ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01429623Updated Jun 15, 2017Results posted

A 3 Year Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Low Dose Ladostigil in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment

A Phase 2 interventional study of ladostigil hemitartrate and Placebo in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia, sponsored by Avraham Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Completed at 12 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged 55 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-15.

Sponsored by Avraham Pharmaceuticals Ltd · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
55 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 54 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in Israel — 6 open to participants now, 8 under way, none of them phase 3. Cognitive Dysfunction · Israel.

Enrollment
2nd of 34
210 · median 50
Started
2012
with 2 others
Phase 2
5 of 54
2 open now
Registered
13th of 54
by date

Among the 54 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in Israel, this one is the 2nd largest by enrollment of the 34 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2012, is one of 5 in phase 2, and was the 13th registered.

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,875 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,121 are open to participants now.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Open to participants now

6 of the 54 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in Israel are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

All 6 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Israel have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Israel →

Who these studies take

Of the 751 Cognitive Dysfunction studies recruiting now, 363 (48%) set no upper age limit and 143 (19%) stop at 75 or younger; 46 take children under 18; 259 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 55 Years to 85 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 54 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in Israel, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with the investigational drug ladostigil will delay the onset of Alzheimer's disease(AD) in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). MCI is now recognized as a precursor to AD and clinical tools are available to assess cognitive performance at this earlier stage. Ladostigil is currently under investigation for the treatment of AD. In this study, the investigators will be examining ladostigil at a lower dose level. At this dose level, ladostigil has been shown to reduce signs of early memory loss in animals. Thus, in this study the investigators are attempting to determine if earlier invention with a lower dose of ladostigil will significantly reduce initial memory loss and delay the subsequent progression to more serious cognitive dysfunction.

Read the detailed description

Ladostigil shows neuroprotective activity, reducing oxidative stress, activating microglia, and inhibiting pro-inflammatory cytokines in pre-clinical models. Study assessed its safety and potential efficacy in a 3-year, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Patients from 16 centers in Austria, Germany and Israel with MCI (Albert et al 2011), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) > 24, Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised Verbal Paired Associates ≤ 18, and medial temporal lobe atrophy were stratified by APOE4 genotype and randomly assigned (1:1 allocation) using blocks of 4, to receive either ladostigil, 10 mg per day, or placebo as identically-appearing capsules. The primary endpoint was onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Secondary endpoints were the NTB, DAD, and GDS. Exploratory outcomes were MRI-derived whole brain, hippocampus, and entorhinal cortex volumes; the NeuroTrax Mindstreams computerized cognitive battery; and the CDR. Between February 17, 2012 and August 1, 2013, we randomly allocated 210 patients to placebo (107 patients) or ladostigil (103 patients); 4 patients in each group lacked post baseline assessments. After 36 months 20.4% (21 of 103 patients) of the placebo group and 14.1% (14 of 99 patients) of the ladostigil group progressed to AD (log-rank test p=.16). There were no significant effects on NTB, DAD, or GDS outcomes. There was less decline in whole brain volume in the ladostigil group as compared to placebo (p\<.02), but not hippocampus and entorhinal cortex volumes, and CDR and a trend for less decline on the RAVLT total delayed score component of the NTB (p=.09). Fourteen patients taking placebo and 21 taking ladostigil discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Serious adverse events were reported by 26 (25.2%) patients in the ladostigil group and 28 (26.2%) patients in the placebo group. Ladostigil appeared safe, well-tolerated, and may have potential for improving memory and delaying progression to dementia.

03

Conditions studied

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Dementia

Keywords

  • Mild Cognitive Impairment
  • Early Stage Dementia
  • Conversion to Alzheimer's disease
  • Memory Impairment
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
55 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women (non-) with a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) according to consensus criteria as defined by Petersen
  • Abnormal memory function will be evaluated by Verbal Paired Associates from the Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised. Norm values for healthy adults in two age cohorts are: a) 50-70 years 19.7 (SD=2.9) and b) 75-95 years 18.3 (SD=2.8). Patients that score \< or = 23 will be included.
  • Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0.5 (Memory box score 0.5 or 1, no box score > 1)
  • (MMSE) > 24 and \< or = 30
  • General cognition and functional performance is sufficiently preserved such that a diagnosis of AD can be excluded by the site physician at the time of the screening visit.
  • No significant cerebrovascular disease indicated by Modified Hackinski Ischaemic Score equal to or below 4
  • Age 55-85 years based upon correlation of cognition and Scheltens score observed in this age range
  • Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) of \< or = 5
  • An informer who has frequent contact with the subject (e.g. an average of 10 hours per week or more) is available and agrees to monitor administration of study drug, to observe the subject for adverse events and to accompany the subject to clinical visits during the trial, if the presence of the informer is required.
  • All patients have to undergo an MRI scan after the screening visit, i.e. during the screening visit, irrespective of MRIs having been performed prior to entry into the study. MRI findings have to be consistent with a diagnosis of MCI.
  • Central rating of medial temporal lobe according to Scheltens scale. The right and left medial temporal structures will be rated separately and an overall estimate will be deduced using the average of the two ratings. An average score > 1 is required to make patients eligible for the study.
  • Adequate visual and auditory acuity must be demonstrated to allow for neuropsychological testing.
  • Good general health status acceptable for participation in a 36-month clinical trial, with no additional diseases expected to interfere with the study
  • without abnormalities according to exclusion criteria listed below
  • Subject is not pregnant, lactating or of childbearing potential (i.e. women must be two years post menopausal or surgically sterile)
  • Signed by patient and informer prior to any study specific procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to perform screening or baseline examinations
  • Any significant neurological disease other than suspected MCI
  • MRI exclusion criteria which allow for mild concomitant vascular lesions are:

    • Thromboembolic infarction
    • Other focal lesions which may be responsible for the cognitive status of the patient such as infectious disease, space-occupying lesions, normal pressure hydrocephalus or any other abnormalities associated with significant central nervous disease
    • More than one lacunar infarct defined as a focal lesion of CSF signal intensity with a diameter of \< 1.5cm in any dimension
    • Any lacunar infarct in a strategically important location such as the thalamus, hippocampus of either hemisphere, head of the left caudate
    • White matter lesions involving more than 25% of the hemispheric white matter
    • Implants such as pacemakers, insulin pumps, cochlear implants, nerve stimulators, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and other medical implants that have not been certified for MRI
    • Ferromagnetic foreign bodies such as shell fragments need to be considered on an individual basis
    • Metallic implants that can cause artifacts and RF induced heating such as surgical prostheses or aneurysm clips need to be considered on an individual basis
  • Clinical or laboratory findings consistent with:

    • Central nervous system diseases such as those resulting from severe head trauma, tumours, subdural haematomas or other space occupying processes, etc
    • Seizure disorder
    • Other infectious, metabolic or systemic diseases affecting central nervous system (syphilis, present hypothyroidism, present vitamin B12 or folate deficiency, serum electrolytes out of normal range, juvenile onset diabetes mellitus, etc)
  • History or evidence of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (DSM IV criteria); active major depression
  • advanced or unstable disease that may interfere with primary or secondary variable evaluations, and which may bias the assessment of the clinical or mental status of the patient or put the patient at special risk, such as:

    • Malignant tumours within the last five years except skin (other than melanoma) or indolent prostate cancer
    • History of myocardial infarction within one year prior to screening or unstable or severe cardiovascular disease including angina or congestive heart failure with symptoms at rest
    • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic pressure > 170mmHg or diastolic pressure > 100mmHg)
    • Bradycardia (persistent heart beat \< 50/min) or tachycardia ( persistent heart beat > 100/min)
    • AV block (type II / Mobitz II and type III), congenital long syndrome, sinus node dysfunction or prolonged QTcB-interval (males > 450msec, females > 470msec)
    • Clinically significant obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma
    • Clinically significant laboratory findings that indicate abnormalities in blood biochemistry, blood haematology or urinalysis
    • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus defined by > 8.5
    • Clinically significant liver disease, coagulopathy or vitamin K deficiency within the past two years prior to screening
    • Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > mg/dl or \< or = to 45ml/min according to Cockgroft-Gault formula); in case of creatinine clearance \< or = 45ml/min, an alternative verification of the renal function must be completed using cystatin C analysis. In case of normal level of cystatin C, the patient can be included in the study.
  • Any prior use of medications approved by local authorities for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (e.g. tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, memantine or other newly approved medications)
  • Disability that may prevent the subject from completing all study requirements (e.g. blindness, deafness, severe language difficulty, etc)
  • Women who are fertile and of child bearing potential
  • Chronic daily intake of antidepressants as noted in section 9.5 of the clinical study protocol
  • Suspected or known drug or alcohol abuse, i.e. more than approximately 60g alcohol (approximately 1 lter of beer or 0.5 liter of wine) per day as indicated by elevated MCV significantly above normal value at screening
  • Suspected or known allergy to any components of the study treatments
  • Enrollment in another study or intake of investigational drug within the previous three months
  • Any condition (e.g. epilepsy) which in the opinion of the investigator makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
210 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ladostigil hemitartrate

    10mg ladostigil base

    Drug: ladostigil hemitartrate

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Control

    drug product excipients

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drugladostigil hemitartrate

    10mg ladostigil base administered once daily as hard gelatin capsule

    Also known as: ladostigil, Ladostigil capsules

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo comparator

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Conversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Placebo

    Total number of conversions from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's disease across entire 3 year study period. Conversion is determined, or defined, by a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of greater than or equal to one. Composite rating ranges from 0 no symptoms of dementia to 3 Severe symptoms of dementia.

    Time frame: 3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Geriatric Depression Scale for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population

    Mean value change (from baseline) in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) across entire study period. The GDS ranges from 0 to 30. Scores of 0-9 are considered "normal", 10-19 "mildly depressed", and 20-30 "severely depressed".

    Time frame: 3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months

  2. Change in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population

    Mean value change (from baseline) in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery (NTB) across entire study period. The NTB included the following well known cognitive tests: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Controlled Word Association Test (COWAT), Category Fluency Test (CFT), WMS-R Digit Span, and Trail Making Part A and B. The mean value was comprised of the z score of each of these tests with all z scores in the direction of higher scores better functioning. Range -3 to +3.

    Time frame: 3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months

  3. Change in Disability Assessment in Dementia for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population

    Mean value change (from baseline) in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) across entire study period. DAD evaluates the basic and instrumental activities in daily activities of elderly people with dementia. Higher scores reflect better functioning. DAD ranges from 0 to 100.

    Time frame: 3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months

07

Results

Posted Jun 15, 2017

Participant flow

Recruitment between Feb. 17, 2012 and August 1, 2013.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLadostigil HemitartratePlacebo Control
Started102107
Converted to alzheimer's1421
Completed5148
Not completed5159
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Adverse event714
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1913
Withdrew: Physician decision23
Withdrew: Protocol violation32
Withdrew: Assorted12
Withdrew: Conversion to alzheimer's disease1421
Withdrew: No post baseline data44

Outcome measures

PrimaryConversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Placebo

Total number of conversions from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's disease across entire 3 year study period. Conversion is determined, or defined, by a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of greater than or equal to one. Composite rating ranges from 0 no symptoms of dementia to 3 Severe symptoms of dementia.

Time frame:
3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Conversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Placebo
ParticipantsLadostigil HemitartratePlacebo Control
Conversion From Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's Disease Compared to Placebo1421
Statistical analysis
  • Ladostigil Hemitartrate vs Placebo Control · Log Rank · p = <0.16 · Odds ratio (or): 1.55 · 95% CI 0.74 to 3.25
SecondaryChange in Geriatric Depression Scale for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population

Mean value change (from baseline) in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) across entire study period. The GDS ranges from 0 to 30. Scores of 0-9 are considered "normal", 10-19 "mildly depressed", and 20-30 "severely depressed".

Time frame:
3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · Change from basline on units on a scale
Change in Geriatric Depression Scale for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population
Change from basline on units on a scaleLadostigil HemitartratePlacebo Control
Change in Geriatric Depression Scale for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population.084 ± 1.70.242 ± 1.87
Statistical analysis
  • Ladostigil Hemitartrate vs Placebo Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.61 · Mean difference (net): .37
SecondaryChange in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population

Mean value change (from baseline) in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery (NTB) across entire study period. The NTB included the following well known cognitive tests: Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Controlled Word Association Test (COWAT), Category Fluency Test (CFT), WMS-R Digit Span, and Trail Making Part A and B. The mean value was comprised of the z score of each of these tests with all z scores in the direction of higher scores better functioning. Range -3 to +3.

Time frame:
3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · Change from basline on units on a scale
Change in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population
Change from basline on units on a scaleLadostigil HemitartratePlacebo Control
Change in Neuropsychiatric Test Battery for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population.21 ± .55.17 ± .43
Statistical analysis
  • Ladostigil Hemitartrate vs Placebo Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.32 · Mean difference (net): -0.066
SecondaryChange in Disability Assessment in Dementia for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population

Mean value change (from baseline) in Disability Assessment in Dementia (DAD) across entire study period. DAD evaluates the basic and instrumental activities in daily activities of elderly people with dementia. Higher scores reflect better functioning. DAD ranges from 0 to 100.

Time frame:
3,6,12,18,24,30 and 36 months
Reported as:
Mean · Change from basline on units on a scale
Change in Disability Assessment in Dementia for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population
Change from basline on units on a scaleLadostigil HemitartratePlacebo Control
Change in Disability Assessment in Dementia for Ladostigil Versus Placebo Population-0.77 ± 8.43-0.40 ± 5.11
Statistical analysis
  • Ladostigil Hemitartrate vs Placebo Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.97 · Mean difference (net): .79

Adverse events

Collected over 36 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ladostigil Hemitartrate1/103 (1%)26/103 (25.2%)56/103 (54.4%)
Placebo Control0/107 (0%)28/107 (26.2%)59/107 (55.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 73
Most frequent serious events
EventLadostigil HemitartratePlacebo Control
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders0/1034/107
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1033/107
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders2/1030/107
SyncopeNervous system disorders2/1030/107
Glaucoma surgerySurgical and medical procedures2/1030/107
Confusional statePsychiatric disorders0/1032/107
Angina unstableCardiac disorders1/1030/107
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders1/1030/107
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders1/1030/107
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders1/1030/107
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventLadostigil HemitartratePlacebo Control
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations11/10313/107
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/10310/107
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders7/1034/107
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/1035/107
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/1037/107
FatigueGeneral disorders4/1037/107
Catarct operationSurgical and medical procedures3/1037/107
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders6/1033/107
DepressionPsychiatric disorders6/1033/107

Baseline characteristics

103 were randomized to ladostigil, however 1 subject withdrew consent before first dose.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Ladostigil HemitartratePlacebo ControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years151631
>=65 years8891179
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Ladostigil HemitartratePlacebo ControlTotal
Mean71.3 ± 6.371.4 ± 6.871.35 ± 6.54
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Ladostigil HemitartratePlacebo ControlTotal
Female364177
Male6766133
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Ladostigil HemitartratePlacebo ControlTotal
Austria232447
Israel475097
Germany333366
08

Study locations

12 sites
  • Medizinische Universitat Graz, Abteilung fur Neurologie
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Landeskrankenhaus Hall, Memory Klinik
    Hall in Tirol, 6060, Austria
  • Privatordination Rainer
    Wien, 1130, Austria
  • Studienambulanz St. Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin, Emovis GmbH
    Berlin, 13088, Germany
  • Otto-von-Guericke-Universitat, Universitatsklinik fur Neurologie und fur Stereotaktische
    Magdeburg, 30120, Germany
  • Studienzentrum Nordwest
    Westerstede, 26655, Germany
  • Department of Geriatrics and Memory Clinic, Mental Health Center, Israel
    Beersheva, 84170, Israel
  • Cognitive Neurology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus
    Haifa, 31096, Israel
  • Cognitive Clinic, Department of Geriatrics, Carmel Medical Center
    Haifa, 34362, Israel
  • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hadassah University Hospital, PO Box 24035
    Jerusalem, 91240, Israel
  • Memory Clinic, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer
    Ramat Gan, 52621, Israel
  • Center for Memory and Attention Disorders, Department of Neurology, Sourasky Medical Center
    Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Winblad B, Palmer K, Kivipelto M, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L, Wahlund LO, Nordberg A, Backman L, Albert M, Almkvist O, Arai H, Basun H, Blennow K, de Leon M, DeCarli C, Erkinjuntti T, Giacobini E, Graff C, Hardy J, Jack C, Jorm A, Ritchie K, van Duijn C, Visser P, Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment--beyond controversies, towards a consensus: report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Intern Med. 2004 Sep;256(3):240-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x. PubMed 15324367 ↗
  • DeCarli C, Frisoni GB, Clark CM, Harvey D, Grundman M, Petersen RC, Thal LJ, Jin S, Jack CR Jr, Scheltens P; Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Group. Qualitative estimates of medial temporal atrophy as a predictor of progression from mild cognitive impairment to dementia. Arch Neurol. 2007 Jan;64(1):108-15. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.1.108. Erratum In: Arch Neurol. 2007 Mar;64(3):459. PubMed 17210817 ↗
  • Schneider LS, Geffen Y, Rabinowitz J, Thomas RG, Schmidt R, Ropele S, Weinstock M; Ladostigil Study Group. Low-dose ladostigil for mild cognitive impairment: A phase 2 placebo-controlled clinical trial. Neurology. 2019 Oct 8;93(15):e1474-e1484. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008239. Epub 2019 Sep 6. PubMed 31492718 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2012, a primary completion of Jul 2016 and a completion of Sep 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2017, 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 3, 2011
First posted
Sep 7, 2011
Start
Feb 2012
Primary completionActual
Jul 2016
CompletionActual
Sep 2016
Results first posted
Jun 15, 2017
Last update
Jun 15, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 15, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01429623
Lead sponsor
Avraham Pharmaceuticals Ltd
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2011
Start date
Feb 2012
Primary completion
Jul 2016
Completion
Sep 2016
Results posted
Jun 15, 2017
Last update
Jun 15, 2017

Study contacts

Tzvi Dwolatzky, MD
principal investigator · Director, Department of Geriatrics and Memory Clinic, Mental Health Center, Israel P.O. Box 4600, Beersheva 84170

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion