CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01376440Updated Jan 24, 2012

Acceptability and Effectiveness of Household Water Treatment in Reducing Diarrhea Among Under Five Children

A Phase 1 interventional study of household water treatment in Acute Diarrhoea, sponsored by Haramaya Unversity. Completed at 1 site in Ethiopia. Open to participants aged 1 Month to 59 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-01-24.

Sponsored by Haramaya Unversity · Phase 1, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
845
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
1 Month to 59 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Millenium development goals (MDGs) call for reducing by half the proportion of people without sustainable access to safe drinking water. This goal was adopted in large part because safe drinking water has been seen as critical to fighting diarrheal disease. Source protection is considered the main intervention area to achieve this goal. However, research worldwide that has shown that even drinking water which is safe at the source is subject to frequent and extensive fecal contamination during collection, storage and use in the home. This contamination is through the introduction of cups, dippers or hands, contamination by flies, cockroaches, and rats. Even piped water supplies of adequate microbial quality can pose infectious disease risks if they become contaminated due to unsanitary collection, storage conditions and practices within households.

To reduce this problem, point-of-use water treatment has been advocated as a means to substantially decrease the global burden of diarrhea and to contribute to the MDGs. However, research indicates that there are many unanswered questions around Household water treatment (HWT) that require small or medium scale epidemiological studies and randomized controlled trials, especially with regard to effectiveness, acceptability and identifying suitable target populations. Some of the most urgent questions to be resolved are:(1) How much of the currently cited disease reduction of HWT is due to bias? (2) What is the effect of HWT on nutritional status (weight gain and growth)?(3) At which populations should HWT be targeted? (4) Is it acceptable and sustainable in poor communities where the risk of diarrheal disease is high.

hypothesis: Do household water treatment with chlorine reduce diarrhea among underfive children? hypothesis: Do household water treatment with chlorine acceptable in the community?

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Diarrhoea

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • three or more loss stools in 24 hours
03

In context

Diarrhea

852 studies on the registry are indexed under Diarrhea; 78 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 845 is above the median of 136 across 713 interventional studies indexed under Diarrhea.

Browse Diarrhea studies →

Lead sponsor

Haramaya Unversity is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Month to 59 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All children under five years of age in the randomly selected clusters of Kersa district

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • seriously sick children in the randomly selected clusters of Kersa district
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
845 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Household water treatment

    household water treatment with 1.25% sodium hypochlorite

    Other: household water treatment

  • No intervention
    control

    Usual practice (the use of "Jerrican" for water storage, which is considered as safe storage)

Interventions

  • Otherhousehold water treatment

    household water treatment with 1.25% sodium hypochlorite

    Also known as: 1.25% sodium hypochlorite

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess the prevalence of diarrhea among under five children

    weekly visit of the household for the presence of diarrhoea among underfive for four months in both the intervention and control groups

    Time frame: four months

Secondary outcomes

  1. To assess the weight gain among the intervention and control groups of under five children

    This is designed to assess whether there is weight gain (objective outcome) in children assigned to the intervention group compared to the control group. It is supplement to the prevalence of diarrhea which is subjective outcome for this study

    Time frame: At the beginning and end of the study ( 4 months interval)

  2. Residual chlorine test

    The use of the intervention (1.25% hypochlorite) is confirmed by the testing the residual chlorine weekly for for months from each household assigned in the intrevention group

    Time frame: four months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Kersa district
    Kersa, Eastern Hararage 235, Ethiopia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mengistie B, Berhane Y, Worku A. Household water chlorination reduces incidence of diarrhea among under-five children in rural Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 23;8(10):e77887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077887. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24194899 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 24, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01376440
Lead sponsor
Haramaya Unversity
Responsible party
Bezatu Mengiste (Mr, Haramaya Unversity) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 20, 2011
Start date
Jun 2011
Primary completion
Oct 2011
Completion
Oct 2011
Last update
Jan 24, 2012

Study contacts

Bezatu M Alemu, M.Sc
principal investigator · Assistant professor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion