An interventional study of Angioplasty performed via Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon catheter and Angioplasty via DES in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Medical University of Vienna. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-07-21.
Sponsored by Medical University of Vienna · Not applicable and Interventional
The aim of the study is to show the safety and efficacy of the SeQuent® Please (Drug Eluting Balloon or DEB) vs. commonly used Drug Eluting Stents in the treatment of small vessel disease and side branches by pressure wire guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
This study is a randomized, prospective, multi-center, efficacy study with a DES control group assessing the 6-month loss in FFR in patients treated with the "matrix coated paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-balloon catheter" SeQuent® Please and commonly used DES for small vessel de novo and side branch lesions. 100 patients will be studied in total with two equivalent treatment groups DEB \& DES of 50 patients each.
5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.
Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →Medical University of Vienna is the lead sponsor of 1,076 studies on the registry; 177 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon (DEB) dilatation and bare metal stenting
Device: Angioplasty performed via Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon catheter
Device: Angioplasty via DES
Angioplasty performed via commonly used Drug Eluting Stents
Loss in fractional flow reserve (FFR) at 6 months for both treatment groups
Time frame: 6 month
Occurrence of acute (up to 48 hours), subacute (up to 30 days) and late stent thrombosis
Time frame: acute: <48h; subacute: < 30days
NACCE rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months
Time frame: 30days, 6 and 12 month
Procedural success
Percent in-stent stenosis, in-segment stenosis, in-stent late lumen loss and in-segment late lumen loss at 6 months follow-up
Percent in-stent stenosis, in-segment stenosis, in-stent late lumen loss and in-segment late lumen loss at 6 months follow-up
Time frame: 6 month
Angiographic in-stent restenosis rate of the target lesion (≥ 50 % stenosis) at 6 months from the procedure
Time frame: 6 month
Angiographic in-segment stenosis rate of the target lesion (≥ 50 % stenosis) at 6 months from the procedure
Time frame: 6 month
Indication for premature follow-up
Target vessel failure
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Medical University of Vienna