ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01445171TRITONUpdated Sep 1, 2023Results posted

Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve

An interventional study of Aortic Valve Replacement with EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System in Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency and Aortic Valve Stenosis, sponsored by Edwards Lifesciences. Completed at 6 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-01.

Sponsored by Edwards Lifesciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
295
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to confirm that the safety and performance of the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.

Read the detailed description

This is a two-phase, non-randomized, prospective, single arm, multi-center clinical investigation. Each subject in Phase 1 and Phase 2 is consented for a period of 5 years. All subjects will be assessed for clinical follow-up at the following intervals: Discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 1 year and annually thereafter until 5 years of follow-up is achieved per subject.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis

Keywords

  • Aortic Valve Replacement
03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis

1,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 284 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 295 is above the median of 120 across 537 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Edwards Lifesciences is the lead sponsor of 128 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Of its 35 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 33 (94%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Criteria:

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • Aortic stenosis or stenosis-insufficiency of aortic valve requiring a planned replacement as indicated in the preoperative evaluation;
  • Scheduled to undergo planned aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary bypass surgery, MAZE procedure, septal myectomy, pacemaker/ICD implant and or atrial appendage occlusion/removal.
  • Signed and dated the informed consent form prior to investigation procedures;
  • Geographically stable and agrees to attend Follow up assessments at the hospital of surgical services for a maximum of 5 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pure aortic insufficiency
  • Requires emergency surgery
  • Aneurysm of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta requiring surgical intervention
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 25%
  • Active endocarditis within 3 months prior to the scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
  • Concomitant valve (mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic) disease requiring repair with an annuloplasty ring or replacement with prosthesis
  • Prior mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve, mechanical valve, or annuloplasty ring.
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) within 1 month prior to the scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
  • Previously implanted with EDWARDS INTUITY Aortic valve; alcohol or drug abuser
  • Disease limiting life expectancy to less than 12 months
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Currently participating in another drug or device clinical investigation;
  • Documented blood diatheses
  • Requires non-cardiac procedures such as carotid procedures or mediastinal tumor removal
  • Had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6-months prior to scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
  • Study site pre-operative echocardiographic assessment shows evidence of an intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
  • Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical circulatory support, or mechanical ventilation within 30 days of procedure
  • Documented renal insufficiency as determined by Serum creatinine ≥ 200 µmol/L (2.27 mg/dL) at screening or end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis
  • Documented hyperparathyroidism
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
295 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Study Valve

    Subjects act as own control

    Device: Aortic Valve Replacement with EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System

Interventions

  • DeviceAortic Valve Replacement with EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System

    Aortic Valve bioprosthesis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Early Adverse Events

    Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the total number of enrolled subjects times 100.

    Time frame: Events occuring within 30 days of procedure

  2. Percent of Late Adverse Events

    Number of late adverse events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).

    Time frame: Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Subject's With Device Technical Success

    Device technical success is defined as the successful delivery and deployment of one bioprosthesis with one delivery system with a maximum of two attempts.

    Time frame: At time of surgery, an average of 3 hours

  2. Number of Subject's With Procedural Success

    Procedure success is defined as device technical success followed by the absence of adverse events requiring device reoperation, requiring implantation of permanent pacemaker, or subject death.

    Time frame: Discharge(an average of 13 days) or 10 days post-implant, whichever comes first

  3. Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline

    The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

    Time frame: 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

  4. Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time

    The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale is indexed and ranges from a minimum of 0.275 and a maximum of 1.000. A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, and 1 Year post-implant

  5. Subject's Average Mean Systolic Gradient Measurements Over Time.

    Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the aortic valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve.

    Time frame: Discharge (an average of 13 days), 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

  6. Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Measurements Over Time.

    Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.

    Time frame: Discharge (an average of 13 days), 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

  7. Subject's Amount of Aortic Valvular Regurgitation Over Time

    Aortic valvular regurgitation occurs when the aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Aortic valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation.

    Time frame: Discharge (an average of 13 days), 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant

  8. Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count Measurement Over Time.

    Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant

  9. Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant

  10. Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant

  11. Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the fluid component (plasma) in the blood.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant

  12. Subject's Average Platelet Count Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant

  13. Subject's Average Reticulocytes Percentage Over Time.

    Reticulocytes are immature red blood cells; a reticulocyte blood test measures the amount of these cells in the blood.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant

  14. Subject's Average Haptoglobin Measurement Over Time.

    Laboratory Analysis of Haptoglobin on blood drawn from subjects; Haptoglobin is a protein produced by the liver.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant

  15. Subject's Average Serum LDH Measurement Over Time.

    The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) test looks for signs of damage to the body's tissues.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant

07

Results

Posted Feb 17, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Started295
Implanted with study device287
Completed200
Not completed95
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject16
Withdrew: Death51
Withdrew: Subjects declined to return for followup9
Withdrew: Consented but did not receive device8

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent of Early Adverse Events

Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the total number of enrolled subjects times 100.

Time frame:
Events occuring within 30 days of procedure
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of subjects
Percent of Early Adverse Events
Percentage of subjectsINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
All Cause Mortality1.7
Trial Valve Related Mortality1.0
Thromboembolism4.5
Valve Thrombosis0.0
Major Bleeding7.3
All Paravalvular Leak (OPC)1.0
Hemolysis0.7
Endocarditis0.0
Structural Valve Deterioration0.0
Reoperation1.4
Explant1.4
Valve Related AE3.1
PrimaryPercent of Late Adverse Events

Number of late adverse events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).

Time frame:
Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of late adverse events
Percent of Late Adverse Events
Percentage of late adverse eventsINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
All Cause Mortality3.8
Trial Valve Related Mortality0.4
Thromboembolism1.9
Valve Thrombosis0.0
Major Bleeding2.1
All Paravalvular Leak (OPC)0.6
Hemolysis0.2
Endocarditis0.3
Structural Valve Deterioration0.5
Reoperation0.5
Explant0.5
Valve Related AE1.0
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Subject's With Device Technical Success

Device technical success is defined as the successful delivery and deployment of one bioprosthesis with one delivery system with a maximum of two attempts.

Time frame:
At time of surgery, an average of 3 hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subject's With Device Technical Success
ParticipantsINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Number of Subject's With Device Technical Success287
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Subject's With Procedural Success

Procedure success is defined as device technical success followed by the absence of adverse events requiring device reoperation, requiring implantation of permanent pacemaker, or subject death.

Time frame:
Discharge(an average of 13 days) or 10 days post-implant, whichever comes first
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subject's With Procedural Success
ParticipantsINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Number of Subject's With Procedural Success277
Other pre-specifiedSubject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

Time frame:
1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline
ParticipantsINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
1 Month — Improved121
1 Month — Same59
1 Month — Worsened14
3 Months — Improved189
3 Months — Same65
3 Months — Worsened8
1 Year — Improved191
1 Year — Same57
1 Year — Worsened7
2 Years — Improved180
2 Years — Same46
2 Years — Worsened12
3 Years — Improved157
3 Years — Same56
3 Years — Worsened12
4 Years — Improved137
4 Years — Same60
4 Years — Worsened10
5 Years — Improved125
5 Years — Same52
5 Years — Worsened16
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time

The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale is indexed and ranges from a minimum of 0.275 and a maximum of 1.000. A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, and 1 Year post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time
units on a scaleBaseline and 3 Months Follow-UpBaseline and 1 Year Follow-Up
Baseline0.79 ± 0.200.79 ± 0.19
Follow-Up0.87 ± 0.180.83 ± 0.22
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Mean Systolic Gradient Measurements Over Time.

Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the aortic valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve.

Time frame:
Discharge (an average of 13 days), 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Subject's Average Mean Systolic Gradient Measurements Over Time.
mmHgINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Discharge10.6 ± 4.2
1 Month9.5 ± 2.8
3 Months9.0 ± 3.4
1 Year9.0 ± 3.5
2 Years8.8 ± 3.0
3 Years9.6 ± 4.3
4 Years10.0 ± 4.7
5 Years9.9 ± 5.1
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Effective Orifice Area Measurements Over Time.

Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.

Time frame:
Discharge (an average of 13 days), 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · Centimeters Squared
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Measurements Over Time.
Centimeters SquaredINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Discharge1.7 ± 0.2
1 Month1.6 ± 0.2
3 Months1.7 ± 0.2
1 Year1.7 ± 0.2
2 Years1.7 ± 0.2
3 Years1.7 ± 0.2
4 Years1.7 ± 0.3
5 Years1.7 ± 0.3
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Amount of Aortic Valvular Regurgitation Over Time

Aortic valvular regurgitation occurs when the aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Aortic valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation.

Time frame:
Discharge (an average of 13 days), 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subject's Amount of Aortic Valvular Regurgitation Over Time
ParticipantsINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Discharge — 0 None/+1 Trivial244
Discharge — +2 Mild10
Discharge — +3 Moderate2
Discharge — +4 Severe1
1 Month — 0 None/+1 Trivial10
1 Month — +2 Mild1
1 Month — +3 Moderate0
1 Month — +4 Severe0
3 Months — 0 None/+1 Trivial235
3 Months — +2 Mild11
3 Months — +3 Moderate4
3 Months — +4 Severe1
1 Year — 0 None/+1 Trivial231
1 Year — +2 Mild14
1 Year — +3 Moderate3
1 Year — +4 Severe0
2 Years — 0 None/+1 Trivial86
2 Years — +2 Mild7
2 Years — +3 Moderate4
2 Years — +4 Severe0
3 Years — 0 None/+1 Trivial177
3 Years — +2 Mild12
3 Years — +3 Moderate4
3 Years — +4 Severe0
4 Years — 0 None/+1 Trivial125
4 Years — +2 Mild11
4 Years — +3 Moderate4
4 Years — +4 Severe0
5 Years — 0 None/+1 Trivial161
5 Years — +2 Mild9
5 Years — +3 Moderate4
5 Years — +4 Severe0
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average White Blood Cell Count Measurement Over Time.

Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · 10^3 cells/microliters
Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count Measurement Over Time.
10^3 cells/microlitersINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Baseline6.80 ± 2.0
3 Months6.97 ± 1.8
1 Year7.10 ± 2.0
5 Years7.31 ± 2.0
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Red Blood Cells Count Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · 10^6 cells/microliters
Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count Over Time.
10^6 cells/microlitersINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Baseline4.30 ± 0.5
3 Months4.40 ± 0.5
1 Year4.36 ± 0.5
5 Years4.35 ± 0.8
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Hemoglobin Count Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · g/dl
Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count Over Time.
g/dlINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Baseline12.87 ± 1.7
3 Months12.49 ± 1.4
1 Year13.00 ± 1.5
5 Years13.16 ± 1.6
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Hematocrit Percentage Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the fluid component (plasma) in the blood.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of red blood cells
Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage Over Time.
percentage of red blood cellsINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Baseline38.29 ± 4.7
3 Months38.07 ± 4.1
1 Year38.93 ± 4.1
5 Years39.58 ± 4.4
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Platelet Count Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · 10^3 platelets per microliter
Subject's Average Platelet Count Over Time.
10^3 platelets per microliterINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Baseline220.33 ± 66.30
3 Months223.07 ± 59.70
1 Year213.22 ± 60.40
5 Years206.85 ± 63.5
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Reticulocytes Percentage Over Time.

Reticulocytes are immature red blood cells; a reticulocyte blood test measures the amount of these cells in the blood.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of reticulocytes
Subject's Average Reticulocytes Percentage Over Time.
percentage of reticulocytesINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Baseline2.13 ± 2.5
3 Months1.59 ± 1.9
1 Year2.07 ± 5.0
5 Years1.82 ± 2.2
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Haptoglobin Measurement Over Time.

Laboratory Analysis of Haptoglobin on blood drawn from subjects; Haptoglobin is a protein produced by the liver.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · g/L
Subject's Average Haptoglobin Measurement Over Time.
g/LINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Baseline63.08 ± 69.50
3 Months82.15 ± 81.10
1 Year80.65 ± 80.50
5 Years79.36 ± 81.20
Other pre-specifiedSubject's Average Serum LDH Measurement Over Time.

The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) test looks for signs of damage to the body's tissues.

Time frame:
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Reported as:
Mean · U/L
Subject's Average Serum LDH Measurement Over Time.
U/LINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Baseline223.91 ± 53.0
3 Months271.37 ± 87.20
1 Year250.56 ± 76.20
5 Years254.46 ± 76.30

Adverse events

Collected over Events occurring from baseline through five years post-implant. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
INTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System51/287 (17.8%)233/287 (81.2%)189/287 (65.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 71
Most frequent serious events
EventINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
OtherGeneral disorders137/287
Pulmonary - Pleural EffusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders57/287
Infection - OtherInfections and infestations37/287
Cardiac - OtherCardiac disorders32/287
Cardiac - Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders32/287
Gastrointestinal - OtherGastrointestinal disorders26/287
Other - AnemiaGeneral disorders25/287
Cardiac - Heart FailureCardiac disorders20/287
Cardiac - Other ArrhythmiaCardiac disorders18/287
Cardiac - AV Block IIICardiac disorders17/287
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 62
Most frequent other events
EventINTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
OtherGeneral disorders85/287
Infection - OtherInfections and infestations45/287
Cardiac - Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders43/287
Pulmonary - Pleural EffusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders16/287
Infection - LocalInfections and infestations13/287
Gastrointestinal - OtherGastrointestinal disorders12/287
Other - AnemiaGeneral disorders11/287
Cardiac - BBB - Left CompleteCardiac disorders9/287
Renal - Renal DysfunctionRenal and urinary disorders9/287
Valvular - Mitral Regurgitation - MildCardiac disorders9/287

Baseline characteristics

The outcome is reported for subjects who received the EDWARDS INTUITY Aortic Valve models 8300ACA and 8300ACB, and the EDWARDS INTUITY Delivery System models 8300DCA and 8300DCB where data is available.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)INTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Mean75.3 ± 6.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)INTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
Female141
Male146
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)INTUITY Aortic Valve and INTUITY Delivery System
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • AKH Vienna-Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien; University Vienna
    Vienna, 1090, Austria
  • Kerchoff Klinik-Bad Nauheim
    Bad Nauheim, 61231, Germany
  • Herzzentrum Uniklink Koln-Klinik und Poliklinik fur Herz und Thoraxzchirurgie
    Cologne, 50937, Germany
  • MHH-Medizinische Hoschschule Hannover
    Hanover, 30625, Germany
  • University Leipzig: Herzzentrum Leipzig Gmbh
    Leipzig, 04289, Germany
  • Klinikum der Universitat Muchen-Grosshadern; Clinic at the University of Munich
    Munich, 81377, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Laufer G, Haverich A, Andreas M, Mohr FW, Walther T, Shrestha M, Rahmanian P, Holzhey D, Roth M, Schmitz C, Schramm R, Giot C, Wahlers TCW. Long-term outcomes of a rapid deployment aortic valve: data up to 5 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;52(2):281-287. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx103. PubMed 28453629 ↗
  • Haverich A, Wahlers TC, Borger MA, Shrestha M, Kocher AA, Walther T, Roth M, Misfeld M, Mohr FW, Kempfert J, Dohmen PM, Schmitz C, Rahmanian P, Wiedemann D, Duhay FG, Laufer G. Three-year hemodynamic performance, left ventricular mass regression, and prosthetic-patient mismatch after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in 287 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2854-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.049. Epub 2014 Aug 1. PubMed 25218544 ↗
  • Kocher AA, Laufer G, Haverich A, Shrestha M, Walther T, Misfeld M, Kempfert J, Gillam L, Schmitz C, Wahlers TC, Wippermann J, Mohr FW, Roth M, Skwara A, Rahmanian P, Wiedemann D, Borger MA. One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):110-5; discussion 115-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.108. Epub 2012 Oct 8. PubMed 23058665 ↗
  • Wahlers TCW, Andreas M, Rahmanian P, Candolfi P, Zemanova B, Giot C, Ferrari E, Laufer G. Outcomes of a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Versus Its Conventional Counterpart: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2018 May/Jun;13(3):177-183. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000509. PubMed 29912142 ↗
  • Alaklabi AM, Abdul Rab S, Sabbah BN, Maklad AE, Dokollari A, Van den Eynde J, Pompeu Sa M, Arjomandi Rad A, Ahsan MR, Fatehi Hassanabad A. Innovations in Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comprehensive Overview of the Intuity Rapid Deployment Valve. Cardiol Rev. 2026 Jan-Feb 01;34(1):30-39. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000657. Epub 2024 Feb 9. PubMed 38334371 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 15, 2011

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01445171
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 3, 2011
Start date
Jan 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2017
Completion
Dec 2017
Results posted
Feb 17, 2020
Last update
Sep 1, 2023

Study contacts

Prof Axel Haverich
study director · MHH Hannover

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion