CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01352182Updated Sep 2, 2020Results posted

Pharmacokinetic and Biomarker Study of Pioglitazone in Adolescents With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Pioglitazone hydrochloride in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-02.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone and to determine the effect on inflammatory biomarkers for pioglitazone in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Read the detailed description

Severe sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among adults and children. Few clinical trials have demonstrated clinical benefit in sepsis. Severe sepsis is a systemic inflammatory syndrome in response to infection that is associated with acute organ dysfunction. The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARg) is involved in the regulation of the sepsis-induced inflammatory response. The central hypothesis is that pioglitazone reduces the inflammatory responses in children with severe sepsis and septic shock.

02

Conditions studied

  • Severe Sepsis
  • Septic Shock
03

In context

Sepsis

1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 105 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 661 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 54 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Weight range between 30 to less than or equal to 90kg
  • Have a known or suspected infection and meet criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock as defined according to the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference guidelines

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Are in a moribund state in which death is perceived as imminent
  • Have an advanced directive or do not resuscitate order to withhold life-sustaining
  • Have a history of cyanotic heart disease or congestive heart failure
  • Have a serum transaminase level (ALT) that exceeds about 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (>112 unit/L)
  • Are or become pregnant
  • Are already on or have a history of taking pioglitazone or rosiglitazone
  • Have type 1 or 2 diabetes
  • Have total body weight below 30 kg or above 90 kg
  • Have a serious condition, in addition to sepsis, which in the opinion of the investigator would compromise the participant
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pioglitazone hydrochloride

    Pioglitazone hydrochloride treatment group

    Drug: Pioglitazone hydrochloride

  • No intervention
    Normal standard care

    Normal standard care control group

Interventions

  • DrugPioglitazone hydrochloride

    Participants will receive a daily dose of pioglitazone at 0.5 mg/kg/dose for 5 days.

    Also known as: Actos

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the Safety Profile of Pioglitazone in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock as the Number of Hypoglycemic Events

    The number of hypoglycemic events in pioglitazone vs standard care. Hypoglycemia was defined as blood glucose level that remains \<40mg/dl despite dextrose bolus treatment.

    Time frame: Assessement over five days

  2. Safety Labs - Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)

    BUN levels in blood from subject on the final day of enrollment

    Time frame: Final day of study

  3. Safety Labs - Creatinine

    Creatinine levels in blood from subject on the final day of enrollment

    Time frame: Final day of study

  4. Safety Labs - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

    ALT levels in blood from subject on the final day of enrollment

    Time frame: Final day of study

  5. Pioglitazone Area Under Curve Estimates by Treatment Group and Route of Administration

    Pioglitazone concentration as the total area under curve divided by the number of days receiving the drug in subjects who took the drug by mouth versus by naso-gastric tube

    Time frame: five days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effect of Pioglitazone Area Under the Curve on Changes in IL-6

    We examined the effect of pioglitazone Area under the curve on IL-6 in patients receiving pioglitazone only. (Control subjects did not receive pioglitazone). The pharmacokinetic endpoint was area under the curve (AUC) total/days of pioglitazone administration

    Time frame: Evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers will be obtained prior to dosing for the first five days of the study

07

Results

Posted Sep 2, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Small sample size

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard Care
Started84
Completed84
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryEvaluate the Safety Profile of Pioglitazone in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock as the Number of Hypoglycemic Events

The number of hypoglycemic events in pioglitazone vs standard care. Hypoglycemia was defined as blood glucose level that remains \<40mg/dl despite dextrose bolus treatment.

Time frame:
Assessement over five days
Reported as:
Number · events
Evaluate the Safety Profile of Pioglitazone in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock as the Number of Hypoglycemic Events
eventsPioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard Care
Evaluate the Safety Profile of Pioglitazone in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock as the Number of Hypoglycemic Events00
Statistical analysis
  • Pioglitazone Hydrochloride vs Normal Standard Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 1.0
PrimarySafety Labs - Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)

BUN levels in blood from subject on the final day of enrollment

Time frame:
Final day of study
Reported as:
Median · mg/dl
Safety Labs - Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
mg/dlPioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard Care
Safety Labs - Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)7.5 (6 to 18.75)10 (5.25 to 15.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Pioglitazone Hydrochloride vs Normal Standard Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 1.0 (threshold for significance p\<0.05)
PrimarySafety Labs - Creatinine

Creatinine levels in blood from subject on the final day of enrollment

Time frame:
Final day of study
Reported as:
Median · mg/dl
Safety Labs - Creatinine
mg/dlPioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard Care
Safety Labs - Creatinine0.72 (0.39 to 0.778)0.415 (0.305 to 0.593)
Statistical analysis
  • Pioglitazone Hydrochloride vs Normal Standard Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.154 (threshold for significance p\<0.05)
PrimarySafety Labs - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

ALT levels in blood from subject on the final day of enrollment

Time frame:
Final day of study
Reported as:
Median · U/L
Safety Labs - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)
U/LPioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard Care
Safety Labs - Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)21.5 (13.5 to 25.25)24.5 (11 to 27.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Pioglitazone Hydrochloride vs Normal Standard Care · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.683 (significance threshold p\<0.05)
PrimaryPioglitazone Area Under Curve Estimates by Treatment Group and Route of Administration

Pioglitazone concentration as the total area under curve divided by the number of days receiving the drug in subjects who took the drug by mouth versus by naso-gastric tube

Time frame:
five days
Reported as:
Mean · ng*h/ml
Pioglitazone Area Under Curve Estimates by Treatment Group and Route of Administration
ng*h/mlPioglitazone Hydrochloride by MouthPioglitazone Hydrochloride by Nasogastric Tube
Pioglitazone Area Under Curve Estimates by Treatment Group and Route of Administration5363 ± 23621052 ± 942
Statistical analysis
  • Pioglitazone Hydrochloride by Mouth vs Pioglitazone Hydrochloride by Nasogastric Tube · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.08 (significance threshold p\<0.05)
SecondaryEffect of Pioglitazone Area Under the Curve on Changes in IL-6

We examined the effect of pioglitazone Area under the curve on IL-6 in patients receiving pioglitazone only. (Control subjects did not receive pioglitazone). The pharmacokinetic endpoint was area under the curve (AUC) total/days of pioglitazone administration

Time frame:
Evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers will be obtained prior to dosing for the first five days of the study
Reported as:
Least squares mean · ng/ml
Effect of Pioglitazone Area Under the Curve on Changes in IL-6
ng/mlPioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard Care
Effect of Pioglitazone Area Under the Curve on Changes in IL-6-1.4425 ± 0.3741NA ± NA
Statistical analysis
  • Pioglitazone Hydrochloride · Regression, Linear · p = 0.003 · Slope: -1.44

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were monitored for each subject throughout each subject's hospitalization which ranged from 4 days to 30 days for control subjects and 4 days to 23 days for pioglitazone subjects.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pioglitazone Hydrochloride2/8 (25%)2/8 (25%)5/8 (62.5%)
Normal Standard Care0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)2/4 (50%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard Care
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/80/4
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders1/80/4
Severe biventricular dysfunctionCardiac disorders1/80/4
mediastinal hemorrhageRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/80/4
Surgical and medical procedures - OtherSurgical and medical procedures1/80/4
ventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders1/80/4
ventricular fibrillationCardiac disorders1/80/4
hemolysisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/80/4
intracranial hemorrhageNervous system disorders1/80/4
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 39
Most frequent other events
EventPioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard Care
FeverGeneral disorders5/80/4
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/82/4
HypoalbuminemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/82/4
HypokalemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders2/82/4
HypophosphatemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/81/4
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/80/4
Complaint of chest painCardiac disorders0/81/4
Sinus tachycardiaCardiac disorders1/81/4
Adrenal insufficiencyEndocrine disorders1/81/4
PancreatitisGastrointestinal disorders0/81/4

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard CareTotal
Mean13.8 ± 3.520.8 ± 9.716.083 ± 6.721
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard CareTotal
Female336
Male516
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard CareTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White8412
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Pioglitazone HydrochlorideNormal Standard CareTotal
United States8412
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kaplan JM, Denenberg A, Monaco M, Nowell M, Wong H, Zingarelli B. Changes in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activity in children with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jan;36(1):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1654-6. Epub 2009 Sep 17. PubMed 19760394 ↗
  • Sherwin CM, Ding L, Kaplan J, Spigarelli MG, Vinks AA. Optimal study design for pioglitazone in septic pediatric patients. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2011 Aug;38(4):433-47. doi: 10.1007/s10928-011-9202-8. Epub 2011 Jun 11. PubMed 21667139 ↗
  • Kaplan JM, Zingarelli B, Krallman K, Tang Girdwood S, Lagory D, Mizuno T, Fei L, Wong HR, Vinks AA. Phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetic study on the use of pioglitazone in critically ill patients with sepsis: a randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):2006-2008. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5374-7. Epub 2018 Sep 25. No abstract available. PubMed 30255316 ↗

Related links

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 2, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01352182
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 11, 2011
Start date
Oct 2011
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
Jan 2017
Results posted
Sep 2, 2020
Last update
Sep 2, 2020

Study contacts

Jennifer M. Kaplan, M.D., M.S.
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion