CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01348074DOSIDOUpdated Apr 5, 2016

Reinitiation of Anticoagulation After Temporary Withdrawal of Vitamin K Antagonist

A Phase 2 interventional study of Double dose in Atrial Fibrillation, Venous Thromboembolism and Heart Valve Disease, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-05.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is not known how to best restart warfarin after temporary withdrawal. Participants will be randomized to two groups. Group 1 will restart warfarin at their usual maintenance dose, group 2 will restart warfarin at double their maintenance dose for two days followed by their usual maintenance dose. The main outcome parameter will be the number of patients who are back in therapeutic INR (international normalized ratio) range 4, and 9 days after restarting anticoagulation with warfarin. Thromboembolic and/or bleeding events will be recorded as additional parameters. These data will be collected by a standardized telephone interview at 1 month. In addition, the investigators will evaluate a possible prothrombotic state by measuring the potential of thrombin generation and D-dimers in the subset of patients visiting HHS-General Hospital for their INR tests.

Read the detailed description

We will investigate if it is feasible to use double maintenance dose for the first two administrations of vitamin K antagonists when these drugs were temporarily interrupted and thus keep the time of an increased risk of thromboembolism and duration of "bridging" at a minimum. The control group will consist of patients who resume vitamin K antagonists at their usual maintenance dose. The aim of the study is to establish how to best restart anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists after temporal withdrawal of these drugs. The main outcome parameter will be the proportion of patients who are back to a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) ratio at certain days after restarting vitamin K antagonists. Two additional parameters will be evaluated: Firstly, bleeding and thromboembolic complications will be reported and secondly, a possible prothrombotic state, measured as an elevation of D-dimer, at the initiation of anticoagulation will be evaluated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Venous Thromboembolism
  • Heart Valve Disease
  • Surgery

Keywords

  • warfarin
  • surgery
  • management
  • thromboembolism
  • bleeding
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 923 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 104 is below the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 720 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Current treatment with warfarin
  • Need for temporary interruption for invasive procedure or surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for post-operative hospitalization more than one day
  • Participation in another clinical trial
  • No consent given
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
104 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Double dose

    Re-initiation with warfarin at twice the usual maintenance dose the first 2 days, then maintenance dose.

    Drug: Double dose

  • No intervention
    Usual maintenance dose

    Usual maintenance dose from Day 1, i.e. no postoperative loading dose.

Interventions

  • DrugDouble dose

    For each individual the dose on Day 1 and Day 2 will be twice the one normally taken

    Also known as: Loading dose

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with INR back in therapeutic range Day 5 or Day 10

    Proportion of patients with INR 2.0-3.0 on Day 5 or Day 10 (day of invasive procedure defined as Day 1)

    Time frame: Day 5-10

Secondary outcomes

  1. Thromboembolic events

    Objectively verified arterial or venous thromboembolic events

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Major bleeding events

    Defined by the ISTH criteria of 2010

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Minor bleeding events

    Any bleeding requiring medical attention but not fulfilling the criteria of Major bleeding

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Laboratory parameters of hypercoagulability

    Quantitative D-dimer and Thrombin Generation performed in a subset at day of procedure, day 5 and 10 to identify abnormal rise.

    Time frame: 10 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Thrombosis Service, HHS- General Hospital
    Hamilton, Ontario L8L 2X2, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schulman S, El Bouazzaoui B, Eikelboom JW, Zondag M. Clinical factors influencing the sensitivity to warfarin when restarted after surgery. J Intern Med. 2008 Apr;263(4):412-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01913.x. Epub 2008 Jan 16. PubMed 18205763 ↗
  • Schulman S, Hwang HG, Eikelboom JW, Kearon C, Pai M, Delaney J. Loading dose vs. maintenance dose of warfarin for reinitiation after invasive procedures: a randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Aug;12(8):1254-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.12613. Epub 2014 Jun 25. PubMed 24837794 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01348074
Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Responsible party
Sam Schulman (Prof., McMaster University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 5, 2011
Start date
Apr 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2013
Completion
Dec 2013
Last update
Apr 5, 2016

Study contacts

Sam Schulman, MD, PhD
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion