A Phase 2/3 interventional study of rIX-FP in Hemophilia B, sponsored by CSL Behring. Completed at 30 sites in 10 countries. Open to male participants aged 12 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-09.
Sponsored by CSL Behring · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment
This study will examine the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of rIX-FP for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes in subjects who have previously received factor replacement therapy for hemophilia B.
866 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 137 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 63 is above the median of 28 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Hemophilia A.
Browse Hemophilia A studies →CSL Behring is the lead sponsor of 142 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (71%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Routine weekly prophylaxis and episodic treatment for bleeding episodes. An individualized dosing interval may be tested in sub-group subjects during the 2nd part of the trial. Subjects may participate in a surgical 'sub-study' in which rIX-FP may be administered prior to, during and after surgical intervention.
Biological: rIX-FP
Episodic treatment for bleeding episodes during the first 6 months then switch to routine weekly prophylaxis for a further 6 months Subjects may participate in a surgical 'sub-study' in which rIX-FP may be administered prior to, during and after surgical intervention.
Biological: rIX-FP
Recombinant IX-FP (rIX-FP) is a fusion protein linking coagulation factor IX with albumin, and will be administered by intravenous administration
Change in Frequency of Spontaneous Bleeding Events Between On-demand and Prophylaxis Treatments (Annualized)
Subjects in the on-demand arm received on-demand dosing with rIX-FP for up to 26 weeks (on-demand regimen), and then received weekly prophylaxis with rIX-FP for the remainder of the study (prophylaxis regimen). The effectiveness of prophylaxis in comparison to on-demand therapy was investigated by comparing the same subject's annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR) during the on-demand regimen and during the prophylaxis regimen.
Time frame: Up to 26 weeks for on-demand regimen, and between 1 and 17 months for prophylaxis regimen.
Number of Subjects Developing Inhibitors Against Factor IX (FIX)
The number of participants developing inhibitors against factor IX (FIX) along with the 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval, are summarized for subjects with 50 or more exposure days (EDs) to rIX-FP, and for all participants in the study.
Time frame: Up to 27.7 months (maximum)
The Frequency of Related Adverse Events
The percentage of participants experiencing treatment-related adverse-events (TEAEs).
Time frame: For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months.
Number of Subjects Developing Antibodies Against rIX-FP
Time frame: For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months.
Proportion of Bleeding Episodes Requiring One or ≤ Two Injections of rIX-FP to Achieve Hemostasis
Number of injections required to achieve hemostasis expressed as a percentage of the bleeding episodes requiring treatment.
Time frame: For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months.
Investigator's Overall Clinical Assessment of Hemostatic Efficacy for Treatment of Bleeding Episodes, Based on a Four Point Ordinal Scales (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor/No Response)
Number of bleeding episodes requiring treatment that resulted in hemostatic efficacy of excellent, good, moderate, poor/no response, according to the Investigator's clinical assessment of hemostatic efficacy, expressed as a percentage of the bleeding episodes requiring treatment.
Time frame: For the duration of the study; median 20.27 months
rIX-FP Consumed Per Month While Maintaining Assigned Prophylactic Treatment Interval During Routine Prophylaxis.
Time frame: For Prophylaxis Arm 7-, 10- and 14-day regimens, median 269, 240 and 386 days respectively. For On-demand Arm, prophylaxis regimen, median 316 days.
Time frame: Median 269, 240, 386 and 316 days, respectively (see Description)
Incremental Recovery of rIX-FP
Pharmacokinetic (PK) data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.
Time frame: 336 hours
Half-life (t1/2) of a Single Dose of rIX-FP
PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.
Time frame: 336 hours
Area Under the Curve (AUC)
AUC to the last sample with quantifiable drug concentration (AUClast) of a single dose of rIX-FP. PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.
Time frame: 336 hours
Clearance of a Single Dose of rIX-FP
PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.
Time frame: 336 hours
Investigator's (or Surgeon's) Overall Clinical Assessment of Hemostatic Efficacy for Surgical Prophylaxis, Based on a Four Point Ordinal Scale (Excellent, Good, Moderate, Poor/No Response)
Number of surgical events treated prophylactically with rIX-FP that resulted in hemostatic efficacy of excellent, good, moderate, poor/no response, according to the Investigator's (surgeon's) overall assessment of hemostatic efficacy for surgical prophylaxis.
Time frame: Up to 14 days after surgery
Annualized Spontaneous Bleeding Events Compared Between 7 Day Prophylactic and Extended Regimens
Median number of spontaneous bleeds per year per subject comparing 7-, 10- and 14- day prophylactic regimens.
Time frame: During treatment, between median 240 and 386 days per subject.
Subjects were enrolled from 30 sites in 10 countries.
| Milestone | Prophylaxis | On-demand |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 40 | 23 |
| Completed | 37 | 18 |
| Not completed | 3 | 5 |
| Withdrew: Protocol violation | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 1 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 2 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 0 | 3 |
Subjects in the on-demand arm received on-demand dosing with rIX-FP for up to 26 weeks (on-demand regimen), and then received weekly prophylaxis with rIX-FP for the remainder of the study (prophylaxis regimen). The effectiveness of prophylaxis in comparison to on-demand therapy was investigated by comparing the same subject's annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR) during the on-demand regimen and during the prophylaxis regimen.
| bleeds/year/subject | On-demand Arm, On-demand Regimen | On-demand Arm, Prophylaxis Regimen |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Frequency of Spontaneous Bleeding Events Between On-demand and Prophylaxis Treatments (Annualized) | 15.43 (7.98 to 17.96) | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.96) |
The number of participants developing inhibitors against factor IX (FIX) along with the 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence interval, are summarized for subjects with 50 or more exposure days (EDs) to rIX-FP, and for all participants in the study.
| participants | Safety Population |
|---|---|
| Participants with >=50 EDs to rIX-FP (n = 49) | 0 (0.0 to 7.3) |
| All participants (n = 63) | 0 (0.0 to 5.7) |
The percentage of participants experiencing treatment-related adverse-events (TEAEs).
| Percentage of participants | Prophylaxis | On-demand | Safety Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Related TEAE | 10.0 | 4.3 | 7.9 |
| Not related TEAE | 87.5 | 78.3 | 84.1 |
| participants | Safety Population |
|---|---|
| Number of Subjects Developing Antibodies Against rIX-FP | 0 |
Number of injections required to achieve hemostasis expressed as a percentage of the bleeding episodes requiring treatment.
| percentage of bleeding episodes treated | Prophylaxis | On-demand Arm, On-demand Regimen | On-demand Arm, Prophylaxis Regimen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 injection | 92.1 | 94.5 | 91.9 |
| 1 or 2 injections | 100.0 | 98.6 | 94.6 |
Number of bleeding episodes requiring treatment that resulted in hemostatic efficacy of excellent, good, moderate, poor/no response, according to the Investigator's clinical assessment of hemostatic efficacy, expressed as a percentage of the bleeding episodes requiring treatment.
| percentage of bleeding episodes | Prophylaxis | On-demand |
|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 71.3 | 87.5 |
| Good | 20.8 | 7.4 |
| Moderate | 3.0 | 2.3 |
| Poor/No response | 0 | 0.4 |
| Missing | 5.0 | 2.3 |
Time frame: For Prophylaxis Arm 7-, 10- and 14-day regimens, median 269, 240 and 386 days respectively. For On-demand Arm, prophylaxis regimen, median 316 days.
| IU/kg/month | On-demand Arm, Prophylaxis Regimen | Prophylaxis Arm, 7-day Regimen | Prophylaxis Arm, 10-day Regimen | Prophylaxis Arm, 14-day Regimen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rIX-FP Consumed Per Month While Maintaining Assigned Prophylactic Treatment Interval During Routine Prophylaxis. | 191.69 ± 36.33 | 202.68 ± 47.92 | 201.50 ± 42.56 | 157.44 ± 16.34 |
Pharmacokinetic (PK) data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.
| (IU/dL)/(IU/kg) | Prophylaxis | On-demand |
|---|---|---|
| Incremental Recovery of rIX-FP | 1.29 ± 0.33 | 1.24 ± 0.25 |
PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.
| hour | Prophylaxis | On-demand |
|---|---|---|
| Half-life (t1/2) of a Single Dose of rIX-FP | 104.77 ± 22.73 | 96.88 ± 20.94 |
AUC to the last sample with quantifiable drug concentration (AUClast) of a single dose of rIX-FP. PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.
| IU*hr/dL | Prophylaxis | On-demand |
|---|---|---|
| Area Under the Curve (AUC) | 6534.15 ± 1856.96 | 5963.30 ± 1893.00 |
PK data are presented for a single 50 IU/kg dose of rIX-FP.
| mL/hr | Prophylaxis | On-demand |
|---|---|---|
| Clearance of a Single Dose of rIX-FP | 50.19 ± 12.92 | 59.00 ± 19.37 |
Number of surgical events treated prophylactically with rIX-FP that resulted in hemostatic efficacy of excellent, good, moderate, poor/no response, according to the Investigator's (surgeon's) overall assessment of hemostatic efficacy for surgical prophylaxis.
| events | Surgical Population |
|---|---|
| Excellent | 6 |
| Good | 0 |
| Moderate | 0 |
| Poor/No response | 0 |
Median number of spontaneous bleeds per year per subject comparing 7-, 10- and 14- day prophylactic regimens.
| bleeds/year/subject | Prophylaxis Arm, 7-day Regimen | Prophylaxis Arm, 10-day Regimen | Prophylaxis Arm, 14-day Regimen |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annualized Spontaneous Bleeding Events Compared Between 7 Day Prophylactic and Extended Regimens | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.00) | 0.00 (0.00 to 0.00) | 0.00 (0.00 to 1.00) |
Collected over For the duration of the study, up to 27.7 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prophylaxis | — | 1/40 (2.5%) | 36/40 (90%) |
| On-demand | — | 2/23 (8.7%) | 18/23 (78.3%) |
| Event | Prophylaxis | On-demand |
|---|---|---|
| ACQUIRED EPILEPTIC APHASIANervous system disorders | 0/40 | 1/23 |
| SYNOVITISMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/40 | 1/23 |
| PAIN IN EXTREMITYMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/40 | 0/23 |
| MUSCLE HAEMORRHAGEMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 1/40 | 0/23 |
| Event | Prophylaxis | On-demand |
|---|---|---|
| HEADACHENervous system disorders | 11/40 | 4/23 |
| NASOPHARYNGITISInfections and infestations | 10/40 | 6/23 |
| ARTHRALGIAMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 9/40 | 0/23 |
| DIARRHOEAGastrointestinal disorders | 2/40 | 3/23 |
| INFLUENZAInfections and infestations | 4/40 | 3/23 |
| LIMB INJURYInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 5/40 | 1/23 |
| UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTIONInfections and infestations | 5/40 | 0/23 |
| DIZZINESSNervous system disorders | 4/40 | 0/23 |
| TOOTHACHEGastrointestinal disorders | 4/40 | 1/23 |
| BACK PAINMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 4/40 | 2/23 |
Safety Population
| Age, Customized(participants) | Prophylaxis | On-demand | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 11 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 to 17 years | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| 18 to 64 years | 33 | 23 | 56 |
| 65 years and over | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Prophylaxis | On-demand | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Male | 40 | 23 | 63 |
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
CSL Behring