CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01367457Updated Apr 27, 2016Results posted

INHIBITOR: Retrospective Study Of Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma And Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treated With Temsirolimus

An observational study in Carcinoma, Renal Cell and Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 16 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-27.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
243
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The principal objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of temsirolimus use in patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Read the detailed description

There is not sampling method

02

Conditions studied

  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell
  • Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 243 is above the median of 136 across 625 observational studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma or Mantle Cell Lymphoma that have been treated with Temsirolimus as per clinical practice.

Inclusion criteria

Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma or Mantle Cell Lymphoma that have been treated with Temsirolimus as per clinical practice.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients that do not have a minimum (pre-specified) of data in their clinical record.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
243 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients that received treatment with Temsirolimus

    Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma or Mantle Cell Lymphoma that have been treated with Temsirolimus as per clinical practice.

    Other: Temsirolimus (Non-Interventional Study)

Interventions

  • OtherTemsirolimus (Non-Interventional Study)

    There is not any intervention in this study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    Progression-free survival: interval between start of treatment to first day when progressive disease (PD) was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for participants with RCC and Cheson criteria for participants with MCL, or death due to any cause. RECIST criteria: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum. In addition to relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). Appearance of one or more new lesions also considered progression. Cheson criteria: appearance of any new sites of lymphoma OR at least 50% increase in product of longest perpendicular dimensions of any previously identified lymph node mass (LNM) OR at least 50% increase in longest dimension of any previously identified LNM greater than 1 cm in longest transverse dimension OR at least 50% increase in size of any previously involved site of lymphoma.

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment up to disease progression (up to 80 months)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

    Objective response: percentage of participants who achieved complete remission (CR) or partial response (PR). RECIST criteria was used for participants with RCC and Cheson criteria for participants with MCL. RECIST criteria (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes(target or non-target) reduced in short axis to \<10 mm, PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions). Cheson criteria (CR: all lymph node masses regressed to normal size, each lymph node mass that was \>1.5 cm in longest transverse dimension regressed to \<=1.5 cm, lymph node mass that was 1.1-1.5 cm regressed to \<=1 cm, complete disappearance of all radiographic evidence of disease, PR: at least 50% decrease in sum of products of the longest perpendicular dimensions of the previously identified dominant lymph node masses, no increase in size of other lymph nodes.)

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment up to disease progression (up to 80 months)

  3. Duration of Response (DOR)

    Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the interval from the date the response was documented to the first date that progression of disease (PD) was observed in participants with PR or CR. RECIST criteria was used for participants with RCC and Cheson criteria for participants with MCL. PD, CR and PR are defined in primary outcome 1 and 2.

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment up to disease progression (up to 80 months)

  4. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the day of the start of the treatment to death, or censored to the last date when the participant was identified to be alive.

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment untill death (up to 80 months)

  5. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent events were between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs).

    Time frame: Baseline to the 28 calendar days after the last administration of study drug (upto 80 months)

07

Results

Posted Apr 27, 2016

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCL: Temsirolimus + Rituximab
Started1932326
Completed52326
Not completed18800
Withdrew: Death200
Withdrew: Investigator's decision200
Withdrew: Clinical decline (cd)200
Withdrew: Progression and death800
Withdrew: Toxicity1600
Withdrew: Progression13700
Withdrew: Patient asks for rest + slow progression100
Withdrew: Investigator's opinion, stable disease100
Withdrew: Bleeding from cavernous haemangioma100
Withdrew: 3 yr temsirolimus treatment (no disease)100
Withdrew: Low grade toxicities + stable disease100
Withdrew: Choledocolithiasis and pancreatitis100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100
Withdrew: Cd, associated leukaemia100
Withdrew: Uncontrolled pain100
Withdrew: Overall status worsens to grade 4100
Withdrew: Stabilisation + frequent infections100
Withdrew: No clinical benefit100
Withdrew: Intestinal obstruction with necrosis100
Withdrew: Overall decline100
Withdrew: Rejection of treatment100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up100
Withdrew: Death from septic shock100
Withdrew: Cd, suspected disease progression (dp)100
Withdrew: Patient's wish100
Withdrew: Palliative. overall decline100
Withdrew: Suspected dp/suspected active infection100

Outcome measures

PrimaryProgression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival: interval between start of treatment to first day when progressive disease (PD) was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) for participants with RCC and Cheson criteria for participants with MCL, or death due to any cause. RECIST criteria: at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum. In addition to relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter (mm). Appearance of one or more new lesions also considered progression. Cheson criteria: appearance of any new sites of lymphoma OR at least 50% increase in product of longest perpendicular dimensions of any previously identified lymph node mass (LNM) OR at least 50% increase in longest dimension of any previously identified LNM greater than 1 cm in longest transverse dimension OR at least 50% increase in size of any previously involved site of lymphoma.

Time frame:
From initiation of treatment up to disease progression (up to 80 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
monthsRCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCC: Temsirolimus + Rituximab
Progression-free Survival (PFS)4.04 (3.03 to 5.05)7.467 (4.171 to 10.763)13.233 (3.306 to 23.161)
PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Objective Response

Objective response: percentage of participants who achieved complete remission (CR) or partial response (PR). RECIST criteria was used for participants with RCC and Cheson criteria for participants with MCL. RECIST criteria (CR: disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes(target or non-target) reduced in short axis to \<10 mm, PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions). Cheson criteria (CR: all lymph node masses regressed to normal size, each lymph node mass that was \>1.5 cm in longest transverse dimension regressed to \<=1.5 cm, lymph node mass that was 1.1-1.5 cm regressed to \<=1 cm, complete disappearance of all radiographic evidence of disease, PR: at least 50% decrease in sum of products of the longest perpendicular dimensions of the previously identified dominant lymph node masses, no increase in size of other lymph nodes.)

Time frame:
From initiation of treatment up to disease progression (up to 80 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
percentage of participantsRCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCC: Temsirolimus + Rituximab
CR0.534.830.8
PR14.317.450.0
SD46.626.17.7
DP38.621.711.5
PrimaryDuration of Response (DOR)

Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the interval from the date the response was documented to the first date that progression of disease (PD) was observed in participants with PR or CR. RECIST criteria was used for participants with RCC and Cheson criteria for participants with MCL. PD, CR and PR are defined in primary outcome 1 and 2.

Time frame:
From initiation of treatment up to disease progression (up to 80 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response (DOR)
monthsRCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCC: Temsirolimus + Rituximab
Duration of Response (DOR)13.21 (8.55 to 17.87)7.28 (4.23 to 9.85)8.82 (6.42 to 13.16)
PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the day of the start of the treatment to death, or censored to the last date when the participant was identified to be alive.

Time frame:
From initiation of treatment untill death (up to 80 months)
Reported as:
Median · months
Overall Survival (OS)
monthsRCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCC: Temsirolimus + Rituximab
Overall Survival (OS)10.81 (8.20 to 13.42)19.233 (3.052 to 35.415)18.667 (NA to NA)
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent events were between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious adverse events (Non-SAEs).

Time frame:
Baseline to the 28 calendar days after the last administration of study drug (upto 80 months)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
participantsRCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCC: Temsirolimus + Rituximab
AEs1451916
SAEs1837

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
RCC: Temsirolimus—18/193 (9.3%)142/193 (73.6%)
MCL: Temsirolimus—3/23 (13%)18/23 (78.3%)
MCL: Temsirolimus + Rituximab—7/26 (26.9%)14/26 (53.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 28
Most frequent serious events
EventRCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCL: Temsirolimus + Rituximab
OthersGeneral disorders1/1930/232/26
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/1931/230/26
PneumoniaInfections and infestations0/1931/231/26
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1931/230/26
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1930/231/26
Interstitial lung diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1930/231/26
Aspergillus infectionInfections and infestations0/1930/231/26
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations0/1930/231/26
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1930/231/26
Atrioventricular block completeCardiac disorders0/1930/231/26
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 104
Most frequent other events
EventRCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCL: Temsirolimus + Rituximab
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders11/19312/235/26
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders58/1934/233/26
AstheniaGeneral disorders43/1934/231/26
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders41/1931/231/26
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders13/1933/234/26
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders26/1932/233/26
HyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders23/1933/232/26
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/1931/233/26
HypercholesterolaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders19/1932/230/26
PneumonitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders17/1932/232/26

Baseline characteristics

Baseline population included all participants with RCC or MCL who received atleast 1 dose of study treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)RCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCL: Temsirolimus + RituximabTotal
Mean65.27 ± 11.1470.56 ± 11.0772.34 ± 7.1166.54 ± 11.04
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)RCC: TemsirolimusMCL: TemsirolimusMCL: Temsirolimus + RituximabTotal
Female573363
Male1362023179
08

Study locations

16 sites
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
    Oviedo, Asturias 33006, Spain
  • Hospital de Cabueñes
    Cabueñes, Gijon 33394, Spain
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario
    Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña 15706, Spain
  • Complejo Hospitalario Materno-Infantil Insular de Las Palmas
    Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas 35016, Spain
  • Hospital de Navarra
    Pamplona, Navarra 31008, Spain
  • Hospital Provincial de Castellon
    Castellon, Valencia 12002, Spain
  • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
    A Coruña, 15006, Spain
  • Complejo AAsistencial de Avilla
    Avila, 05004, Spain
  • Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
    Barcelona, 08025, Spain
  • Hospital Vall D'Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital del Mar
    Barcelona, 8940, Spain
  • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña. Hospital Teresa Herrera
    La Coruña, 15006, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center
    Madrid, 28033, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Hospital de Madrid Norte - Sanchinarro
    Madrid, 28050, Spain
09

References and documents

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 27, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01367457
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 7, 2011
Start date
Jan 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Results posted
Apr 27, 2016
Last update
Apr 27, 2016

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion