CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01376414Updated Aug 26, 2016

H. Pylori Testing for Patients With Non-specific Upper Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department

An observational study in Gastritis, Peptic Ulcer and Peptic Ulcer Perforation, sponsored by George Washington University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-26.

Sponsored by George Washington University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
212
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot study aims to estimate the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) colonization in patients presenting with non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP) in an urban academic emergency department (ED) located in Washington, DC.

Read the detailed description

The major goal is to study the prevalence of H. pylori using the 13C Urea Breath Test (UBT) in emergency department (ED) patients with non-specific abdominal pain. The investigators plan to enroll 250 patients during the pilot stage of this study. This T2 translational trial aims to apply recommended guidelines for the investigation and management of NSAP and dyspepsia into the practical arena of ED clinical care. The "test-and-treat" approach to symptomatic H. pylori infection has been endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA). Patients who test positive for H. pylori by UBT will be treated with clarithromycin-based triple medication therapy as recommended by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) at the discretion of the treating physician. The rationale is that successful identification of H. pylori in the ED and initiation of treatment may reduce future risk of gastritis, gastric lymphoma, and gastric cancer, and is cost-effective through reduction of future healthcare costs and symptom severity. Study subjects will be followed for medication compliance, resolution of symptoms, and ability to obtain outpatient follow-up. As part of this study, the investigators will be collecting important information on the ED evaluation of abdominal pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastritis
  • Peptic Ulcer
  • Peptic Ulcer Perforation
  • Stomach Ulcer

Keywords

  • dyspepsia
  • abdominal
  • pain
  • helicobacter
  • pylori
  • [C06.405.748.398]
  • [C06.405.748.586]
  • [C06.405.748.586.698]
  • [C06.405.748.586.849]
03

In context

Gastritis

196 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastritis; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 212 is below the median of 400 across 79 observational studies indexed under Gastritis.

Browse Gastritis studies →

Lead sponsor

George Washington University is the lead sponsor of 187 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 11 (85%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

All adult patients (>18 years) presenting to the ED with symptoms of abdominal pain will be screened for eligibility. The ED is a single site urban academic level one trauma center.

Inclusion criteria

For any patient with chief complaint of "ABD", "STOM", "EPIG", "CHEST", "NAUS" "Do you have pain or discomfort or burning in your upper abdomen as the main reason for coming to ER today?"

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient LESS than 18 years old.
  • Patient does NOT speak English NOR has reliable adult translator.
  • Patient does NOT have capacity to give consent? (confused/intoxicated/etc.)
  • The patient currently is on antibiotics.
  • The patient currently is on a PPI. (eg. Prilosec [omeprazole]), protonix [pantoprazole], prevacid [lansoprazole], aciphex [rabeprazole], nexium [esomeprazole]
  • The patient has taken bismuth or pepto-bismol today.
  • The patient is known to be or suspected to be pregnant.
  • The patient UNABLE to walk to H.pylori Breath test.
  • The patient had "recent" negative H.pylori test for same symptoms.
  • There an "obvious alternative cause" for pain (per attending).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
212 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Non specific upper abdominal pain

    Cohort is patients who present to the Emergency Department with primary complaint of upper abdominal pain without obvious cause.

    Other: Urea Breath Test (UBT) for H. pylori infection

Interventions

  • OtherUrea Breath Test (UBT) for H. pylori infection

    13C UBT to detect H. pylori infection. Single bedside test that determines infection in about ten minutes. Test machine is a product of Exalenz bioscience.

    Also known as: 13C, UBT, H. pylori, helicobacter, gastric, ulcers, dyspepsia, emergency, abdominal pain, exalenz

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of H. pylori infection in ED patients with symptomatic abdominal pain

    Prevalence of H. pylori infection diagnosed by UBT in patients with symptomatic upper abdominal pain treated in the ED.

    Time frame: 6 momths

Secondary outcomes

  1. SES measures

    DoeS SES correlate with HP infection?

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • George Washington University Hospital
    Washington, District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • GWU Hospital
    Washington, District of Columbia 20037, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01376414
Lead sponsor
George Washington University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 20, 2011
Start date
Mar 2011
Primary completion
Aug 2014
Completion
Mar 2015
Last update
Aug 26, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion