CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01347385Updated May 4, 2011

Barbed Suture Versus Traditional Suture Material for Laparoscopic Myomectomy

An interventional study of Laparoscopic myomectomy with unidirectional barbed suture and Traditional suture material in Fibroids, sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-05-04.

Sponsored by Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2011), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to determine if the use of a new type of barbed suture material for laparoscopic myomectomy (surgical removal of fibroids) versus the traditional approach of suturing with conventional suture material to close the uterine defect once the fibroid has been removed, improves surgical outcomes. Specifically, the investigators will investigate the effect of barbed suture on operative time, blood loss, adverse post-operative events and hospital stay.

Read the detailed description

Although the laparoscopic myomectomy has benefits over the abdominal approach, such as less blood loss, less hemoglobin drop post-operatively, decreased post-operative pain and fewer overall complications, it is a difficult procedure, which often requires greater operative time to perform. In the current climate of attempting to reduce health care expenditures, even though the minimally invasive approach offers the advantage of reduced hospital stay, a deterrent for hospital administration and surgeons may be the increased operative time it may require. Barbed suture is a relatively new material available in gynecologic surgery. Barbs are cut into the suture with the barbs facing in a direction opposite that of the needle. The barbs allow for anchoring of the suture in tissues, which prevents migration and allows suturing without knot tying. This study will be a single-centre non-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed suture versus traditional suture material.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fibroids

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Fibroids
  • Laparoscopic myomectomy
  • Barbed suture
03

In context

Leiomyoma

490 studies on the registry are indexed under Leiomyoma; 81 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 62 across 345 interventional studies indexed under Leiomyoma.

Browse Leiomyoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre is the lead sponsor of 566 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • women who are planning to undergo laparoscopic myomectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • greater than five fibroids
  • uterus extending beyond the umbilicus
  • major medical comorbidity or psychiatric illness, which could affect follow-up and/or compliance
  • patients undergoing concomitant surgical procedures at the time of myomectomy (such as resection of endometriosis or ovarian cystectomy)
  • pregnancy (all patients will have serum pregnancy testing prior to surgery)
  • patients with any suggestion of abnormal pathology on imaging or endometrial biopsy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Barbed suture

    Procedure: Laparoscopic myomectomy with unidirectional barbed suture

  • Active comparator
    Traditional suture material

    Procedure: Traditional suture material

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic myomectomy with unidirectional barbed suture

    Patients will be randomized to repair of the uterine defect during laparoscopic myomectomy using unidirectional barbed suture material (V-Loc 180TM, CovidienTM). For patients randomized to the barbed suture arm of the trial, any secondary fibroid that is greater than 5cm intra-operatively (as measured by a laparoscopic measurement instrument) will also be closed with barbed suture material. The cut-off of 5cm will be used, since it is generally above this size when uterine defects need to be closed in multiple layers, making the barbed suture potentially useful. Any other secondary fibroids less than 5cm will be closed with traditional extracorporeal suturing in both arms of the trial, since these can usually be closed in one layer.

    Also known as: V-Loc 180TM, CovidienTM

  • ProcedureTraditional suture material

    Patients will be randomized to repair of the uterine defect during laparoscopic myomectomy using traditional extracorporeal suturing using absorbable monofilament suture material.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Operative time

    We will record the operative time from beginning to completion of suturing each fibroid separately, as well as total operative time for the entire procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blood loss

    We will subtract the amount of irrigation fluid used from the total amount of fluid suctioned during the procedure to arrive at an estimated blood loss in millilitres. We will also measure the patient's hemoglobin at the routine pre-operative visit and then on the morning of the first post-operative day to determine the difference in hemoglobin. The amount of intravenous fluids administered to the patients intra- and post-operatively will be documented in order to account for any changes in hemoglobin that are spurious due to fluid administration.

    Time frame: Intra-operative

  2. Adverse events

    All adverse events that occur until 6 weeks post-operatively will be documented including injury to the bladder, bowel, ureter or blood vessel, infection/abscess, fever, blood transfusion, readmission to hospital, re-operation, and venous thromboembolism.

    Time frame: Intra-operatively until 6 weeks post-operatively

  3. Hospital stay

    We will document the length of hospital stay post-operatively in days.

  4. Fertility and pregnancy-related outcomes

    Telephone interviews will be conducted at 2 and 5 years post-operatively to determine pregnancy rates, live birth rates and adverse pregnancy outcomes of participants.

    Time frame: 2 and 5 years post-operatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 4, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01347385
Lead sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
First posted
May 4, 2011
Start date
Jan 2012
Primary completion
Jan 2014 (estimated)
Last update
May 4, 2011

Study contacts

Jamie Kroft, MD, FRCSC
Contact
jamie.kroft@utoronto.ca
416-480-6100 ext. 5063
Jamie Kroft, MD, FRCSC
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto
Grace Y Liu, MD, FRCSC
principal investigator · Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion