CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01496274Updated May 9, 2016Results posted

A Safety and Efficacy Study of a Recombinant Fusion Protein Linking Coagulation Factor IX With Albumin (rIX-FP) in Patients With Hemophilia B

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of rIX-FP in Hemophilia B, sponsored by CSL Behring. Completed at 30 sites in 10 countries. Open to male participants aged 12 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-09.

Sponsored by CSL Behring · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
12 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study will examine the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of rIX-FP for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes in subjects who have previously received factor replacement therapy for hemophilia B.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia B
03

In context

Hemophilia A

866 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 63 is above the median of 28 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

CSL Behring is the lead sponsor of 142 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male subjects, 12 to 65 years old
  • Severe hemophilia B (FIX activity of ≤ 2%)
  • Subjects who have received FIX products (plasma-derived and/or recombinant FIX) for > 150 exposure days (EDs)
  • No history of FIX inhibitor formation, no detectable inhibitors at Screening and no family history of inhibitors against FIX
  • Written informed consent for study participation
  • On-demand subjects only, who have experienced a minimum average of 2 non-trauma induced bleeding episodes requiring treatment with a FIX product during the previous 6 or 3 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to any FIX product or hamster protein
  • Known congenital or acquired coagulation disorder other than congenital FIX deficiency
  • HIV positive subjects with a CD4 count \< 200/mm3
  • Low platelet count, kidney or liver dysfunction
  • Recent life-threatening bleeding episode
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prophylaxis

    Routine weekly prophylaxis and episodic treatment for bleeding episodes. An individualized dosing interval may be tested in sub-group subjects during the 2nd part of the trial. Subjects may participate in a surgical 'sub-study' in which rIX-FP may be administered prior to, during and after surgical intervention.

    Biological: rIX-FP

  • Experimental
    On-demand

    Episodic treatment for bleeding episodes during the first 6 months then switch to routine weekly prophylaxis for a further 6 months Subjects may participate in a surgical 'sub-study' in which rIX-FP may be administered prior to, during and after surgical intervention.

    Biological: rIX-FP

Interventions

  • BiologicalrIX-FP

    Recombinant IX-FP (rIX-FP) is a fusion protein linking coagulation factor IX with albumin, and will be administered by intravenous administration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Frequency of Spontaneous Bleeding Events Between On-demand and Prophylaxis Treatments (Annualized)

    Subjects in the on-demand arm received on-demand dosing with rIX-FP for up to 26 weeks (on-demand regimen), and then received weekly prophylaxis with rIX-FP for the remainder of the study (prophylaxis regimen). The effectiveness of prophylaxis in comparison to on-demand therapy was investigated by comparing the same subject's annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR) during the on-demand regimen and during the prophylaxis regimen.

    Time frame: Up to 26 weeks for on-demand regimen, and between 1 and 17 months for prophylaxis regimen.

  2. Number of Subjects Developing Inhibitors Against Factor IX (FIX)

    The number of participants developing inhibitors against factor IX (FIX) along with the 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval, are summarized for subjects with 50 or more exposure days (EDs) to rIX-FP, and for all participants in the study.

    Time frame: Up to 27.7 months (maximum)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Frequency of Related Adverse Events

    The percentage of participants experiencing treatment-related adverse-events (TEAEs).

    Time frame: For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months.

  2. Number of Subjects Developing Antibodies Against rIX-FP

    Time frame: For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months.

  3. Proportion of Bleeding Episodes Requiring One or ≤ Two Injections of rIX-FP to Achieve Hemostasis

    Number of injections required to achieve hemostasis expressed as a percentage of the bleeding episodes requiring treatment.

    Time frame: For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months.

  4. Investigator's Overall Clinical Assessment of Hemostatic Efficacy for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Based on a Four Point Ordinal Scales (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor/No Response)

    Number of bleeding episodes requiring treatment that resulted in hemostatic efficacy of excellent, good, moderate, poor/no response, according to the Investigator's clinical assessment of hemostatic efficacy, expressed as a percentage of the bleeding episodes requiring treatment.

    Time frame: For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months

  5. rIX-FP Consumed Per Month While Maintaining Assigned Prophylactic Treatment Interval During Routine Prophylaxis.

    Time frame: For Prophylaxis Arm 7-, 10- and 14-day regimens, median 269, 240 and 386 days respectively. For On-demand Arm, prophylaxis regimen, median 316 days.

    Time frame: Median 269, 240, 386 and 316 days, respectively (see Description)

  6. Incremental Recovery of rIX-FP

    Pharmacokinetic (PK) data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.

    Time frame: 336 hours

  7. Half-life (t1/2) of a Single Dose of rIX-FP

    PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.

    Time frame: 336 hours

  8. Area Under the Curve (AUC)

    AUC to the last sample with quantifiable drug concentration (AUClast) of a single dose of rIX-FP. PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.

    Time frame: 336 hours

  9. Clearance of a Single Dose of rIX-FP

    PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.

    Time frame: 336 hours

  10. Investigator's (or Surgeon's) Overall Clinical Assessment of Hemostatic Efficacy for Surgical Prophylaxis, Based on a Four Point Ordinal Scale (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor/No Response)

    Number of surgical events treated prophylactically with rIX-FP that resulted in hemostatic efficacy of excellent, good, moderate, poor/no response, according to the Investigator's (surgeon's) overall assessment of hemostatic efficacy for surgical prophylaxis.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days after surgery

  11. Annualized Spontaneous Bleeding Events Compared Between 7 Day Prophylactic and Extended Regimens

    Median number of spontaneous bleeds per year per subject comparing 7-, 10- and 14- day prophylactic regimens.

    Time frame: During treatment, between median 240 and 386 days per subject.

07

Results

Posted May 9, 2016

Participant flow

Subjects were enrolled from 30 sites in 10 countries.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneProphylaxisOn-demand
Started4023
Completed3718
Not completed35
Withdrew: Protocol violation01
Withdrew: Adverse event11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject20
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up03

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Frequency of Spontaneous Bleeding Events Between On-demand and Prophylaxis Treatments (Annualized)

Subjects in the on-demand arm received on-demand dosing with rIX-FP for up to 26 weeks (on-demand regimen), and then received weekly prophylaxis with rIX-FP for the remainder of the study (prophylaxis regimen). The effectiveness of prophylaxis in comparison to on-demand therapy was investigated by comparing the same subject's annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR) during the on-demand regimen and during the prophylaxis regimen.

Time frame:
Up to 26 weeks for on-demand regimen, and between 1 and 17 months for prophylaxis regimen.
Reported as:
Median · bleeds/year/subject
Change in Frequency of Spontaneous Bleeding Events Between On-demand and Prophylaxis Treatments (Annualized)
bleeds/year/subjectOn-demand Arm, On-demand RegimenOn-demand Arm, Prophylaxis Regimen
Change in Frequency of Spontaneous Bleeding Events Between On-demand and Prophylaxis Treatments (Annualized)15.43 (7.98 to 17.96)0.00 (0.00 to 0.96)
Statistical analysis
  • On-demand Arm, On-demand Regimen vs On-demand Arm, Prophylaxis Regimen · Wilcoxon signed-rank test · p = <0.0001 (P value is based on a Wilcoxon signed-rank test of H0: AsBR ratio (prophylaxis regimen/on-demand regimen) ≥ 0.50. The ratio was based on the original scale.)
PrimaryNumber of Subjects Developing Inhibitors Against Factor IX (FIX)

The number of participants developing inhibitors against factor IX (FIX) along with the 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval, are summarized for subjects with 50 or more exposure days (EDs) to rIX-FP, and for all participants in the study.

Time frame:
Up to 27.7 months (maximum)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects Developing Inhibitors Against Factor IX (FIX)
participantsSafety Population
Participants with >=50 EDs to rIX-FP (n = 49)0 (0.0 to 7.3)
All participants (n = 63)0 (0.0 to 5.7)
SecondaryThe Frequency of Related Adverse Events

The percentage of participants experiencing treatment-related adverse-events (TEAEs).

Time frame:
For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months.
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
The Frequency of Related Adverse Events
Percentage of participantsProphylaxisOn-demandSafety Population
Related TEAE10.04.37.9
Not related TEAE87.578.384.1
SecondaryNumber of Subjects Developing Antibodies Against rIX-FP
Time frame:
For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Subjects Developing Antibodies Against rIX-FP
participantsSafety Population
Number of Subjects Developing Antibodies Against rIX-FP0
SecondaryProportion of Bleeding Episodes Requiring One or ≤ Two Injections of rIX-FP to Achieve Hemostasis

Number of injections required to achieve hemostasis expressed as a percentage of the bleeding episodes requiring treatment.

Time frame:
For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months.
Reported as:
Number · percentage of bleeding episodes treated
Proportion of Bleeding Episodes Requiring One or ≤ Two Injections of rIX-FP to Achieve Hemostasis
percentage of bleeding episodes treatedProphylaxisOn-demand Arm, On-demand RegimenOn-demand Arm, Prophylaxis Regimen
1 injection92.194.591.9
1 or 2 injections100.098.694.6
SecondaryInvestigator's Overall Clinical Assessment of Hemostatic Efficacy for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Based on a Four Point Ordinal Scales (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor/No Response)

Number of bleeding episodes requiring treatment that resulted in hemostatic efficacy of excellent, good, moderate, poor/no response, according to the Investigator's clinical assessment of hemostatic efficacy, expressed as a percentage of the bleeding episodes requiring treatment.

Time frame:
For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of bleeding episodes
Investigator's Overall Clinical Assessment of Hemostatic Efficacy for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Based on a Four Point Ordinal Scales (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor/No Response)
percentage of bleeding episodesProphylaxisOn-demand
Excellent71.387.5
Good20.87.4
Moderate3.02.3
Poor/No response00.4
Missing5.02.3
SecondaryrIX-FP Consumed Per Month While Maintaining Assigned Prophylactic Treatment Interval During Routine Prophylaxis.

Time frame: For Prophylaxis Arm 7-, 10- and 14-day regimens, median 269, 240 and 386 days respectively. For On-demand Arm, prophylaxis regimen, median 316 days.

Time frame:
Median 269, 240, 386 and 316 days, respectively (see Description)
Reported as:
Mean · IU/kg/month
rIX-FP Consumed Per Month While Maintaining Assigned Prophylactic Treatment Interval During Routine Prophylaxis.
IU/kg/monthOn-demand Arm, Prophylaxis RegimenProphylaxis Arm, 7-day RegimenProphylaxis Arm, 10-day RegimenProphylaxis Arm, 14-day Regimen
rIX-FP Consumed Per Month While Maintaining Assigned Prophylactic Treatment Interval During Routine Prophylaxis.191.69 ± 36.33202.68 ± 47.92201.50 ± 42.56157.44 ± 16.34
SecondaryIncremental Recovery of rIX-FP

Pharmacokinetic (PK) data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.

Time frame:
336 hours
Reported as:
Mean · (IU/dL)/(IU/kg)
Incremental Recovery of rIX-FP
(IU/dL)/(IU/kg)ProphylaxisOn-demand
Incremental Recovery of rIX-FP1.29 ± 0.331.24 ± 0.25
SecondaryHalf-life (t1/2) of a Single Dose of rIX-FP

PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.

Time frame:
336 hours
Reported as:
Mean · hour
Half-life (t1/2) of a Single Dose of rIX-FP
hourProphylaxisOn-demand
Half-life (t1/2) of a Single Dose of rIX-FP104.77 ± 22.7396.88 ± 20.94
SecondaryArea Under the Curve (AUC)

AUC to the last sample with quantifiable drug concentration (AUClast) of a single dose of rIX-FP. PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.

Time frame:
336 hours
Reported as:
Mean · IU*hr/dL
Area Under the Curve (AUC)
IU*hr/dLProphylaxisOn-demand
Area Under the Curve (AUC)6534.15 ± 1856.965963.30 ± 1893.00
SecondaryClearance of a Single Dose of rIX-FP

PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.

Time frame:
336 hours
Reported as:
Mean · mL/hr
Clearance of a Single Dose of rIX-FP
mL/hrProphylaxisOn-demand
Clearance of a Single Dose of rIX-FP50.19 ± 12.9259.00 ± 19.37
SecondaryInvestigator's (or Surgeon's) Overall Clinical Assessment of Hemostatic Efficacy for Surgical Prophylaxis, Based on a Four Point Ordinal Scale (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor/No Response)

Number of surgical events treated prophylactically with rIX-FP that resulted in hemostatic efficacy of excellent, good, moderate, poor/no response, according to the Investigator's (surgeon's) overall assessment of hemostatic efficacy for surgical prophylaxis.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days after surgery
Reported as:
Number · events
Investigator's (or Surgeon's) Overall Clinical Assessment of Hemostatic Efficacy for Surgical Prophylaxis, Based on a Four Point Ordinal Scale (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor/No Response)
eventsSurgical Population
Excellent6
Good0
Moderate0
Poor/No response0
SecondaryAnnualized Spontaneous Bleeding Events Compared Between 7 Day Prophylactic and Extended Regimens

Median number of spontaneous bleeds per year per subject comparing 7-, 10- and 14- day prophylactic regimens.

Time frame:
During treatment, between median 240 and 386 days per subject.
Reported as:
Median · bleeds/year/subject
Annualized Spontaneous Bleeding Events Compared Between 7 Day Prophylactic and Extended Regimens
bleeds/year/subjectProphylaxis Arm, 7-day RegimenProphylaxis Arm, 10-day RegimenProphylaxis Arm, 14-day Regimen
Annualized Spontaneous Bleeding Events Compared Between 7 Day Prophylactic and Extended Regimens0.00 (0.00 to 0.00)0.00 (0.00 to 0.00)0.00 (0.00 to 1.00)

Adverse events

Collected over For the duration of the study, up to 27.7 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Prophylaxis—1/40 (2.5%)36/40 (90%)
On-demand—2/23 (8.7%)18/23 (78.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventProphylaxisOn-demand
ACQUIRED EPILEPTIC APHASIANervous system disorders0/401/23
SYNOVITISMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/401/23
PAIN IN EXTREMITYMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/400/23
MUSCLE HAEMORRHAGEMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/400/23
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventProphylaxisOn-demand
HEADACHENervous system disorders11/404/23
NASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestations10/406/23
ARTHRALGIAMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders9/400/23
DIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disorders2/403/23
INFLUENZAInfections and infestations4/403/23
LIMB INJURYInjury, poisoning and procedural complications5/401/23
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations5/400/23
DIZZINESSNervous system disorders4/400/23
TOOTHACHEGastrointestinal disorders4/401/23
BACK PAINMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/402/23

Baseline characteristics

Safety Population

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)ProphylaxisOn-demandTotal
0 to 11 years000
12 to 17 years707
18 to 64 years332356
65 years and over000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ProphylaxisOn-demandTotal
Female000
Male402363
08

Study locations

30 sites
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Indiana Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Inc.
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46260, United States
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • BloodCenter of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, United States
  • AKH Wien [Hämatologie, Hämostaseol
    Wien, Austria
  • SHAT "Joan Pavel" OOD [Hemorrhagic Diathesis and Anemia]
    Sophia, 1233, Bulgaria
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest/CHU Morvan
    Brest, 29609, France
  • C.R.T.H. Hôp. Bicêtre-Hémophilie
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
  • CHU de Lyon - Hôpital Edouard Herriot [Hemophilie]
    Lyon, 03 69437, France
  • Hôpital Necker-CRTH
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Instit. für Experimentelle - Hämato & Transfusionsmedizin
    Bonn, Germany
  • Zentralkrankenhaus Prof. Hess-Kinderklinik
    Bremen, 28205, Germany
  • Unikinderklinik Frankfurt/Main [Kinderheilkunde]
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Abt für Pädiatr. Hämatologie
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • Werlhof-Inst. Hannover
    Hannover, Germany
  • Chaim Sheba Medical Center
    Tel Aviv, Israel
  • IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore[Centro emofilia e Trombosi]
    Milano, Italy
  • A.O.U. di Parma [Centro di Rif. Reg. per la cura dell'Emofil
    Parma, 43126, Italy
  • Osp. S.Bortolo ULSS N.6 [Terapie Cell. ed Ematologia]
    Vicenza, 36100, Italy
  • Nara Medical University Hospital [PEDIATRICS]
    Kashihara, 634-8522, Japan
  • University of Occupational and Environmental Health
    Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Nagoya University Hospital
    Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan
  • The Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine
    Nishinomiya, Japan
  • Ogikubo Hospital
    Tokyo, 167-0035, Japan
  • Tokyo Medical University Hospital
    Tokyo, Japan
  • St. Marianna University, School of Medicine, Yokohama Seibu
    Yokohama, 241-0811, Japan
  • FGU "Kirov Research Institute of Haemotology and Blood Trans
    Kirov, 610027, Russian Federation
  • C.H.U. A Coruña [Hematología]
    A Coruna, Spain
  • H.U.Vall d'Hebrón [Hemofillia]
    Barcelona, Spain
  • H.U. La Paz [Coagulopatias Congénitas]
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Santagostino E, Martinowitz U, Lissitchkov T, Pan-Petesch B, Hanabusa H, Oldenburg J, Boggio L, Negrier C, Pabinger I, von Depka Prondzinski M, Altisent C, Castaman G, Yamamoto K, Alvarez-Roman MT, Voigt C, Blackman N, Jacobs I; PROLONG-9FP Investigators Study Group. Long-acting recombinant coagulation factor IX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) in hemophilia B: results of a phase 3 trial. Blood. 2016 Apr 7;127(14):1761-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-09-669234. Epub 2016 Jan 11. PubMed 26755710 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01496274
Lead sponsor
CSL Behring
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 21, 2011
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2014
Results posted
May 9, 2016
Last update
May 9, 2016

Study contacts

Program Director
study director · CSL Behring

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion