ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07332091Updated Oct 21, 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Vamifeport in Adult Participants With Homeostatic Iron Regulator Gene (HFE)-Related Hereditary Hemochromatosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Vamifeport and Placebo in Homeostatic Iron Regulator Gene-related Hereditary Hemochromatosis, sponsored by CSL Behring. Active, not recruiting at 100 sites in 18 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by CSL Behring (part of CSL Limited) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 21, 2026Now Active, not recruiting1 site added+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, proof-of-concept study to assess vamifeport in adult participants with homeostatic iron regulator gene-related hereditary hemochromatosis (HFE-HH). The primary objective of the study is to assess the effect of vamifeport treatment on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based liver iron concentration (LIC) in adult participants with HFE-HH.

02

Conditions studied

  • Homeostatic Iron Regulator Gene-related Hereditary Hemochromatosis

Keywords

  • Small Molecule Ferroportin Inhibitor
  • Hereditary hemochromatosis
  • Iron overload
03

In context

Hemochromatosis

55 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemochromatosis; 4 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is above the median of 61 across 30 interventional studies indexed under Hemochromatosis.

Browse Hemochromatosis studies →

Lead sponsor

CSL Behring is the lead sponsor of 145 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (71%) have results posted.

First submitted after CSL Behring became part of CSL Limited.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult (≥ 18 years) and has provided written .
  • Confirmed diagnosis of HFE-HH in medical history.
  • Evidence of iron overload as shown by:

    • TSAT > 45% (confirmed at 2 visits, at least 14 days apart) at Screening; and
    • Serum ferritin ≥ 200 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) and \< 5000 ng/mL (confirmed at 2 visits, at least 14 days apart) at Screening; and
    • MRI-based LIC between 2.4 and 16 mg/g (43.0 and 286.5 mmol/kg) dry weight (dw) at Screening.
  • between 18.5 and 34.9 kilograms per meter squared (kg/m\^2).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • laboratory abnormalities, 12-lead (ECG) findings, or medical history.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vamifeport Low Dose

    Participants will receive a low dose of vamifeport orally, twice daily (BID) up to Day 360.

    Drug: Vamifeport

  • Experimental
    Vamifeport High Dose

    Participants will receive a high dose of vamifeport orally, BID up to Day 360.

    Drug: Vamifeport

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants will receive placebo matching vamifeport low and high doses orally, BID up to Day 360.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Vamifeport capsule administered orally.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo capsule matching IP administered orally.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based liver iron concentration (LIC)

    Time frame: At Baseline and Day 360

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: Up to Day 390

  2. Percentage of participants with TEAEs

    Time frame: Up to Day 390

  3. Number of participants with treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Time frame: Up to Day 390

  4. Percentage of participants with treatment-emergent SAEs

    Time frame: Up to Day 390

  5. Number of participants with clinically significant change from baseline in clinical safety laboratory tests and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)

    Clinical safety laboratory tests will include hematology, biochemistry and coagulation.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 390

  6. Percentage of participants with clinically significant change from baseline in clinical safety laboratory tests and 12-lead ECG

    Clinical safety laboratory tests will include hematology, biochemistry and coagulation.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 390

  7. Change from baseline in transferrin saturation (TSAT) (measured at trough)

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 360

  8. Number of participants with TSAT less than or equal to (<=) 45% (measured at trough)

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 360

  9. Percentage of participants with TSAT <= 45% (measured at trough)

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 360

  10. Number of participants with 25% reduction in MRI-based LIC

    Time frame: At Day 180 and 360

  11. Number of participants with 50% reduction in MRI-based LIC

    Time frame: At Day 180 and Day 360

  12. Number of participants with TSAT ≤ 45% or MRI-based LIC < 5 milligrams per gram (mg/g)

    Time frame: At Day 360

  13. Number of participants with TSAT ≤ 45% or MRI-based LIC < 2 mg/g

    Time frame: At Day 360

  14. Change from baseline in joint pain score in a visual analog scale (VAS)

    The VAS is a single-item questionnaire. Participants will be asked to record their joint pain at its worst over the previous week, from 0 (No pain) to 10 (Worst possible pain).

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 360

  15. Change from baseline in modified fatigue impact scale (MFIS) total score

    Participants will be asked to read a list of 21 statements and assess how often fatigue has affected them in terms of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning, over the previous 4 weeks, using a 5-point scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always). The total score is obtained by summing the scores of all the 21 items. Higher scores indicate a greater impact of fatigue on a participant's activities.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 360

  16. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life: EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level instrument (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized measure of health status that provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. Participants will complete the questionnaire based on their health on that day. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive profile includes 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Participants will rate each dimension based on 5 levels of severity: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. A higher score indicates a more severe outcome than a lower score.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Days 180, 360, and 390

  17. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life: VAS (Arthralgia)

    The VAS is a single-item questionnaire. Participants will be asked to record their joint pain at its worst over the previous week, from 0 (No pain) to 10 (Worst possible pain).

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 180, 360, and 390

  18. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life: Patient global impression of change in clinical status

    The PGI - Change (PGI-C) instrument is a self-reported measure that reflects belief about the efficacy of treatment. Participants will be asked to rate the change in their overall symptoms since they started taking investigational product (IP) on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (Much improved) to 5 (Much worse). A lower score reflects an improvement in clinical status.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 180, 360, and 390

  19. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life: Patient global impression of severity

    The PGI - Severity (PGI-S) instrument is a self-reported questionnaire and consists of 1 item that measures disease severity. Participants will be asked to rate the severity of their overall symptoms over the previous week on a 5-point scale from 1 (None) to 5 (Very severe). A higher score reflects a more severe outcome than a lower score.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 180, 360, and 390

  20. Change from baseline in health-related quality of life: MFIS physical, cognitive, and psychosocial subscales

    Participants will be asked to read a list of 21 statements and assess how often fatigue has affected them in terms of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functioning, over the previous 4 weeks, using a 5-point scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always). Items on the MFIS will be aggregated into 3 subscales (Physical, Cognitive, or Psychosocial). Higher scores indicate a greater impact of fatigue on a participant's activities.

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 180, 360, and 390

  21. Vamifeport plasma concentrations after a single dose

    Time frame: At Day 1

  22. Vamifeport plasma concentrations at steady state

    Time frame: At Days 15, 180, and 360

  23. Change from baseline in total serum iron (measured at trough)

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 360

  24. Change from baseline in serum ferritin (measured at trough)

    Time frame: From Baseline to Day 360

  25. Frequency of rescue therapy use

    For assessment of this outcome measure, data will be collected retrospectively from 1 year before baseline as well as during the study (up to Day 390).

    Time frame: Up to Day 390

  26. Duration of rescue therapy use

    For assessment of this outcome measure, data will be collected retrospectively from 1 year before baseline as well as during the study (up to Day 390).

    Time frame: Up to Day 390

  27. Time to first use of rescue therapy

    Time frame: Up to Day 360

07

Study locations

100 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — CSL will consider on a case-by-case basis requests to share Individual Patient Data (IPD) with external bona-fide, qualified scientific and medical researchers. For information on the process and requirements for submitting a voluntary data sharing request for IPD, please contact CSL at clinicaltrials@cslbehring.com.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Requests for IPD will generally be considered once review by major regulatory authorities (ie FDA, EMA) is complete and the primary publication is available.

Access criteria: Proposed research should seek to answer a previously unanswered important medical or scientific question. Applicable country specific privacy and other laws and regulations will be considered and may prevent sharing of IPD. If the request is approved and the researcher has executed an appropriate data sharing agreement, IPD that has been appropriately anonymized will be available.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Oct 21, 2026
Sites
1 site added, 1 site removed
Show site
  • Global Medical Research Management LLC · Miami, United States
Show 1 removed
  • Global Medical Research Management · Plantation, United States
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    1 site added, 1 site removed
    Show site
    • Global Medical Research Management LLC · Miami, United States
    Show 1 removed
    • Global Medical Research Management · Plantation, United States
    + 2 other changes: verification date and contact details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07332091
Lead sponsor
CSL Behring
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 12, 2026
Start date
Jan 22, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 15, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: VIT-2763

Start the discussion