CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01467557TEMPOUpdated Jun 19, 2018Results posted

Daily Disposable Performance of 1•DAY ACUVUE® TruEye™ and 1•DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® With LACREON® TECHNOLOGY

An observational study in Myopia and Hyperopia, sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.. Completed at 37 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-19.

Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,171
Ages
8 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is an observational registry of patients who have recently been prescribed 1•DAY ACUVUE® TruEye® or 1•DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® Brand Contact Lenses with LACREON® TECHNOLOGY.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myopia
  • Hyperopia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • adverse events
03

In context

Hyperopia

140 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperopia; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,171 is above the median of 174 across 24 observational studies indexed under Hyperopia.

Browse Hyperopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 220 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 110 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients who have recently been fit with 1-Day ACUVUE® TruEye™ or 1- Day ACUVUE® MOIST® daily disposable lenses.

Inclusion criteria

  • Wearers of 1•DAY ACUVUE® TruEye™ or 1•DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® daily disposable soft contact lenses in both eyes aged >8 years of age who have recently begun use of that lens type and have purchased at least 3 month supply of lenses.
  • The registrant must read and sign the Informed Consent form. Minor subjects must obtain parental signature of Informed Consent and also sign an Informed Assent Form.
  • The registrant must sign the Release of Medical Records in the event of an adverse event in the study.
  • The registrant must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously wearing the type of lenses with which they are registering (1•DAY ACUVUE® TruEye™ or 1•DAY ACUVUE® MOIST® Daily Disposable lenses).
  • Current participant in an unrelated research study.
  • Employee or family member of Recruiting Practitioner or Johnson \& Johnson.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
1,171 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • 1-Day ACUVUE TruEye contact lens users

    1-Day ACUVUE TruEye contact lens users

    Device: narafilcon B daily disposable soft contact lenses

  • 1-Day ACUVUE MOIST contact lens users

    1-Day ACUVUE MOIST contact lens users

    Device: etafilcon A daily disposable soft contact lenses

Interventions

  • Devicenarafilcon B daily disposable soft contact lenses

    daily disposable soft contact lenses

    Also known as: 1-Day ACUVUE TruEye

  • Deviceetafilcon A daily disposable soft contact lenses

    daily disposable soft contact lenses

    Also known as: 1-Day ACUVUE MOIST

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Adverse events were reported by subjects via the electronic surveys if they responded "yes" to the question "Since we last contacted you, have you experienced a red or painful eye that required a visit to an eye doctor or emergency room?". Consensus diagnosis was made after review of clinical records by Adjudication Panel.

    Time frame: Self-report at 2 Week, 4 Month or 12 Month surveys

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in 8-item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline to 2 Week, 4 Month and 12 Month Surveys

    The response set for each question was a 5-level likert scale. Intensity of discomfort, dryness, blurriness were measured with the likert scale from 0(Never Have It) to 5(Very Intense). Frequency of discomfort, dryness, blurry vision, removal of lenses, and eye closure(how often you wanted to close them) were measured with the likert scale from 1(Never) to 5(Constantly). The sum of all responses was recorded for each subject and then the average sum for all subjects was reported. The average can range from 0- 40 (continuous).

    Time frame: Baseline, 2 Week, 4 Month or 12 Month surveys

07

Results

Posted Sep 15, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone1-Day ACUVUE TruEye Contact Lens Users1-Day ACUVUE MOIST Contact Lens Users
Started601570
2 week survey completed551522
4 month survey completed533493
12 month survey completed502463
Completed502463
Not completed99107

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence of Adverse Events

Adverse events were reported by subjects via the electronic surveys if they responded "yes" to the question "Since we last contacted you, have you experienced a red or painful eye that required a visit to an eye doctor or emergency room?". Consensus diagnosis was made after review of clinical records by Adjudication Panel.

Time frame:
Self-report at 2 Week, 4 Month or 12 Month surveys
Reported as:
Number · participants
Incidence of Adverse Events
participants1-Day ACUVUE TruEye Contact Lens Users1-Day ACUVUE MOIST Contact Lens Users
Corneal Infiltrative Events20
CL-Related Adverse Events with Office Visit83
Not CL-Related Adverse Events with Office Visit52
"Yes" to Red Eye Question, but no Office Visit65
SecondaryChange in 8-item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline to 2 Week, 4 Month and 12 Month Surveys

The response set for each question was a 5-level likert scale. Intensity of discomfort, dryness, blurriness were measured with the likert scale from 0(Never Have It) to 5(Very Intense). Frequency of discomfort, dryness, blurry vision, removal of lenses, and eye closure(how often you wanted to close them) were measured with the likert scale from 1(Never) to 5(Constantly). The sum of all responses was recorded for each subject and then the average sum for all subjects was reported. The average can range from 0- 40 (continuous).

Time frame:
Baseline, 2 Week, 4 Month or 12 Month surveys
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in 8-item Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire Score From Baseline to 2 Week, 4 Month and 12 Month Surveys
units on a scale1-Day ACUVUE TruEye Contact Lens Users1-Day ACUVUE MOIST Contact Lens Users
Baseline, n=368, 32012.8 ± 7.212.3 ± 7.2
2 weeks, n=418,4007.3 ± 5.28.0 ± 5.5
4 months, n=418,4008.7 ± 5.79.3 ± 6.2
12 months, n=418,4009.0 ± 6.39.2 ± 6.1

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
1-Day ACUVUE TruEye Contact Lens Users—0/601 (0%)0/601 (0%)
1-Day ACUVUE MOIST Contact Lens Users—0/570 (0%)0/570 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)1-Day ACUVUE TruEye Contact Lens Users1-Day ACUVUE MOIST Contact Lens UsersTotal
<=18 years106121227
Between 18 and 65 years484445929
>=65 years11415
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)1-Day ACUVUE TruEye Contact Lens Users1-Day ACUVUE MOIST Contact Lens UsersTotal
Mean33.2 ± 13.930.3 ± 12.931.8 ± 13.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)1-Day ACUVUE TruEye Contact Lens Users1-Day ACUVUE MOIST Contact Lens UsersTotal
Female400392792
Male201178379
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)1-Day ACUVUE TruEye Contact Lens Users1-Day ACUVUE MOIST Contact Lens UsersTotal
United States6015701171
08

Study locations

37 sites
  • Campbell, California 95008, United States
  • Fullerton, California 92831-1615, United States
  • Huntington Beach, California 92647, United States
  • Los Angeles, California 90049, United States
  • Mountain View, California 94041, United States
  • Newport Beach, California 92660, United States
  • Salinas, California 93901, United States
  • San Francisco, California 94103, United States
  • San Francisco, California 94111, United States
  • San Francisco, California 94158, United States
  • San Jose, California 95131, United States
  • Sunnyvale, California 94086, United States
  • Washington, District of Columbia 20016, United States
  • Boca Raton, Florida 33431-7253, United States
  • Boca Raton, Florida 33432-3938, United States
  • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316, United States
  • Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33328-2018, United States
  • North Miami, Florida 33181, United States
  • Pembroke Pines, Florida 33024, United States
  • Wellington, Florida 33414, United States
  • Roswell, Georgia 30075, United States
  • Des Moines, Iowa 50310, United States
  • Shreveport, Louisiana 71105, United States
  • Belmont, Massachusetts 02478, United States
  • Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States
  • Dedham, Massachusetts 02026, United States
  • Lake Hopatcong, New Jersey 07849, United States
  • New York, New York 10022, United States
  • New York, New York 10036, United States
  • Charlotte, North Carolina 28210, United States
  • Gastonia, North Carolina 28054, United States
  • Cleveland, Ohio 43081, United States
  • Johnstown, Ohio 43031, United States
  • Westerville, Ohio 43081, United States
  • Brentwood, Tennessee 37027-7552, United States
  • Amarillo, Texas 79119, United States
  • Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53227, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hickson-Curran SB, Chalmers RL, Keay L, Gleason W. Patient-Reported Wearing Experience From Hydrogel Daily Disposable Wearers Older Than 40 Years From the TEMPO Registry. Eye Contact Lens. 2017 Sep;43(5):313-317. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000271. PubMed 27243356 ↗
  • Chalmers RL, Hickson-Curran SB, Keay L, Gleason WJ, Albright R. Rates of adverse events with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel daily disposable lenses in a large postmarket surveillance registry: the TEMPO Registry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jan 8;56(1):654-63. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15582. PubMed 25574042 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 19, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01467557
Lead sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 8, 2011
Start date
Oct 2011
Primary completion
Oct 2013
Completion
Oct 2013
Results posted
Sep 15, 2015
Last update
Jun 19, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion