CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01462565Updated Oct 16, 2017Results posted

Study of a New Thermo Stable Formulation of Epoprostenol Sodium to Treat Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

A Phase 4 interventional study of current marketed FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) and new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium in Hypertension, Pulmonary, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 8 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-16.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this multicentre, open label, single-arm study in approximately 20 adult patients is to evaluate the Impact on lifestyle of a new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium in subjects with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH).

Read the detailed description

This is a multicentre, open label, single-arm study in approximately 20 adult patients (18 - 75 years old) designed to evaluate the Impact on lifestyle of a new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium in subjects with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH). The co-primary objectives are 1) to describe the effect of the new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium on quality of life and 2) to determine the dose titration requirement in patients switching from the currently marketed FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) to the new thermo stable formulation. Secondary objectives include assessing the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium and the exploratory objective is to evaluate the effect of the new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium on haemodynamic parameters in a subset of subjects.

Subjects who are already receiving FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) for the treatment of PAH and have been on a stable dose for at least 3 months and on stable doses of other PAH treatments for at least 30 days prior to screening will be enrolled. After a screening visit, eligible subjects will have a 4-week run-in period with their existing FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) treatment. At the end of the 4-week period, they will be admitted to the clinic for baseline assessments and for switching to study medication (the new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium). Subjects will remain in hospital for a minimum of 6 hours to ensure clinical and hemodynamic stability prior to discharge. Subjects may stay in hospital for up to 24-48 hours after switching to the new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium at the discretion of the investigator. Dose titration requirement will be assessed at the time of discharge. Haemodynamic parameters will be obtained in a subgroup of subjects enrolled in centres where the collection of haemodynamic data is considered part of the standard of care. Subjects will receive the study medication as a continuous intravenous infusion for a 4-week treatment period. Those who complete the 4-week treatment period will have the option of entering an extension phase of the study to continue receiving the new formulation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension, Pulmonary

Keywords

  • flolan
  • pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • thermo stable formulation
  • epoprostenol sodium
  • modified sterile diluent
03

In context

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

761 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; 142 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 38 across 509 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Browse Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult male or female at least 18 to 75 years at the time of screening.
  • Subjects must have been on FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) as approved in the product label.
  • Subjects must be on stable doses of their existing FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) treatment for a minimum of 3 months prior to screening.
  • Subjects must be on stable doses of any current PAH treatments other than FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) in the last 30 days.
  • Subjects must walk a distance of at least 150 meters during six-minute walk distance test (6MWD). This test must be completed during the Screening Visit.
  • A female subject is eligible to participate if she is of non-childbearing potential or of childbearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at screen, and agrees to use one of the contraception methods listed in the protocol.
  • Subjects must be competent to understand the information given in the Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) approved informed consent form and must sign the form prior to the initiation of any study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are given FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) for a condition or in a manner that is outside the approved indication.
  • Subjects with congestive heart failure arising from severe left ventricular dysfunction.
  • Subjects, with or without supplemental oxygen, who have a resting arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) \<90% as measured by pulse oximetry at screening.
  • Subjects have been hospitalized as an emergency or visited the emergency room for a condition related to PAH or treatment for PAH in the last 3 months.
  • The subject's clinical condition is such that they are not expected to remain clinically stable for the duration of the study.
  • Female subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Subjects who have demonstrated noncompliance with previous medical regimens.
  • Subjects who have a history of abusing alcohol or illicit drugs within 1 year.
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of active hepatitis (hepatitis B surface antibody and hepatitis C antibody).
  • Subjects who have participated in a clinical study involving another investigational drug or device within four weeks before screening.
  • Subjects who had history malignancies within the past 5 years, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix.
  • Any concurrent condition that would affect the safety of the subject or in the opinion of the investigator it is not in the best interest of the patient to participate in the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    All subjects

    Subjects enter the study already taking current marketed FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) and continue for 4 weeks (run-in). At baseline, they will be swopped to the new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium for 4 weeks (or longer if they continue in the extension phase of the study).

    Drug: current marketed FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium) · Drug: new thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium

Interventions

  • Drugcurrent marketed FLOLAN (epoprostenol sodium)

    continuous intravenous infusion

  • Drugnew thermo stable formulation of epoprostenol sodium

    continuous intravenous infusion

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)

    Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health), 2 summary scores (physical component and mental component), and a self-evaluated change in health status. Subscale and summary scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale and summary scores was considered as better health status. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3)

  2. Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey

    Study-specific questionnaire comprised the pre-defined15 questions which included activities of daily living assessment. Participants rated the question on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 was do not agree and 10 was strongly agree. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at Baseline. Changes from Baseline was assessed for Questions 2 to 12. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3).

  3. Change From Baseline in Dose of Thermo Stable Epoprostenol Sodium at Week 4

    Dose titration requirement was assessed at the time of discharge. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at Baseline. Units- nanogram per kilogram per minute (ng/kg/min). Baseline was Visit 2 i.e . Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events(SAEs)

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect and medically significant and all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinaemia. Only treatment emergent AEs and SAEs were reported in this outcome measure. Specifically, this study reported 2 SAEs, but only 1 was categorized as treatment emergent.

    Time frame: Up to visit 3 (Week 4)

  2. Number of Participants With Infusion Site Reactions During Treatment Period

    Infusion site reactions were reported during the treatment period. Infusion site was inspected for erythema, excoriation, induration, skin necrosis or signs of local sepsis.

    Time frame: Baseline visit (Visit 2) to Week 4 (Visit 3)

  3. Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4 : Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Systolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is beating. Diastolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is relaxed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4(Visit 3)

  4. Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4: Heart Rate

    Summary mean change in heart rate measured in beats per minute (beats/min or BPM). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) to Week 4

  5. Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry

    Abnormal clinical chemistry was analyzed as follows: serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) \>= 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) , aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT) \>= 3 x ULN , total bilirubin \>= 34.2, creatinine \>= 176.8.

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)

  6. Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology

    Values for hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count were analyzed. Participants with abnormal values have been reported. The low and high value concern were as follows: hemoglobin (Males \< 98, \>180.0) (females \<91, \>161.0)grams per litre (g/L); hematocrit (Males \< 32.0, \>54.0) (females \<29.0, \>50.6) fraction (1); platelet count (\< 100, \> 500) gram international units per litre (gI/L).

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)

  7. Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis

    Dipstick method was used to measure blood, glucose and protein. Data was analyzed up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up visit).

    Time frame: Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)

  8. Change From Baseline in Six Minute Walk Distance Test (6MWD) After 4-weeks of Treatment

    This assessment was a non-encouraged test that measures the distance walked for a duration of 6 minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at observation minus value at Baseline. Baseline visit was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4

  9. Breathlessness After 6MWD - Borg Dyspnoea Index (BDI)

    The BDI was calculated by using a 10-point scale (0 = None, 10 = Maximum) and indicates the degree of breathlessness after completion of the 6-minute walk test. The BDI scale was assessed by each participant. Change from Baseline = score at observation minus score at Baseline. Baseline visit was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) to Week 4

  10. World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment

    World Health Organization functional class was analyzed as class I, class II, class III and class IV. World Health Organization functional class was analyzed at Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 \[+ or - 7 days\]) and Week 4. The classed were defined as Class I: No symptoms of pulmonary arterial hypertension with exercise or at rest, Class II: No symptoms at rest but uncomfortable and short of breath with normal activity, Class III: May not have symptoms at rest but activities greatly limited by shortness of breath, fatigue, or near fainting and Class IV: Symptoms at rest and severe symptoms with any activity. Hence the severity increased from class I (better) to Class IV (worse).

    Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4

  11. Mean Oxygen Saturation in Blood Over Time

    Pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation) was analyzed. Data for Pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation) was analyzed up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 \[Week 4\]).

    Time frame: up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 [Week 4])

  12. Number of Participants With Urine Pregnancy Test Positive

    Urine samples were collected for urine pregnancy test. Urine samples were collected at up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 \[Week 4\]). Number of participants with urine pregnancy test positive has been reported.

    Time frame: up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 [Week 4])

07

Results

Posted Oct 16, 2017

Participant flow

A total of 17 participants were recruited from 23 November 2011 to 16 May 2012, out of which 16 participants entered the treatment phase. Study was conducted across 5 centres in the United States, 1 centre in Canada and 1 centre in the Netherlands.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Started16
Completed16
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)

Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health), 2 summary scores (physical component and mental component), and a self-evaluated change in health status. Subscale and summary scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale and summary scores was considered as better health status. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at baseline. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Score on a scaleEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Physical Functioning-1.156 ± 3.6593
Role-Physical-0.765 ± 6.3050
Role-Emotional0.002 ± 11.1773
Vitality0.781 ± 7.1636
Mental Health0.883 ± 7.6063
Social Functioning1.706 ± 7.1043
Bodily Pain3.065 ± 5.8291
General Health-0.606 ± 5.6068
Physical Health Component-0.123 ± 4.2876
Mental Health Component1.141 ± 6.5078
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey

Study-specific questionnaire comprised the pre-defined15 questions which included activities of daily living assessment. Participants rated the question on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 was do not agree and 10 was strongly agree. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at Baseline. Changes from Baseline was assessed for Questions 2 to 12. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4 (Visit 3).
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Study Specific Participant Acceptance Survey
Score on a scaleEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Q2- ability to perform physical activities-0.9 ± 2.29
Q3- ability to perform your basic daily activies-1.5 ± 1.86
Q4- ability to perform activities with your family-0.8 ± 2.37
Q5- ability to participate in social activities-0.9 ± 1.88
Q6- ability to comply with your Flolan treatment0.3 ± 3.34
Q7- ability to perform new activity(Jogging, walk)0.4 ± 2.00
Q8- overall satisfaction0.4 ± 1.09
Q9- interested physical activity-0.1 ± 2.53
Q10- feel physically restricted from participating0.1 ± 2.73
Q11- confident in my ability to do new activity0.6 ± 2.50
Q12- treatment regimen constantly weighs on mind-0.6 ± 1.75
PrimaryChange From Baseline in Dose of Thermo Stable Epoprostenol Sodium at Week 4

Dose titration requirement was assessed at the time of discharge. Change from Baseline was calculated as score at observation minus score at Baseline. Units- nanogram per kilogram per minute (ng/kg/min). Baseline was Visit 2 i.e . Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · ng/kg/min
Change From Baseline in Dose of Thermo Stable Epoprostenol Sodium at Week 4
ng/kg/minEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Change From Baseline in Dose of Thermo Stable Epoprostenol Sodium at Week 40.22 ± 1.169
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events(SAEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect and medically significant and all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinaemia. Only treatment emergent AEs and SAEs were reported in this outcome measure. Specifically, this study reported 2 SAEs, but only 1 was categorized as treatment emergent.

Time frame:
Up to visit 3 (Week 4)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events(SAEs)
ParticipantsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Any AEs9
Any SAEs1
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Infusion Site Reactions During Treatment Period

Infusion site reactions were reported during the treatment period. Infusion site was inspected for erythema, excoriation, induration, skin necrosis or signs of local sepsis.

Time frame:
Baseline visit (Visit 2) to Week 4 (Visit 3)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Infusion Site Reactions During Treatment Period
ParticipantsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Erythema1
Signs of local sepsis1
Other1
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4 : Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is beating. Diastolic blood pressure is a measure of blood pressure while the heart is relaxed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4(Visit 3)
Reported as:
Mean · Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4 : Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Systolic blood pressure-0.4 ± 11.47
Diastolic blood pressure0.4 ± 10.99
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4: Heart Rate

Summary mean change in heart rate measured in beats per minute (beats/min or BPM). Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. Baseline was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) to Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · beats/min
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4: Heart Rate
beats/minEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs at Week 4: Heart Rate-1.7 ± 8.52
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry

Abnormal clinical chemistry was analyzed as follows: serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT) \>= 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) , aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT) \>= 3 x ULN , total bilirubin \>= 34.2, creatinine \>= 176.8.

Time frame:
Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry
ParticipantsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinical Chemistry0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology

Values for hemoglobin, hematocrit, and platelet count were analyzed. Participants with abnormal values have been reported. The low and high value concern were as follows: hemoglobin (Males \< 98, \>180.0) (females \<91, \>161.0)grams per litre (g/L); hematocrit (Males \< 32.0, \>54.0) (females \<29.0, \>50.6) fraction (1); platelet count (\< 100, \> 500) gram international units per litre (gI/L).

Time frame:
Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology
ParticipantsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Hemoglobin (G/L) : Week 4: high1
Hematocrit (1): Screening: Low14
Hematocrit (1): Baseline: Low15
Hematocrit (1): Week 4: Low15
Hematocrit (1): Follow-up: Low1
Platelet count (GI/L): Screening: Low5
Platelet count (GI/L): Baseline: Low2
Platelet count (GI/L): Week 4: Low1
Platelet count (GI/L): Follow up: Low1
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis

Dipstick method was used to measure blood, glucose and protein. Data was analyzed up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up visit).

Time frame:
Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis
ParticipantsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Number of Participants With Abnormal Urinalysis0
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Six Minute Walk Distance Test (6MWD) After 4-weeks of Treatment

This assessment was a non-encouraged test that measures the distance walked for a duration of 6 minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at observation minus value at Baseline. Baseline visit was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · meters
Change From Baseline in Six Minute Walk Distance Test (6MWD) After 4-weeks of Treatment
metersEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Change From Baseline in Six Minute Walk Distance Test (6MWD) After 4-weeks of Treatment-3.55 ± 45.321
SecondaryBreathlessness After 6MWD - Borg Dyspnoea Index (BDI)

The BDI was calculated by using a 10-point scale (0 = None, 10 = Maximum) and indicates the degree of breathlessness after completion of the 6-minute walk test. The BDI scale was assessed by each participant. Change from Baseline = score at observation minus score at Baseline. Baseline visit was Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 (+ or - 7 days).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) to Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Breathlessness After 6MWD - Borg Dyspnoea Index (BDI)
Score on a scaleEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Breathlessness After 6MWD - Borg Dyspnoea Index (BDI)0.36 ± 0.535
SecondaryWorld Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment

World Health Organization functional class was analyzed as class I, class II, class III and class IV. World Health Organization functional class was analyzed at Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 \[+ or - 7 days\]) and Week 4. The classed were defined as Class I: No symptoms of pulmonary arterial hypertension with exercise or at rest, Class II: No symptoms at rest but uncomfortable and short of breath with normal activity, Class III: May not have symptoms at rest but activities greatly limited by shortness of breath, fatigue, or near fainting and Class IV: Symptoms at rest and severe symptoms with any activity. Hence the severity increased from class I (better) to Class IV (worse).

Time frame:
Baseline (Visit 2 i.e. Day-14 [+ or - 7 days]) and Week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
World Health Organization [WHO] Functional Class at Baseline and After 4- Weeks of Treatment
ParticipantsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Baseline WHO Class I2
Baseline WHO Class II9
Baseline WHO Class III4
Baseline WHO Class IV0
Week 4 Class I2
Week 4 Class II10
Week 4 Class III4
Week 4 Class IV0
SecondaryMean Oxygen Saturation in Blood Over Time

Pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation) was analyzed. Data for Pulse oximetry (oxygen saturation) was analyzed up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 \[Week 4\]).

Time frame:
up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 [Week 4])
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of oxygen in blood
Mean Oxygen Saturation in Blood Over Time
Percentage of oxygen in bloodEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Baseline94.3 ± 1.95
Week 494.5 ± 2.58
Follow-up (1 week after Week 4)93.0 ± NA
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Urine Pregnancy Test Positive

Urine samples were collected for urine pregnancy test. Urine samples were collected at up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 \[Week 4\]). Number of participants with urine pregnancy test positive has been reported.

Time frame:
up to the treatment follow up (1 week after Visit 3 [Week 4])
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Urine Pregnancy Test Positive
ParticipantsEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Number of Participants With Urine Pregnancy Test Positive0

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 1 week after Week 4 (Follow-up) for SAEs and Up to Visit 3 (Week 4) for non-serious adverse events.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection0/16 (0%)2/16 (12.5%)9/16 (56.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Device related infectionInfections and infestations2/16
Catheter site haemorrhageGeneral disorders1/16
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventEpoprostenol Sodium for Injection
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders2/16
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/16
FatigueGeneral disorders2/16
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/16
AscitesGastrointestinal disorders1/16
Paraesthesia oralGastrointestinal disorders1/16
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders1/16
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/16
Muscle tightnessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/16
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/16

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Mean50.0 ± 13.37
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Female12
Male4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Epoprostenol Sodium for Injection
Hispanic or Latino15
Not Hispanic or Latino1
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami Beach, Florida 33140, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118-2393, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Columbus, Ohio 43221, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75390-8550, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Provencher S, Paruchuru P, Spezzi A, Waterhouse B, Gomberg-Maitland M; pH12 Flolan reformulation study group. Quality of life, safety and efficacy profile of thermostable flolan in pulmonary arterial hypertension. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120657. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25793960 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01462565
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 31, 2011
Start date
Nov 1, 2011
Primary completion
May 16, 2012
Completion
Nov 8, 2012
Results posted
Oct 16, 2017
Last update
Oct 16, 2017

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion