EA; MRgFUS Group. Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) compared with abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of uterine leiomyomas. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):572-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.7435. PubMed 19852046 ↗
  • Funaki K, Fukunishi H, Sawada K. Clinical outcomes of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine myomas: 24-month follow-up. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):584-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.7455. PubMed 19852041 ↗
  • Okada A, Morita Y, Fukunishi H, Takeichi K, Murakami T. Non-invasive magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids in a large Japanese population: impact of the learning curve on patient outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;34(5):579-83. doi: 10.1002/uog.7454. PubMed 19852042 ↗
  • Kim YS, Lim HK, Kim JH, Rhim H, Park BK, Keserci B, Kohler MO, Bae DS, Kim BG, Lee JW, Kim TJ, Sokka S, Lee JH. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts immediate therapeutic response of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Invest Radiol. 2011 Oct;46(10):639-47. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318220785c. PubMed 21654495 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01504308
Lead sponsor
Philips Healthcare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 5, 2012
Start date
May 2012
Primary completion
Mar 2016
Completion
Mar 2016
Last update
Apr 5, 2017

Study contacts

John H Fischer II, MD
principal investigator · St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States
Robert K Zurawin, MD
principal investigator · St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas, United States
Elizabeth David, MD
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hyo Keun Lim, MD
principal investigator · Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Aytekin Oto, MD
principal investigator · University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Amanda Yunker, D.O.
principal investigator · Vanderbilt Medical Center
Peter Liu, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Michigan
Rajiv Chopra, PhD
principal investigator · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion