CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01337934RASPUpdated Apr 5, 2018

Lactated Ringer Versus Albumin in Early Sepsis Therapy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Lactated Ringer and Albumin in Septic Shock and Severe Sepsis, sponsored by University of Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-05.

Sponsored by University of Sao Paulo · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
360
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The use of albumin in critical ill patients is a matter of controversy. A large randomized controlled trial reported that albumin was as safe and effective as crystalloid solution for fluid replacement in intensive care unit, although the last one was less expensive. In Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines there are no preference for crystalloids over colloids. But recently, a retrospective analysis of patients with severe sepsis from SAFE study reported that the use of albumin in these patients would be superior, regarding reduction of mortality. The aim of this study is determine whether the use of albumin improve clinical outcomes in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

02

Conditions studied

  • Septic Shock
  • Severe Sepsis

Keywords

  • Septic shock
  • Sepsis
  • Albumin
  • Lactated Ringer
03

In context

Sepsis

1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 360 is above the median of 105 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 1,005 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age equal or higher than 18 years-old
  • Severe sepsis or septic shock into 6 hours of evolution
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Shock from other causes
  • Adverse reactions to human albumin
  • Previous fluid resuscitation during current disease
  • Previous use of albumin in the last 72 hours
  • Religion objection
  • Enrollment in another study
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Hepatic cirrhosis
  • End stage renal disease
  • Plasmapheresis
  • End of life patients
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
360 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Lactated Ringer

    Patients randomized for this group will receive 500 ml of lactated Ringer solution in early phase of sepsis or septic shock (less than six hour from sepsis onset) if mean arterial pressure was under 65mmHg, or blood lactate concentration higher than 4 mmol/L or base excess under - 4mmol/L until the target of central venous pressure of 8 mmHg or higher or recovery of hypotension.

    Drug: Lactated Ringer

  • Active comparator
    Albumin

    Patients randomized for Albumin group will receive 500 ml of 4% Albumin solution in early phase of sepsis (less than six hour from sepsis onset) if mean arterial pressure was under 65mmHg or blood lactate concentration higher than 4 mmol/L or base excess under - 4mmol/L until the target of central venous pressure of 8 mmHg or higher or recovery of hypotension.

    Drug: Albumin

Interventions

  • DrugLactated Ringer

    Lactated Ringer

  • DrugAlbumin

    Albumin 4%

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality in 7 days for any cause

    Time frame: day 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score

    Time frame: from day 1 until day 7 of care in ICU

  2. ICU length of stay

    Time frame: day 28

  3. hospital length of stay

    Time frame: day 28

  4. ventilator-free days

    Time frame: day 28

  5. Needing of renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: day 28

  6. days free of vasopressor

    Time frame: day 28

  7. Mortality in 28-days

    Time frame: 28 days after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cancer Institute of Sao Paulo, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo
    Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo/SP 01246000, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hajjar LA, Vincent JL, Galas FR, Nakamura RE, Silva CM, Santos MH, Fukushima J, Kalil Filho R, Sierra DB, Lopes NH, Mauad T, Roquim AC, Sundin MR, Leao WC, Almeida JP, Pomerantzeff PM, Dallan LO, Jatene FB, Stolf NA, Auler JO Jr. Transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery: the TRACS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Oct 13;304(14):1559-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1446. PubMed 20940381 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01337934
Lead sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
Responsible party
Juliano P Almeida, MD, PhD (Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, University of Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 19, 2011
Start date
Oct 2013
Primary completion
Oct 2016
Completion
Dec 2017
Last update
Apr 5, 2018

Study contacts

Juliano A Almeida, MD
study chair · University of Sao Paulo
Ludhmila Hajjar, PhD
study director · University of Sao Paulo
Clarice H Park, MD
principal investigator · University of Sao Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion