ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07582276Updated Oct 5, 2026

A Prospective Assessment of Bone Health in Patients With Severe Hemophilia A on Factor VIII vs Factor Mimetic Prophylaxis (Efa Emi Bone Health Study)

An observational study in Hemophilia a, sponsored by Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 30 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Oct 5, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in United States+4 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
30 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This study will compare bone mineral density in patients with severe hemophilia A receiving prophylaxis with emicizumab or efanesoctocog alfa. Participants will undergo assessments of bone mineral density, bone remodeling biomarkers, thrombin generation, plasmin generation, and joint health over a five-year period. The study aims to evaluate whether differences in prophylactic therapy are associated with differences in bone health outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Reduced bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and fractures are increasingly recognized in persons with severe hemophilia A. The mechanisms underlying impaired bone health in hemophilia are multifactorial and may include reduced physical activity, chronic joint disease, inflammation, and abnormalities in coagulation-related pathways involved in bone remodeling.

Thrombin has been shown to play an important role in bone metabolism through activation of protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) signaling pathways that influence osteoblast and osteoclast activity. Reduced thrombin generation in severe hemophilia A may contribute to decreased bone formation and increased bone resorption.

Efanesoctocog alfa is an extended half-life factor VIII replacement therapy that maintains higher circulating factor VIII levels and supports thrombin generation. Emicizumab is a non-factor prophylactic therapy that effectively prevents bleeding but does not replace factor VIII. The comparative effects of these therapies on long term bone health have not been well established.

This prospective observational study will compare longitudinal changes in bone mineral density among patients with severe hemophilia A receiving prophylaxis with emicizumab or efanesoctocog alfa over 5 years. Participants will undergo serial dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessments and evaluation of bone remodeling biomarkers, inflammatory cytokines, thrombin generation, plasmin generation, and joint health over a five-year period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia a

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bone Health
  • Emicizumab
  • Efanesoctocog alfa
  • hemophilia
03

In context

Hemophilia A

844 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 138 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 81 across 310 observational studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients that are seen at dedicated Hemophilia treatment Centers

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The participant or legally authorized representative is willing and able to provide written .
  2. Diagnosis of severe hemophilia A (factor VIII activity \< 1%).
  3. Male sex.
  4. Age between 30 and 50 years (inclusive).
  5. between 18.5 and 40 kg/m2
  6. The participant must have been on prophylaxis with Efanesoctocog alfa or Emicizumab for at least 3 months prior to enrollment and intend to remain on the current regimen for the next 5 years.
  7. Willingness to undergo all research procedures, including DEXA scans and the collection of blood samples.
  8. Willingness to complete all standard-of-care bleeding and treatment logs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unwillingness of the participant, parent, or legally authorized representative to provide .
  2. Diagnosis of a bleeding disorder other than or in addition to severe hemophilia A.
  3. Active Factor VIII inhibitors at the time of enrollment
  4. History of a disease known to influence bone metabolism unrelated to a bleeding disorder. (Examples: Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, Ehlers Danlos syndrome, Hyperparathyroidism)
  5. Past or present treatment with any anti-osteoporotic medication, excluding oral vitamin D or oral calcium supplements.
  6. Documented infection or infection (whether in progress or cured) at the cirrhotic stage.
  7. Presence of a non-removable metal device that would interfere with research procedures.
  8. Inability to tolerate a DEXA scan due to limited range of motion or body habitus.
  9. History of bone fractures or surgical repair within 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
  10. Participants with weight >300 pounds, due to limitations of DEXA scanner
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with Severe Hemophilia A on Efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis

    Participants with severe hemophilia A receiving prophylaxis with efanesoctocog alfa as part of routine clinical care. Participants will undergo longitudinal assessments of bone mineral density, bone remodeling biomarkers, thrombin generation, plasmin generation, and joint health over a five-year period.

  • Patients with Severe Hemophilia A on Emicizumab prophylaxis

    Participants with severe hemophilia A receiving prophylaxis with emicizumab as part of routine clinical care. Participants will undergo longitudinal assessments of bone mineral density, bone remodeling biomarkers, thrombin generation, plasmin generation, and joint health over a five-year period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Longitudinal change in femoral neck bone mineral density (g/cm²)

    Bone mineral densitometry

    Time frame: Baseline and annually through 5 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Longitudinal change in Lumbar spine (L1-L4) bone mineral density (g/cm²)

    Bone mineral densitometry

    Time frame: Baseline and annually through 5 years.

  2. Longitudinal change in total hip bone mineral density (g/cm²)

    Bone mineral densitometry

    Time frame: Baseline and annually through 5 years.

  3. Longitudinal Change in Bone Remodeling Biomarkers and Cytokines

    PINP, CTX-I, OPG, RANKL, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α

    Time frame: Baseline and annually through 5 years.

  4. Change in Thrombin Generation and Plasmin Generation Parameters

    Simultaneous Thrombin and Plasmin Generation Assay

    Time frame: Baseline and annually through 5 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sivagurunathan S, Pagel CN, Loh LH, Wijeyewickrema LC, Pike RN, Mackie EJ. Thrombin inhibits osteoclast differentiation through a non-proteolytic mechanism. J Mol Endocrinol. 2013 Apr 23;50(3):347-59. doi: 10.1530/JME-12-0177. Print 2013 Jun. PubMed 23419317 ↗
  • Song SJ, Pagel CN, Campbell TM, Pike RN, Mackie EJ. The role of protease-activated receptor-1 in bone healing. Am J Pathol. 2005 Mar;166(3):857-68. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62306-1. PubMed 15743797 ↗
  • Pagel CN, Song SJ, Loh LH, Tudor EM, Murray-Rust TA, Pike RN, Mackie EJ. Thrombin-stimulated growth factor and cytokine expression in osteoblasts is mediated by protease-activated receptor-1 and prostanoids. Bone. 2009 May;44(5):813-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.12.031. Epub 2009 Jan 15. PubMed 19442625 ↗
  • Pagel CN, de Niese MR, Abraham LA, Chinni C, Song SJ, Pike RN, Mackie EJ. Inhibition of osteoblast apoptosis by thrombin. Bone. 2003 Oct;33(4):733-43. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(03)00209-6. PubMed 14555279 ↗
  • Al Dieri R, de Laat B, Hemker HC. Thrombin generation: what have we learned? Blood Rev. 2012 Sep;26(5):197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 2. PubMed 22762893 ↗
  • Goldscheitter G, Recht M, Sochacki P, Manco-Johnson M, Taylor JA. Biomarkers of bone disease in persons with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2021 Jan;27(1):149-155. doi: 10.1111/hae.13986. Epub 2020 Aug 27. PubMed 32856388 ↗
  • Gerstner G, Damiano ML, Tom A, Worman C, Schultz W, Recht M, Stopeck AT. Prevalence and risk factors associated with decreased bone mineral density in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2009 Mar;15(2):559-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2008.01963.x. Epub 2009 Feb 1. PubMed 19187193 ↗
  • Wallny TA, Scholz DT, Oldenburg J, Nicolay C, Ezziddin S, Pennekamp PH, Stoffel-Wagner B, Kraft CN. Osteoporosis in haemophilia - an underestimated comorbidity? Haemophilia. 2007 Jan;13(1):79-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01405.x. PubMed 17212729 ↗
  • Paschou SA, Anagnostis P, Karras S, Annweiler C, Vakalopoulou S, Garipidou V, Goulis DG. Bone mineral density in men and children with haemophilia A and B: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2399-407. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2773-7. Epub 2014 Jul 8. PubMed 25001982 ↗
  • Ghosh K, Shetty S. Bone health in persons with haemophilia: a review. Eur J Haematol. 2012 Aug;89(2):95-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2012.01803.x. Epub 2012 Jun 22. PubMed 22587752 ↗
  • Walker IR, Julian JA. Causes of death in Canadians with haemophilia 1980-1995. Association of Hemophilia Clinic Directors of Canada. Haemophilia. 1998 Sep;4(5):714-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.1998.00179.x. PubMed 9873876 ↗
  • Smit C, Rosendaal FR, Varekamp I, Brocker-Vriends A, Van Dijck H, Suurmeijer TP, Briet E. Physical condition, longevity, and social performance of Dutch haemophiliacs, 1972-85. BMJ. 1989 Jan 28;298(6668):235-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6668.235. PubMed 2493872 ↗
  • Bunta AD. It is time for everyone to own the bone. Osteoporos Int. 2011 Aug;22 Suppl 3:477-82. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1704-0. Epub 2011 Aug 17. PubMed 21847769 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with with other researchers , and each participating site has access to only their centers data; however , aggregated data will be included in future publications and will be made available toparticipating centers following study completion

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 5, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in United States
Show site
  • Arkansas Children's · Little Rock, United States
Oct 5, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026→Sep 21, 2026 (actual)
Oct 5, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2031→Sep 2031
Oct 5, 2026
Study completion
Aug 1, 2032→Sep 2032
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in United States
    Show site
    • Arkansas Children's · Little Rock, United States
    Start date Jul 1, 2026→Sep 21, 2026 (now actual)
    Primary completion Aug 1, 2031→Sep 2031
    Study completion Aug 1, 2032→Sep 2032
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07582276
Responsible party
Divyaswathi Citla Sridhar (Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 12, 2026
Start date
Sep 21, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Carol D Pierce, RN
Contact
piercecarold@uams.edu
501-364-4440
Divyaswathi Citla Sridhar, MD
principal investigator · Arkansas Children's Reserach Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion