CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01339858Breier-StanleyUpdated May 8, 2019Results posted

The Effect of N-Acetyl Cysteine on Cortical Erosion in Early Stage Schizophrenia

A Phase 4 interventional study of N-Acetyl Cysteine and sugar pill in Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorder NOS and Schizoaffective Disorder, sponsored by Indiana University. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-08.

Sponsored by Indiana University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine if NAC, added to existing antipsychotic treatment, is superior to placebo for cortical erosion in patients with early stage psychosis. The primary hypothesis is that there will be significantly less cortical erosion as measured by cortical thickness, cortical volume and cortical white matter density (assessed by DTI) in patients treated for 12 months with NAC as compared to those treated with placebo. The secondary objectives of this study are to determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for fMRI determined working memory and semantic memory tasks, cortical MR spectroscopy measures (glutathione, N-acetylaspartate, and glutamine/glutamate levels), electrophysiologically determined attention measures (e.g., mismatch negativity, P300), symptoms, functional measures and cognitive functioning.

Read the detailed description

Schizophrenia is a severe, debilitating illness that typically begins during the teen-age years and early twenties, and worsens over time as it evolves into a chronic, life-long disorder. Existing treatments suppress psychotic symptoms but do not prevent the evolution of underlying disease processes that results in poor, long term outcomes. Recent studies have shown that progressive erosion of cortical mass occurs during the early stages of schizophrenia (1-3). The investigators hypothesize that arresting cortical erosion during the early phases of schizophrenia will prevent subsequent clinical deterioration and the descending course of illness associated with this disorder. The investigators propose to establish a research program that will assess the ability of agents with neuroprotective properties to halt cortical loss and thereby prevent subsequent clinical deterioration.

N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is an attractive molecule for the proposed study because of two of its mechanistic properties. First, it is an established neuroprotective agent. NAC is a precursor to glutathione which is a primary detoxifier of reactive oxygen and other radical molecules which damage neuronal tissue (4-6). Glutathione deficiencies have been well documented in schizophrenia (7, 8). Second, NAC modulates glutamate release. NMDA hypofunction and altered glutamate release have been hypothesized to contribute to the cortical atrophy observed in early stage schizophrenia (9, 10). NAC has been shown to antagonize both the phencyclidine (PCP) effects of increased frontal glutamate levels and induction of social isolation in rodents (11). PCP is a pharmacological model of schizophrenia. In a controlled clinical trial of patients with chronic schizophrenia, NAC improved mismatch negativity, a pre-attentive measure of cortical information processing that has been consistently implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and has been shown to correlate with cortical erosion in early stage patients (12, 13). In a double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial of chronic schizophrenic patients, NAC significantly improved general psychopathology scores, negative symptoms and extrapyramidal symptoms (14). NAC was well tolerated with no significant effects on any safety parameter or adverse events. The favorable tolerability of NAC has been further demonstrated in a recent study conducted at IUSM Riley Hospital in children (ages 4 to 12 years) with autism at relatively high doses (dose range of 900 to 4200 mg/day) in which there were no serious adverse events reported and NAC was well tolerated (15).

The investigators propose to determine if NAC has disease modifying potential in early stage schizophrenia. The investigators hypothesize that NAC will improve measures of cortical integrity in early stage schizophrenia and these brain effects will be related to improvements in negative symptoms and cognitive functioning. Primary outcome measures in the trials will be serial assessments of cortical integrity using magnetic resonance structural (cortical thickness, cortical volume, diffuses tensor imaging, DTI). In addition the investigators will assess the possible effects of NAC treatment on other parameters linked to cortical erosion including fMRI coupled with working memory and semantic memory tasks, MR spectroscopy (cortical glutathione, N-acetylaspartate, and glutamine/glutamate levels) and electrophysiological measures (e.g., mismatch negativity, P300). The investigators will also determine the relationship between effects of NAC on negative symptoms, positive symptoms, functional status, cognition (BACS), and safety parameters; and brain indices.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia
  • Psychotic Disorder NOS
  • Schizoaffective Disorder
  • Schizophreniform
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 70 across 2,872 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Indiana University is the lead sponsor of 958 studies on the registry; 200 are open to participants now.

Of its 142 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 112 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

SUBJECTS DIAGNOSED WITH A PSYCHOTIC DISORDER

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizophreniform, schizoaffective, psychosis disorder NOS
  • Age range 16-35 years
  • Male or female
  • Within 2 years of the first onset of psychotic symptoms that resulted in work/school/social dysfunction and/or treatment (PI will review potential subjects who have been experiencing symptoms >2 years but \<5 years and will allow to enter the trial on a case-by-case basis)
  • Ability to provide informed consent and/or assent (all subjects)
  • For subjects 16 and 17 years of age, parental/guardian consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable medical conditions
  • Active seizure disorder
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Females unwilling to utilize birth control
  • Implanted pacemaker, medication pump, vagal stimulator, deep brain stimulator, TENS unit, or ventriculoperitoneal shunt (because of MR studies).
  • Known IQ less than 70
  • DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of substance dependence (with the exception of nicotine or caffeine dependence)
  • Psychotic symptoms secondary to substance use
  • Considered a high risk for suicidal acts - active suicidal ideation with intent to act as determined by clinical interview

HEALTHY CONTROL SUBJECTS

The comparison subjects will consist of 40 healthy normal volunteers recruited from the community who will be age and gender matched to subjects diagnosed with a psychotic disorder entering the NAC treatment study

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age range of 18-30 (inclusive) and able to give voluntary informed consent (Note: Subjects diagnosed with a psychotic disorder under the age of 18 will be age matched to control subjects aged 18).
  2. Male or Female

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current severe mental disorder (Schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, other psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder)
  2. Known/documented IQ \< 70
  3. Pregnant or lactating women
  4. Acute, serious, or unstable medical condition
  5. Metallic implants or other contraindication to MRI (including but not limited to: Implanted pacemaker, medication pump, vagal stimulator, deep brain stimulator, TENS unit, or ventriculoperitoneal shunt)
  6. First degree relative with a psychotic disorder (i.e. schizophrenia, schizophreniform, schizoaffective, psychosis disorder NOS, substance induced psychosis, major depression with psychotic features, or bipolar disorder with psychotic features).
  7. Current DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence (with the exception of nicotine or caffeine) as diagnosed within the 6 months prior to screening visit
  8. Known history of seizure disorder, head trauma, stroke, traumatic brain injury, significant loss of consciousness
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    N-Acetyl Cysteine

    NAC and matched placebo will be supplied in unmarked capsules. Each NAC capsule will contain 600 mg of NAC. Dosing will begin at 600 mg/d and titrated up over 5 weeks until a maximum dose of 3600 mg/d is reached. This approximate dose was effective and well tolerated in a recent study of treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder by Krystal and colleagues at Yale (16). In addition, a double-blind placebo controlled trial recently completed at IUSM Riley Hospital in children (age 4 to 12 years) with autism spectrum disorders used doses ranging from 900 mg/day to 4200 mg/day and reported no serious adverse events and found the agent well tolerated (15). Dose adjustments downward to 1920 mg/d will be permitted if tolerability issues are encountered at the maximum dose.

    Drug: N-Acetyl Cysteine

  • Placebo comparator
    Sugar Pill

    matched placebo

    Other: sugar pill

Interventions

  • DrugN-Acetyl Cysteine

    NAC and matched placebo will be supplied in unmarked capsules. Each NAC capsule will contain 480 mg of NAC. Dosing will begin at 480 mg/d and titrated up by 480 mg/d each week until a maximum dose of 2880 mg/d (BID) is reached. This approximate dose was effective and well tolerated in a recent study of treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder by Krystal and colleagues at Yale (16). In addition, a double-blind placebo controlled trial recently completed at IUSM Riley Hospital in children (age 4 to 12 years) with autism spectrum disorders used doses ranging from 900 mg/day to 4200 mg/day and reported no serious adverse events and found the agent well tolerated (15). Dose adjustments downward to 1920 mg/d will be permitted if tolerability issues are encountered at the maximum dose

  • Othersugar pill

    matched placebo will be supplied in unmarked capsules. Dosing regimen will be the same as in the N-Acetyl Cysteine arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cortical Thickness

    We anticipate that 12 months treatment with NAC as an add-on treatment will show significantly less cortical erosion as measured by cortical thickness than treatment with placebo

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Cortical Volume

    We anticipate that 12 months treatment with NAC as an add-on treatment will show a difference in cortical volume than treatment with placebo

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Working Memory

    determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo as determined by brain activity during n-back working memory task during fMRI.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  2. Number of Participants With Glutamine/Glutamate Level Changes

    Identify number of participants with 12 months of NAC treatment who had glutamine/glutamate level changes as measured by cortical magnetic resonance spectroscopy measures.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Attention Measures

    determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for attention measures (e.g., mismatch negativity, P300) as measured by electrophysiology methods. Electrophysiology measures will be recorded from a 64 channel, silver/silver-chloride scalp electrode montage.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Symptoms of a Psychotic Disorder

    Determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for symptom management of a psychotic disorder as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The PANSS is a semi-structured interview, containing 30 items that assess positive, negative, and general psychopathology symptoms. Positive symptoms=7 items, negative symptoms=7 items, and general psych.=16 items. Scores for each item range from 1-absent to 7-extreme. To calculate total score, all items on the scale are summed to yield a score from 30-210,a lower score reflecting fewer symptoms. To calculate factor scores various items from positive, negative, and general psych. are summed together to yield Cognitive/Disorganized, Negative, and Positive factor scores. Cog/Disorg factor scores sum 7 items, ranging from 7-49. Neg factor scores sum 7 items, ranging from 7-49. Pos factor scores sum 8 items, ranging from 8-56. For all factor scores a lower score reflects less symptom severity.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Cognitive Functioning

    determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for cognitive functioning as measured by the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). The BACS is a battery specifically designed to measure treatment-related changes in cognition by utilizing 6 tasks, and has alternate forms, thus minimizing practice effects. Each task generates a raw score (with a higher score indicating better performance): verbal memory 0-75; digit sequencing 0-28; token motor task 0-100; semantic\&letter fluency 0-148; symbol coding 0-110; and tower of London 0-22. The raw scores are used to generate a composite score that is calculated by summing t-scores derived by comparisons with a normative sample of 404 healthy controls. The six brief assessments' t-scores, are summed, and averaged to provide a composite t-score. The composite score min and max are between -43 and 100. A higher score indicating better cognitive performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  6. Functional Status

    determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for functional measures as measured by the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). The PSP scale is a 100-point, single item, clinician rated scale to assess 4 domains of functioning, including personal and social relationships, socially useful activities, self care and disturbing and aggressive behaviors. A score from 0-100 is generated, with a higher score representing better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  7. Mismatch Negativity Voltage Differences

    Determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for attention measures as measured by the voltage of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) of the event-related potential. The voltage of the peak MMN response was measured at the Fz electrode site.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Symptoms of a Psychotic Disorder

    determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for symptom management of a psychotic disorder as assessed by the Clinical Global Impressions Severity Scale (CGI-S). The CGI-S is used for repeated evaluations of global psychopathology and is a 7 point Likert scale rating severity on a scale of 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill).

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Results

Posted May 8, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Started3030
Completed1418
Not completed1612

Outcome measures

PrimaryCortical Thickness

We anticipate that 12 months treatment with NAC as an add-on treatment will show significantly less cortical erosion as measured by cortical thickness than treatment with placebo

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mm
Cortical Thickness
mmN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Left Total Cortical Thickness at 52 Weeks2.53 ± 0.032.54 ± 0.03
Right Total Cortical Thickness at 52 weeks2.51 ± 0.032.52 ± 0.03
Left Caudal Middle Frontal Thickness at 52 Weeks2.59 ± 0.042.57 ± 0.04
Right Caudal Middle Frontal Thickness at 52 Weeks2.49 ± 0.042.49 ± 0.05
Left Middle Temporal Thickness at 52 Weeks2.84 ± 0.042.87 ± 0.05
Right Middle Temporal Thickness at 52 Weeks2.91 ± 0.042.95 ± 0.05
Left Superior Parietal Thickness at 52 Weeks2.16 ± 0.032.21 ± 0.04
Right Superior Parietal Thickness at 52 Weeks2.17 ± 0.032.18 ± 0.04
SecondaryWorking Memory

determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo as determined by brain activity during n-back working memory task during fMRI.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Bold signal change
Working Memory
Bold signal changeN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Baseline pre exposure to NAC0.299 ± .200.356 ± .24
6 months exposure to NAC0.351 ± .240.398 ± .28
12 months exposure to NAC0.315 ± .1850.406 ± .23
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Glutamine/Glutamate Level Changes

Identify number of participants with 12 months of NAC treatment who had glutamine/glutamate level changes as measured by cortical magnetic resonance spectroscopy measures.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Glutamine/Glutamate Level Changes
ParticipantsNAC Treated Early Psychosis PatientsPlacebo Group
Number of Participants With Glutamine/Glutamate Level Changes180
Statistical analysis
  • NAC Treated Early Psychosis Patients · ANOVA · p = 0.32
SecondaryAttention Measures

determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for attention measures (e.g., mismatch negativity, P300) as measured by electrophysiology methods. Electrophysiology measures will be recorded from a 64 channel, silver/silver-chloride scalp electrode montage.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Hz
Attention Measures
HzN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
EEG Alpha power3.81 ± 0.404.18 ± 0.73
EEG Delta power2.96 ± 0.253.46 ± 0.35
EEG Gamma power0.37 ± 0.030.47 ± 0.05
EEG Theta power1.33 ± 0.301.33 ± 0.35
Auditory Steady State Response 40 Hz0.05 ± 0.010.06 ± 0.01
SecondarySymptoms of a Psychotic Disorder

Determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for symptom management of a psychotic disorder as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The PANSS is a semi-structured interview, containing 30 items that assess positive, negative, and general psychopathology symptoms. Positive symptoms=7 items, negative symptoms=7 items, and general psych.=16 items. Scores for each item range from 1-absent to 7-extreme. To calculate total score, all items on the scale are summed to yield a score from 30-210,a lower score reflecting fewer symptoms. To calculate factor scores various items from positive, negative, and general psych. are summed together to yield Cognitive/Disorganized, Negative, and Positive factor scores. Cog/Disorg factor scores sum 7 items, ranging from 7-49. Neg factor scores sum 7 items, ranging from 7-49. Pos factor scores sum 8 items, ranging from 8-56. For all factor scores a lower score reflects less symptom severity.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Symptoms of a Psychotic Disorder
scores on a scaleN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
PANSS Total Score at 52 Weeks46.79 ± 2.2456.44 ± 2.32
PANSS Cognitive/Disorganized Factor at 52 Weeks11.09 ± 0.6813.68 ± 0.70
PANSS Negative Symptom Factor at 52 Weeks10.35 ± 1.0213.22 ± 1.06
PANSS Positive Symptom Factor at 52 Weeks14.77 ± 1.0516.38 ± 1.09
SecondaryCognitive Functioning

determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for cognitive functioning as measured by the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). The BACS is a battery specifically designed to measure treatment-related changes in cognition by utilizing 6 tasks, and has alternate forms, thus minimizing practice effects. Each task generates a raw score (with a higher score indicating better performance): verbal memory 0-75; digit sequencing 0-28; token motor task 0-100; semantic\&letter fluency 0-148; symbol coding 0-110; and tower of London 0-22. The raw scores are used to generate a composite score that is calculated by summing t-scores derived by comparisons with a normative sample of 404 healthy controls. The six brief assessments' t-scores, are summed, and averaged to provide a composite t-score. The composite score min and max are between -43 and 100. A higher score indicating better cognitive performance.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Cognitive Functioning
scores on a scaleN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
BACS Composite Score Baseline26.91 ± 3.2227.70 ± 3.35
BACS Composite Score at 52 Weeks30.03 ± 3.2229.37 ± 3.36
SecondaryFunctional Status

determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for functional measures as measured by the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). The PSP scale is a 100-point, single item, clinician rated scale to assess 4 domains of functioning, including personal and social relationships, socially useful activities, self care and disturbing and aggressive behaviors. A score from 0-100 is generated, with a higher score representing better performance.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Functional Status
scores on a scaleN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
PSP Adjusted Score at Baseline62.51 ± 2.2664.46 ± 2.35
PSP Adjusted Score at 52 Weeks64.51 ± 2.3365.44 ± 2.42
SecondaryMismatch Negativity Voltage Differences

Determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for attention measures as measured by the voltage of the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) of the event-related potential. The voltage of the peak MMN response was measured at the Fz electrode site.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · microvolts
Mismatch Negativity Voltage Differences
microvoltsN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Mismatch Negativity Voltage Differences-2.51 ± 0.28-3.44 ± 0.38
PrimaryCortical Volume

We anticipate that 12 months treatment with NAC as an add-on treatment will show a difference in cortical volume than treatment with placebo

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · mm^3
Cortical Volume
mm^3N-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Total Cortical Gray Matter Volume at 52 Weeks233.0 ± 5.2235.8 ± 6.0
Total Cortical White Matter Volume at 52 Weeks423.8 ± 11.5418.5 ± 13.1
SecondarySymptoms of a Psychotic Disorder

determine if 12 months of NAC add-on treatment is superior to placebo for symptom management of a psychotic disorder as assessed by the Clinical Global Impressions Severity Scale (CGI-S). The CGI-S is used for repeated evaluations of global psychopathology and is a 7 point Likert scale rating severity on a scale of 1 (normal, not ill) to 7 (very severely ill).

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Symptoms of a Psychotic Disorder
scores on a scaleN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Symptoms of a Psychotic Disorder2.78 ± 0.183.00 ± 0.19

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
N-Acetyl Cysteine—3/30 (10%)28/30 (93.3%)
Sugar Pill—2/30 (6.7%)27/30 (90%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Psychosis ExacerbationPsychiatric disorders2/302/30
Asthma ExacerbationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/300/30
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventN-Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Weight GainMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/306/30
Nausea and VomitingGastrointestinal disorders3/305/30
Depressed MoodPsychiatric disorders4/304/30
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/302/30
SedationGeneral disorders2/303/30
InsomniaGeneral disorders3/302/30
Illness ExacerbationPsychiatric disorders3/300/30
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/303/30
Upper Respiratory InfectionInfections and infestations2/303/30
Suicidal IdeationPsychiatric disorders0/302/30

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)N-Acetyl CysteineSugar PillTotal
<=18 years213
Between 18 and 65 years282957
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)N-Acetyl CysteineSugar PillTotal
Mean22.2 ± 4.225.0 ± 5.223.1 ± 4.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)N-Acetyl CysteineSugar PillTotal
Female7613
Male232447
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)N-Acetyl CysteineSugar PillTotal
United States303060
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Prevention and Recovery Center for Early Psychosis (PARC)
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • Indiana University Psychotic Disorders Clinic
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46222, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Breier A, Liffick E, Hummer TA, Vohs JL, Yang Z, Mehdiyoun NF, Visco AC, Metzler E, Zhang Y, Francis MM. Effects of 12-month, double-blind N-acetyl cysteine on symptoms, cognition and brain morphology in early phase schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophr Res. 2018 Sep;199:395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Mar 24. PubMed 29588126 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01339858
Lead sponsor
Indiana University
Collaborators
Stanley Medical Research Institute
Responsible party
Alan Breier (Psychiatrist, Indiana University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 21, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2015
Completion
Dec 2015
Results posted
May 8, 2019
Last update
May 8, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion