CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01335243MatriBoneUpdated Jun 18, 2026

Efficacy and Safety Study of Lumbar Interbody Fusion With MatriTMBONE Associated With Autologous Bone Marrow

A Phase 2 interventional study of The Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) surgery in Degenerative Osteoarthritis and Degenerative Lumbar Vertebra, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
target number of subkect not reached
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this clinical study is the estimation of the rate of intersomatic fusion observed 12 months after lumbar interbody fusion by posterior approach with PEEK interbody cage of fusion in PEEK performed with autologous bone of decortication and osseous substitute with a biomaterial (MatriBONE associated with the autologous bone marrow), associated with a posterolateral bone graft performed with MatriBone waxed with bone marrow. Indication is dedicated for patients by painful degenerative osteoarthritis, by narrow lumbar canal and\or spondylolisthesis.

Read the detailed description

This clinical study corresponds to a TLIF surgery using a per-operating artificial substitute specific biomaterial: autologous osteoblasts punctured on iliac crest and put on a collagen support waxed with tri-calcium phosphate (which is osteoconductive) to perform a intervertebral body fusion.

Biomaterial MATRITM BONE: Device of class III, with marking IT in the indication of arthrodesis. It will be administered during the lumbar interbody fusion's procedure.

The material is a matrix of collagen mineralized containing a homogeneous mixture of collagen cleansed of type I+III and an osseous biphasic substitute HA / TCP. The proportion of both constituents is 90 % of osseous substitute for 10 % of collagen en masse. The collagen is reduced in approximately 1 month and the osseous substitute leads to an osseous reshaping in 6 - 9 months approximately.

The follow up will last 12 months with 2 visits (6 and 12 months after surgery), 2 CT scan slides before inclusion and at 12 months, classical X-rays before inclusion and at 6 and 12 months, questionnaires (visual analogic scale for pain, and quality of life with OSWESTRY and SF36 scales) before inclusion and at 6 and 12 months, and biological exams (CRP/VS, for inflammation) at each visit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Osteoarthritis
  • Degenerative Lumbar Vertebra

Keywords

  • Orthopedic Procedures
  • Spine
  • Interbody fusion
  • Arthrodesis
  • Lumbar Vertebrae
  • CT Scan
  • Spine balance
  • Instrumented fusion
  • Posterior fusion
  • Degenerative spine
  • painful
03

In context

Joint Diseases

712 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Diseases; 127 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 60 across 470 interventional studies indexed under Joint Diseases.

Browse Joint Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged between 18 and 65 years old.
  • Body mass index lower than 35
  • Degenerative osteoarthritis painful and invalidating degenerative lumbar vertebra for at least 6 months and resistance fighter in the conservative treatment
  • Narrow lumbar canal and\or spondylolisthesis with neurological disorder associated with signs of primary instability or induced to neurological liberation
  • Patient requiring a surgery on a single interbody level.
  • Given informed consent
  • Patient with French health system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For women: no efficient contraception (intra uterine device, or contraceptive pill)
  • Pregnant or feeding women
  • Surgery zone local infection local
  • Lumbar interbody fusion of more than two levels
  • Spondylolisthesis of high rank (stage 3 or 4 of the classification of Meyerding)
  • Scoliosis lumbar vertebra gives a complex to (Cobb angle> 40°)
  • All surgical contraindications
  • Severe hyperparathyroidism: calcium > 2,45 mmol/l and [PTH] ≥ 50pg / ml
  • Uncontrolled diabetes (untreated or non stabilized by treatment)
  • Long corticoid treatment (more than 6 months and stopped since less than 3 months)
  • Current Chemotherapy or during the last three months
  • Antecedent of regional radiotherapy
  • All contraindication to MatriTM BONE: osteomyelitis, bone degenerative disease or necrosis of surgery site.
  • Known turned out Osteoporosis untreated (dexa: > 2 DS)
  • Subject participating in another research including a period of always current exclusion in the pre-inclusion
  • Person placed under protection of justice
  • Severely altered physical and\or psychological Health, which according to, the investigator, can affect to participant's compliance to the study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TLIF surgery

    Procedure: The Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureThe Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) surgery

    The TLIF surgery use a per-operating artificial substitute specific biomaterial: autologous osteoblasts punctured on iliac crest and put on a collagen support waxed with tri-calcium phosphate (which is osteoconductive) to perform a intervertebral body fusion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. patients' proportion which an intervertebral fusion

    The main assessment criteria of this study are patients' proportion which an intervertebral fusion is documented to CT scanners The intervertebral fusion is documented by the revealing of at least an osseous continuous span of a vertebral level in the other one on one of three CT scan slides centred on the cage.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. NOTION OF TOLERANCE: Frequency and gravity of unwanted Adverse Events linked to the procedure and\or the use of the biomaterial

    Frequency and gravity of unwanted Adverse Events linked to the procedure and\\or the use of the biomaterial: O Inflammatory or allergic reaction to the tested product (VS and CRP before inclusion). * Non-union turned out and painful * Invalidating lumbar pain * Infection on the operated site

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Evaluation of the pain

    Evaluation of the pain with an analogical visual scale (EVA)

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Quality of life evaluation

    Quality of life evaluation by means of OSWESTRY and SF-36 scales

    Time frame: 12 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Unité d'Orthopédie-Traumatologie rachis II, Pellegrin
    Bordeaux, 33076, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Anand N, Hamilton JF, Perri B, Miraliakbar H, Goldstein T. Cantilever TLIF with structural allograft and RhBMP2 for correction and maintenance of segmental sagittal lordosis: long-term clinical, radiographic, and functional outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 15;31(20):E748-53. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000240211.23617.ae. PubMed 16985443 ↗
  • Battie MC, Videman T, Levalahti E, Gill K, Kaprio J. Genetic and environmental effects on disc degeneration by phenotype and spinal level: a multivariate twin study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2801-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818043b7. PubMed 19050586 ↗
  • Battie MC, Videman T, Kaprio J, Gibbons LE, Gill K, Manninen H, Saarela J, Peltonen L. The Twin Spine Study: contributions to a changing view of disc degeneration. Spine J. 2009 Jan-Feb;9(1):47-59. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.011. PubMed 19111259 ↗
  • Carter JD, Swearingen AB, Chaput CD, Rahm MD. Clinical and radiographic assessment of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using HEALOS collagen-hydroxyapatite sponge with autologous bone marrow aspirate. Spine J. 2009 Jun;9(6):434-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.11.004. Epub 2008 Dec 25. PubMed 19111510 ↗
  • Chen Z, Zhao J, Liu A, Yuan J, Li Z. Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Int Orthop. 2009 Feb;33(1):197-201. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0531-1. Epub 2008 Mar 21. PubMed 18357449 ↗
  • el-Masry MA, Khayal H, Salah H. Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) using a single cage for treatment of low grade lytic spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008 Oct;74(5):667-71. PubMed 19058702 ↗
  • Goyal N, Wimberley DW, Hyatt A, Zeiller S, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ. Radiographic and clinical outcomes after instrumented reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of mid and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jul;22(5):321-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318182cdab. PubMed 19525786 ↗
  • Houten JK, Post NH, Dryer JW, Errico TJ. Clinical and radiographically/neuroimaging documented outcome in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2006 Mar 15;20(3):E8. doi: 10.3171/foc.2006.20.3.9. PubMed 16599424 ↗
  • Jagannathan J, Sansur CA, Oskouian RJ Jr, Fu KM, Shaffrey CI. Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2009 May;64(5):955-63; discussion 963-4. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000343544.77456.46. PubMed 19404155 ↗
  • Lauber S, Schulte TL, Liljenqvist U, Halm H, Hackenberg L. Clinical and radiologic 2-4-year results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jul 1;31(15):1693-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000224530.08481.4e. PubMed 16816765 ↗
  • Rihn JA, Patel R, Makda J, Hong J, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ. Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2009 Aug;9(8):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.004. Epub 2009 May 30. PubMed 19482519 ↗
  • Rihn JA, Makda J, Hong J, Patel R, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. The use of RhBMP-2 in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic analysis. Eur Spine J. 2009 Nov;18(11):1629-36. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1046-1. Epub 2009 May 28. PubMed 19475434 ↗
  • Sasso RC, LeHuec JC, Shaffrey C; Spine Interbody Research Group. Iliac crest bone graft donor site pain after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective patient satisfaction outcome assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Feb;18 Suppl:S77-81. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000112045.36255.83. PubMed 15699810 ↗
  • Schleicher P, Beth P, Ottenbacher A, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake KJ, Haas NP, Kandziora F. Biomechanical evaluation of different asymmetrical posterior stabilization methods for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Oct;9(4):363-71. doi: 10.3171/SPI.2008.9.10.363. PubMed 18939923 ↗
  • Xiao Y, Li F, Chen Q. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with one cage and excised local bone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 May;130(5):591-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0917-6. Epub 2009 Jun 30. PubMed 19565252 ↗
  • Xiao YX, Chen QX, Li FC. Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of the technique, indications and graft materials. J Int Med Res. 2009 May-Jun;37(3):908-17. doi: 10.1177/147323000903700337. PubMed 19589277 ↗
  • Yan DL, Pei FX, Li J, Soo CL. Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2008 Oct;17(10):1311-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0739-1. Epub 2008 Aug 7. PubMed 18685873 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01335243
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Collaborators
Biom'Up France SAS
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 14, 2011
Start date
May 2011
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2015
Completion
Jun 30, 2015
Last update
Jun 18, 2026

Study contacts

Jean-Charles LE HUEC, PUPH
principal investigator · University Hospital, Bordeaux
Antoine BENARD, MD
study chair · University Hospital, Bordeaux

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion